• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - coverage - Page 2
Tag:

coverage

Health

Medicaid & Work: Why Most Adult Workers Lack Job-Based Health Coverage

by Chief Editor March 6, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Medicaid Work Requirements: Why Most Already Work, and Why It Matters

The recent passage of the 2025 reconciliation law, dubbed the “One Big, Gorgeous Bill,” has brought renewed attention to work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. While the legislation focuses on encouraging employment, a closer look reveals that most adults subject to these requirements are already working. The challenge isn’t a lack of willingness to work, but rather the nature of the jobs held by many Medicaid recipients and their limited access to employer-sponsored health coverage.

The Working Poor and the Coverage Gap

Employer-sponsored insurance remains the primary source of health coverage for working-age adults in the United States. Although, access is far from universal. Low-wage workers, those in certain industries, part-time employees, and those working at smaller firms are significantly less likely to be offered health insurance through their jobs. Many employers, both large and small, recognize that Medicaid provides crucial healthcare access to their employees.

New work requirements are unlikely to dramatically increase employment, as most Medicaid adults are already employed or face significant barriers to finding work. These requirements aren’t expected to substantially reduce reliance on Medicaid, given the limited availability and affordability of job-based coverage for low-wage earners.

Who’s Affected? A Deeper Dive into the Data

An analysis of data from the 2025 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) highlights the realities faced by Medicaid recipients who are employed. The analysis focuses on adults aged 19-64 in states that have adopted Medicaid expansion, as well as Wisconsin (with partial expansion), as these individuals will be subject to the new work requirements.

Most Medicaid workers face barriers to employer-sponsored insurance. Approximately 65% of Medicaid adult workers in expansion states and Wisconsin either work for employers that don’t offer health coverage (52%) or are ineligible for the coverage offered (13%). This contrasts sharply with non-Medicaid covered workers, where only 21% face similar barriers.

Affordability is a major hurdle. Even when eligible for job-based insurance, about 26% of Medicaid adult workers decline it, compared to 17% of those not covered by Medicaid. A key reason? The cost. Medicaid often provides more affordable, and sometimes more comprehensive, coverage than what’s available through their employer.

Wrap-around coverage fills the gaps. Roughly 9% of Medicaid adult workers are covered by both Medicaid and their employer’s plan. In these cases, Medicaid often supplements the employer-provided insurance, covering premiums, cost-sharing, and benefits not included in the employer plan.

Part-Time Work and Industry Matters

Part-time workers are particularly vulnerable. About one-third (32%) of adult Medicaid workers are employed part-time. Among these individuals, only 21% are eligible for employer-sponsored insurance, compared to 42% of full-time workers. This disparity stems from the Affordable Care Act’s shared responsibility mandate, which primarily applies to employers with at least 50 full-time equivalent employees working 30 hours or more per week.

Industry plays a role. Eligibility for job-based insurance varies significantly by industry, ranging from 56% in mining to just 20% in agriculture and forestry. Workers in educational and health services (23% of Medicaid adult workers) have a relatively high eligibility rate (41%), while those in leisure and hospitality (16% of Medicaid adult workers) have a much lower rate (22%).

Why Aren’t They Eligible? Hours are the Key

Among Medicaid adult workers offered insurance by their employer, the most common reason for ineligibility is insufficient work hours. Nearly 70% of those ineligible report not working enough hours or weeks to qualify. Other reasons include not having worked for the employer long enough (13%) or being employed by contract or temporary agencies not covered by the employer’s plan (5%).

Did you know? Low-wage workers in firms with a high proportion of low-wage earners often face higher premium contributions for health insurance, making it even more difficult to afford coverage.

FAQ: Medicaid Work Requirements

  • Q: Will these work requirements actually assist people find jobs?
  • A: The data suggests not significantly, as most are already working.
  • Q: What happens if someone can’t verify their work status?
  • A: They are likely to lose Medicaid coverage.
  • Q: Why are part-time workers less likely to be offered insurance?
  • A: The Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate focuses on full-time employees.

Pro Tip: If you’re a Medicaid recipient facing new work requirements, document your employment carefully and understand your state’s specific reporting procedures.

The implementation of these new work requirements will likely lead to reduced Medicaid enrollment, even among those who are employed, due to difficulties in verifying work status. The data clearly demonstrates that the issue isn’t a lack of willingness to work, but rather systemic barriers to accessing affordable health coverage through employment.

Explore further: KFF’s Medicaid resource center provides in-depth information on Medicaid policies and trends.

What are your thoughts on the new Medicaid work requirements? Share your comments below!

March 6, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Medicare Advantage Enrollment 2026: Growth Slows, SNPs Rise – KFF

by Chief Editor February 28, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Medicare Advantage Enrollment: A Shift Towards Specialized Plans

Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment continues its upward trajectory, but a recent analysis of data released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reveals a significant shift in growth drivers. Whereas overall enrollment reached just over 35 million as of February 1, 2026 – a 3% increase from the previous year – the growth is increasingly concentrated in Special Needs Plans (SNPs).

The Rise of SNPs: Meeting Specialized Healthcare Needs

SNPs, designed for beneficiaries with specific health conditions or dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid, accounted for a remarkable 83% of the enrollment increase over the past year. More than 8 million people are now enrolled in SNPs, representing 23% of total MA enrollment. This growth reflects a deliberate strategy by insurers to cater to populations with complex healthcare needs and a permanent place for these plans within the Medicare program since 2018.

This trend suggests a growing demand for plans that offer tailored care and support services. SNPs often provide care coordination, disease management programs, and access to specialized providers, addressing the unique challenges faced by their target populations.

Individual Plan Growth Slows, While Group Plans See Mixed Results

In contrast to the robust growth of SNPs, enrollment in traditional individual Medicare Advantage plans increased at the slowest rate in decades. The increase was modest, rising by only 224,000 people. Employer- and union-sponsored group plans experienced a slight decline with a decrease of approximately 40,000 enrollees, though this was partially offset by growth in employer MA-only plans.

This divergence highlights a potential shift in the MA market. While individual plans remain popular, SNPs are rapidly gaining traction, potentially attracting beneficiaries who are seeking more specialized and coordinated care.

Insurance Company Performance: A Tale of Two Trends

The performance of major insurers varied significantly. Humana and Kaiser Permanente were the only large insurers to increase total Medicare Advantage enrollment, adding 1.2 million and 64,000 enrollees, respectively. UnitedHealth Group, the largest MA insurer, experienced a loss of over 530,000 enrollees, primarily due to declines in individual and group plans. CVS Health and Elevance Health also saw enrollment decreases.

These shifts in enrollment suggest that insurers are facing different levels of success in adapting to the changing dynamics of the MA market. Those who are effectively expanding their SNP offerings and catering to specialized populations appear to be faring better.

What Drives the SNP Surge?

Several factors contribute to the growing popularity of SNPs. The plans are designed to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations, offering targeted benefits and care coordination. CMS has been actively encouraging the growth of SNPs through policy changes and financial incentives. Insurers are responding by expanding their SNP offerings, recognizing the potential for growth in this segment.

The increasing number of beneficiaries eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid is also fueling the demand for SNPs. These dual-eligible individuals often have complex health needs and benefit from the coordinated care provided by SNPs.

Looking Ahead: Potential Future Trends

The trends observed in the latest enrollment data suggest several potential future developments in the Medicare Advantage market:

  • Continued SNP Growth: SNPs are likely to continue to be the primary driver of MA enrollment growth in the coming years.
  • Increased Competition: Insurers will likely intensify their focus on SNPs, leading to increased competition and innovation in this segment.
  • Focus on Value-Based Care: SNPs are well-positioned to support value-based care models, which emphasize quality and outcomes over volume.
  • Consolidation in the MA Market: The varying performance of insurers may lead to further consolidation in the MA market, as larger players acquire smaller ones.

Methods

This analysis uses data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Landscape files. The analysis aggregates enrollment data from the monthly enrollment by contract/plan/state/county files, which excludes county-plan combinations that have fewer than 11 enrollees, leading to somewhat lower Medicare Advantage enrollment counts than reported elsewhere. Cost plans, PACE plans, and HCPPs are excluded.

This function was supported in part by Arnold Ventures. KFF maintains full editorial control over all of its policy analysis, polling, and journalism activities.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is Medicare Advantage? Medicare Advantage is a type of Medicare health plan offered by private companies approved by Medicare.
  • What are Special Needs Plans (SNPs)? SNPs are a type of Medicare Advantage plan designed for people with specific health conditions or who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid.
  • Why are SNPs growing so quickly? SNPs are growing because they offer tailored care and support services to beneficiaries with complex healthcare needs.
  • What does this mean for Medicare beneficiaries? Beneficiaries will likely have more choices, particularly in specialized plans, and potentially access to more coordinated and comprehensive care.

Explore further: Learn more about Medicare Advantage plans and uncover one that fits your needs by visiting the Medicare website.

February 28, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Medicaid Postpartum Coverage: State Extensions & Updates (2026)

by Chief Editor February 25, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Expanding Postpartum Medicaid: A Lifeline for Maternal Health

The Medicaid program currently covers approximately 4 in 10 births nationwide. For decades, federal law mandated coverage for pregnant individuals through just 60 days after childbirth. However, a significant shift is underway, driven by growing concerns about maternal mortality and health disparities. A provision within the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 offered states a new pathway to extend this critical coverage to a full 12 months postpartum, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2023 made this option permanent.

The Rise of 12-Month Coverage Extensions

Prior to April 1, 2022, some states proactively extended postpartum coverage using section 1115 waivers or state funds. However, the American Rescue Plan Act’s state plan amendment (SPA) option streamlined the process, making it more accessible for states to participate. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provided guidance in December 2021 to facilitate implementation.

Why the Extension Matters: Addressing a Critical Gap

The 60-day postpartum period often proves insufficient for addressing the complex health needs that arise after childbirth. Many maternal deaths, particularly those related to preventable causes like overdose and suicide, occur after the initial postpartum period ends. Extending coverage to 12 months allows for continuous care during a vulnerable time, addressing issues like postpartum depression, chronic hypertension, and other complications.

Racial Disparities and Maternal Health

The need for extended coverage is particularly acute for addressing racial disparities in maternal health outcomes. Data consistently shows that women of color experience significantly higher rates of maternal mortality, and morbidity. Providing consistent access to care for a full year postpartum can help mitigate these disparities and improve health equity.

State-by-State Progress: A Growing Movement

As of February 24, 2026, states are at various stages of implementing extended postpartum Medicaid coverage. Some have already fully implemented the 12-month extension, while others are actively planning to do so through legislation or SPA submissions. Tracking these state actions is crucial for understanding the national landscape of maternal health policy.

Looking Ahead: Potential Future Trends

The permanent nature of the 12-month postpartum coverage extension signals a long-term commitment to improving maternal health. Several trends are likely to emerge in the coming years:

  • Increased State Adoption: More states are expected to adopt the 12-month extension, driven by federal incentives and growing awareness of its benefits.
  • Focus on Comprehensive Care: States will likely expand the scope of services covered during the extended postpartum period, including mental health care, substance use disorder treatment, and chronic disease management.
  • Data-Driven Evaluation: Ongoing evaluation of the impact of extended coverage will be essential for identifying best practices and refining policies.
  • Integration with Other Programs: States may explore integrating postpartum Medicaid coverage with other maternal health programs and initiatives.

FAQ: Postpartum Medicaid Coverage

Q: What is a State Plan Amendment (SPA)?
A: A SPA is a formal request from a state to the federal government (CMS) to change its Medicaid program. It’s the primary mechanism states are using to extend postpartum coverage.

Q: Is the 12-month postpartum coverage extension mandatory for all states?
A: No, it is an option states can choose to implement.

Q: What does this mean for individuals who are currently pregnant?
A: Coverage availability will depend on the state in which they reside. Individuals should check with their state’s Medicaid agency for specific details.

Q: What is a Section 1115 waiver?
A: Section 1115 waivers allow states to test innovative approaches in Medicaid, outside the scope of standard federal rules. Some states used these prior to the SPA option.

Did you know? The American Rescue Plan Act initially offered the 12-month extension for five years, but the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 made it a permanent option for states.

Pro Tip: If you are unsure about your eligibility for postpartum Medicaid coverage, contact your state’s Medicaid agency or a local health clinic for assistance.

To learn more about maternal health resources and support, visit the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) website.

Have questions about postpartum Medicaid coverage in your state? Share them in the comments below!

February 25, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

IRA Drug Negotiation: Improved Medicare Part D Coverage in 2026 & 2027

by Chief Editor February 12, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Medicare Drug Price Negotiation: Early Wins and What’s Next

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) is already delivering on its promise to lower prescription drug costs for Medicare beneficiaries. A recent analysis from KFF reveals that the IRA’s coverage requirement – mandating all Medicare Part D plans cover drugs selected for price negotiation – is leading to improved access to vital medications. This isn’t just about lower prices; it’s about ensuring people can actually get the drugs they need.

Expanding Coverage: The First 10 Negotiated Drugs

As of January 1, 2026, the first 10 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiation are seeing increased coverage. Before the IRA’s requirements took effect, coverage varied significantly between Part D plans. Now, all plans must include these drugs, in all dosages and forms. The KFF analysis highlights substantial gains in coverage for insulin products like Fiasp and NovoLog, as well as for the cancer drug Imbruvica. For example, Fiasp coverage jumped from 24% of Part D enrollees in 2025 to full coverage in 2026.

Looking Ahead: The Next Wave of Negotiated Drugs and Wegovy

The impact won’t stop there. A second set of 15 drugs will have negotiated prices taking effect in 2027 and the IRA’s coverage requirement will again expand access. One drug in particular is drawing significant attention: Wegovy, a GLP-1 medication used for obesity and cardiovascular disease risk reduction.

Currently, Medicare Part D plans generally only cover Wegovy for cardiovascular disease, due to restrictions on covering drugs for weight loss. However, the Trump administration is exploring a voluntary model to expand coverage for GLP-1s to treat obesity, potentially opening access to Wegovy for a wider range of beneficiaries starting in 2027. The IRA’s coverage requirement will then ensure that all Part D plans cover Wegovy for Medicare-covered uses.

Beyond Wegovy: More Drugs Gaining Wider Access

Wegovy isn’t the only drug poised for increased coverage. Other drugs selected for negotiation in the second round, like Austedo and Austedo XR (for involuntary movement disorders), Otezla (for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis), and Breo Ellipta (for asthma and COPD), currently aren’t covered by all Part D plans. The IRA will change that, bringing these medications to more beneficiaries. Several drugs already benefit from broad coverage due to being part of Medicare’s “protected classes,” including antineoplastics like Xtandi, Pomalyst, Ofev, Ibrance, and Calquence, and the antipsychotic Vraylar.

The IRA's Coverage Requirement for Selected Drugs Will Improve Access to the GLP-1 Drug Wegovy and Six Other Part D Drugs Selected for Negotiation in Round 2, Starting in 2027

This analysis was supported in part by Arnold Ventures. KFF maintains full editorial control over all of its policy analysis, polling, and journalism activities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program?

This program, part of the Inflation Reduction Act, allows Medicare to negotiate the prices of some high-cost prescription drugs, aiming to lower costs for beneficiaries and the program itself.

How does the IRA improve drug coverage?

The IRA requires all Medicare Part D plans to cover drugs selected for price negotiation, ensuring broader access to these medications.

What is the status of Wegovy coverage under Medicare?

Currently, Wegovy is generally covered only for cardiovascular disease. A voluntary model is being considered to expand coverage for obesity treatment starting in 2027.

Pro Tip: Check with your specific Part D plan to understand your coverage for negotiated drugs and any potential cost-sharing requirements.

The IRA’s impact on drug pricing and access is still unfolding, but these early results are encouraging. As more drugs are added to the negotiation program, Medicare beneficiaries can expect continued improvements in affordability and coverage.

February 12, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Prior Authorization: Major Burden for 7 in 10 Insured Adults – KFF Poll

by Chief Editor February 8, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Prior Authorization: The Growing Headache for American Healthcare Consumers

Affordability remains the top concern for Americans when it comes to healthcare, but a new KFF Health Tracking Poll reveals a different, equally frustrating problem: prior authorization. This process – requiring insurance approval before accessing certain tests, treatments, or medications – is increasingly seen as a major burden, impacting nearly 70% of insured adults.

What is Prior Authorization and Why is it a Problem?

Prior authorization isn’t a new concept, but its prevalence is growing. Insurance companies use it to control costs, but the process often creates significant hurdles for patients and providers. It can lead to delays in care, denials of necessary treatments, and increased administrative burdens for everyone involved.

The KFF poll found that one in three insured adults consider prior authorizations a “major burden,” with an additional 37% viewing it as a “minor burden.” This surpasses the burden reported from understanding medical bills (60%), scheduling appointments (60%), or finding in-network providers (53%).

Chronic Conditions Amplify the Issue

The impact of prior authorization is particularly acute for individuals managing chronic conditions. Nearly 40% of insured adults with chronic illnesses identify prior authorizations as their single biggest healthcare burden, more than double the rate of other concerns. This is because those with ongoing medical needs often require more frequent treatments and medications, leading to more interactions with insurance companies.

Delays and Denials: Real-World Consequences

The consequences of prior authorization extend beyond mere inconvenience. Approximately two-thirds of adults report that delays and denials of healthcare services by insurance companies are a “major problem.” Around 33% have experienced a denial of coverage, 29% have faced delays in receiving care, and 29% have been required to try a less expensive alternative before their preferred treatment was approved.

These delays and denials aren’t just frustrating; they can have tangible negative impacts. One-third of those affected report a major negative impact on their mental health and finances, while one in four experienced a negative impact on their physical health.

A Bipartisan Concern

Interestingly, the frustration with prior authorization transcends political divides. The KFF poll shows that it’s a significant burden across party lines, as well as among individuals with different types of insurance, including Medicaid, employer-sponsored plans, and those who purchase insurance directly.

Looking Ahead: Potential Trends and Solutions

Several trends suggest the prior authorization issue will likely intensify in the coming years. Healthcare costs continue to rise, putting pressure on insurers to find ways to control spending. The increasing complexity of medical treatments and the growing number of individuals with chronic conditions will too contribute to the problem.

However, there’s also growing momentum for solutions. Legislative efforts are underway in several states to streamline the prior authorization process and increase transparency. Some insurers are experimenting with “gold carding” programs, which exempt providers with consistently high approval rates from prior authorization requirements for certain services. Technology solutions, such as automated prior authorization tools, are also emerging.

The Rise of Automation

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are poised to play a larger role in automating the prior authorization process. These technologies can analyze medical records and clinical guidelines to determine whether a treatment is likely to be approved, potentially reducing the need for manual review. However, ethical considerations and the need for human oversight will be crucial.

Increased Transparency

Greater transparency from insurance companies is another key area for improvement. Patients and providers need clear information about prior authorization requirements, approval rates, and the reasons for denials. Standardized forms and electronic submission processes can also help streamline the process.

FAQ

Q: What is the purpose of prior authorization?
A: Insurance companies use prior authorization to manage costs and ensure that medical treatments are appropriate and necessary.

Q: Can I appeal a prior authorization denial?
A: Yes, you have the right to appeal a denial. Your insurance company should provide information on the appeals process.

Q: What can I do if I’m experiencing problems with prior authorization?
A: Talk to your doctor’s office and your insurance company. You can also contact your state insurance regulator for assistance.

Q: Are there any legislative efforts to address prior authorization?
A: Yes, several states are considering legislation to streamline the prior authorization process and increase transparency.

Did you know? Nearly half of insured adults have experienced a healthcare service, treatment, or medication being either denied or delayed due to prior authorization in the past two years.

Pro Tip: Always check with your insurance company before starting a new treatment or medication to understand the prior authorization requirements.

What are your experiences with prior authorization? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

February 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Abortion Coverage Laws: State-by-State Guide (2026)

by Chief Editor February 8, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Shifting Landscape of Abortion Access in the US: Coverage, Bans and Future Trends

The legal status of abortion in the United States remains a complex and rapidly evolving issue. Following the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, states have been granted the authority to regulate or ban abortion, leading to a patchwork of laws across the country. As of January 6, 2026, thirteen states have enacted total abortion bans (Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Dakota, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia).

The Hyde Amendment and Ongoing Coverage Battles

Even before the overturning of Roe v. Wade, access to abortion was significantly impacted by the Hyde Amendment, first enacted in 1977. This federal law prohibits the use of federal funds for abortion services, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the pregnant person. This disproportionately affects individuals enrolled in Medicaid, Medicare, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

The impact of the Hyde Amendment continues to be felt. Currently, 30 states and the District of Columbia limit Medicaid coverage of abortion to the restrictions outlined in the Hyde Amendment. Ten states have laws prohibiting abortion coverage in private insurance plans, and 25 states restrict coverage in plans sold on state marketplaces.

Did you know? Delaware was the first state to codify Roe v. Wade during the first Trump Administration, anticipating challenges to reproductive care.

State Responses: Expanding vs. Restricting Access

The response to the overturning of Roe v. Wade has varied dramatically by state. Even as some states have moved to ban or severely restrict abortion access, others are actively working to protect and expand it. Thirteen states currently require abortion coverage in both private and ACA Marketplace plans, and also use state funds to cover abortion for Medicaid enrollees. Delaware, for example, prohibits cost-sharing for abortions up to $750.

This divergence is creating significant disparities in access to care, with individuals in states with restrictive laws often needing to travel long distances to obtain abortion services. This raises concerns about equity and access for low-income individuals and people of color, who may face greater barriers to travel and care.

The Role of Private Insurance and the ACA

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has also played a role in the abortion coverage debate. While the ACA maintains the Hyde Amendment’s restrictions, it also permits states to ban abortion coverage from Marketplace plans. Since 2010, many states have enacted such restrictions, further limiting access to abortion care.

However, a growing number of states are taking steps to ensure abortion coverage in private insurance plans. These efforts are often seen as a way to mitigate the impact of the Hyde Amendment and ensure that individuals have access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare.

Future Trends and Potential Developments

Several trends are likely to shape the future of abortion access in the US:

  • Continued Legal Challenges: Legal battles over abortion restrictions are expected to continue, potentially leading to further clarification of state laws and federal regulations.
  • State Constitutional Amendments: Some states, like Delaware, are considering constitutional amendments to explicitly protect abortion rights.
  • Increased Focus on Medication Abortion: Medication abortion, which involves the use of pills to terminate a pregnancy, is likely to become an increasingly important focus of legal and political debate.
  • Expansion of Telehealth Services: The use of telehealth to provide abortion care may expand, particularly in states with limited access to in-person services.

FAQ

Q: What is the Hyde Amendment?
A: The Hyde Amendment bans federal funding for most abortions, primarily impacting those who rely on Medicaid.

Q: How many states have banned abortion?
A: As of January 6, 2026, thirteen states have banned abortion.

Q: Does the ACA affect abortion coverage?
A: The ACA maintains the Hyde Amendment’s restrictions but allows states to ban abortion coverage from Marketplace plans.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about the latest developments in abortion law by visiting resources like the KFF Abortion Dashboard.

Aim for to learn more about reproductive rights and access to care? Explore our other articles or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.

February 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

2026 WM Phoenix Open: Scheffler, Koepka & How to Watch Golf’s Party

by Chief Editor February 8, 2026
written by Chief Editor
Getty Images

The WM Phoenix Open continues to be a major event on the PGA Tour, drawing hundreds of thousands of fans and creating a unique atmosphere. This year’s tournament features top players like Scottie Scheffler, who rebounded from a rare over-par round to climb the Phoenix Open leaderboard.

Scheffler’s Dominance and the Competitive Field

Scottie Scheffler, a past champion at TPC Scottsdale (2022 and 2023), is a clear favorite. His ability to bounce back from setbacks highlights his consistent performance over the last few seasons. Alongside Scheffler, the field includes Brooks Koepka, a two-time WM Phoenix Open winner and Hideki Matsuyama, also a two-time champion. Other notable players competing for the title are Xander Schauffele, Cameron Young, Collin Morikawa, Jordan Spieth, Chris Gotterup, and Viktor Hovland.

How to Watch Round 4 on Sunday

Round 4 of the 2026 WM Phoenix Open will begin at 11 a.m. Eastern. Fans can follow the action through PGA Tour Live from 11 a.m. To 6 p.m. (PGA Tour Live). Television coverage starts at 12 p.m. On Golf Channel and continues from 3 p.m. To 6 p.m. On CBS and Paramount+. Streaming options include CBSSports.com and the CBS Sports App from 3 p.m. To 6 p.m. Radio coverage is available from 1 p.m. To 6 p.m. On PGA Tour Radio.

Sunday’s TV Schedule (All times Eastern)

Round 4 starts: 11 a.m. [Tee times]

PGA Tour Live: 11 a.m. – 6 p.m.

Golf Channel: 12 p.m. – 3 p.m.

CBS & Paramount+: 3 p.m. – 6 p.m.

CBSSports.com & CBS Sports App: 3 p.m. – 6 p.m.

PGA Tour Radio: 1 p.m. – 6 p.m.

The WM Phoenix Open Experience

The WM Phoenix Open is known for its lively atmosphere, attracting a large and enthusiastic crowd. While not everyone enjoys the high-energy environment, players who embrace it often identify success and grow fan favorites in the Arizona desert.

February 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

2025 Reconciliation Law: Rural Health Funds Won’t Offset Medicaid Cuts

by Chief Editor February 6, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Rural Healthcare at a Crossroads: Navigating the 2025 Reconciliation Law

The 2025 reconciliation law brought significant changes to federal healthcare support, including substantial cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Whereas concerns were raised about the impact on rural areas, Congress responded with a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program, often called the “rural health fund.” However, a closer glance reveals a complex situation where comparing these funds to the cuts requires careful consideration.

The Scale of the Cuts vs. The Rural Health Fund

The law includes an estimated $911 billion in cuts to federal Medicaid spending, with approximately $137 billion of those cuts potentially impacting rural areas over ten years. The rural health fund, totaling $50 billion over five years (2026-2030), appears to offer some relief. However, simply comparing these numbers can be misleading. The cuts to Medicaid are phased in, with the most significant changes occurring after the rural health fund expires.

Timing is Everything: A Misleading Comparison

The timing of the funding and cuts is crucial. The rural health fund provides $10 billion annually, while Medicaid cuts are gradual, increasing over time. Initial allocations of the rural health fund, while helpful, shouldn’t be directly compared to the ten-year estimated Medicaid cuts. Experts suggest that future rural health fund allotments could differ significantly from the first-year distribution, and unspent funds may be redistributed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Annualizing Cuts and the Budget Window

Creating annualized state-specific estimates of Medicaid cuts is similarly uncertain. While the Congressional Budget Office provides annual estimates, allocating these reductions to states or rural areas introduces significant complexity. Many of the most substantial Medicaid cuts don’t take effect until 2027, making comparisons to the 2026 rural health fund allocation problematic. The effects of the cuts will also continue to grow beyond the ten-year budget window.

Beyond Medicaid: The Bigger Picture

The impact extends beyond Medicaid cuts. The expiration of enhanced premium tax credits in the ACA marketplaces will also lead to coverage losses, particularly in states with smaller Medicaid cuts. It’s unlikely any state will fully offset the combined losses from Medicaid cuts and ACA changes with the rural health fund. Only 15% of the rural health funds can be used for direct patient care, limiting its ability to fully compensate for reduced Medicaid payments to providers or increased numbers of uninsured individuals.

What This Means for Rural Hospitals and Communities

Rural hospitals, already facing financial challenges, could experience increased strain. Reduced Medicaid payments and a growing uninsured population may lead to service reductions or even closures. This could limit access to essential healthcare services for rural residents, exacerbating existing health disparities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Will the rural health fund completely offset the Medicaid cuts for rural areas?
A: No. The $50 billion rural health fund is significantly smaller than the estimated $137 billion in Medicaid cuts for rural areas over ten years, and the timing of the funding doesn’t align with the phased implementation of the cuts.

Q: How will the rural health fund money be distributed to states?
A: The distribution is based on a formula considering factors like rural population and healthcare needs. Initial allocations have been announced, but future allotments may vary.

Q: What can the rural health fund be used for?
A: Funds can be used for a variety of purposes, including improving healthcare infrastructure, expanding access to care, and supporting workforce development. However, only 15% can be used for direct patient care.

Q: What are the potential consequences of these changes for rural residents?
A: Rural residents may face reduced access to healthcare services, increased financial burdens, and worsening health outcomes.

Did you know? The $50 billion rural health fund is intended to help mitigate the impact of the Medicaid cuts, but its effectiveness will depend on how states utilize the funds and how the cuts are ultimately implemented.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about how your state is allocating and utilizing the rural health fund. Advocate for policies that prioritize access to care in rural communities.

Explore more articles on healthcare policy and rural health to stay up-to-date on the latest developments.

Subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates and insights on healthcare trends.

February 6, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

2025 Budget Law: Medicaid Changes & Impact on Health Centers

by Chief Editor February 4, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Healthcare Access Under Pressure: How New Laws Could Impact Millions

Recent changes to federal law are poised to significantly reshape the healthcare landscape, potentially leaving millions without coverage and increasing the strain on vital safety net providers like community health centers. A new analysis from KFF projects that these shifts could lead to 10 million more uninsured Americans by 2034, a concerning trend with far-reaching implications.

Medicaid Changes: A Rising Tide of Uninsured?

At the heart of these changes are revisions to Medicaid eligibility and funding. New policies, including mandatory work requirements for able-bodied adults enrolled through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expansion, are expected to be a major driver of coverage loss. These requirements, while intended to promote self-sufficiency, often create administrative hurdles and can disproportionately affect individuals facing barriers to employment, such as lack of transportation or childcare.

Furthermore, the move to require states to conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every six months, instead of annually, is likely to result in more people falling off the rolls due to administrative errors or simply failing to navigate the renewal process. The elimination of automatic renewal in the ACA Marketplace and the removal of a special enrollment period for those with incomes below 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL) will add to these challenges.

Did you know? States are already grappling with significant budget constraints. These federal funding changes will exacerbate those challenges, potentially leading to cuts in provider rates and limitations on coverage expansions.

Immigrant Communities Face Increased Barriers

The impact of these changes will be particularly acute for immigrant communities. New eligibility restrictions are making many lawfully present immigrants ineligible for crucial programs like Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), ACA Marketplace subsidies, and even Medicare.

Data from a recent KFF/New York Times survey reveals that health centers are a primary source of care for a substantial portion of the immigrant population – 30% overall, rising to 45% for those likely undocumented. As affordable healthcare options dwindle, reliance on these centers is expected to increase, potentially overwhelming their capacity. States are also reducing state-funded coverage for immigrants, compounding the problem.

Pro Tip: Immigrants should proactively explore all available options, including state-specific programs and community-based resources, to understand their eligibility and access care.

Family Planning Services: A Potential Gap in Care

The recent decision to strip federal Medicaid funding for one year to Planned Parenthood clinics is also raising concerns. This follows a pattern of restrictions on reproductive healthcare access, including actions taken during the Trump administration and a recent Supreme Court ruling.

With fewer options available, demand for family planning services at health centers is likely to surge. In 2023, 18% of female Medicaid enrollees received their last contraceptive visit at a health center, a figure that varies significantly by state. However, health centers may struggle to meet this increased demand, particularly in areas where other reproductive health providers are limited. A report by the Guttmacher Institute suggests that health centers may not be able to readily replace the services provided by Planned Parenthood.

What Does This Mean for Health Centers?

Community health centers are bracing for a significant increase in uninsured patients and demand for services. They will play a critical role in helping individuals navigate the complex changes to Medicaid and the ACA Marketplace, but their resources are already stretched thin. Reduced federal funding for Medicaid, coupled with limitations on provider taxes and state directed payments, will further constrain their ability to provide comprehensive care.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What are provider taxes?
A: Provider taxes are fees levied on healthcare providers by states, often used to draw down additional federal Medicaid funding.

Q: What is the FPL?
A: The Federal Poverty Level is a measure used to determine eligibility for various government assistance programs, including Medicaid and the ACA Marketplace.

Q: Will these changes affect everyone equally?
A: No. Low-income individuals, immigrants, and those living in states with limited safety net programs are likely to be disproportionately affected.

Q: Where can I find more information about Medicaid eligibility?
A: Visit Medicaid.gov or your state’s Medicaid agency website.

Q: What can I do to help?
A: Support organizations that advocate for affordable healthcare access and contact your elected officials to express your concerns.

Reader Question: “I’m worried about losing my Medicaid coverage. What steps should I take now?”

A: It’s wise to be proactive. Ensure your contact information is up-to-date with your state’s Medicaid agency. Be prepared to respond promptly to any requests for information. And don’t hesitate to reach out to a local health center or enrollment assister for help navigating the process.

Explore our other articles on affordable healthcare options and community health centers to learn more. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on healthcare policy and access.

February 4, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Prior Authorization: Top Healthcare Burden for Insured Americans – KFF Poll

by Chief Editor February 2, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Prior Authorization: The Growing Headache for Insured Americans

Navigating the healthcare system is rarely simple, but a new KFF poll reveals a particularly frustrating obstacle: prior authorization. More than a third of insured Americans (32%) identify it as a “major burden” – even more so than struggling with bills, finding in-network providers, or simply getting timely appointments. This isn’t just a minor annoyance; it’s a significant barrier to care, and the problem is poised to worsen.

Why Prior Authorization is Becoming a Bigger Issue

Prior authorization requires healthcare providers to obtain approval from an insurance company before a specific test, treatment, or medication can be administered. While intended to control costs, the process often creates delays, administrative burdens for doctors, and, crucially, can deny patients access to necessary care. The KFF poll highlights that 34% of respondents identified prior authorization as *the single biggest* burden they face when accessing healthcare.

This burden is particularly acute for those managing chronic conditions. Nearly 40% of insured adults with ongoing health needs cite prior authorization as their top challenge – more than double the percentage who point to other hurdles. Consider Sarah, a 55-year-old with rheumatoid arthritis. She routinely faces weeks-long delays in getting her biologic medication approved, leading to debilitating flare-ups and emergency room visits. “It’s a constant battle,” she says. “I have insurance, but it feels like they’re actively trying to prevent me from getting the treatment my doctor prescribes.”

Did you know? The administrative costs associated with prior authorization are estimated to be in the billions of dollars annually, impacting both healthcare providers and insurers. These costs are ultimately passed on to consumers.

The Expanding Scope of Prior Authorization

Historically, prior authorization was primarily used for expensive procedures or brand-name medications. However, insurers are increasingly expanding its use to cover a wider range of services, including routine tests, physical therapy, and even some generic drugs. This trend is driven by several factors:

  • Pressure to Control Costs: Healthcare costs continue to rise, and insurers are seeking ways to manage expenses.
  • Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Influence: PBMs, which negotiate drug prices with manufacturers, often incentivize prior authorization to steer patients towards preferred (and often cheaper) medications.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation: Insurers are investing in AI-powered tools to automate the prior authorization process, but these systems aren’t always accurate or patient-centered.

Looking ahead, expect to see prior authorization applied to even more services, particularly as telehealth and remote patient monitoring become more prevalent. Insurers will likely seek to control costs in these emerging areas, potentially requiring prior authorization for virtual consultations or remote monitoring devices.

The Impact on Mental Health and Financial Well-being

The KFF poll reveals a disturbing link between prior authorization and negative health outcomes. Nearly half of insured adults (47%) have experienced denials, delays, or alterations in their care due to insurance requirements. Among those affected, a significant proportion reported major negative impacts on their mental health (34%), finances (33%), and physical health (26%).

These impacts aren’t just anecdotal. Delays in treatment can lead to worsening conditions, increased hospitalizations, and lost productivity. Financial burdens can force patients to delay or forgo necessary care altogether. The stress and frustration associated with navigating the prior authorization process can exacerbate mental health issues like anxiety and depression.

Pro Tip: Keep detailed records of all communication with your insurance company regarding prior authorization requests. Document dates, times, names of representatives, and any reference numbers. This documentation can be invaluable if you need to appeal a denial.

Future Trends and Potential Solutions

Several trends are shaping the future of prior authorization:

  • Increased Scrutiny from Regulators: State and federal lawmakers are beginning to take notice of the problems associated with prior authorization. Some states are enacting legislation to streamline the process and reduce unnecessary delays.
  • Rise of “Gold Card” Programs: Some insurers are offering “gold card” programs that exempt certain providers or patients from prior authorization requirements based on their track record of appropriate care.
  • Standardization Efforts: Industry groups are working to develop standardized prior authorization forms and processes, which could reduce administrative burdens.
  • Advocacy for Transparency: Patient advocacy groups are pushing for greater transparency in the prior authorization process, including clear explanations of why requests are denied and information about appeal rights.

However, meaningful change will require a multi-faceted approach. This includes legislative reforms, increased transparency from insurers, and a greater focus on patient-centered care. The current system prioritizes cost control over patient access, and that needs to shift.

FAQ

Q: What is prior authorization?
A: It’s a requirement from your insurance company that your doctor get approval before prescribing a medication or ordering a test or procedure.

Q: Can I appeal a prior authorization denial?
A: Yes, you have the right to appeal. Your insurance company should provide information about the appeals process.

Q: What can I do if my prior authorization is delayed?
A: Contact your insurance company and your doctor’s office to inquire about the status of your request. Document all communication.

Q: Is prior authorization going away?
A: While some reforms are being considered, it’s unlikely to disappear entirely. However, efforts to streamline the process and reduce unnecessary burdens are gaining momentum.

Want to learn more about navigating your health insurance? Explore our other articles on healthcare costs and patient rights. Share your experiences with prior authorization in the comments below!

February 2, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Inside the money machine of online casinos and gaming platforms turning play into profit

    May 5, 2026
  • Readers Speak: Vessel seizures top Hormuz risk

    May 4, 2026
  • All-you-can-drink Bali resort kids will go gaga over

    May 4, 2026
  • US to Assist Ships Trapped in Strait of Hormuz

    May 4, 2026
  • Trump: US to Assist Stuck Ships in Strait of Hormuz

    May 4, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World