Latvia’s parliament, the Saeima, has adopted amendments to laws designed to shield journalists, activists, and researchers from abusive lawsuits. The changes, approved in a third reading, strengthen protections against strategic litigation intended to silence critical voices.
Protecting Public Interest Perform
The amendments to the Law on the Protection of Persons Involved in the Public Interest and the Civil Procedure Law aim to reinforce freedom of speech and ensure the public’s access to information. They are intended to reduce the risk of self-censorship by providing greater independence to those working in the public interest.
The new laws clarify what constitutes acting in the public interest and establish criteria for identifying malicious lawsuits. Courts will now have the authority to dismiss such cases, require claimants to cover legal costs, and even impose fines.
Safeguards and Limitations
While strengthening protections for those acting in the public interest, the amendments do not restrict the right to pursue legitimate legal claims. Defamation suits are still permitted, and civil liability remains in place. Crucially, the protections will not apply to cases involving disinformation or knowingly false information presented under the guise of public interest.
Justice Minister Inese Lībiņa-Egnere emphasized that strategic lawsuits are increasingly used to pressure journalists, civil activists, and researchers, leading to self-censorship. The Latvian Civic Alliance also noted the directive imposes a mandatory obligation on member states to protect individuals acting in the public interest from abusive attacks.
The directive must be transposed into national law by May 7, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of these amendments?
The amendments aim to strengthen protection against strategic lawsuits and reinforce freedom of speech and the public’s right to receive comprehensive and high-quality information.
Will these changes prevent anyone from going to court?
No, the draft laws do not restrict individuals’ rights to go to court or prohibit claims for defamation. They simply introduce safeguards against abusive litigation.
What happens if someone knowingly spreads false information?
Protection mechanisms will not apply in cases where disinformation or knowingly false information is spread under the guise of public interest.
As Latvia implements these new protections, it remains to be seen how effectively courts will identify and address abusive lawsuits, and whether this will truly foster a more open and accountable environment for journalists and civil society.