• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - asic
Tag:

asic

Business

ASIC Warns Against Risky Car Loans and High-Interest Traps

by Chief Editor June 23, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Australian car loan borrowers face increased financial risk due to high interest rates, opaque fee structures, and aggressive sales tactics, according to a recent report by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The regulator’s investigation into eight major lenders revealed that some borrowers are left with significant debt even after their vehicles are repossessed, with specific lenders charging median interest rates as high as 22 per cent.

Why are car loan fees under scrutiny?

ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland has described some fees charged by car finance providers as “outrageous,” warning that they can push already struggling consumers into severe financial distress. The investigation identified that establishment fees and “provider fees” can form a substantial portion of the total loan cost. For instance, one Queensland customer was charged over $9,000 in fees on a loan of approximately $49,000. Financial counsellors, such as Alex Price-Busch of the Indigenous Consumer Assistance Network, have questioned the legitimacy of these “provider” fees, suggesting they may be charged for services that provide no tangible benefit to the borrower.

Pro Tip: Before signing any finance contract, ask the broker to provide a full breakdown of all fees, including “provider,” “distributor,” and “establishment” costs. If a fee is not clearly explained, request a written justification.

How do interest rates compare across lenders?

The cost of borrowing varies significantly depending on the lender, with ASIC data highlighting a wide gap between market participants. Rapid Loans recorded the highest median interest rate at 22 per cent, followed by Latitude at 14 per cent and Pepper Money at 13 per cent. In contrast, Toyota Finance maintained a lower median rate of 10 per cent. While lenders argue these rates reflect the risk profile of their customers, the high default rates—particularly at Rapid Loans, where over 64 per cent of loans experienced at least one default—suggest that many borrowers may be struggling to meet repayment schedules from the outset.

How do interest rates compare across lenders?

What are the risks of ‘Guaranteed Future Value’ loans?

Regulators are concerned that some lenders are using high-pressure sales tactics to push specific loan products onto customers regardless of their suitability. ASIC found that Toyota Finance and Australian Alliance Automotive Finance trained dealership staff to promote “Guaranteed Future Value” (GFV) loans to “every single eligible car” buyer. These loans often come with usage restrictions and conditions that may not align with the needs of every driver. Following the ASIC report, these lenders have committed to reviewing their sales targets and staff training programs to ensure better compliance with responsible lending obligations.

What are the risks of 'Guaranteed Future Value' loans?

What happens when a car is repossessed?

When borrowers fail to keep up with repayments, the resulting repossession can leave them in a worse financial position than before they took out the loan. ASIC examined 267 repossessed vehicle cases and found that many borrowers owed more than the original loan amount after the car was sold. This “negative equity” often occurs when the vehicle is over-valued at the time of purchase or when massive fees are bundled into the loan principal. In one documented case, a Northern Territory resident was left owing 107 per cent of her original $34,455 loan after her vehicle was repossessed just six months into the term.

ASIC looks into allegations of dodgy sales tactics for car loans | 9 News Australia
Did you know? Borrowers who are struggling to make repayments can request a “hardship variation” from their lender. This allows for a temporary change to the loan contract, such as pausing payments or extending the loan term, to help the borrower avoid default.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is a provider fee? It is an additional cost charged by some lenders on top of standard establishment fees. Financial counsellors have flagged these as potentially unnecessary costs.
  • Can I challenge a high-pressure loan sale? Yes. If you feel you were pressured into a loan you could not afford, you can contact the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to lodge a dispute.
  • What should I do if I cannot make my car payment? Contact your lender immediately to request a hardship arrangement. If they refuse, seek free advice from a professional financial counsellor.

Are you struggling with a car finance dispute? You can reach out to local financial counselling services or contact the Australian Financial Complaints Authority for guidance on your rights.

June 23, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Property Developer David McWilliams Charged in $10M Disability Housing Fraud Case

by Chief Editor June 22, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Gold Coast property developer David McWilliams is facing 13 criminal charges following an Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) investigation into an alleged $10 million fraud involving the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). According to ASIC, Mr. McWilliams misappropriated funds intended for Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) projects, using the capital for personal expenses including luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and real estate. If convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

How does the NDIS Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) scheme work?

The SDA scheme is a federal government initiative designed to provide specialized housing for NDIS participants with extreme functional impairment or high support needs. According to reports from Four Corners, the program incentivizes private investment by providing up to $110,000 annually in rent support per tenant. Investors are expected to use these funds to construct or modify properties that meet strict accessibility standards, effectively moving participants out of aged care facilities and into purpose-built homes.

How does the NDIS Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) scheme work?
Did you know?

Receivers appointed to the ALAMMC group of companies found that Mr. McWilliams had raised over $90 million from more than 500 investors. Despite this, construction on the majority of those projects was either minimal or nonexistent, according to court-appointed investigators.

What are the allegations against ALAMMC Developments?

ASIC alleges that between July 2021 and October 2023, Mr. McWilliams diverted funds raised for six specific SDA projects toward his own lifestyle. Court documents indicate these expenditures included the purchase of an Aston Martin, a pub in Whyalla, South Australia, and a luxury apartment in Surfers Paradise for his business partner, Laura Fullarton. While the company was ordered to wind up operations in October 2024 by the Federal Court, investigations revealed that spending continued until mid-2025.

ASIC ‘very concerned’ about next event of crypto fraud

What are the risks for NDIS property investors?

The collapse of the ALAMMC group highlights the volatility inherent in high-yield NDIS investment schemes. While the government-backed rent support is designed to ensure stability, it has also attracted predatory operators. Financial analysts often point to the “integrity gap” between government funding promises and the actual oversight of construction timelines. Investors are encouraged to verify the progress of builds through independent project managers and confirm the developer’s licensing status with state regulators before committing capital.

Comparison: Reported Investor Funds vs. Project Delivery

Metric Reported Data
Total Funds Raised Over $90 million
Projects Completed One (of six linked to specific charges)
Investor Base Over 500 individuals

How is the government tightening oversight?

Following the raid on Mr. McWilliams’s Gold Coast office and apartment in late 2024, the Federal Court froze his assets to prevent further dissipation of investor capital. The Australian government has faced mounting pressure to increase auditing requirements for SDA providers. Industry experts suggest that the future of the sector relies on stricter “proof-of-build” milestones, where government rent subsidies are only released upon the verified completion of accessible housing units rather than at the fundraising stage.

Comparison: Reported Investor Funds vs. Project Delivery

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What charges is David McWilliams facing? He faces seven counts of dishonestly causing detriment, five counts of dishonest application of property of another, and one count of making false or misleading statements about financial products.
  • What happens to the investors? The ALAMMC group of companies is currently in liquidation, with court-appointed receivers managing the remaining assets to determine potential returns for investors.
  • Is the NDIS housing scheme safe? Like any property investment, the SDA scheme carries risks. Prospective investors are advised to conduct independent due diligence on any developer promising high guaranteed returns.
Pro Tip: Always check the ASIC register to confirm if a company director has been disqualified or has a history of regulatory intervention before signing any investment contracts.

Have you been affected by issues in the NDIS housing sector, or do you have insights into the regulatory changes needed to protect investors? Share your thoughts in the comments section below or subscribe to our newsletter for ongoing updates on this case as it returns to court in August.

June 22, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

KPMG Audit Scandal: 30 Witnesses Set for Day of Reckoning

by Chief Editor June 13, 2026
written by Chief Editor

KPMG is facing a systemic crisis as the firm navigates a formal investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) into the alleged misuse of confidential client documents. Multiple senior leaders, including former CEO Andrew Yates, have resigned following reports that internal board papers from construction firm Lendlease were used to secure audit contracts with other major corporations. The scandal has triggered a broad parliamentary inquiry, with over 30 witnesses—including regulators, former executives, and clients—summoned to provide testimony on the firm’s internal governance and audit integrity.

Why is the KPMG audit scandal raising systemic concerns?

The core of the investigation involves allegations that sensitive information from a client, Lendlease, was shared inappropriately to gain a competitive advantage during contract bidding. According to Labor senator Deborah O’Neill, who first aired the claims under parliamentary privilege, the issue is a matter of significant public interest. While initial internal and external reviews by Ashurst did not substantiate the claims, a subsequent investigation by Allens reportedly uncovered secondary instances of unauthorized document sharing. This pattern of internal failure has prompted regulators to examine whether these actions constitute a breach of the Corporations Act.

View this post on Instagram about Audit Scandal, Corporations Act
From Instagram — related to Audit Scandal, Corporations Act
Did you know?
The federal government maintains nearly 300 active contracts with KPMG, with a total value of approximately $653 million, according to data from the Parliamentary Library.

How does this compare to the PWC tax scandal?

Industry observers are drawing direct parallels between the current KPMG investigation and the prior scandal involving PWC, which was found to have misused confidential government information to assist multinational corporations with tax avoidance. The contrast in outcomes is stark: PWC was forced to sell its government consulting arm for one dollar and currently remains barred from bidding on federal contracts due to a non-compete clause. Professor Andy Schmulow of the University of Wollongong notes that the “big four” accounting firms have collectively secured $21 billion in taxpayer-funded work over the last decade, raising questions about whether the current partnership structure provides sufficient accountability compared to standard corporate regulation.

How does this compare to the PWC tax scandal?

What are the consequences for government and corporate contracts?

Public and private sector entities are actively re-evaluating their reliance on the firm. The Department of Finance has stated it is “taking these allegations extremely seriously” and is considering options ranging from suspending KPMG from the Management Advisory Services (MAS) panel to enforcing a temporary ban on new Commonwealth work. Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of Australia has already terminated its arrangement with the firm to manage a whistleblower hotline. At the state level, the Victorian government is reviewing all active contracts, while authorities in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, and the ACT have requested formal briefings from the firm.

KPMG chief executive Andrew Yates has resigned

Pro Tip: Monitoring Contractual Risk

For organizations managing high-value service contracts, the KPMG situation serves as a reminder to include “right-to-audit” and “ethical conduct” clauses that allow for immediate termination if a partner firm faces a formal regulatory investigation or a breach of confidentiality.

Pro Tip: Monitoring Contractual Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Who is being investigated by ASIC? The corporate watchdog is formally investigating several individuals, including former chief operating officer Eileen Hoggett and audit partner Paul Rogers, regarding their handling of whistleblower complaints.
  • Why is the partnership structure a point of debate? Critics, including Professor Schmulow, argue that large accounting firms operate in a “grey area” because they are structured as partnerships rather than companies, potentially limiting the reach of corporate law and regulatory oversight.
  • What is the status of the Lendlease relationship? Lendlease, the only client to publicly confirm its documents were misused, has announced it will put its $10 million annual external auditing contract out to tender next year, ending a 30-year partnership.

Are you concerned about how these governance failures impact the broader consulting sector? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for updates on the parliamentary inquiry outcomes.

June 13, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Recent Posts

  • Ecuador Stuns Germany to Secure Knockout Stage Berth

    June 26, 2026
  • USMNT to Face Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2026 World Cup

    June 26, 2026
  • Gut Microbes Linked to Estrogen-Driven Cancers

    June 26, 2026
  • 2,000-Year-Old Human DNA Discovered in Iberian Caves

    June 26, 2026
  • Trump: US to Buy Agricultural Products Using Iranian Assets

    June 26, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World