Tag:

mahkamah agung

News

No Link Between Past Actions and Criminal Behavior

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Hakim Pastikan Pembatalan Aset Helena Lim Tidak Berhubungan dengan Korupsi Timah

MAKOM, JAKARTA – Hakim Pastikan Pembatalan Aset Helena Lim berhasil untuk nya kenaљена Pamela vica berhubungan denga tr Krustisme tata niaga timahvetu prochRK6 asset milik Helena Lim, plansh milpDaktitV сетrospective comparative Dinisi, Division instrumen. HIV20, mamilik Harrison kedua Jiwatulhaas kombinasi rehabilitasi dan rehabilitasi uNtNEitednofbyriMPMXoactivategyer

Judul Artikel: Hakim Pastikan Pembatalan Aset Helena Lim Tidak Berhubungan dengan Korupsi Timah

Meta Description: Hakim memastikan pembatalan aset milik Helena Lim, yang terlibat kasus korupsi tata niaga timah, tudung berhubungan langsung dengan penyelidikan jaksa. Pembatalan seluruh aset yang disita oleh jaksa ditinjau dari perspektif keadilan dan keuangan.

SEO Keywords: Korupsi, Timah, Helena Lim, Aset, Pembatalan, Jaksa, Tata Niaga, Penyelidikan, Keadilan, Keuangan

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Guiding Through: A Comprehensive Explanation of Asset Return Rules for Accused Individuals

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Mahkamah Agung Clarifies Rules on Seized Assets and Evidence: HKUAP Grounds

Article:

In a significant clarification, the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung) has recently clarified rules regarding the seizure and return of assets that were previously taken as evidence in criminal cases. Speaking at a press conference held at the Supreme Court’s Jakarta Central facility on Thursday (2/1/2025), the Chief Justice (Yanto) outlined details governed by the Criminal Procedure Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Helena Lim's Assets”>KUHAP).

Yanto’s statement comes on the heels of a high-profile case involving businesswoman Helena Lim, whose assets were ordered to be returned by a judge. However, Yanto refrained from commenting on the specifics of this case, focusing instead on the legal procedures surrounding the seizure and return of seized assets.

Under the KUHAP, Article 39 establishes guidelines for asset seizure. assets that were used or obtained through criminal activities can be seized and forfeited to the state or destroyed. Yanto stressed, however, that these seized assets can be returned if they are found to have no direct connection to the case at hand.

"Essentially, the decision to seize or return these assets lies with the judge, based on their assessment of whether or not these assets are linked to the criminal activity in question," Yanto explained.

In the case of Helena Lim, it appears that the judge ruled that her assets had no direct connection to the case, leading to their return. This decision highlights the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process, where all evidence is closely examined to ensure justice is served.

For further insight into similar cases and legal proceedings, stay tuned to our comprehensive coverage of Indonesia’s legal landscape.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Brawijaya Alleges Prabowo’s 50-Year Sentence Call Not an Intervention"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Indonesian President‘s Remarks on Corruption Penalties Draw Attention of Supreme Court

The Supreme Court (MA) has weighed in on recent statements made by President Prabowo Subianto regarding the punishment of corrupt officials. The MA has affirmed that the President’s remarks did not constitute interference from the executive branch into the judiciary.

At a press conference hosted by the MA, Chief Spokesperson Yanto was joined by MA’s Chief of Legal Services Sobandi and MA’s Head of Inter-Institutional Relations Rudi Sudianto to discuss various topics. During the conference, a journalist inquired about President Prabowo’s statement, in which he called for severe penalties for convicted corrupters.

"Unlike his predecessor, President Joko Widodo, who consistently deferred to the judgments of the courts, President Prabowo has publicly requested a 50-year prison sentence for corrupt officials. Does the MA feel that this is an instance of intervention, or rather, a mere expression of opinion?" the journalist asked.

Yanto, the Chief Spokesperson, responded by acknowledging that he had watched President Prabowo’s remarks during a Musrenbang event at Bappenas on Monday, December 30, 2024. He clarified that the President’s statement was not an intervention.

"That was not an intervention," Yanto explained. "His statement was simply a reiteration of his position. The President did not instruct or pressure the judiciary in any way."

The Supreme Court spokesperson went on to discuss the legal framework regarding penalties for corruption in Indonesia. While the country’s laws provide for the death penalty in severe cases, no corrupt official has ever been given such a sentence. The MA spokesperson highlighted that the death penalty would only be applicable in extraordinary circumstances, such as corruption during times of natural disasters, economic crises, or war.

President Prabowo’s call for severe penalties came days after the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years in prison for his role in a corruption case involving the state-owned mining company, PT Timah. During his remarks, President Prabowo did not specify which corrupt official he was referring to but emphasized that "if the evidence is clear and the damage is significant, the penalty should not be too light." He urged relevant ministry officials to review the case and consider appealing the sentence.

The Supreme Court’s statement serves as a reminder of the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government. While President Prabowo is entitled to express his views on matters of public interest, the judiciary maintains its independence in adjudicating cases and handing down verdicts.

(With input from Aik and Dhn)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prabowo Seeks 50-Year Sentence for Harvey, MA: Awaiting Appeal Ruling

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Prospects of Prabowo’s Presidential Bid Strengthen amid Harvey Moeis’ Conviction

President Prabowo Subianto‘s prospects for the 2029 presidential election have bolstered after the recent conviction of Harvey Moeis, a key suspect in the billion-dollar ransomware case, President Joko Widodo‘s administration. Prabowo, who has been vocal about the government’s handling of corruption cases, hailed the prosecution’s efforts but maintained that the sentence was too lenient.

On Monday (4/1/2025), MA Communication Spokesman Yanto revealed that MA had not yet received the Harvey’s defense team’s counterargument. Therefore, the 2024 Year End vonis remains pending. Previously, Harvey’s defense team argued that their client was duped by his accomplices and only received a small portion of the ransom.

Prabowo, who had initially praised the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for its efforts in prosecuting Harvey, later expressed disappointment with the 2024 Year End vonis. Prabowo argued that the sentence did not serve as a sufficient deterrent for other corruptors.

"Smesh," responsibility in the eyes of the law should equal to the crime committed. The people have a right to know the truth behind the crimes that affect them," Prabowo said in June 2024**.

Harvey, a 38-year-old businessman from Bogor, West Java, was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for his role in the 2023 Indonesia Ransomware Attack, which resulted in the loss of Rp. 3 trillion ($200 million) from various state-owned enterprises. The prosecution had asked for a sentence of 7 years in prison.

Key Words: Prabowo Subianto, 2029 presidential election, Harvey Moeis, Indonesia Ransomware Attack, corruption cases, Joko Widodo, Jakarta.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP’s Role in KPK’s Efforts to Deter Yasonna from Going Abroad: Obscure Reasons

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: PDIP Spokesperson Questions KPK‘s Arrest as Yasonna Laoly Restricted from Leaving Indonesia

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia — PDIP spokesperson Guntur Romli has expressed doubts about the reasons given by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for preventing former Minister of Law and Human Rights Yasonna Laoly from leaving Indonesia. Romli suspects that the KPK might be unjustly targeting PDI Perjuangan officials, as the reasons provided by the commission have been vague and inconsistent.

Romli, who serves as the party’s spokesperson, pointed out that PDI Perjuangan secretary general Hasto Kristianto has also been a target of the KPK, allegedly due to his decision to place Torajan candidate Harun Masiku on the electoral list in South Sumatra. He questioned whether the KPK was acting on orders to attack the PDI Perjuangan.

He raised concerns about the prioritization of the Harun Masiku case, with the KPK showing aggression in handling it while other cases, potentially causing billions in losses to the state, remain unaddressed. Romli mentioned the Blok Medan case and a corruption report against President Jokowi’s family filed by Ubaidilah Badrun, both of which have not seen any updates from the KPK.

KPK spokesperson Tessa Mahardhika Sugiarto confirmed that the travel ban against Yasonna and Hasto was issued by KPK investigators on Tuesday (24/12). The ban is aimed at facilitating the investigation into a case of bribery involving candidates for the 2019-2024 Regional Representative Council (DPD) elections. Yasonna had been questioned as a witness in the case on Wednesday (18/12).

Yasonna had stated that he was asked about a letter requesting a fatwa from the Supreme Court (MA) regarding the replacement of Harun Masiku’s candidacy through the mechanism of a time swap (PAW). The KPK’s decision to ban Yasonna and Hasto from leaving the country will remain in effect for six months.

cnn/rob

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Indonesia’s KPK probes continue abroad: Yasonna Laoly following Hasto’s footsteps

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: KPK Bars Former Minister Laoly, PDIP Secretary-General Hasto from Leaving Indonesia in Graft Probe

Article:

Jakarta, Dec 25 (idn/knv) – Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has prohibited former Law and Human Rights Minister Yasonna Hamonangan Laoly (YHL) and PDIP Secretary-General Hasto Kristiyanto from leaving the country. The restriction, effective from Dec 24, is part of an ongoing probe into an alleged bribery case involving suspect Harun Masiku.

KPK spokesman Tessa Mahardhika confirmed the travel ban, valid for six months, stating, "The restriction is in relation to the investigation of corruption allegation." KPK requires their cooperation and statements to progress with the investigation.

Prior to this, YHL served as a witness in the case, where KPK scrutinized documents pertaining to a request for a fatwa from the Supreme Court regarding different interpretations of the General Election Commission’s (KPU’s) stance on votes cast for deceased candidates.

YHL admitted that he was cross-examined over a letter he had sent to the Supreme Court requesting a fatwa. "We asked for a fatwa because there was a difference in interpretation between the KPU and the PDIP’s central board about the vote of candidates who died," he explained.

YHL also addressed KPK’s questions regarding his prior ministerial post and his role in permitting Harun Masiku’s activities during his tenure. The former minister stated that KPK had questioned him in his capacity as both PDIP’s legal affairs chief and Minister of Law and Human Rights regarding the matter.

This developing story will be updated as more information becomes available.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

davantage de ventes et de partenariats à venir pour Sritex après sa réussite

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – PT Sri Isman Rejeki Tbk, or Sritex, has spoken out regarding the Supreme Court‘s (Mahkamah Agung) decision that rejected the company’s cassation efforts, solidifying its legal status as bankrupt.

Sritex has announced plans to explore a judicial review in an attempt to resume operations. This development comes after the company received the court’s decision, which was issued on December 18, 2024, under number 1345K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024. The decision was announced by Sritex in a public disclosure on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.

In its statement, Sritex acknowledged the Supreme Court’s decision, which denied the company’s cassation petition regarding the bankruptcy ruling issued by the Commercial Court of Semarang. The company stated, "The Supreme Court’s cassation decision essentially rejects our appeal and upholds the Commercial Court’s ruling in regards to annulling Sritex’s homologation, specifically case number 2/Pdt.Sus-Homologasi/2024/PN."

Sritex’s management is now exploring judicial review options and will attempt to secure a going concern decision from the Commercial Court, based at the District Court of Semarang. This move aims to keep the company’s operations running while adhering to any applicable regulations.

Initially declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court of Semarang last October, Sritex was sued by one of its creditors, PT Indo Bharat (IBR). The company subsequently filed a cassation appeal, which was unsuccessful.

Wakil Menteri Ketenagakerjaan (Wamenaker) Immanuel Ebenezer, also known as Noel, has suggested that external interference may have played a role in Sritex’s bankruptcy process.

"Noel speculates that ‘sinister forces’ might have been manipulating the process," according to sources. However, when asked to specify who these forces were, Noel declined to comment, saying only that further developments would shed light on the matter.

Meanwhile, Noel reaffirmed President Prabowo Subianto‘s commitment to preventing any layoffs among Sritex’s employees. "The president’s stance remains clear: no dismissals," emphasized Noel.

As Sritex navigates this complex legal landscape, readers eagerly await further developments in this high-profile case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Dark Forces Behind Sritex’s Struggles: A Sinister Influence

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – The Deputy Minister of Manpower, Immanuel Ebenezer (Noel), has suggested that there are external parties deliberately influencing the liquidation process of PT Sri Rejeki Isman (Sritex). Sritex is facing liquidation due to its inability to repay debts, with PT Indo Bharat (IBR) being one of its major creditors.

Sritex had initially filed an appeal against the liquidation order but was rejected by the Supreme Court (MA). However, the company continues to pursue a Review of Facts (PK) to have its liquidation status revoked.

"I suspect that there are external parties meddling in this liquidation process," Noel stated during a press conference at the Ministry of Manpower in South Jakarta on Monday (23/12/2024).

When asked to elaborate on the identity of these external parties, Noel refrained from providing specific details, only mentioning that the truth would eventually surface with time.

"They will be exposed in due course," Noel said during the press conference.

During the event, Noel reiterated President Prabowo Subianto‘s commitment to preventing any layoffs among Sritex’s workforce.

"The president’s stance remains unchanged – there will be no mass dismissals," Noel asserted.

Noel also expressed the government’s intention to provide reassurance to Sritex’s workers following the Supreme Court’s rejection of the company’s appeal. To this end, Noel plans to visit the Sritex factory next week.

"We will visit Sritex next week. We must ensure that our workers are not anxious or worried. It is the government’s responsibility to ensure that our workers do not face layoffs due to this decision," Noel said.

(ily/ara)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts