International

The federal government plans to abandon seven warehouses—including a $145.44 million Salt Lake City facility—acquired to house up to 10,000 detainees, according to The New York Times. The shift marks a retreat from a Trump-era immigration crackdown that sparked lawsuits and protests.

Why is Salt Lake City’s detention center being scrapped?

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) acquired the 833,000-square-foot warehouse at 6020 W. 300 South in March 2023, intending to retrofit it for mass detention. But the plan faced immediate backlash: Salt Lake County and the city filed a federal lawsuit to block it, while a new group, Uproar Utah, formed to challenge the initiative. Demonstrations erupted, and even Republican Gov. Spencer Cox—who had voiced support—found himself in a politically fraught position.

According to The New York Times, ICE now plans to either sell or repurpose the seven warehouses nationwide, acquired for over $700 million. A DHS spokesman told KSL the agency would use existing detention space instead, emphasizing its focus on “removing the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.” The spokesman added that DHS remains “always evaluating the best methods” to achieve this.

Did You Know?

Salt Lake City’s warehouse was one of the largest proposed detention sites in the U.S., designed to hold up to 10,000 detainees—nearly double the current average capacity of ICE’s largest facilities. The site’s proximity to Salt Lake City International Airport raised concerns about water strain, as opponents warned it could worsen the drying of the Great Salt Lake.

What happens next for the warehouses—and Utah?

While ICE has not confirmed the Salt Lake City location’s fate, local officials—including Salt Lake County and the city—have received no official word about a sale or transfer. Jim McConkie, a lawyer with Uproar Utah, called the report “solid” and credited public opposition for forcing the reversal. “For those grounded in the belief that human dignity is sacred, government support for so cruel a measure represents a profound failure of moral leadership,” he said.

However, The New York Times noted that immigration officials are still pursuing plans to convert four other warehouses into detention centers. The shift could reflect a broader strategy: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin, who took over in March 2024 after Kristi Noem’s removal, has emphasized community partnerships while reviewing agency policies. In his confirmation hearing, Mullin stated: “We want to work with community leaders. We want to be good partners.”

Expert Insight

The scrapping of these warehouses signals a tactical pivot—one driven as much by legal and political pressure as by operational logic. Historically, mass detention expansions have faced resistance, from Arizona’s SB 1070 protests to the 2018 “family separation” backlash. Utah’s case is notable because opposition united even in a conservative stronghold, where water scarcity and infrastructure concerns added local urgency. If ICE proceeds with only four sites, it may signal a calculation that scale matters more than speed—but the legal battles in Utah and elsewhere could still force further delays.

How does this compare to past detention expansions?

Unlike previous expansions—such as the rapid construction of tent cities in Texas during the Trump administration—this retreat involves abandoning pre-purchased properties, a rare move that reflects both financial and political costs. In 2018, ICE spent $238 million on a temporary tent facility in Tornillo, Texas, which was dismantled after just 10 months amid lawsuits. This time, the warehouses were acquired before retrofitting began, avoiding the immediate public outcry that followed Tornillo’s opening.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will Salt Lake City’s warehouse be sold or repurposed?

ICE plans to either sell or transfer the seven warehouses, including the Salt Lake City site, but local officials have received no official confirmation of the decision. A DHS spokesman did not directly address the report, instead reiterating plans to use existing detention space.

Why did DHS change its plans?

Public opposition, lawsuits from Salt Lake County and the city, and the formation of Uproar Utah likely played a role. DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin has framed the review as part of evaluating “the best methods” to remove detainees, but legal and political resistance in Utah—a Republican-leaning state—may have accelerated the shift.

Are other detention centers still being built?

Yes. The New York Times reported that ICE is still pursuing plans to convert four other warehouses into detention centers, though no specific locations were named. The agency’s focus remains on using existing facilities rather than expanding capacity.

As communities across the U.S. weigh the costs of detention facilities, one question remains: Will this retreat signal a broader shift—or just a pause in a policy still unfolding?