Craven Week

Kai Pratt, a highly rated front row prospect for the Sharks and the Junior Boks, faces a potential four-year ban after testing positive for an anabolic steroid. South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (Saids) CEO Khalid Galant confirmed the A sample was positive following a routine out-of-competition test on April 10 at a training camp in Stellenbosch.

Why did Kai Pratt test positive for a banned substance?

Pratt tested positive for an anabolic steroid during a routine screening of the Junior Bok squad. According to Khalid Galant, the player was one of five athletes tested on that specific day. Pratt has since employed legal counsel and requested an analysis of his B sample, as permitted by anti-doping protocols.

The Sharks confirmed the situation in a statement, noting they are unable to provide specifics as the process remains confidential. The club stated they take “player welfare, education and compliance with anti-doping regulations extremely seriously.”

Is there a systemic doping problem in South African rugby?

While British media outlets have suggested a systemic issue, no evidence of a state-run doping program has been produced. The Telegraph reported on March 2, drawing a link between the Springboks’ 2019 and 2023 World Cup titles and a decline in domestic testing.

The Telegraph cited data showing South Africa has 89 rugby-related doping violations, accounting for roughly 20% of the global total. However, Galant disputes the idea that fewer tests mean less oversight. He told Daily Maverick that Saids has shifted toward “intelligence-based testing,” using data and tip-offs to be more precise rather than relying on raw volume.

Comparison of Testing Volumes and Violations

How common is doping at the schoolboy and professional levels?

Doping violations are a recurring issue at the annual Craven Week. Galant described a “win at all costs” culture and a tolerance for banned substances among some parents and coaches. Historical data from Craven Week shows a steady stream of positives, mostly anabolic steroids: five in 2015, six in 2018, and three in 2023.

At the professional level, high-profile Springboks have faced bans, including Aphiwe Dyantyi, Sbu Nkosi, and Elton Jantjies. Other affected players include Liam Santos, Nande Lucas, Emile Klassen, and Ngonidzashe Chidoma.

Not all cases involve deliberate cheating. Lions and Bok prop Asenathi Ntlabakanye previously declared a doctor-prescribed substance. In that instance, two medical professionals cleared him to take medications containing banned substances, though neither doctor testified at the hearing.

What happens next for Kai Pratt?

Pratt’s future depends on the B sample result and subsequent legal hearings. If the ban is upheld, he could be sidelined for up to four years. He is currently absent from the Junior Boks’ U20 World Championship campaign in Georgia, though the team officially cited a foot injury and subsequent surgery for his withdrawal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an A sample and a B sample?
The A sample is the primary specimen tested. If it returns a positive result, the athlete can request the B sample be analyzed to confirm the original finding.

Why are testing numbers dropping in South Africa?
Saids cites funding constraints and the closure of South Africa’s only WADA-accredited laboratory. Galant also attributes the drop to a shift toward more precise, intelligence-led testing.

What is the typical penalty for anabolic steroids?
Depending on the circumstances and the ability to prove lack of intent, athletes can face bans ranging from several months up to four years.

Who is Kai Pratt?
Pratt is an 18-year-old prop contracted to the Sharks and a former standout player from Oakdale Landbou.

Join the Conversation: Do you think “intelligence-based testing” is an effective replacement for high-volume screening in youth sports? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more investigative sports reporting.