• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - Cyril Ramaphosa - Page 2
Tag:

Cyril Ramaphosa

News

Sexwale Challenges Ramaphosa’s Phala Phala Account

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 24, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

ANC veteran Tokyo Sexwale has publicly challenged President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala farm scandal, labeling the President’s explanation regarding stolen US dollars as a “cock and bull story.” Sexwale, a highly influential political figure and former Robben Island prisoner, voiced his criticism during an interview on the SMWX podcast.

The controversy centers on the theft of cash from the President’s Phala Phala farm. President Ramaphosa has maintained that the funds were proceeds from the sale of cattle and game to a Sudanese businessman, Hazim Mustafa and were left at the farm to secure future purchases. Sexwale dismissed this account, stating, “The entire explanation surrounding the hidden cash is a cock-and-bull story. It’s a childish story.”

Did You Know? Tokyo Sexwale served 13 years on Robben Island for his anti-apartheid activities alongside figures such as Nelson Mandela, and he previously held the positions of Gauteng Premier and Minister of Human Settlements.

Institutional Concerns and Accountability

Sexwale argued that the President must appear before the newly formed parliamentary impeachment committee to answer for the incident. He specifically questioned the circumstances surrounding the foreign businessman’s entry into South Africa, noting that airport and revenue service records indicate no record of the individual’s arrival. He warned that the scandal is damaging the credibility of vital state institutions, including the South African Police Service (SAPS), the South African Revenue Service (SARS), and the South African Reserve Bank (SARB).

View this post on Instagram about Constitutional Court, South African Police Service
From Instagram — related to Constitutional Court, South African Police Service

This development follows a December 2022 Constitutional Court ruling that found the National Assembly acted unlawfully when it initially rejected an independent panel report into the matter. That panel had identified prima facie evidence of a potential serious constitutional violation. In response, National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza initiated a 31-member Section 89 Impeachment Committee to review the findings and determine if the President should be removed.

Expert Insight: The public critique from a senior ANC figure like Sexwale signals deepening internal fractures within the governing party. As the impeachment committee prepares to convene, the potential for further scrutiny of state institutions—specifically regarding their transparency and procedural integrity—may create significant political headwinds for the administration.

What Lies Ahead

The impeachment committee is tasked with compiling a final report on whether the President should be removed from office. While most political parties have submitted their representatives to the 31-member body, the ANC has reportedly experienced delays in its own deployment process due to internal disputes. Analysts suggest that once the inquiry begins its sessions, it could expose systemic issues within SAPS, SARS, and SARB, potentially complicating the political survival of both the President and the ANC.

Tokyo sexwale episode on Smwx 👏🔥| Sizwe mpofu |

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Tokyo Sexwale calling for the President to appear before an impeachment committee?
Sexwale believes the President’s explanation regarding the origin of the stolen cash is dishonest and insists that the circumstances must be tested through an official parliamentary process.

What is the status of the impeachment committee?
The 31-member committee was established by Speaker Thoko Didiza following a Constitutional Court ruling. While most parties have submitted their representatives, the ANC has faced delays in finalizing its own list of members.

What does the analyst Sandile Swana predict regarding the inquiry?
Swana suggests that a full inquiry may reveal that officials within SAPS, SARS, and SARB did not perform their duties properly, which could negatively impact the standing of the President and the ANC.

Do you believe the forthcoming impeachment committee proceedings will provide the clarity South Africans are seeking regarding the Phala Phala scandal?

May 24, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Didiza rejects motion of no confidence by ATM against Ramaphosa over Phala Phala inquiry

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 20, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has declined a request from African Transformation Movement (ATM) leader Vuyo Zungula to table a motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa. The request, which stemmed from the ongoing Phala Phala scandal, was rejected following similar efforts by the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party to invoke Section 102 of the Constitution.

Legal Grounds for the Decision

In her formal response, Speaker Didiza cited Assembly Rule 129(2), which requires the Speaker to prioritize motions of no confidence while consulting with the Chief Whip and the Leader of Government Business. She further noted that under Rule 129(3), such motions must comply with House rules, relevant laws, and directives from the Rules Committee.

View this post on Instagram about Constitutional Court, President Ramaphosa
From Instagram — related to Constitutional Court, President Ramaphosa

The Speaker determined that the motion’s grounds were already being addressed by the Assembly. This follows the Constitutional Court judgment in Economic Freedom Fighters and Another v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others (2026) ZACC 17.

Didiza emphasized that the theft at the Phala Phala farm has already been referred to an impeachment committee for further inquiry. Under Rule 90, she stated that discussion of the matter should not be anticipated through other mechanisms while this process is underway.

Did You Know? The Phala Phala scandal involves the theft of $580,000 that was allegedly hidden inside a sofa at President Ramaphosa’s farm in Limpopo in February 2020.

Opposition Demands and Constitutional Rulings

The ATM and MK Party argued that recent events have undermined public trust in the president. The ATM specifically submitted a motion targeting both Ramaphosa and his Cabinet, claiming his continued tenure damages the integrity of the Office of the President.

The MK Party requested that any potential vote of no confidence be conducted via secret ballot to protect Members of Parliament from internal intimidation.

These requests followed a Constitutional Court ruling that found Parliament’s previous handling of the Phala Phala report was invalid and unconstitutional. The court overturned a December 2022 decision not to refer the matter to an impeachment committee and ruled that Assembly Rule 129I was unconstitutional.

Expert Insight: This situation highlights a complex procedural tension. While opposition parties are attempting to use motions of no confidence to force immediate accountability, the Speaker is relying on the strict sequence of parliamentary rules and the specific mandates of the Constitutional Court to channel the inquiry through a formal impeachment committee instead.

Current Status and Potential Next Steps

President Ramaphosa has denied any wrongdoing, describing the Section 89 Independent Panel report—chaired by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo—as “flawed.” He has consistently rejected calls from opposition parties to resign.

Didiza rejects ATM's motion of no confidence

Moving forward, the President may seek to overturn the findings of the panel, as he has confirmed he will take the report on judicial review following legal advice. Meanwhile, Parliament is expected to establish the impeachment committee to conduct a full inquiry as ordered by the apex court.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Speaker Thoko Didiza decline the motion of no confidence?
She declined the submission because the grounds for the motion are already being handled by the Assembly via an impeachment committee, as directed by the Constitutional Court. She also cited Rule 90, which prevents the anticipation of a matter already under inquiry.

Frequently Asked Questions
Constitutional Court ruling

What did the Constitutional Court rule regarding the Phala Phala report?
The court ruled that Parliament’s handling of the report was unconstitutional and invalid, specifically overturning the December 2022 decision not to refer the report to an impeachment committee. It also declared Rule 129I of the Assembly’s rules to be unconstitutional.

What is President Ramaphosa’s legal strategy regarding the panel report?
President Ramaphosa intends to take the Section 89 Independent Panel report on judicial review after receiving advice from his legal team.

Do you believe parliamentary committees or motions of no confidence are the more effective tool for ensuring executive accountability?

May 20, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

ANC rejects claims of NEC clash over Mbeki, Phala Phala

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 18, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The African National Congress (ANC) has strongly denied reports of internal conflict during a special National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting. The party refuted claims that tensions flared over comments allegedly directed at former President Thabo Mbeki regarding the Phala Phala saga.

Allegations of Internal Friction

Reports surfaced over the weekend alleging that tensions rose during a closed-door meeting in Cape Town. It was claimed that deputy international relations minister Thandi Moraka criticized Mbeki for his public commentary on the Phala Phala matter.

According to reports from Sunday World, Moraka accused Mbeki of posturing as a “super leader” whose views were treated as “alpha and omega” within certain sections of the ANC. Moraka, who is viewed as closely aligned with President Cyril Ramaphosa, reportedly expressed concern over senior veterans discussing sensitive internal issues publicly rather than using party structures.

Did You Know? In early 2023, Thabo Mbeki wrote to ANC deputy president Paul Mashatile to question the party’s use of its parliamentary majority to block the adoption of the Section 89 panel report into President Ramaphosa.

The Phala Phala Context

The reported dispute allegedly occurred during discussions regarding the ANC’s communication strategy. This followed a recent Constitutional Court judgment that ordered Parliament to establish an impeachment inquiry into the Phala Phala scandal.

Former President Mbeki has been openly critical of how the ANC has handled the matter since 2022. This friction exists alongside a broader legal battle involving the presidency.

Expert Insight: The clash between established party veterans and current leadership underscores a significant tension regarding the boundary between internal party loyalty and public accountability. When senior figures weigh in on legal scandals, it may signal a deeper fragmentation in the party’s unified front.

ANC Rejects Media Reports

ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu dismissed the reports as “fabricated and unsubstantiated,” stating the party rejects them with contempt. Bhengu asserted that the alleged confrontations did not occur during the special NEC meeting.

“The ANC believes this article stands as an example of how the media should not operate. Freedom of the press carries with it a responsibility to report truthfully, fairly and ethically, not to deliberately sow division through anonymous and unverifiable claims,” Bhengu said.

Ramaphosa’s Stance and Legal Challenges

Despite calls for his resignation following the apex court’s ruling, President Cyril Ramaphosa has stated he will not step down. He maintains that he has not stolen public money, committed any crime, or violated his oath of office since a criminal complaint was filed in June 2022.

ANC NEC meeting debates Phala Phala farm robbery

Ramaphosa intends to proceed with a 2022 plan to challenge the findings of the independent panel. This decision to revive a judicial review of the Section 89 Independent Panel Report has been sharply condemned by the EFF, which claims the President is using legal mechanisms to avoid accountability.

Potential Developments

The situation may lead to further legal challenges as Ramaphosa pursues the judicial review of the panel’s findings. This process could result in continued pressure from opposition parties like the EFF.

the party’s internal stability may be tested as Parliament moves to establish the impeachment inquiry ordered by the Constitutional Court.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the ANC deny the reports of NEC tensions?
National spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu stated that the reports were fabricated and unsubstantiated, claiming no such confrontations occurred during the meeting.

What specific accusations were allegedly made against Thabo Mbeki?
It was reported that Thandi Moraka accused Mbeki of acting as a “super leader” and criticized him for commenting on sensitive internal matters publicly.

Does President Ramaphosa intend to resign?
No. President Ramaphosa has stated he will not resign, as doing so would pre-empt a process defined by the constitution.

Do you believe senior party veterans should use public platforms to critique internal party decisions?

May 18, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

ANC says Ramaphosa’s Tolashe removal shows commitment to ethical governance

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 15, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Cyril Ramaphosa has removed Sisisi Tolashe from her position as Minister of Social Development. The decision has prompted a widespread political response, with parties across the spectrum describing the move as a necessary step amid growing public pressure and mounting allegations.

ANC Praises Commitment to Ethics

The African National Congress (ANC) has praised the intervention, framing it as a demonstration of the government’s commitment to ethical governance. ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu stated the party “welcomes President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to remove Comrade Sisisi Tolashe as Minister of Social Development in line with his constitutional responsibilities and commitment to ethical governance.”

View this post on Instagram about Department of Social Development, President Cyril Ramaphosa
From Instagram — related to Department of Social Development, President Cyril Ramaphosa

To maintain stability, Sindisiwe Chikunga has been appointed as the acting minister. The governing party noted that this appointment would ensure “continuity, stability and uninterrupted service delivery in this critical portfolio.”

Bhengu further asserted that the move shows the seriousness with which the ANC and the President approach the fight against corruption, maladministration, and ethical lapses. The party argued that anti-corruption efforts have “moved beyond rhetoric into concrete action” through accountability measures and Special Investigating Unit proclamations.

Did You Know? RISE Mzansi highlighted that the Department of Social Development manages nearly R300 billion in public funds.

Opposition Parties Claim Pressure Forced Action

While opposition parties also welcomed the removal, several suggested the President only acted after sustained political and public pressure. Democratic Alliance (DA) leader Geordin Hill-Lewis stated the DA welcomes the firing “following the relentless pressure applied by the DA for her removal from Cabinet.”

Opposition Parties Claim Pressure Forced Action
Department of Social Development

Hill-Lewis described Tolashe’s position as “untenable” and urged the President to urgently appoint a permanent replacement. He emphasized that South Africans deserve a credible minister who can lead the department with integrity and a focus on serving vulnerable people.

Similarly, Freedom Front Plus MP Philip van Staden argued that the President had “no choice” but to dismiss Tolashe as allegations intensified. Van Staden cited claims regarding the “improper use of vehicles donated by the Chinese Embassy,” the alleged employment of a state official as a private caregiver, and irregular appointments within the department.

Expert Insight: This dismissal reflects a high-stakes environment within the Government of National Unity. The swift reaction from multiple opposition parties suggests that the Department of Social Development has become a primary litmus test for whether the current administration can translate its anti-corruption rhetoric into tangible administrative consequences.

Demands for Transparency

RISE Mzansi described the removal as a “necessary step toward restoring the public’s trust” in a department serving the country’s most vulnerable. The party pointed to the “highly irregular appointment of an unqualified Chief of Staff” and unresolved questions regarding luxury vehicle donations as major distractions.

RISE Mzansi warned that public funds should not be managed under an “ethical cloud,” stating that accountability “must be the standard, not the exception.”

Future Implications

Following this decision, political parties may continue to demand that the full report and findings leading to the dismissal be disclosed to the public. There is likely to be continued pressure on President Ramaphosa to swiftly appoint a permanent minister to restore stability to the department.

The government could face further scrutiny over governance and accountability as parties call for greater transparency regarding the circumstances of Tolashe’s exit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has been appointed to lead the department in the interim?
Sindisiwe Chikunga has been appointed as the acting minister to ensure continuity and stability.

What specific allegations were cited by the Freedom Front Plus?
MP Philip van Staden cited allegations involving irregular appointments, the alleged use of a state official as a private caregiver, and the improper use of vehicles donated by the Chinese Embassy.

How did the ANC characterize the President’s decision?
The ANC described the move as a demonstration of the government’s commitment to accountability and ethical governance, showing seriousness in tackling corruption and maladministration.

Do you believe the appointment of an acting minister is sufficient to restore public trust in the Department of Social Development?

May 15, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

EFF and MKP walk out as Ramaphosa faces heated Parliament session

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 14, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

Tensions peaked in Parliament on Thursday as President Cyril Ramaphosa faced a session of oral questions. The proceedings were marked by a dramatic walkout by members of the EFF and the MKP.

The volatility stemmed from a desire by some members to address a Constitutional Court ruling regarding the Phala Phala farm theft matter. Speaker Thokozile Didiza intervened, ruling that members were prohibited from speaking on matters outside the official agenda.

Impeachment and the Phala Phala Saga

The current friction follows a directive from the Constitutional Court, which ordered Parliament to establish a process to determine whether impeachment proceedings against the president should be considered.

While the official agenda focused on government initiatives, opposition parties are likely to shift attention back to the Phala Phala scandal. They argue that unanswered questions surrounding the matter continue to damage public trust in the presidency.

Did You Know? The Constitutional Court has specifically directed Parliament to establish a process to determine if impeachment proceedings against President Ramaphosa should be considered in relation to the Phala Phala farm theft.

Operation Prosper and Economic Goals

President Ramaphosa was expected to brief members of Parliament on Operation Prosper, the government’s military deployment designed to target illegal mining and gang violence.

MK Party & EFF walk out of Parliament refusing to be addressed by Ramaphosa.

the president’s briefing was intended to cover efforts to reduce unemployment and attract new investment to the country.

Expert Insight: The clash between the official agenda—focused on security and economics—and the opposition’s focus on the Phala Phala ruling highlights a significant struggle for the narrative within the Government of National Unity. The insistence on impeachment processes suggests that legal rulings are now being leveraged as primary political tools to challenge executive stability.

Scrutiny of Cabinet and Police Leadership

The session also brought focus to allegations involving Social Development Minister Sisi Tolashe. Members of Parliament have raised concerns regarding leadership and accountability within her department.

Scrutiny of Cabinet and Police Leadership
Speaker Thokozile Didiza

The Democratic Alliance (DA) has called for stronger action, stating that “the allegations now facing Minister Tolashe can no longer be treated as minor political controversy or an internal party matter.”

The DA further detailed that the situation evolved from questions about vehicles allegedly donated for the ANC Women’s League and registered in the names of the Minister’s children into “a broader set of allegations involving possible abuse of public office, possible misleading of Parliament.”

The DA emphasized that the Government of National Unity (GNU) “cannot be in a lousy position because of an individual.”

Simultaneously, SAPS National Commissioner Fannie Masemola remains under scrutiny. His suspension and ongoing court processes have raised wider questions regarding the stability of the country’s policing leadership.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the MKP and EFF walk out of the Parliament session?
The parties walked out after Speaker Thokozile Didiza ruled that members could not speak on matters outside the official agenda, specifically regarding the Constitutional Court ruling on the Phala Phala saga.

What is Operation Prosper?
Operation Prosper is a government military deployment aimed at targeting illegal mining and gang violence.

What are the specific allegations against Minister Sisi Tolashe?
Allegations involve vehicles reportedly registered in the names of the Minister’s children and allegedly donated for the benefit of the ANC Women’s League, leading to claims of possible misleading of Parliament and abuse of public office.

How should a government balance urgent security deployments with the need to address leadership accountability?

May 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

MPs express fury over clearance of PPS officers amid IPID findings

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 14, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

Parliamentarians expressed outrage on Wednesday after two Presidential Protection Services (PPS) officers were cleared by internal South African Police Service (SAPS) disciplinary proceedings. This outcome occurred despite the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) making adverse findings against the officials.

The controversy centers on PPS head Major-General Wally Rhoode and Constable HH Rekhoto. Members of Parliament accused law enforcement agencies of conducting a cover-up and applying inconsistent standards for senior officers involved in the Phala Phala matter.

Investigation Findings and Allegations

The investigation began following a July 2022 complaint by ATM leader Vuyo Zungula. IPID acting head of investigations, Thuso Keefelakae, detailed allegations including the failure to report crimes under the SAPS Act and the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act (PRECCA), as well as kidnapping, assault, and torture.

View this post on Instagram about General Rhoode, Investigation Findings and Allegations
From Instagram — related to General Rhoode, Investigation Findings and Allegations

The IPID probe specifically found that Major-General Rhoode failed to report offenses to the then-national commissioner Khehla Sitole and did not ensure the registration of case dockets regarding theft and housebreaking at the Phala Phala farm.

the investigation revealed that Rhoode conducted interviews with suspects while Constable Rekhoto traveled to Cape Town to survey suspect addresses. These activities were identified as the alleged unlawful use of state resources.

Did You Know? The IPID investigation found that while Rhoode and former presidential advisor Bejani Chauke traveled to Namibia, the unlawfulness of the border crossing could not be conclusively established.

Conflict Over Disciplinary Outcomes

The IPID submitted recommendations for disciplinary action against Rhoode and Rekhoto in October 2023. However, SAPS conducted its own internal hearings and notified IPID of a “not guilty” outcome in May 2024.

SAPS officials maintained that the disciplinary tribunal was independent and that the organization complied with recommendations from the Public Protector, and IPID. Acting National Commissioner Puleng Dimpane asserted that no special treatment was given, stating that all members are subjected to hearings equally regardless of rank.

IPID acting head Hlengani Bila defended the decision to classify the Phala Phala report, arguing it was necessary to protect the integrity of parallel investigations.

Expert Insight: This situation highlights a critical tension between independent oversight bodies and internal police disciplinary mechanisms. When an external watchdog like IPID finds misconduct but internal tribunals clear the officers, it creates a perception of “bizarre standards” that may undermine public confidence in law enforcement accountability.

Political Fallout and Legal Status

The findings sparked sharp criticism from across the political spectrum. DA MP Diane Barnard-Kohler described the disciplinary process as involving “bizarre standards,” while ADCP leader Kenneth Meshoe suggested that a senior official’s failure to register a criminal act could be indicative of corruption.

MK Party MP David Skosana questioned the independence of the IPID and suggested the matter would be addressed during impeachment proceedings. Similarly, EFF MP Muzi Khoza raised concerns regarding the absence of meaningful consequences for the alleged misconduct.

Meanwhile, DPCI head Siphesihle Nkosi reported that while a prosecutor declined to prosecute corruption and money laundering charges, the housebreaking and theft case remains in court. A hearing is expected later this month, with extradition requests lodged for two outstanding foreign suspects.

Potential Next Steps

Given the expressed dissatisfaction of parliamentarians, there may be further calls for transparency regarding the classified IPID report. The ongoing court case regarding housebreaking and theft could provide new evidence that may influence the narrative surrounding the officers’ conduct.

Depending on the outcome of the upcoming court hearing, there is a possibility that the impeachment process mentioned by some MPs could further scrutinize the “shenanigans and cover-ups” alleged by political critics.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which officers were cleared despite IPID’s findings?

Major-General Wally Rhoode, the head of the Presidential Protection Services, and Constable HH Rekhoto were cleared by SAPS internal disciplinary proceedings.

What specific misconduct did the IPID find regarding Major-General Rhoode?

The IPID found that Rhoode failed to report offenses to the then-national commissioner and failed to ensure that case dockets for housebreaking and theft at the Phala Phala farm were registered.

What is the current status of the criminal cases related to the Phala Phala farm?

The investigation into corruption and money laundering was finalized with a decision not to prosecute. However, the housebreaking and theft case is currently in court and is due to be heard later this month.

Do you believe internal police tribunals are the appropriate venue for judging senior officials in high-profile cases?

May 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

We are all equal before the law’ as he awaits Constitutional Court ruling on Phala Phala case

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 7, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The Constitutional Court is set to deliver a ruling this Friday on whether the National Assembly acted rationally when it rejected a report detailing alleged misconduct by President Cyril Ramaphosa.

The case centers on a December 2022 vote where Parliament voted 214 to 148 against adopting the Section 89 Independent Panel Report. This report had found prima facie evidence that the President may have violated his oath of office.

The Legal Battle Over Parliamentary Discretion

The EFF and the African Transformation Movement (ATM) argue that the National Assembly’s decision to reject the report was irrational and served as an attempt to shield the President.

View this post on Instagram about National Assembly, Independent Panel Report
From Instagram — related to National Assembly, Independent Panel Report

Conversely, the National Assembly maintains it acted within its discretionary powers. It argues that the courts should not interfere with internal parliamentary decisions to uphold the separation of powers.

Did You Know? The National Assembly’s decision to reject the Section 89 Independent Panel Report was finalized with a vote of 214 to 148.

Allegations of Cover-Ups and Misconduct

The controversy stems from a February 2020 burglary at the Phala Phala farm. Arthur Fraser, the former head of the State Security Agency, filed a criminal complaint at the Rosebank police station regarding the incident.

Fraser alleged that approximately $4 million was stolen—a figure later contested by the President, who stated the amount was $580,000. Fraser further claimed the money was not declared to the Reserve Bank.

According to Fraser’s 2022 affidavit, the incident was not reported to the police. Instead, he alleges President Ramaphosa instructed Major General Wally Rhoode of the Presidential Protection Unit to lead a secret investigation.

Fraser claims Rhoode assembled a team of former SAPS members, Crime Intelligence officials, and a local farmer to retrieve the funds. He further alleges that suspects were kidnapped and interrogated on the property and that a domestic worker was paid R150,000 for her silence.

Expert Insight: This case represents a critical intersection between executive privilege and constitutional accountability. The court’s decision will likely clarify the extent to which parliamentary discretion can be challenged when it involves prima facie evidence of a head of state’s misconduct.

Findings of the Independent Panel

The panel, led by retired Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo, concluded in November 2022 that there was prima facie evidence that Ramaphosa may have committed serious violations of the law and the Constitution.

The report stated that the President acted in a manner inconsistent with his office and exposed himself to a conflict between official responsibilities and private business interests.

The panel also found that the President potentially violated the Constitution by engaging in paid work through his farming business and should answer for the use of state resources for a secret investigation without a registered case docket.

Potential Legal Violations

Fraser has alleged that the possession of undisclosed foreign currency in furniture constitutes prima facie proof of money laundering under Section 4 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act No. 121 of 1998.

Constitutional Law: Equal Protection (Pt.1) — Analytical Framework

He further suggested the conduct may contravene Section 36 of the General Law Amendment Act no 62 of 1955, regarding the unexplained possession of suspected stolen goods and violations of currency and exchange control laws.

Fraser argued that payments to suspects and the domestic worker may constitute corruption under the Prevention of Corrupt Activities Act and were intended to obstruct the course of justice.

What May Happen Next

If the Constitutional Court finds the National Assembly’s rejection was irrational, it could lead to a requirement for Parliament to reconsider the report’s findings.

A ruling in favor of the EFF and ATM may potentially reopen the path toward an impeachment inquiry, as suggested by the original panel report.

However, if the court upholds the National Assembly’s decision, it may reinforce the principle of separation of powers regarding internal parliamentary proceedings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Constitutional Court ruling on Friday about?
The court is ruling on the rationality of the National Assembly’s December 2022 decision to reject the Section 89 Independent Panel Report.

What did the Section 89 panel find regarding President Ramaphosa?
The panel found prima facie evidence that the President may have violated his oath of office, acted inconsistently with his office, and potentially violated the Constitution through his farming business.

What are the specific allegations made by Arthur Fraser?
Fraser alleges a cover-up of a farm burglary, the use of state resources for a secret investigation, the kidnapping and interrogation of suspects, and the payment of a domestic worker to ensure silence.

Do you believe the separation of powers should prevent courts from reviewing parliamentary votes on executive conduct?

May 7, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

We will not be bullied, SA tells US

by Rachel Morgan News Editor March 23, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

A recent march in Johannesburg signaled growing public frustration with perceived US interference in South African affairs, coinciding with a resurgence of grassroots support for the African National Congress (ANC) ahead of the 2026 local government elections.

Rising Tensions

The demonstration, which proceeded from Newtown to Constitution Hill in Braamfontein, saw protesters carrying placards with messages like “We will not be bullied” and “In defence of our sovereignty and democratic gains.” These sentiments mirrored earlier warnings from President Cyril Ramaphosa against what he termed bullying tactics from the United States.

ICJ Case and US Intervention

The escalating tensions are further complicated by differing views on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case concerning allegations of genocide. President Ramaphosa has criticised US President Donald Trump’s attacks on South Africa’s foreign policy and transformation initiatives. Trump has accused the South African government of enabling “white genocide” due to farm killings, a claim rejected by the South African government, civil society, and international observers.

The ICJ has found genocidal intent plausible, and the International Criminal Court has indicted Israeli officials for crimes against humanity. On March 13th, the US formally intervened at the ICJ, labeling South Africa’s genocide allegations as false and aiming to prevent a ruling of genocide against Israel, a key US ally. The US argued that Israel does not possess the “specific intent” required to establish genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention and suggested the case is part of a broader campaign against the country.

Did You Know? The African National Congress (ANC) was founded in 1912 as the South African Native National Congress.

Ambassadorial Concerns

Recently, US Ambassador to South Africa, Leo Brent Bozell III, expressed disappointment with Pretoria’s response to “five asks” from the US government. These requests include abolishing broad-based black economic empowerment, addressing farm attacks, handling the “Kill the Boer” song, reconsidering land expropriation, securing a deal regarding South Africa’s critical minerals, and resolving issues related to digital transformation.

The ANC has refused to alter its transformation policies, and ANC deputy secretary-general Nomvula Mokonyane criticised the US envoy for making “undiplomatic statements.” The People’s March culminated in the presentation of a memorandum to Minister of Justice Mmamoloko Kubayi.

Expert Insight: The current diplomatic friction highlights a fundamental disagreement over sovereignty and the right of nations to pursue their own internal policies without external pressure. The US’s intervention in the ICJ case and its direct requests to South Africa demonstrate a willingness to actively shape the political landscape, which is being met with increasing resistance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ANC’s position on the US requests?

The ANC has refused to alter its transformation policies and criticised the US Ambassador for “undiplomatic statements.”

What is the US position on the ICJ case?

The US formally intervened at the ICJ, labelling South Africa’s genocide allegations as false and aiming to prevent a ruling of genocide against Israel.

What was the purpose of the march in Johannesburg?

The march was a demonstration of public frustration with the United States’ involvement in South Africa’s internal affairs.

As relations between South Africa and the United States become increasingly strained, what impact might this have on future diplomatic and economic cooperation between the two nations?

March 23, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

An intimate, final memorial for Rev. Jesse Jackson fills civil rights leader’s Chicago headquarters

by Rachel Morgan News Editor March 8, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

CHICAGO (AP) — Following a public celebration of his life, Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. Was honored with a more private memorial service Saturday at the Rainbow PUSH Coalition headquarters on the South Side of Chicago. The service, attended by approximately a few hundred family members, allies, and confidants, marked the culmination of a week of commemorations.

A Call to Continue the Work

Speakers at the homegoing service, including Jackson’s children, civil rights leaders, and presidents from African nations, emphasized that the best way to honor his legacy is to continue advocating for universal human rights and economic justice. Yusef Jackson, one of the late reverend’s sons and president of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, stated, “This proves appropriate that we respect this season of grief…Even though, it is also appropriate to honor him by stepping up, to step out, and continue his work by answering his call to serve.”

Did You Know? Rev. Jesse Jackson led a protest as a high schooler that desegregated a local library in segregated Greenville, South Carolina, marking the beginning of his lifelong commitment to civil rights leadership.

The Rainbow PUSH Coalition has recently deepened partnerships with activists in Minnesota, following mass protests sparked by what was described as the largest Homeland Security operation ever launched in the state under the Trump administration.

Legacy of Equality and Diversity

U.S. Rep. Jonathan Jackson, an Illinois Democrat and the late reverend’s son, recalled his father’s teachings, stating, “any society that will not support the many who are poor will never be able to save the few who are rich.” He added that his father’s activism and charisma stemmed from a Christian call to service, and that Jackson “was speaking to the children on the reservations, in the barrios, in the ghettos.”

Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, suggested that future presidential candidates should study Jackson’s “rainbow coalition” strategy. He stated, “Let the word go out that anyone who would like to be president of the United States in 2028, you’d better study this concept of the rainbow coalition.”

International Impact and Personal Reflections

The service included musical performances by Stevie Wonder, Opal Staples, Terisa Griffin, Kim Burrell, and a comedy set by Chris Tucker. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa acknowledged Jackson’s role in ending South Africa’s apartheid system, noting Jackson was a close friend of Nelson Mandela. Ramaphosa stated Jackson “told the world that the struggle for dignity in the United States was inseparable from the fight against apartheid and injustice in South Africa.”

Felix Tshisekedi, president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, praised Jackson as a peacemaker and humanitarian, saying, “Your mourning is also ours…The world has lost a pastor, a champion, a mender of bridges. Africa has lost a faithful, loving son.”

Expert Insight: The emphasis on continuing Jackson’s work suggests a deliberate effort by his family and allies to translate his legacy into ongoing activism and political engagement. The broadening of the coalition’s focus to include current issues, such as the situation in Minnesota, indicates an intent to remain relevant in a changing political landscape.

Looking Ahead

Members of the Jackson family and supporters are expected to travel to Selma, Alabama, on Sunday to commemorate the “Bloody Sunday” protest marches. Jackson frequently attended this anniversary march, and organizers say Selma represents the core principles of the civil rights movement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of Saturday’s service?

The service at the Rainbow PUSH Coalition headquarters was a private memorial service for Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr., attended by family, allies, and confidants, serving as a capstone to a week of commemorations.

What did speakers at the service emphasize?

Speakers emphasized that the best way to honor Jackson’s legacy is to continue his advocacy for universal human rights and economic justice.

What is the significance of the upcoming trip to Selma, Alabama?

The trip to Selma, Alabama, is to commemorate the “Bloody Sunday” protest marches, an event Jackson often attended, and represents the core principles of the civil rights movement.

As Rev. Jackson’s family and allies move forward, how will they ensure his message of equality and justice continues to resonate with future generations?

March 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
World

South Africa expels Israel’s top diplomat over insulting posts

by Chief Editor January 30, 2026
written by Chief Editor

South Africa-Israel Rift: A Harbinger of Shifting Global Alliances?

The recent tit-for-tat expulsion of diplomats between South Africa and Israel marks a significant escalation in a relationship already strained by the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Beyond the immediate diplomatic fallout, this event signals a potentially broader realignment of global powers and a growing willingness to publicly challenge established norms.

The Spark: Social Media and Diplomatic Protocol

The immediate trigger for South Africa’s action was reportedly social media posts by Ariel Seidman, Israel’s deputy ambassador, deemed insulting to President Cyril Ramaphosa and a breach of diplomatic etiquette. While the specifics of these posts remain somewhat unclear, the incident highlights the increasing importance – and potential pitfalls – of digital diplomacy. Governments are now navigating a landscape where a single tweet can ignite international crises. This isn’t isolated; in 2023, the US expelled a South African ambassador over comments regarding the “Make America Great Again” movement, demonstrating a growing sensitivity to perceived slights.

Pro Tip: Diplomats today need robust social media training. A poorly worded post can have far-reaching consequences, exceeding the impact of traditional diplomatic channels.

South Africa’s Bold Stance and the ICJ Case

South Africa’s decision to bring a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), alleging genocide in Gaza, is at the heart of this escalating tension. This move, while lauded by Palestinian supporters, has drawn sharp criticism from Israel, which accuses South Africa of acting as a proxy for Hamas. The ICJ case itself is unprecedented, representing a significant legal challenge to Israel’s actions. The outcome, regardless of the verdict, will likely have lasting implications for international law and the conduct of armed conflict.

The historical context is crucial. South Africa, having overcome its own history of apartheid, positions itself as a staunch advocate for Palestinian rights. This moral stance, coupled with its growing influence within the BRICS economic bloc (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), gives its actions added weight.

The BRICS Factor: A New World Order?

The BRICS nations, representing a significant portion of the world’s population and economic power, are increasingly asserting their independence from traditional Western influence. South Africa’s stance on Israel aligns with the generally pro-Palestinian views held by many BRICS members. This suggests a potential shift in the geopolitical landscape, where countries are less hesitant to challenge the policies of major powers like the United States and its allies.

Did you know? BRICS nations are actively exploring alternatives to the US dollar for international trade, further signaling a desire for greater economic autonomy.

US Response and the Risk of Further Isolation

The United States, a staunch ally of Israel, has already expressed strong disapproval of South Africa’s actions. The Trump administration, in particular, has been openly critical of South Africa’s foreign policy, accusing it of being anti-American and supportive of Iran and Hamas. This friction could lead to further diplomatic and economic repercussions, potentially isolating South Africa on the international stage. However, South Africa appears willing to accept this risk in pursuit of its principles.

The Future of Diplomatic Engagement

This situation raises critical questions about the future of diplomatic engagement. Traditional methods of quiet diplomacy seem increasingly ineffective in a world of instant communication and heightened political polarization. The use of international courts, while potentially divisive, may become a more common avenue for resolving disputes. Furthermore, the role of social media in shaping public opinion and influencing diplomatic relations will only continue to grow.

The expulsion of diplomats is rarely a solution, but it can serve as a dramatic signal of deeper underlying tensions. The South Africa-Israel rift is a microcosm of a larger global struggle for power and influence, and its resolution – or lack thereof – will have far-reaching consequences.

FAQ

Q: What does “persona non grata” mean?
A: It’s a Latin term meaning “an unwelcome person.” It’s a diplomatic designation used to signal that a foreign diplomat is no longer acceptable in a country.

Q: What is the ICJ and what is its role in this conflict?
A: The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. South Africa brought a case alleging that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ is investigating these claims.

Q: How does the BRICS alliance influence this situation?
A: BRICS nations generally support the Palestinian cause and are increasingly challenging the dominance of Western powers, giving South Africa political backing.

Q: Will this affect trade relations between South Africa and Israel?
A: It’s likely. Diplomatic tensions often lead to economic consequences, and trade between the two countries could be significantly reduced.

What are your thoughts on the evolving relationship between South Africa and Israel? Share your perspective in the comments below!

Explore more articles on international relations and geopolitical trends here.

January 30, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • 60,000 University Seats Vacant: Why Students Are Skipping Enrollment

    June 27, 2026
  • Iran and US Trade Accusations Over Ceasefire Violations

    June 27, 2026
  • Motorola Moto Pad 70 Pro: Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, 144Hz Display, and 10,200mAh Battery

    June 27, 2026
  • Zahid: BN Victory in Johor Polls to Align State and Federal Governments

    June 27, 2026
  • Qantas Passengers Stranded on Auckland Tarmac for 8+ Hours

    June 27, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World