Washington D.C. – Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated Wednesday that further U.S. military action in Venezuela remains a possibility, though the administration currently does not anticipate escalation. Rubio told lawmakers the President retains the authority to use force should Venezuela’s current leadership or other adversaries challenge U.S. demands.
Venezuela Remains a Point of Contention
Rubio’s statements followed the deployment of a “massive armada,” as described by President Trump, intended to pressure Iran regarding its nuclear program. This action occurred alongside ongoing tensions with Denmark over Greenland, impacting U.S. relations with NATO allies. Rubio emphasized that “the president never rules out his options as commander in chief to protect the national interest of the United States.”
The Secretary of State testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for the first time since Maduro’s capture. Democratic lawmakers questioned Rubio on congressional war powers and whether the operation had advanced democratic principles in Venezuela. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) argued, “We’ve traded one dictator for another. All the same people are running the country.”
Concerns Over Influence and Allegations
Acting President Delcy Rodríguez, formerly Maduro’s vice president, has reportedly committed to opening Venezuela’s energy sector to American companies. However, questions persist regarding her alleged involvement in trafficking networks, with reports indicating she has been on the DEA’s radar for years. Despite a warning from President Trump that she would “pay a very big price” if she did not cooperate, Rodríguez has publicly defended Venezuela’s right to diplomatic relations with countries like China, Russia, and Iran.
Venezuela’s significant financial ties to China – exceeding $100 billion in loans over recent decades – further complicate the situation. U.S. military leaders have also expressed concern over Iran’s growing presence in the region, specifically the potential for Iranian drones to threaten U.S. forces. Rubio stated the President would retain the option to “eliminate” any such threat.
Broader Foreign Policy Concerns
The administration’s foreign policy also faced scrutiny regarding its impact on U.S. economic strength and alliances. Despite the implementation of tariffs, China posted a record global trade surplus in 2025, while U.S. manufacturing employment reportedly declined. Lawmakers questioned whether U.S. policy had unified allies against China, citing strained relations with Canada and other partners.
Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) dissented, arguing that Maduro’s capture should be considered an act of war, requiring congressional authorization. A recent war powers resolution aimed at limiting further military action in Venezuela was dismissed by Congressional Republicans, based on assurances from the administration of future consultation.
Looking Ahead
Rubio indicated the administration’s goal is a “friendly, stable, prosperous Venezuela,” but acknowledged that free and fair elections would require time and stabilization efforts. He will meet with opposition figure María Corina Machado this week. However, he cautioned that a segment of the Venezuelan population remains committed to “Chavista ideology,” and that political prisoners remain jailed, while figures like Edmundo González Urrutia and Machado may still be blocked from seeking office.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current U.S. position on potential military action in Venezuela?
The Trump administration does not anticipate further military action in Venezuela at this time, but reserves the right to use force if necessary to protect U.S. interests.
What concerns were raised during Rubio’s testimony?
Lawmakers questioned the administration on congressional war powers, the effectiveness of Maduro’s capture in advancing democracy, and the potential for escalation with Iran and China.
What role is Delcy Rodríguez playing in the current situation?
Delcy Rodríguez, the acting President of Venezuela, has committed to opening the energy sector to American companies, but faces scrutiny due to past allegations of involvement in trafficking networks.
Given the complex web of geopolitical interests and internal political dynamics, what steps might be necessary to achieve a truly stable and democratic Venezuela?
