Qualcomm Snapdragon: Key Architects Leave Amid PC Push – What’s Next?

by Chief Editor

Qualcomm Faces Leadership Shakeup as Key Chip Architects Depart

Qualcomm may be poised for a pivotal year in the PC market as it seeks to expand beyond its smartphone business. Its Snapdragon X2 Elite processors appear to be a high-performance solution, potentially offering the fastest cores available in a Windows PC upon release. However, the company now faces a challenge as the creators of this success have unexpectedly left the firm.

The Departure of Nuvia Founders

Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite processors (and the Oryon architecture powering them, now as well found in mobile chips) weren’t created in a vacuum. The architecture was acquired through the acquisition of Nuvia, a company that originally announced the Arm core under the name Phoenix in 2020.

Nuvia was founded by engineers who previously worked at Apple, developing their processors, including the highly regarded M1 chip. Gerard Williams III, a key figure, was previously chief architect and Senior Director of Apple’s A7 to A12X processors. He also has experience at Intel and Arm, where he designed the Cortex-A8.

Another co-founder, John Bruno, also worked on successful Apple chips and spent time at Google, as well as AMD and ATI. The performance of the Oryon architectures – first, second, and third generations – is a testament to their capabilities.

Two of Three Oryon Brains are Gone

Recently, both John Bruno and Gerard Williams III announced their departures from Qualcomm, holding roles as Senior Vice Presidents of Engineering and Chief Architect, respectively. Bruno announced his departure on LinkedIn, effective January 30th, without providing specific reasons. Williams followed suit, also expressing gratitude to his colleagues.

The timing of these departures is notable, potentially coinciding with the expiration of obligations related to the Nuvia acquisition or the opportunity to sell shares.

The Nuvia leadership team in 2019: Bruno, Williams, and Gulati (Source: Reuters)

Is This a Major Problem?

While Qualcomm will undoubtedly miss these successful leaders, it’s important to avoid overstating the impact. Executive departures are common in the chip industry, and product development is increasingly a team effort. Qualcomm may be able to continue the development of the Oryon cores effectively, provided it has built a strong organization and culture.

Qualcomm recently acquired Ventana, a RISC-V hardware and AI startup, which may be a strategic move to bolster its talent pool. Some speculate that engineers from Ventana could partially replace the expertise lost from Nuvia.

Fresh Hole in Adreno GPU Leadership Too

Prior to the announcements regarding Williams and Bruno, Qualcomm also lost Eric Demers, Senior Vice President for Engineering, who led the development of the Adreno GPUs. Demers, who had been with Qualcomm for 14 years, has joined Intel to lead GPU engineering for data centers.

Demers previously worked at ATI and was instrumental in the development of Radeon graphics chips. His departure represents a loss of experienced architectural talent for Qualcomm.

Nuvia Talent at Intel?

Demers’ move to Intel suggests the possibility that Williams and Bruno may also join the company. Given Williams’ success at Apple, his addition to Intel would be a significant coup. However, this remains speculation, and their next move could be elsewhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the Snapdragon X2 Elite? It is Qualcomm’s latest processor designed for Windows PCs, aiming to compete with Apple’s M-series chips and Intel processors.
  • Who were Gerard Williams III and John Bruno? They were co-founders of Nuvia, the company whose Oryon architecture powers Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite processors.
  • What is Nuvia? A company acquired by Qualcomm that specialized in Arm core design, founded by former Apple engineers.
  • Why are these departures concerning? These individuals were key architects of Qualcomm’s recent processor successes, and their departure raises questions about the future of the Oryon architecture.

Sources: LinkedIn, CRN, ComputerBase

You may also like

Leave a Comment