• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - dark energy
Tag:

dark energy

Business

Could a New Universe Form Inside a Dying Star?

by Chief Editor June 18, 2026
written by Chief Editor

A new theoretical model suggests that collapsing massive stars may form “gravastars”—ultra-compact objects containing a mini-universe—rather than black holes. Published in Physical Review D by Daniel Jampolski and Professor Luciano Rezzolla of Goethe University Frankfurt, the research provides a dynamic solution to Albert Einstein’s equations of General Relativity, proposing that dark energy within a core expansion could halt stellar collapse before a singularity occurs.

What is a Gravastar?

A gravastar, or gravitational vacuum star, is a hypothetical astrophysical object that serves as an alternative to the black hole model. While black holes are defined by a singularity—a point of infinite density—and an event horizon from which nothing can escape, gravastars avoid these mathematical paradoxes. According to Jampolski and Rezzolla, these objects consist of ordinary matter in their outer layers, while the interior is filled with dark energy. This internal pressure provides the necessary force to counteract gravitational collapse, maintaining structural stability without the need for an infinitely curved spacetime singularity.

What is a Gravastar?
Did you know?
The term “gravastar” was first coined by Pawel Mazur and Emil Mottola in 2001. Their original proposal suggested these objects could be the end-state of stellar collapse, though a dynamic formation mechanism remained unproven for over two decades.

How does a mini-universe form inside a star?

The research proposes that during the final stages of a massive star’s life, a miniature universe emerges within the collapsing matter. As the star exhausts its nuclear fuel, gravity forces an inward collapse. Jampolski and Rezzolla’s solution suggests that at this extreme state of compression, a process similar to the Big Bang occurs. This internal expansion generates an outward force that balances the inward pull of gravity. “The Big Bang of the emerging universe can unfold once the star has already collapsed almost to the point of becoming a black hole,” Jampolski states. This equilibrium creates a stable, compact object that mimics the mass and density of a black hole without the singularity.

Why do physicists look for alternatives to black holes?

Black holes rely on the existence of a singularity, a concept that challenges the limits of General Relativity. At the singularity, the known laws of physics cease to provide reliable predictions, and the infinite curvature of spacetime creates a mathematical “breakdown.” By proposing gravastars, physicists aim to resolve these inconsistencies. Rezzolla emphasizes that this research is not intended to disprove black holes, which remain the most accepted model for stellar collapse. Instead, the study encourages an unbiased approach to extreme gravity, noting that theoretical “exotic” interpretations have frequently evolved into accepted scientific wisdom throughout the history of physics.

Nikhef interview about gravitational waves with Luciano Rezzolla
Pro Tip:
When researching compact objects, differentiate between “observed” black holes—identified by X-ray emissions or gravitational waves—and “theoretical” objects like gravastars, which currently exist only as solutions to Einstein’s field equations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are gravastars the same as black holes?

No. While both are ultra-compact, black holes contain a singularity and an event horizon. Gravastars are theorized to lack a singularity, using dark energy pressure to remain stable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can we observe a gravastar?

Not yet. Because gravastars would be nearly as compact as black holes, they are extremely difficult to detect with current technology. Researchers are still developing observational signatures that could distinguish them from black holes.

Does this discovery mean black holes don’t exist?

No. According to Professor Rezzolla, black holes remain the simplest and most natural explanation for gravitational collapse. This study offers a mathematical alternative that addresses specific theoretical problems within General Relativity.


What do you think about the possibility of mini-universes hidden within stars? Share your thoughts in the comments section below or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates on the latest breakthroughs in theoretical astrophysics.

June 18, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

Gravastars vs. Black Holes: Do Collapsing Stars Create Exotic Alternatives?

by Chief Editor June 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Theoretical physicists have developed a new model demonstrating that collapsing stars could potentially form “gravastars” instead of black holes, offering a solution to the mathematical paradoxes of singularities. According to research published in Physical Review D by Daniel Jampolski and Luciano Rezzolla of Goethe University Frankfurt, a star’s collapse can be halted by an expanding “de Sitter bubble” of vacuum energy, preventing the formation of an event horizon and a point of infinite density.

How a Gravastar Avoids the Singularity

A gravastar, or gravitational vacuum condensate star, serves as a theoretical alternative to the black hole model where spacetime caves in on itself. As reported in the study, the collapse of a star triggers a “miniature Big Bang” at its core. This de Sitter region produces an outward pressure derived from dark-energy-like vacuum energy. When this force balances against the star’s gravity, the collapse terminates before the matter reaches the critical point of forming an event horizon. This mechanism allows the object to remain a stable, massive, and compact structure without necessitating a singularity where physical laws cease to function.

Did you know?
The term “gravastar” was coined to describe a “gravitational vacuum condensate star.” Unlike black holes, which are defined by an event horizon that traps light, a gravastar is theoretically an object with a physical surface that could prevent the loss of information.

The Limits of Stellar Collapse

The research establishes specific mathematical boundaries for when this phenomenon can occur. Jampolski and Rezzolla calculated a maximum compactness limit of 0.375 for a star to successfully form a gravastar. This figure sits just below the established Buchdahl limit of 0.444, which defines the general relativistic bounds for stable, static, spherical objects. If a star exceeds the 0.375 threshold, the model indicates that the internal pressure from the de Sitter bubble will fail to halt the collapse, resulting in the formation of a standard black hole.

The Limits of Stellar Collapse

Why Black Holes Remain the Standard

Despite the mathematical consistency of the gravastar model, Luciano Rezzolla emphasizes that black holes remain the most probable outcome of stellar death. In their findings, the authors note that gravastar formation is highly selective, requiring an “infinitely tuned” balance of energy density and spatial curvature to prevent a complete collapse. While the model provides a valid theoretical framework, it does not suggest that current black hole candidates identified by astronomers are necessarily gravastars. Instead, it serves as a foundational exercise to explore what extreme gravity might allow within the bounds of Einstein’s general relativity.

Why Black Holes Remain the Standard
Pro Tip:
To distinguish between black holes and gravastars, researchers are focusing on gravitational-wave signatures. Because gravastars possess a physical surface rather than an event horizon, they should theoretically produce different “echoes” in gravitational waves during mergers, according to current theoretical simulations.

Future Directions for Compact Object Research

The next phase of this research involves testing these models against more complex, realistic conditions. Currently, the Jampolski-Rezzolla model assumes spherical symmetry and an idealized dust-like state for the outer shell of the star. Future studies must determine if a gravastar could remain stable if the star rotates or if the internal bubble forms off-center. These departures from symmetry are critical, as they could potentially destabilize the shell and force the object to collapse into a black hole regardless of the initial conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between a black hole and a gravastar?

A black hole contains a singularity where matter is infinitely compressed and an event horizon from which nothing can escape. A gravastar contains an internal region of dark energy and a surface, avoiding both the singularity and the event horizon.

Luciano Rezzolla – Binary neutron stars: from gravitational to particle physics – IPAM at UCLA

Does this study prove that black holes do not exist?

No. According to Luciano Rezzolla, this work provides a mathematically consistent alternative for how a collapse might end, but it does not invalidate observations of black holes, which remain the simplest explanation for observed gravitational phenomena.

Why is the “de Sitter bubble” important?

The de Sitter bubble acts as an internal pressure source that mimics the outward expansion of the universe. It provides the necessary force to counteract gravitational collapse at the final stages of a star’s life.


Are you interested in the latest developments in astrophysics? Subscribe to our newsletter for deep dives into the mysteries of the cosmos and the latest peer-reviewed research.

June 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

Astronomers Discover the Cause of a Dying Galaxy

by Chief Editor June 13, 2026
written by Chief Editor

New data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) reveals that early massive galaxies “died” by rapidly ejecting their gas through powerful winds triggered by intense star formation. Research published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society indicates that these galaxy-scale winds can exhaust a galaxy’s fuel in less than 100 million years, explaining why astronomers observe unexpectedly large numbers of dead galaxies less than 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang.

Why do early galaxies die so young?

Galaxies grow by converting cold gas into stars, but they eventually run out of fuel. According to researchers Rebecca Davies and Deanne Fisher of Swinburne University of Technology, the early universe was far more crowded than today, leading to frequent cosmic collisions. These mergers funnel gas toward galaxy centers, triggering frenzied bursts of star formation. While this growth is rapid, it also creates powerful winds that blast remaining gas into space, effectively shutting down the galaxy’s ability to form new stars.

Did you know?

In the early universe, roughly 40% of large galaxies were in the process of merging, a significantly higher rate than the few percent observed in the present-day universe.

What role do galaxy winds play in star formation?

Galaxy winds are high-speed streams of gas ejected from a galaxy’s center. Astronomers have long identified two primary drivers for these winds: supermassive black holes and exploding stars (supernovae). While black holes were previously considered the primary suspects for “killing” the largest galaxies, the study of the galaxy CRISTAL-02 demonstrates that intense star formation alone can drive winds strong enough to expel gas. This finding challenges the assumption that only black holes possess the power to halt galaxy growth.

How does CRISTAL-02 change our understanding of cosmic history?

CRISTAL-02 serves as a primary case study for “fast and young” galaxy death. Observations show the galaxy is forming stars at twice the rate of its peers, yet it is simultaneously ejecting gas at double the rate it consumes fuel. Because this plume of cold gas is nearly as long as the galaxy itself, researchers conclude the system will likely exhaust its reservoir of star-forming material in under 100 million years. This provides a natural, mechanical explanation for the “dead” galaxies detected by the JWST in the early universe, moving away from theories requiring stronger dark energy.

Rebecca Davies | Galspec Conference Session 4 Pre-recorded Talk | Thursday 14 April 2021

Comparison: Galaxy Death Mechanisms

Mechanism Primary Driver Effect
Supermassive Black Holes High-speed gravitational acceleration Ejects gas from most massive galaxies
Intense Star Formation Supernovae and radiation pressure Drives winds during rapid growth phases

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a dead galaxy?
A dead galaxy is one that has exhausted its cold gas supply and stopped forming new stars.

Comparison: Galaxy Death Mechanisms

Why were scientists surprised by early dead galaxies?
Standard cosmological models predicted that galaxies needed more than 10 billion years to age and die; seeing them in the first billion years defied those expectations.

How do telescopes see “invisible” winds?
The JWST detects hot, fast-moving gas, while the ALMA radio telescope measures the cold, star-forming gas being swept away. Combining these datasets provides a full picture of the ejection process.

Pro Tip:

To keep up with the latest deep-space discoveries, follow the official James Webb Space Telescope mission updates for real-time imagery and data releases.

Have questions about the early universe or want to share your thoughts on these findings? Join the conversation in the comments section below or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly astronomy updates.

June 13, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

NASA’s $4 Billion Roman Space Telescope Arrives in Florida for Launch

by Chief Editor June 2, 2026
written by Chief Editor

For decades, the Hubble Space Telescope has served as our window into the deep past of the universe. But as we stand on the precipice of a new era in space exploration, NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is preparing to turn that window into a panoramic view. By combining Hubble’s legendary image quality with a field of view 100 times larger, this mission is set to rewrite the textbooks on cosmic evolution and exoplanetary science.

The Next Frontier: Why “Wide-Field” Matters

Until now, our search for alien worlds has been largely limited by the “soda straw” effect. Telescopes like Hubble and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) offer incredible detail, but they cover tiny patches of the sky. The Roman Space Telescope changes the game by acting as a wide-angle lens for the cosmos.

By capturing sweeping panoramas, Roman will allow astronomers to move beyond studying individual stars and start mapping entire galactic populations. This shift in scale is essential for understanding dark energy—the mysterious force driving the expansion of the universe—and uncovering the structural history of our galaxy.

Did you know? While Hubble has spent over 30 years exploring the universe, the Roman Space Telescope is expected to discover more exoplanets in its first few years than humanity has found in the entire history of modern astronomy.

Hunting for 100,000 New Worlds

Current exoplanet catalogs, which hold roughly 6,300 confirmed worlds, are heavily biased toward planets close to their stars or those in our immediate “solar neighborhood.” Roman is designed to break this bottleneck. Through a technique called gravitational microlensing, the telescope can detect planets thousands of light-years away, even those that don’t transit their host stars.

Hunting for 100,000 New Worlds
SpaceX Falcon Heavy Roman Space Telescope

This will reveal a hidden census of the Milky Way, including:

  • Cold, distant worlds: Planets orbiting far from their suns, similar to Neptune or Uranus.
  • Free-floating planets: Rogue worlds drifting through the galaxy without a parent star.
  • Rocky Earth-analogs: Potentially habitable planets in unexplored galactic regions.

Complementing the Titans: Roman, Gaia, and Webb

The future of astronomy is collaborative. The European Space Agency’s Gaia mission has already revolutionized our map of the Milky Way by tracking the positions and motions of two billion stars. Roman acts as the perfect partner, using its infrared capabilities to peer through the thick, obscuring dust of the galactic plane.

The Roman Space Telescope – NASA's next generation observatory
Pro Tip: If you want to track the latest data releases from space missions, bookmark the NASA Exoplanet Archive. It is the gold standard for real-time updates on new discoveries.

Overcoming the Odds: A Legacy of Resilience

The path to the launchpad has been anything but smooth. Originally dubbed WFIRST, the project faced intense scrutiny and multiple cancellation threats due to budget concerns. Its survival is a testament to the scientific community’s insistence that we need both the high-resolution power of JWST and the high-volume survey capabilities of Roman. Like its namesake, Nancy Grace Roman—the “Mother of Hubble”—the mission has proven that persistence is a prerequisite for scientific breakthrough.

Overcoming the Odds: A Legacy of Resilience
SpaceX Falcon Heavy Roman Space Telescope

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the Roman Space Telescope different from Hubble?
While both have a 2.4-meter mirror, Roman has a field of view 100 times larger, allowing it to survey the sky much faster and observe larger cosmic structures.
What is gravitational microlensing?
It is a technique where a foreground star acts as a magnifying glass, bending the light of a distant star. If a planet is orbiting that foreground star, it causes a specific “blip” in the light, revealing its existence.
Will Roman be able to see alien life?
Roman is designed to characterize the atmospheres of exoplanets and identify their chemical makeup, which is a critical step in searching for potential biosignatures.

Are you excited about the next generation of space telescopes?

Drop a comment below and let us know which cosmic mystery you hope the Roman Space Telescope solves first! Don’t forget to subscribe to our newsletter for weekly updates on the final countdown to launch.

June 2, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Recent Posts

  • 55-Year-Old ‘Beach Boys’ Star’s New Drama: Is His Aging Look Shocking Fans?

    July 9, 2026
  • The Croatian Mindset and Competitive Spirit: My Personal Takeaway

    July 9, 2026
  • Proton eMas 5 Price Drops to SGD159k Amid Record Singapore COE Highs

    July 9, 2026
  • Microsoft Expands AI Vulnerability Detection to Windows

    July 9, 2026
  • A New Method Solves a Long-standing API Problem

    July 9, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

© 2026 Newsy Today. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: [email protected]


Back To Top

For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: [email protected]

Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World