The head of the Hawks in KwaZulu-Natal, Maj-Gen Lesetja Senona, was reportedly removed from his office on Saturday, an action his legal representation is calling unlawful. The circumstances surrounding his removal remain under investigation, according to his attorney.
Details of the Removal
Rudolph Baloyi, Senona’s attorney, stated that Senona and his secretary were allegedly escorted from the office by a SAPS officer. The officer, whose name is known to Baloyi’s firm, reportedly acted on the instruction of KZN Police Commissioner Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, confiscating office keys and Senona’s laptop. Baloyi further alleges that Senona was then followed home.
KwaZulu-Natal police spokesperson Col Robert Netshiunda indicated a statement would be forthcoming, but declined to comment further due to ongoing commissions of inquiry. Hawks spokesperson Brig Thandi Mbambo confirmed Senona remains the head of the Hawks in KwaZulu-Natal, stating the DPCI was not involved in his removal from the building and that the matter should be addressed with the office of Lt-Gen Mkhwanazi.
Context: The Madlanga Commission
Senona’s removal follows his recent appearance before the Madlanga commission, where he was questioned about his relationship with Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala, who faces attempted murder charges. Senona described Matlala as “like a younger brother” and claimed he was unaware of Matlala’s alleged criminal activities until recently.
However, evidence presented to the commission reportedly showed Senona forwarded sensitive police information to Matlala and provided advice regarding a SAPS tender. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has called for Senona’s immediate arrest and prosecution, alleging he shared confidential police information with Matlala, potentially compromising officer safety.
Baloyi maintains that only Senona’s employer, the DPCI, has the authority to suspend him, and that the acting head of the DPCI was unaware of the removal. He stated they are seeking legal recourse.
What Happens Next?
It is possible that a formal investigation will be launched into the circumstances surrounding Senona’s removal. The DPCI could initiate an internal review to determine if proper procedures were followed. A legal challenge to the legality of the removal is also a possible next step. The presidency has welcomed recommendations for criminal investigations and decisions regarding the employment status of individuals implicated in the Madlanga commission’s report, suggesting further action could be taken.
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Madlanga commission’s inquiry?
The Madlanga commission was established to investigate allegations of corruption and misconduct within the police service, and Senona was among five officers identified in the commission’s preliminary report.
What was Senona’s explanation for sharing information with Matlala?
Senona told the commission he initially did not know Matlala was linked to criminal activities and claimed he cut ties with him once he became aware of the allegations. He also stated he did not read the full document he forwarded to Matlala, a claim the commissioners found implausible.
Who instructed the SAPS officer to remove Senona from his office?
According to Senona’s attorney, Rudolph Baloyi, the SAPS officer was instructed by KZN Police Commissioner Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi to remove Senona from office and confiscate his belongings.
Given the conflicting accounts and the gravity of the allegations, what level of transparency do you believe is necessary to maintain public trust in law enforcement?