The newly formed Board of Peace, initiated by Donald Trump at the World Economic Forum in Davos, is facing early challenges as several international actors express reservations about its structure and intent.
A Shifting Mandate
Initially conceived to oversee the Gaza ceasefire and subsequent reconstruction following the Hamas–Israel conflict, the Board of Peace’s scope has broadened to encompass a wider range of international conflicts. Donald Trump chairs the body, and its inaugural meeting is scheduled for February 19, 2026, in Washington, D.C., with a primary focus on Gaza’s reconstruction.
Membership in the Board requires aspiring permanent members to contribute US$1 billion. The invitation extended to Vladimir Putin, whose country invaded Ukraine in 2022, has sparked debate regarding the Board’s political implications.
Reservations and Alternative Approaches
While largely comprised of U.S. Allies, the Board has encountered resistance. Italy and the European Union will attend the Washington meeting as observers, not members. The Holy See has formally declined participation, with Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin emphasizing the importance of the United Nations maintaining its role in global crisis management.
Mexico has also rejected full membership, citing the absence of Palestinian representation within the Board’s structure. This decision reflects concerns among nations in the Global South regarding the need for inclusive representation in governance mechanisms addressing Middle Eastern conflicts.
Israel, Indonesia, and Diplomatic Calibration
Israel has joined the Board of Peace as its 22nd member, following discussions between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. This development presents a complex diplomatic situation for Indonesia.
Indonesia has affirmed that its participation does not signify political normalization with Israel. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Yvonne Mewengkang stated that Indonesia’s involvement is limited to stabilization, civilian protection, humanitarian assistance, and Gaza’s reconstruction, and does not alter Indonesia’s position on Palestine.
The Indonesian Navy is preparing to deploy hospital ships and specialized Marine medical and engineering units, prioritizing visible humanitarian leadership.
A New Global Governance Model?
The emergence of the Board of Peace reflects a broader trend of alternative diplomatic platforms gaining traction as confidence in traditional multilateral institutions fluctuates. However, the Board’s success hinges on perceptions of neutrality, representational balance, and institutional credibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of the Board of Peace’s inaugural meeting?
The inaugural meeting, scheduled for February 19, 2026, in Washington, D.C., will primarily focus on Gaza’s reconstruction.
What was the Vatican’s reason for declining membership?
The Holy See declined membership, emphasizing that global crisis management should remain under the mandate of the United Nations.
What is Indonesia’s position regarding its participation in the Board of Peace?
Indonesia has reaffirmed that its participation does not constitute political normalization with Israel and is strictly tied to stabilization, civilian protection, humanitarian assistance, and Gaza’s reconstruction.
As the Board of Peace navigates these initial challenges, will its ability to foster genuine collaboration and address complex geopolitical issues ultimately outweigh concerns about its structure and representation?
