Tag:

constitution

Melaka PKR Urges Consensus to Resolve Nominated Assemblymen Dispute

by Chief Editor July 14, 2026

written by Chief Editor

Melaka PKR has called for an immediate halt to unilateral decisions regarding the State Constitution (Melaka) (Amendment) Enactment 2026, which introduces the appointment of nominated assemblymen. Acting Melaka PKR chairman Adam Adli Abdul Halim stated on July 14 that the party aims to preserve state administrative stability through consensus, following a move by five Pakatan Harapan assemblymen to withdraw from the state government.

Constitutional Amendments and Legislative Stability

The core of the current political friction in Melaka involves the legislative path taken to pass the State Constitution (Melaka) (Amendment) Enactment 2026. According to Adam Adli, who also serves as the Deputy Higher Education Minister, the proposal to include nominated assemblymen requires a deeper evaluation rooted in accountability and democratic integrity. The amendment, which passed in the state assembly, triggered an immediate response from Melaka DAP, which announced its withdrawal from the state administration.

Political stability remains the primary concern for the PKR leadership. Adam Adli emphasized that the party’s stance aligns with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s directive to prioritize the welfare of the people over internal political maneuvering. The PKR leadership has explicitly stated that the decision by the five Pakatan Harapan assemblymen to withdraw was not a collective agreement reached at the state leadership level.

The Push for Consensus and Negotiation

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has intervened, requesting that Melaka DAP defer its decision to exit the government. The goal of this intervention is to maintain a focus on economic growth and the delivery of public services. According to statements provided by Melaka PKR, the party is advocating for a return to the negotiating table to resolve differences of opinion regarding the legislative amendment.

Pro tip: When evaluating constitutional amendments, experts often look at the balance between executive appointments and democratic representation. Ensuring transparency in the nomination process is essential to maintain public trust in state institutions.

Future Implications for State Governance

The tension in Melaka highlights the recurring challenge of maintaining coalition harmony when significant constitutional changes are introduced. Future stability depends on whether the Melaka Pakatan leadership can establish a formal mechanism for vetting state-level constitutional changes before they reach the assembly floor. As of mid-July, the priority remains the resolution of the impasse to prevent further erosion of administrative functionality.

Did you know?

The appointment of nominated assemblymen is a mechanism used in several jurisdictions to ensure representation for specific groups or to balance legislative numbers, though it frequently sparks debate regarding the democratic mandate of those individuals.

Adam Adli made acting Melaka PKR chief to replace Shamsul

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Melaka DAP withdraw from the state government?

Melaka DAP announced its withdrawal following the passage of the State Constitution (Melaka) (Amendment) Enactment 2026, which allows for the appointment of nominated assemblymen.

What is the current position of Melaka PKR?

Melaka PKR, led by Acting Chairman Adam Adli, has urged all parties to stop making hasty decisions and instead resolve the issue through consensus, prioritizing state stability and public welfare.

Has the Prime Minister intervened?

Yes, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has requested that Melaka DAP defer its withdrawal to ensure the state government remains focused on development and the people’s needs.

Stay informed on the latest political developments in Melaka by subscribing to our newsletter. Do you believe nominated assemblymen strengthen or weaken the democratic process? Let us know in the comments below.

July 14, 2026 0 comments

News

Police Vow Zero Tolerance for Xenophobic Violence Ahead of Protests

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 27, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

South African law enforcement has been ordered to take decisive action to prevent violence and xenophobia during planned anti-immigration protests scheduled for June 30. Deputy Minister of Police Polly Boshielo stated on Friday that authorities will prioritize preventing unrest rather than simply responding to it, specifically targeting individuals using digital platforms to incite attacks or coordinate looting.

Why are police being deployed for the June 30 protests?

The deployment follows social media campaigns calling for undocumented foreign nationals to leave South Africa by the end of June. While protest organizers have publicly described their planned actions as peaceful, Boshielo noted that previous demonstrations linked to this campaign have been associated with property destruction, looting, and violence.

Addressing the National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (NATJOINTS) during a State of Readiness Parade, Boshielo accused organizers of spreading misinformation. She stated that the government is actively addressing illegal immigration, noting that thousands of undocumented foreign nationals are deported annually while border management efforts continue.

“There will be no tolerance for vigilantism, no tolerance for xenophobic or any type of violence, no tolerance for intimidation and no tolerance for anyone, no matter who they are, who thinks they can decide who may or may not live in our communities,” Boshielo said.

Did You Know?
The planned demonstrations are tied to social media campaigns demanding that undocumented foreign nationals depart South Africa by the end of June.

How will law enforcement prevent potential unrest?

The operational response involves a coordinated effort from the South African Police Service, metropolitan police departments, municipal law enforcement, intelligence structures, and private security partners.

Boshielo has instructed officers to focus on early intervention and increased visible patrols. The strategy aims to identify and neutralize threats before violence breaks out. Law enforcement has also been directed to work with community leaders to discourage violent behavior.

Authorities are also targeting digital incitement. Boshielo warned that officials will not only arrest “foot soldiers” on the ground but will also pursue those using keyboards to spread hate speech or provide instructions to burn and loot.

Expert Insight:
The directive to move from reactive policing to proactive prevention suggests that authorities are preparing for a decentralized style of unrest, where coordination may occur through digital channels rather than traditional physical gatherings.

What are the legal consequences for inciting violence?

Anyone found threatening foreign nationals or encouraging attacks will face criminal investigation. Law enforcement officers have been instructed to trace the origins of inflammatory messages and make arrests where evidence supports criminal charges.

Deputy Police Minister Dr Polly Boshielo speaking at the Maqongqo Hall.

Boshielo emphasized that while immigration laws must be enforced through lawful processes, the South African Constitution protects all people in the country, regardless of their nationality or immigration status. She told officers that their mandate is to “take the side of the law” rather than taking sides based on origin or language.

The upcoming operation may serve as a significant test of the police service’s constitutional mandate. Boshielo expressed hope that the actions of law enforcement would show a preference for the rule of law and human dignity over the “rule of the mob.”

Frequently Asked Questions

When are the anti-immigration protests scheduled to take place?
The protests are scheduled for June 30.

Who is involved in the security operation?
The operation is a coordinated NATJOINTS effort involving the South African Police Service, metro police, municipal law enforcement, intelligence structures, and private security companies.

What is the government’s stance on undocumented foreign nationals?
The Deputy Minister stated that the government is working to strengthen border management and that thousands of undocumented foreign nationals are deported every year.

Do you believe increased digital monitoring is an effective way to prevent physical unrest?

June 27, 2026 0 comments

News

MK’s Visvin Reddy Files SAHRC Complaint Against Durban Mayor Over Migrant Remarks

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 20, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) Member of Parliament Visvin Reddy has filed a formal complaint with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) against eThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba. The complaint follows a viral video showing the mayor in a confrontation at Durban’s Sherwood Park, where he told human rights activist Yeshelen Govender, “I’m not speaking to you, I’m speaking to the Africans.”

Did You Know?
The man involved in the altercation, Yeshelen Govender, is the son of former ANC MEC Maggie Govender. While the mayor’s spokesperson initially claimed the man was a foreign national, his identity as a Durban-based activist and citizen was later confirmed.

Constitutional Allegations and the SAHRC Complaint

According to the formal complaint submitted by Reddy, the mayor’s conduct constitutes a breach of Section 9, which covers the Right to Equality, and Section 10, which protects Human Dignity. Reddy argues that by labeling a South African citizen of Indian descent as “not an African,” the mayor engaged in discriminatory rhetoric that denies the historical and constitutional status of the Indian community in South Africa.

Reddy’s filing requests that the SAHRC investigate the incident and consider several remedies. These include a formal, unconditional public apology from Mayor Xaba to Govender and the broader public, as well as a R30,000 financial penalty. The suggested penalty would be distributed equally among three non-profit organizations: The Divine Life Society, Food for Life, and Gift of the Givers.

Expert Insight:
This incident highlights the tension between public office bearers and civil society activists during sensitive community disputes. By invoking constitutional protections, the complaint shifts the focus from a localized argument at a migrant camp to a broader legal debate regarding who constitutes an “African” under the country’s democratic framework.

What Could Happen Next?

The SAHRC is expected to review the complaint to determine if there are grounds for a full investigation into the mayor’s remarks. If the commission proceeds, it may issue findings regarding whether the mayor’s language violated the constitutional rights of the complainant.

BREAKING: MAYOR CYRIL XABA ANNOUNCES 72-HOUR ACTION | PLAN DURBAN TO FAST-TRACK DEPORTATIONS

Additionally, the matter may be referred to municipal and political structures to evaluate if the mayor’s conduct breached the code of conduct for public office bearers. While spokesperson Mlu Mtungwa has defended the mayor’s actions, citing the nature of the confrontation at the park, the outcome of the SAHRC process could determine if further disciplinary or corrective measures are required. Yeshelen Govender has stated he intends to meet with the mayor to discuss the matter directly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Mayor Cyril Xaba at Sherwood Park?
The mayor was at the park during a period when thousands of foreign migrants were camping there to demand repatriation.

What was the specific remark that led to the complaint?
In a video of the altercation, Mayor Xaba is seen telling Yeshelen Govender, “I’m not speaking to you, I’m speaking to the Africans.”

What is the mayor’s current position on the incident?
Spokesperson Mlu Mtungwa has insisted that the mayor acted appropriately given Govender’s conduct during the confrontation and has declined to provide further comment while the matter is under consideration.

How should public officials balance the need for firm communication with the legal requirements of constitutional equality?

June 20, 2026 0 comments

News

Ramaphosa Files Urgent Interdict to Halt Impeachment Process

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 12, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Cyril Ramaphosa has filed an urgent application in the Western Cape High Court seeking to halt Parliament’s impeachment process. According to the court papers filed Friday, the President argues the inquiry should be suspended while he challenges the validity of the Section 89 independent panel report, which alleged he may have committed serious misconduct during the 2020 Phala Phala farm burglary.

Did You Know?
The current impeachment committee, established following a Constitutional Court ruling in May, is comprised of 31 Members of Parliament tasked with determining if there are sufficient grounds to recommend the President’s removal from office.

The Legal Challenge to the Section 89 Report

In his latest court filing, President Ramaphosa contends that the impeachment process should not proceed while the legal review of the underlying panel report remains pending. The President reportedly argues that the independent panel “misconceived its mandate” and improperly interpreted the allegations brought against him by former spy boss Arthur Fraser.

View this post on Instagram about Constitutional Court, Arthur Fraser

From Instagram — related to Constitutional Court, Arthur Fraser

The President has warned that allowing the parliamentary process to continue would result in “irreparable harm” and potentially trigger a constitutional conflict. Mr. Ramaphosa has consistently denied any wrongdoing regarding the theft of millions of US dollars from his Limpopo property.

Expert Insight:
The significance of this filing lies in the tension between judicial oversight and legislative authority. By seeking to pause the committee’s work, the President is attempting to prevent a potential impeachment recommendation from taking root while the foundational report—the very document that triggered the process—is being contested in the High Court.

Context of the Parliamentary Inquiry

This latest legal maneuver follows a May ruling by the Constitutional Court, which found that Parliament acted unlawfully by blocking impeachment proceedings against the President in 2022. That court decision compelled the National Assembly to form a new committee to investigate the matter further.

Phala Phala Saga | Ramaphosa goes to court over impeachment: ATM's Vuyolwethu Zungula reaction

National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza subsequently announced the formation of the 31-member committee. The body is now responsible for evaluating whether the evidence meets the threshold for recommending the removal of the President from office.

What Happens Next?

The immediate future of the impeachment inquiry remains uncertain as it hinges on the judiciary’s response to this new application. If the High Court grants the urgent request, the committee’s work could be delayed indefinitely while the court determines whether the Section 89 panel report was lawful.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the President seeking to halt the impeachment process?
According to his court filings, the President argues that the process should not continue while he is challenging the lawfulness of the Section 89 independent panel report in court.

What is the role of the 31-member committee?
The committee, announced by Speaker Thoko Didiza, is tasked with determining whether there are sufficient grounds to recommend the President’s removal from office following allegations linked to the Phala Phala scandal.

What is the origin of the Phala Phala allegations?
The scandal began when former spy boss Arthur Fraser accused the President of concealing the theft of millions of US dollars from his Limpopo farm.

How do you view the balance between parliamentary oversight and the right to judicial review in this matter?

June 12, 2026 0 comments

News

Cyril Ramaphosa’s Arrest: It’s a Matter of When, Says Nqakula

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 9, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

Former Minister of Safety and Security Charles Nqakula has publicly predicted that President Cyril Ramaphosa will face arrest within months regarding the Phala Phala scandal. According to Nqakula, the investigation into the 2020 theft of foreign currency from the President’s Limpopo game farm has produced “overwhelming” evidence that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is currently processing.

The Basis for the Arrest Prediction

Nqakula, a veteran African National Congress (ANC) stalwart, stated during an interview on the African Renaissance Network that the legal exposure facing the President is inevitable. He characterized the evidence as a collection of “endless” alleged crimes, including the failure to declare large sums of foreign currency to the South African Reserve Bank and the South African Revenue Service (SARS).

The former minister also cited allegations that police were used illegally to investigate the robbery, which was reportedly never officially reported, and that individuals were kidnapped and transported across the border to Namibia. Nqakula argued that these findings provide sufficient grounds for the NPA to act, despite the passage of nearly two years since the incident became public.

Did You Know?
The Phala Phala investigation was triggered by a criminal complaint filed in June 2022 by former State Security Agency director-general Arthur Fraser, who alleged that President Ramaphosa concealed the theft of millions of dollars from his game farm.

Why Investigations Take Time

Responding to concerns regarding the slow pace of the prosecution, Nqakula maintained that investigators are being methodical to ensure their case is “airtight.” He noted that cases involving a sitting president carry high professional stakes for law enforcement officers, who must “dot the i’s and cross the t’s” to avoid career-ending failures.

Nqakula drew on his historical experience, referencing a 1992 exchange with a senior police intelligence official who emphasized that professional officers prioritize their own legal standing and pensions over political loyalty. He suggested that contemporary police officers are similarly motivated by self-preservation and are unlikely to risk jail time to protect a politician if the evidence of wrongdoing is clear.

Expert Insight:
The significance of Nqakula’s assessment lies in his background as a former Minister of Safety and Security. His commentary suggests a shift in how political allies view the institutional independence of the NPA. While the President survived a December 2022 impeachment vote in the National Assembly, the ongoing legal pressure highlights the persistent tension between executive power and the criminal justice system’s investigative mandate.

Political and Legal Pressure

Beyond the legal mechanics, Nqakula highlighted a convergence of factors that he believes are narrowing the President’s options. He pointed to rising public anger, pressure from opposition parties, and internal divisions within the ANC as evidence that the political environment is becoming increasingly difficult for the President.

Ramaphosa will be ARRESTED says Charles Nqakula for something other than Phala Phala (ALLEGEDLY)

Nqakula stated that if he were acting as legal counsel for the President, he would advise him to prepare for a formal legal challenge. He concluded that the law is moving toward a resolution, and that the President faces a situation where he has limited room to maneuver.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Phala Phala scandal?
The scandal involves the 2020 theft of undisclosed foreign currency from President Cyril Ramaphosa’s Phala Phala Wildlife game farm, and subsequent allegations that the incident was covered up.

Has the President faced previous legal challenges regarding this?
Yes. A Section 89 parliamentary panel previously found prima facie evidence that the President violated the Constitution, though he survived an impeachment vote in the National Assembly in December 2022.

Why does Nqakula believe an arrest is imminent?
Nqakula points to the “sheer weight” of documented evidence and argues that the NPA cannot delay action indefinitely, as police officers are increasingly concerned about their own professional futures and potential liability.

Do you believe the legal process regarding the Phala Phala case is moving at an appropriate speed given the complexity of the allegations?

June 9, 2026 0 comments

News

Ramaphosa to Unveil New Government Migration Plan on Sunday

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 7, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Cyril Ramaphosa is set to address the nation at 18h00 on Sunday, June 7, 2026, from the Union Buildings in Pretoria. The Presidency has confirmed the address will outline the government’s management approach to illegal migration and the recent surge in anti-foreigner protests. This follows the Cabinet’s approval of a comprehensive migration strategy, including a new National Action Plan.

Did You Know? The government’s approach to migration is informed by a report developed by the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration, a body that has been coordinating with the Department of Employment and Labour to address these long-standing issues.

Why the government is stepping in

Rising tensions surrounding undocumented migrants have impacted several regions, with reports of protests in Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Western Cape. Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni stated that while the Constitution protects the right to protest, individuals do not have the right to take the law into their own hands. The government has explicitly rejected calls for a “shutdown” of the country, which have been promoted by the group March and March ahead of a self-imposed June 30 deadline for undocumented migrants to leave.

Expert Insight: The government faces a complex balancing act. It must uphold constitutional rights to assembly while simultaneously asserting state authority to prevent vigilantism. By involving the criminal justice cluster and the Department of Employment and Labour, the state is signaling that migration policy is being treated as a multi-departmental security and labor issue rather than just a policing matter.

What could happen next

Following the President’s address, representatives from the justice cluster are expected to be available to answer media questions regarding the government’s enforcement plans. Because Acting National Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Puleng Dimpane and the National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (Natjoints) have already issued warnings against lawlessness, it is likely that law enforcement will maintain a heightened presence in areas experiencing unrest. Furthermore, as some foreign nationals have already departed the country—mirroring the 295 individuals who left via a voluntary repatriation program from Ghana last month—it is possible that the government’s formal plan may influence the decisions of remaining undocumented residents.

Breaking at SONA 2026 | President Cyril Ramaphosa announces a major immigration crackdown.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where will the President’s address take place?
The address will be held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria.

What is the government’s stance on the planned “shutdown”?
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni has stated clearly that no shutdown will be allowed and that no group has the right to take the law into its own hands.

What is the National Action Plan (NAP)?
The NAP is a country report on migration in South Africa that was developed by the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration and recently approved by the Cabinet.

How do you believe the government’s new migration plan will affect community relations in your area?

June 7, 2026 0 comments

News

SAPS Investigates Officer Caught Returning Alleged Bribe in Viral Video

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 7, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The South African Police Service (SAPS) in Gauteng has initiated formal disciplinary proceedings against a police constable following the circulation of a video on social media. The footage allegedly shows the officer returning R2,000 to a civilian in connection with a bribery incident. Authorities have identified the officer involved and launched a departmental investigation to determine if criminal conduct occurred.

Why the investigation matters

This incident highlights the ongoing efforts by SAPS to address corruption and maintain institutional integrity. According to the police, the solicitation, facilitation, or acceptance of a bribe is both a criminal offense and a direct breach of the organization’s Code of Conduct. Gauteng Provincial Commissioner Lieutenant General Tommy Mthombeni emphasized that the service will not tolerate corruption in any form. He stated, “Members who abuse their authority, compromise their integrity, or betray the trust placed in them by the public will be dealt with decisively.”

Did You Know? The South African Police Service operates under the mandate of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa and the South African Police Service Act 68 of 1995, which establish the framework for ethical and professional policing standards across the country’s 1,154 police stations.

What happens next

The internal departmental investigation is currently underway to establish the full circumstances of the event. Captain Tintswalo Sibeko confirmed that the probe is designed to determine whether criminal charges should be pursued against the officer. The findings of this investigation will dictate whether the member faces further disciplinary action or criminal prosecution. In the meantime, SAPS has urged the public to report incidents of extortion or misconduct via the SAPS Anti-Corruption Hotline or the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID).

Viral Video Exposes Police Officer Taking Bribe , Immediate Suspension, Investigation initiated

Expert Insight: The swift public response from SAPS management suggests a concerted effort to preserve public trust. By publicly confirming the identity of the officer and initiating both internal and departmental probes, the service is signaling that it intends to prioritize accountability. The outcome of this case could serve as a litmus test for how the organization manages internal misconduct in the digital age, where social media evidence frequently accelerates the oversight process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the officer currently facing?
The officer is the subject of an internal disciplinary process and a departmental investigation following the emergence of the video.

How can members of the public report police corruption?
SAPS encourages citizens to report allegations of bribery, extortion, or misconduct through official channels, specifically the SAPS Anti-Corruption Hotline and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID).

What is the official stance of SAPS regarding bribery?
SAPS maintains that the acceptance, solicitation, or facilitation of a bribe is a criminal offense and a serious violation of the organization’s Code of Conduct.

How do you believe the use of social media evidence is changing the way law enforcement agencies handle internal misconduct?

June 7, 2026 0 comments

News

Didiza rejects motion of no confidence by ATM against Ramaphosa over Phala Phala inquiry

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 20, 2026

written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has declined a request from African Transformation Movement (ATM) leader Vuyo Zungula to table a motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa. The request, which stemmed from the ongoing Phala Phala scandal, was rejected following similar efforts by the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party to invoke Section 102 of the Constitution.

Legal Grounds for the Decision

In her formal response, Speaker Didiza cited Assembly Rule 129(2), which requires the Speaker to prioritize motions of no confidence while consulting with the Chief Whip and the Leader of Government Business. She further noted that under Rule 129(3), such motions must comply with House rules, relevant laws, and directives from the Rules Committee.

View this post on Instagram about Constitutional Court, President Ramaphosa

From Instagram — related to Constitutional Court, President Ramaphosa

The Speaker determined that the motion’s grounds were already being addressed by the Assembly. This follows the Constitutional Court judgment in Economic Freedom Fighters and Another v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others (2026) ZACC 17.

Didiza emphasized that the theft at the Phala Phala farm has already been referred to an impeachment committee for further inquiry. Under Rule 90, she stated that discussion of the matter should not be anticipated through other mechanisms while this process is underway.

Did You Know? The Phala Phala scandal involves the theft of $580,000 that was allegedly hidden inside a sofa at President Ramaphosa’s farm in Limpopo in February 2020.

Opposition Demands and Constitutional Rulings

The ATM and MK Party argued that recent events have undermined public trust in the president. The ATM specifically submitted a motion targeting both Ramaphosa and his Cabinet, claiming his continued tenure damages the integrity of the Office of the President.

The MK Party requested that any potential vote of no confidence be conducted via secret ballot to protect Members of Parliament from internal intimidation.

These requests followed a Constitutional Court ruling that found Parliament’s previous handling of the Phala Phala report was invalid and unconstitutional. The court overturned a December 2022 decision not to refer the matter to an impeachment committee and ruled that Assembly Rule 129I was unconstitutional.

Expert Insight: This situation highlights a complex procedural tension. While opposition parties are attempting to use motions of no confidence to force immediate accountability, the Speaker is relying on the strict sequence of parliamentary rules and the specific mandates of the Constitutional Court to channel the inquiry through a formal impeachment committee instead.

Current Status and Potential Next Steps

President Ramaphosa has denied any wrongdoing, describing the Section 89 Independent Panel report—chaired by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo—as “flawed.” He has consistently rejected calls from opposition parties to resign.

Didiza rejects ATM's motion of no confidence

Moving forward, the President may seek to overturn the findings of the panel, as he has confirmed he will take the report on judicial review following legal advice. Meanwhile, Parliament is expected to establish the impeachment committee to conduct a full inquiry as ordered by the apex court.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Speaker Thoko Didiza decline the motion of no confidence?
She declined the submission because the grounds for the motion are already being handled by the Assembly via an impeachment committee, as directed by the Constitutional Court. She also cited Rule 90, which prevents the anticipation of a matter already under inquiry.

What did the Constitutional Court rule regarding the Phala Phala report?
The court ruled that Parliament’s handling of the report was unconstitutional and invalid, specifically overturning the December 2022 decision not to refer the report to an impeachment committee. It also declared Rule 129I of the Assembly’s rules to be unconstitutional.

What is President Ramaphosa’s legal strategy regarding the panel report?
President Ramaphosa intends to take the Section 89 Independent Panel report on judicial review after receiving advice from his legal team.

Do you believe parliamentary committees or motions of no confidence are the more effective tool for ensuring executive accountability?

May 20, 2026 0 comments