Tag:

kejaksaan agung

News

Indonesian Judge Eko Aryanto: The Man Behind Harvey Moeis’s Sentence of 6.5 Years

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:

Harvey Moeis‘ Sentencing: Judge Eko Ariyanto in Spotlight

Article:

A Significant Sentencing Verdict, Judge Eko Ariyanto, the presiding judge in the corruption case of PT Timah, has handed down a decision that is significantly lighter than what the prosecution sought. Here’s a breakdown of the key points and a look into the judge’s background.

Sentencing Details

Harvey Moeis, the husband of celebrity Sandra Dewi, was sentenced to 6 years and 6 months in prison, with an alternative fine of IDR 1 billion, or an additional 6 months behind bars. He was also ordered to pay compensation of IDR 210 billion within a month, or face an additional 2 years in prison.

The prosecution, however, had sought a far heavier sentence, urging the court to sentence Harvey to 12 years in prison, a fine of IDR 1 billion with an alternative of 1 year imprisonment, plus the compensation of IDR 210 billion with an alternative of 6 years in prison.

About Judge Eko Ariyanto

Eko Ariyanto, the judge who delivered this verdict, is currently serving as the head of the panel of judges at the Central Jakarta District Court. A career public servant (PNS) with a position equivalent to the IV/d grade, Judge Eko has an extensive judicial background.

He obtained his undergraduate degree in Criminal Law at the University of Brawijaya in 1987, followed by a Master’s degree in Law from IBLAM School of Law, and later a Doctorate in Law from the University of 17 August 1945.

Before his role at the Central Jakarta District Court, Judge Eko served as the head judge at the Tulungagung District Court. He has also held the same position in Pandeglang (2009), Blitar (2015), and Mataram (2016).

Notably, he has presided over high-profile cases, including one involving John Kei, which resulted in a 15-year prison sentence for the defendant.

Assets Declaration

In his latest assets declaration, Judge Eko listed total assets worth IDR 2.8 billion, including immovable assets such as land and buildings in Malang valued at IDR 1.3 billion. He also declared five vehicles: three cars (Honda CR-V, Honda Civic Sedan, Toyota Innova Reborn) and two motorcycles (Kawasaki Ninja, Kawasaki KLX), valued at IDR 910 million in total.

Additionally, he declared movable assets worth IDR 395 million, cash and cash equivalents totaling IDR 165.981 million.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years in Prison for IM57+ Fraud, Under Certain Conditions"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Jakartan Businessman Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Multi-Billion Dollar Corruption Case

In a decision that has left many questioning its fairness, businessman Harvey Moeis was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for his role in a corruption case involving the trading of tin commodities. The verdict, handed down by a panel of judges, comes despite the staggering Rp 300 trillion (approximately USD 2.1 billion) in state losses attributed to the scandal.

IM57+ Lakso Anindito, a prominent figure in the anti-corruption movement, expressed his astonishment at the leniency shown to Moeis. "The sentence is not in line with public expectations of justice as Moeis has not actively contributed to fully exposing the scandal," he told detikcom on Saturday, December 28, 2024.

Anindito argued that Moeis’ sentence could only be understood if he had proactively worked to completely unravel the case, including identifying the ultimate beneficiaries of the corruption.

The judges, in their ruling, deemed the prosecution’s 12-year demand excessive for Moeis, whom they viewed as having a limited role in the affair. Moeis was not formally listed as a commissioner, director, or shareholder of PT RBT, the company at the center of the scandal. However, they also emphasized that Moeis’ ability to act as a representative of the company’s management made him a pivotal figure in potentially uncovering the full extent of the corruption.

Moeis’ 6-year, 6-month sentence includes a fine of Rp 1 billion, which, if unpaid, would add an additional 6 months to his jail term. He has also been ordered to pay Rp 210 billion in compensation. Failure to do so could result in his assets being seized and auctioned off to cover the debt, with any additional amount converted into a further 2-year prison sentence.

The corruption case involving Moeis and others has resulted in unprecedented state losses and has drawn widespread public scrutiny. Anindito lamented that the leniency shown to Moeis could set a dangerous precedent for future corruption cases, stating that it undermines the efforts to achieve justice and comprehensive disclosure of such scandals.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Why a 6.5-Year Sentence for Rp 300T Loss in a Proven Deficit Nation"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Baliore IV Judges Sentence Harvey Moeis to 6.5 Years for Timah Corruption, Despite State Loss of Rp 300 Trillion

Subhead: Businessman’s Role Deemed Less Significant, Sparking Disagreement Between Judges and Prosecutors

Article:

In a case that has sent shockwaves through Indonesia’s mining industry, judges from the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) have sentenced businessman Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years imprisonment for his role in a Rp 300 trillion (USD 2.17 billion) state loss from irregularities in tin ore trading. The verdict has raised eyebrows, given the prosecutors’ demand for a 12-year jail term.

The sharp disagreement between the judges and prosecutors centers around Moeis’ role in the scandal. The primary dispute lies in his involvement, with judges arguing that Moeis’ role was not as significant as prosecutors claimed.

Chief Judge Eko Aryanto justified the lighter sentence, stating, "Majelis hakim considers the prosecution’s demand for 12 years too heavy, given Harvey Moeis’ role as outlined in the case chronology." The ruling was delivered at the Jakarta Tipikor Court on Monday (23/12).

Moeis, representing PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found to have attended meetings with PT Timah but held no decision-making powers or direct involvement in either company’s management or finance. The judges recognized Moeis’ role as that of a helper to his friend, RBT’s Director Utama Suparta, who was also found guilty in the case.

The Judges acknowledged that both PT Timah and PT RBT possessed valid mining licenses and were not responsible for illegal mining. Instead, they attributed the illegal mining activities to local residents, numbering in the thousands.

Despite the state’s monumental loss of Rp 300 trillion, the judges maintained that the corruption ring involved multiple culprits, not just Moeis. The total loss includes Rp 2.2 trillion from illegal processing fees, Rp 26.6 trillion from purchases of illegal tin ore, and Rp 271 trillion from environmental damages.

While Moeis’ sentence fell short of the prosecutor’s demands, it serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against corruption in Indonesia’s lucrative mining sector. As investigations into the wider corruption network continue, the public eagerly awaits further developments in this high-stakes case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prosecutor Criticizes 6.5-Year Sentence for Bui Harvey Moeis: Too Lenient!

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – Justice Served, But Critics Seek Harsher Punishment in $300B Timah Corruption Case

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has filed an appeal against the verdict issued to business tycoon Harvey Moeis and four other defendants, arguing that the sentencing was too lenient in a massive corruption case involving state-owned mining company PT Timah Tbk.

Harvey Moeis, along with Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indiarto, Reza Andriansyah, and Suparta, were convicted for their role in a $300 billion corruption case involving the illegal trading of tungsten ore, a byproduct of tin mining, between 2015 and 2022.

"The reason for the appeal is that the sentences given to the five defendants were too mild," said Sutikno, Director of Special Crimes Division at the AGO. "There’s an imbalance in the sentencing, with the punishments not reflecting the severity of their crimes."

The AGO believes that the court failed to consider the broader impact of the defendants’ actions on society, particularly in the Bangka Belitung Islands, where the illegal activities occurred.

Harvey Moeis, the mastermind behind the scheme, was initially sentenced to six years and six months in prison. However, the prosecution had sought a 12-year prison term. Other defendants received sentences ranging from five to eight years, considerably lower than the prosecution’s demands.

"I believe the court only considered the personal roles of the defendants in this case, but they failed to factor in the significant damage caused to the community and the state," Sutikno said in an interview with reporters.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Mahfud Condemns Corruptors, Terms Excessive Peace Talk as Collusion"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Former Minister Mahfud MD Slams Proposal for Settling Corruption Cases via ‘Denda Damai’

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia — Former Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs Mahfud MD has strongly condemned the proposal to settle corruption cases through a ‘denda damai’ (out-of-court settlement) system, recently advocated by Minister of Law Supratman Andi Agtas.

Mahfud argued that it’s wrong to suggest such an idea as corruption cases cannot be resolved through peaceful means. "It’s not just a mistake, it’s completely incorrect. Corruption cases cannot be settled peacefully. If settled peacefully, it would no longer be corruption; it would be called collusion," Mahfud said at the MMD Initiative office in Jakarta on Thursday (26/12).

Mahfud also pointed out that such a practice already exists informally between law enforcement agencies. "It happens all the time, secretly, between prosecutors, police, and judges. And when they’re caught, they end up in prison," he added.

The former minister emphasized that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law and other criminal proceedings do not permit the application of ‘denda damai’ for corruption cases. He was surprised that the Minister of Law attempted to justify this practice by referring to the Law on the Prosecutors’ Office.

Mahfud explained that the ‘denda damai’ provision in the Law on the Prosecutors’ Office only applies to economic crimes related to customs, tax, and excise duties. It’s a negotiation process to lower punitive fines.

"For instance, if you’re supposed to pay a Rp100 billion fine for violating tax laws but end up paying Rp95 billion instead, that’s considered ‘denda damai’. But this process is transparent, done with the approval of the relevant ministry and the Attorney General," Mahfud said.

Previously, Minister of Law Supratman had planned to offer amnesty to state loss perpetrators through ‘denda damai’. The minister believes that the prosecutor general has the authority to impose ‘denda damai’ as permitted by the Law on the Prosecutors’ Office. However, he did not clarify how this would apply to corruption cases.

"Denda damai", according to Supratman, involves discontinuing the court process and imposing a fine agreed upon by the Attorney General. This can be used to manage cases causing state losses.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts