President Cyril Ramaphosa has removed Sisisi Tolashe from her position as Minister of Social Development. The decision has prompted a widespread political response, with parties across the spectrum describing the move as a necessary step amid growing public pressure and mounting allegations.
ANC Praises Commitment to Ethics
The African National Congress (ANC) has praised the intervention, framing it as a demonstration of the government’s commitment to ethical governance. ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu stated the party “welcomes President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to remove Comrade Sisisi Tolashe as Minister of Social Development in line with his constitutional responsibilities and commitment to ethical governance.”
To maintain stability, Sindisiwe Chikunga has been appointed as the acting minister. The governing party noted that this appointment would ensure “continuity, stability and uninterrupted service delivery in this critical portfolio.”
Bhengu further asserted that the move shows the seriousness with which the ANC and the President approach the fight against corruption, maladministration, and ethical lapses. The party argued that anti-corruption efforts have “moved beyond rhetoric into concrete action” through accountability measures and Special Investigating Unit proclamations.
Opposition Parties Claim Pressure Forced Action
While opposition parties also welcomed the removal, several suggested the President only acted after sustained political and public pressure. Democratic Alliance (DA) leader Geordin Hill-Lewis stated the DA welcomes the firing “following the relentless pressure applied by the DA for her removal from Cabinet.”

Hill-Lewis described Tolashe’s position as “untenable” and urged the President to urgently appoint a permanent replacement. He emphasized that South Africans deserve a credible minister who can lead the department with integrity and a focus on serving vulnerable people.
Similarly, Freedom Front Plus MP Philip van Staden argued that the President had “no choice” but to dismiss Tolashe as allegations intensified. Van Staden cited claims regarding the “improper use of vehicles donated by the Chinese Embassy,” the alleged employment of a state official as a private caregiver, and irregular appointments within the department.
Demands for Transparency
RISE Mzansi described the removal as a “necessary step toward restoring the public’s trust” in a department serving the country’s most vulnerable. The party pointed to the “highly irregular appointment of an unqualified Chief of Staff” and unresolved questions regarding luxury vehicle donations as major distractions.
RISE Mzansi warned that public funds should not be managed under an “ethical cloud,” stating that accountability “must be the standard, not the exception.”
Future Implications
Following this decision, political parties may continue to demand that the full report and findings leading to the dismissal be disclosed to the public. There is likely to be continued pressure on President Ramaphosa to swiftly appoint a permanent minister to restore stability to the department.
The government could face further scrutiny over governance and accountability as parties call for greater transparency regarding the circumstances of Tolashe’s exit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who has been appointed to lead the department in the interim?
Sindisiwe Chikunga has been appointed as the acting minister to ensure continuity and stability.
What specific allegations were cited by the Freedom Front Plus?
MP Philip van Staden cited allegations involving irregular appointments, the alleged use of a state official as a private caregiver, and the improper use of vehicles donated by the Chinese Embassy.
How did the ANC characterize the President’s decision?
The ANC described the move as a demonstration of the government’s commitment to accountability and ethical governance, showing seriousness in tackling corruption and maladministration.
Do you believe the appointment of an acting minister is sufficient to restore public trust in the Department of Social Development?
