• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - Medicaid
Tag:

Medicaid

Health

7 Charged in $700K Minnesota Medicaid Fraud Scheme

by Chief Editor June 24, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Minnesota authorities charged seven individuals Tuesday in connection with Medicaid fraud schemes totaling more than $700,000. According to the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, these cases involved fraudulent billing for personal care, psychotherapy, and counseling services that were never performed. This enforcement action follows a broader trend of increased scrutiny by state and federal officials, including the recent suspension of payments to nearly 700 providers by the Minnesota Department of Human Services since January 2025.

How are Medicaid fraud schemes operating?

Fraudulent activity typically involves billing for services that never occurred or using the credentials of licensed professionals without their consent. Charges filed Tuesday detail various methods used to siphon funds from the state’s medical assistance program. For example, Tremayne Jackson is accused of billing for thousands of hours of care in Minnesota while simultaneously working as a basketball coach in Kansas. In a separate case, Christine Pryor allegedly used the identities of three licensed professionals to bill for counseling services for over 160 clients despite having no credentials of her own, according to the Attorney General’s Office.

Did you know?
The Minnesota Department of Human Services has stopped payments to nearly 700 providers since the start of 2025, citing “credible allegations of fraud.”

What are the consequences of systemic Medicaid fraud?

The primary consequence for the state is the loss of federal funding and the depletion of resources intended for low-income residents. The Trump administration has deferred hundreds of millions of dollars in federal Medicaid funding to Minnesota over the last year, citing widespread fraud concerns. Attorney General Keith Ellison stated that his office is prioritizing the recovery of these stolen funds, noting that the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit is actively working to hold individuals accountable for defrauding the healthcare system.

What are the consequences of systemic Medicaid fraud?

How does this compare to recent federal crackdowns?

These latest state-level charges follow a significant federal intervention. Last month, the U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against 15 people involved in a separate $90 million Medicaid fraud scheme. While the state charges announced Tuesday involve seven individuals and roughly $700,000, the federal case highlights a much larger scale of exploitation, specifically within the Housing Stabilization Services program. That program was shut down by the Minnesota Department of Human Services last year due to these ongoing investigations.

Comparison of Recent Fraud Enforcement

Action Scope Source
State Charges (Tuesday) $700,000 MN Attorney General
Federal Charges (Last Month) $90 million U.S. Dept. of Justice

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the penalty for Medicaid fraud?

Penalties vary based on the severity of the charges, but individuals convicted of felony theft by false representation or identity theft face prison time, restitution requirements, and hefty fines.

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison introduces bill to add resources to fighting Medicaid fraud

How does the state detect these schemes?

The Minnesota Department of Human Services monitors billing data for anomalies, such as providers billing for services while they are out of the country or claiming to provide care to patients who have moved to other states.

What should I do if I suspect fraud?

Citizens can report suspected Medicaid fraud to the Minnesota Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit or the Department of Human Services.

Stay Informed

Protecting public funds is an ongoing effort. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on state policy and public safety investigations. Have questions about how these charges impact local healthcare? Leave a comment below.

June 24, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Why Public Health Programs Must Cover Medically Tailored Meals

by Chief Editor June 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Medically tailored meals—nutrient-dense, dietitian-designed food prescribed as clinical therapy—reduce hospitalizations by 31 percent and emergency room visits by 20 percent for Medicaid patients, according to research published in Nature Medicine. These interventions, which generated an average of $3,433 in per-person healthcare savings, are increasingly viewed as a viable strategy to lower the $5 trillion spent annually on U.S. sick care.

Why do medically tailored meals reduce healthcare costs?

Clinical nutrition interventions lower costs by stabilizing chronic conditions before they require expensive acute care. A study conducted by the Tufts University Food is Medicine Institute and the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School found that patients with specific diseases saw significant financial offsets. For instance, individuals with kidney disease experienced gross savings of $12,312 per person, while those with cardiovascular disease saved $10,450, according to the Nature Medicine report.

Why do medically tailored meals reduce healthcare costs?
Did you know?

While 220,000 individuals in Massachusetts currently qualify for medically tailored meals, less than 4 percent—roughly 8,000 people—actually receive them due to fragmented referral pathways and inconsistent insurance coverage, according to Community Servings.

How can federal policy accelerate the “Food is Medicine” movement?

Policymakers are currently considering the Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Demonstration Pilot Act, a bipartisan bill that would establish a six-year Medicare pilot program across 10 states. According to Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food is Medicine Institute at Tufts University, this legislation is essential for providing seniors with reliable access to therapeutic nutrition. The act aims to bridge the gap between current fragmented services and a standardized, insurance-covered medical therapy.

What standards are required for meal-based interventions?

Not every home-delivered food service qualifies as a medically tailored meal. To ensure clinical efficacy, experts argue that providers must adhere to rigorous, evidence-based standards. The Food is Medicine Coalition, a network of 15 accredited nonprofit providers, has developed specific guidelines to prevent insurance programs from paying for meals that lack the nutritional profile required to improve health outcomes. Without these benchmarks, there is a risk that healthcare dollars will be spent on generic meal delivery rather than evidence-based medical treatment, according to David Waters, CEO of Community Servings.

Dariush Mozaffarian, MD, DrPH – Food is Medicine
Pro Tip:

If you are a patient or caregiver managing a diet-sensitive illness, ask your healthcare provider if your insurance plan covers “medically tailored meals” rather than generic meal delivery services to ensure you receive clinically appropriate nutritional support.

How does nutrition research impact future healthcare funding?

The current lack of funding for nutrition science at the National Institutes of Health remains a primary barrier to scaling these programs. While the Nature Medicine findings provide a blueprint for cost-effective care, proponents argue that federal agencies must prioritize nutrition research to integrate food-based therapies into standard clinical practice. By shifting from a reactive “sick care” model to one that emphasizes preventative, evidence-based nutrition, the healthcare system could significantly reduce the burden of chronic, diet-related conditions.

How does nutrition research impact future healthcare funding?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is a medically tailored meal? It is a meal designed by a registered dietitian to meet the specific nutritional needs of a patient managing a serious illness, serving as a clinical intervention.
  • Are these meals covered by insurance? Coverage is currently inconsistent. Advocates are pushing for the Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Demonstration Pilot Act to expand Medicare and Medicaid coverage.
  • Does this actually save money? Yes. Research shows that for every dollar spent on these meals, the healthcare system often sees a significant return through reduced hospitalizations and emergency visits.

Have you or a loved one benefited from medically tailored nutrition programs? Share your experience in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on food-based healthcare policy.

June 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

GOP Faces Growing Pressure to Defund Planned Parenthood

by Chief Editor June 5, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Battle Over Federal Funding: Is a Permanent Defunding Shift on the Horizon?

The political tug-of-war surrounding federal healthcare funding has reached a critical juncture. At the heart of the debate is the future of Medicaid dollars directed toward organizations like Planned Parenthood. As advocacy groups ramp up pressure on lawmakers, the question remains: will we see a long-term legislative shift, or will this continue to be a cyclical political flashpoint?

Did you know? Medicaid serves as the primary revenue stream for many reproductive health clinics. Legislative efforts to restrict these funds often hinge on the argument that taxpayer money should be directed toward facilities that do not provide abortion services.

The Pressure Cooker: Accountability in the Halls of Congress

Advocacy organizations, such as Students for Life Action, are increasingly using “report cards” to hold members of Congress accountable. By threatening negative scores for lawmakers who fail to extend defunding provisions, these groups are changing the landscape of primary politics.

The goal for these activists is clear: a 10-year extension of the current defunding measures. They argue that short-term, one-year provisions—often born out of the necessity to bypass complex Senate procedural rules—create unnecessary “cliffs” that force the issue back into the headlines during sensitive election seasons.

Why the “Cliff” Strategy Matters

When federal funding provisions are set to expire, it forces a binary choice upon legislators. For conservatives, the objective is to permanently decouple abortion providers from federal Medicaid reimbursement. For the opposition, the focus remains on maintaining access to non-abortion services like cancer screenings and contraception, which they argue are essential for low-income populations.

The Economic and Political Implications of Medicaid Restrictions

The financial stakes are substantial. With more than $700 million annually at risk, the debate is not merely ideological—It’s a fight over the operational viability of major healthcare networks. Proponents of defunding suggest that funds could be redirected to community health centers that provide comprehensive care without abortion services. However, critics argue that such a shift could create significant gaps in healthcare access for underserved communities.

Students for Life’s “No Woman Stands Alone” Press Conference!
Pro Tip: When researching policy changes, look beyond the headlines. Examine the actual text of budget resolutions to understand how “procedural limitations” often prevent comprehensive bills from passing, leading to the “short-term fix” cycle we see today.

Navigating the Divide: The Path Forward

The tension between grassroots activists and party leadership is palpable. While some legislators are eager to push for permanent funding bans, others—including high-profile figures—have characterized the issue as “thorny,” suggesting a desire to avoid the political volatility that accompanies abortion-related debates.

As we look toward future legislative sessions, two trends are emerging:

  • Increased Accountability: Expect more interest groups to utilize public scorecards to pressure incumbents.
  • Procedural Maneuvering: Expect continued use of “vote-a-ramas” and amendment processes to force floor votes on polarizing topics.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why is Medicaid funding such a central issue in the abortion debate?
Because Medicaid is a massive source of federal healthcare revenue. Since the Hyde Amendment already prohibits federal funds from paying for most abortions, the debate focuses on whether clinics that provide abortions should be eligible for any Medicaid reimbursement for other services.
What happens if a defunding provision expires?
If a provision expires, the status quo is typically restored, allowing clinics to continue billing Medicaid for non-abortion services like cancer screenings and STI testing, provided they meet standard program requirements.
How do Senate rules affect these funding bills?
Senate rules, such as the filibuster or reconciliation requirements, often dictate the duration of a bill. Here’s why many controversial provisions are passed as temporary measures rather than permanent law.

What is your take on the future of healthcare funding legislation? Do you believe Congress will move toward long-term solutions, or will we continue to see short-term, high-stakes battles? Join the discussion in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for deep-dive policy analysis delivered to your inbox.

June 5, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Dr. Oz Visits University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital to Promote Rural Health

by Chief Editor May 28, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Future of Rural Healthcare: Can Federal Grants Bridge the Funding Gap?

The landscape of rural healthcare in the United States is undergoing a seismic shift. As CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz recently highlighted during a visit to the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital, the federal government is placing a heavy bet on the Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP) to stabilize medical access in underserved communities.

View this post on Instagram about Rural Health Transformation Program, United States
From Instagram — related to Rural Health Transformation Program, United States

However, the transition from legacy Medicaid funding models to this new, grant-based structure has sparked a heated debate among healthcare providers. With $50 billion earmarked for the program through 2030, the question remains: is this enough to sustain the fragile infrastructure of rural hospitals?

The Shift Toward Targeted Federal Funding

The RHTP represents a departure from traditional Medicaid reimbursement models. By allocating 50% of its $50 billion budget equally across states and distributing the remainder based on population metrics, the program aims to provide a more tailored approach to rural needs. Iowa, for instance, has already secured $209 million in the program’s inaugural year, becoming the first state to deploy these grants.

Proponents argue that this model allows for strategic investment in critical areas such as maternal health, oncology, and workforce development. By moving away from broad, systemic payments, officials believe they can encourage hospitals to innovate rather than merely survive.

Pro Tip: Healthcare administrators should focus on aligning their grant proposals with the specific “Rural Health Hub” criteria established by CMS. Demonstrating clear, measurable impacts on local patient access is the surest way to secure long-term funding renewals.

The Stability vs. Transformation Dilemma

Despite the influx of capital, industry leaders like Chris Mitchell, president of the Iowa Hospital Association, have voiced concerns regarding the long-term fiscal viability of this transition. The core tension lies in the trade-off: hospitals are being asked to take on new administrative burdens and specialized projects in exchange for temporary funding, even as they face permanent reductions in Medicaid directed payments.

Dr. Oz visits University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital to talk healthcare

For many rural facilities, the math is difficult. Without a baseline of stable, recurring Medicaid revenue, even the most innovative “transformation” projects may struggle to find the operational liquidity needed to keep the lights on.

Trends Shaping the Next Decade of Rural Health

  • Increased Telehealth Integration: As physical staffing remains a challenge, rural hubs are increasingly relying on remote specialist consultations to keep patients in their home communities.
  • Focus on Specialized Hubs: Expect to see a rise in regional centers of excellence that focus on high-demand services like maternity care and chronic disease management, supported by RHTP grants.
  • Data-Driven Care Delivery: CMS is moving toward a model where funding is tied to patient outcome data, forcing rural hospitals to modernize their electronic health record (EHR) systems.
Did you know? According to the World Health Organization, global health systems are increasingly prioritizing resilient infrastructure to handle both routine care and emerging public health threats. Rural hospitals are the frontline of this global shift.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the Rural Health Transformation Program?
It is a federal initiative designed to provide $50 billion in funding to stabilize and modernize rural healthcare systems through 2030.
How does this program affect Medicaid?
The program operates alongside broader legislative changes to healthcare funding. While federal officials emphasize increased total funding, critics argue that the structure of these grants does not fully replace the stability of previous Medicaid payment models.
Who is eligible for RHTP grants?
Eligibility is typically determined at the state level based on CMS guidelines, with a focus on hospitals and clinics serving rural populations.

What are your thoughts on the future of rural healthcare in your community? Are grant-based models the solution, or do we need a return to more traditional funding structures? Join the conversation in the comments section below or subscribe to our weekly policy newsletter for the latest updates on federal health initiatives.

May 28, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

How Autism Clinics Exploit Medicaid for Preschoolers

by Chief Editor May 27, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Future of Autism Therapy: Navigating the Crossroads of Innovation and Accountability

The autism therapy landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. Once a niche field of specialized clinical interventions, it has exploded into a multibillion-dollar industry fueled by rising diagnoses, state insurance mandates and massive Medicaid expenditures. However, as the industry scales, it is hitting a wall of intense scrutiny regarding profit motives, regulatory gaps, and the quality of care.

As we look toward the next decade, the tension between rapid commercial expansion and clinical integrity will define the sector. We are moving away from an era of “unfettered growth” and entering an era of “rigorous accountability.”

The Regulatory Reckoning: Closing the “Daycare Gap”

One of the most significant trends on the horizon is the tightening of state and federal oversight. For years, autism clinics have operated in a regulatory “gray zone”—functioning more like specialized educational centers than medical facilities, often escaping the rigorous inspections applied to traditional daycares or hospitals.

Expect to see a wave of new legislation aimed at several key areas:

  • Separation of Diagnosis and Treatment: To prevent conflicts of interest, states are moving to outlaw the practice of clinics employing in-house psychologists to both diagnose a child and then immediately enroll them in high-hour therapy programs.
  • Mandatory Inspection Protocols: Legislators are increasingly viewing autism clinics through a child-safety lens, pushing for standardized inspections and stricter background check verifications for behavioral technicians.
  • Fraud Detection Technology: With Medicaid spending on autism therapy tripling in recent years, state auditors are deploying advanced data analytics to flag “red flag” billing patterns, such as the suspicious overprescribing of hours or billing for non-therapeutic activities.
💡 Did You Know?

In some states, Medicaid spending on autism therapy has grown so rapidly that it now rivals or exceeds spending on all emergency department visits combined. This massive influx of capital is what has attracted intense regulatory interest.

The Therapeutic Evolution: Beyond Traditional ABA

For decades, Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) has been the gold standard of autism treatment. However, the industry is facing a growing movement that challenges the traditional “reward and consequence” model, particularly when it is applied with a focus on increasing billable hours rather than individual child needs.

View this post on Instagram about Applied Behavior Analysis, Autonomy and Agency
From Instagram — related to Applied Behavior Analysis, Autonomy and Agency

The Rise of Neurodiversity-Affirming Practices

A major future trend is the shift toward neurodiversity-affirming care. Unlike traditional models that may prioritize “masking” or making a child appear “neurotypical” through repetitive training, new therapeutic frameworks are focusing on:

  • Autonomy and Agency: Prioritizing the child’s ability to communicate their own needs, and preferences.
  • Sensory Regulation: Moving away from behavioral compliance and toward understanding and managing sensory processing challenges.
  • Skill-Based Learning: Focusing on functional life skills that improve quality of life rather than just reducing “maladaptive” behaviors.

As more peer-reviewed studies emerge questioning the long-term efficacy of intensive, high-hour ABA, clinicians will likely pivot toward more holistic, individualized, and shorter-duration interventions.

Financial Integrity: Reforming the Medicaid Model

The current “fee-for-service” model, where clinics are paid per hour of therapy, creates a natural incentive for overprescribing. When a clinic’s revenue is directly tied to how many hours a child is awake and “working,” the risk of fraud—such as the controversial practice of waking children from naps to resume billing—becomes a systemic issue.

Breakdown of key evidence used in Medicaid fraud investigation

The future of reimbursement is moving toward Value-Based Care (VBC). In this model, insurance providers and Medicaid programs pay for outcomes rather than outputs. Instead of paying $80 an hour for a technician to sit with a child, payers will look to reward clinics that demonstrate measurable progress in communication, social integration, and independence.

⭐ Pro Tip for Parents: Vetting Your Clinic

When selecting a provider, don’t just ask about their credentials. Ask: “How do you measure progress, and how is your staff’s performance evaluated?” If the answer focuses solely on “hours completed” rather than “milestones achieved,” proceed with caution.

The Private Equity Paradox: Scale vs. Sustainability

The entry of private equity into the autism space has been a double-edged sword. On one hand, it has provided the capital necessary to expand services into rural and underserved areas where access was previously non-existent. The pressure to deliver high returns to investors can lead to the “ugly” side of the industry: high staff turnover, aggressive sales tactics, and a focus on revenue over clinical excellence.

We are likely to see a market correction. As regulatory pressure increases and the “low-hanging fruit” of Medicaid billing is picked clean, the era of rapid, unchecked acquisition by private equity firms may slow. The winners in the next decade will be the organizations that can prove clinical efficacy and operational compliance, rather than just those that can achieve the most rapid scale.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Why is there so much controversy surrounding ABA therapy?

While many families find ABA transformative, controversies arise when the therapy is used to force compliance through repetitive training, or when profit-driven clinics overprescribe hours to maximize Medicaid reimbursements.

2. How can I tell if an autism clinic is prioritizing profit over my child?

Watch for “red flags” such as being told your child must be out of school to receive therapy, being pressured into high-hour schedules (e.g., 30-40 hours a week) without a clear clinical reason, or seeing high turnover among the therapists working with your child.

3. What is the difference between ABA and neurodiversity-affirming care?

ABA often focuses on changing behaviors to meet societal norms through reinforcement. Neurodiversity-affirming care focuses on supporting the individual’s unique way of interacting with the world, prioritizing communication, sensory needs, and self-advocacy.

4. Will Medicaid changes affect my child’s access to therapy?

While some states are attempting to cut rates or limit hours to combat fraud, the goal of most reforms is to ensure that funds are used for high-quality, effective care rather than being lost to inefficient or fraudulent billing practices.


What do you think about the future of autism care? Are you seeing these shifts in your local community? Join the conversation in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more deep dives into the evolving healthcare landscape.

May 27, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

New Iowa Cancer Screening Law Falls Short for Most Residents

by Chief Editor May 24, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Future of Healthcare Access: What Iowa’s ‘Patients First’ Legislation Means for the Nation

The healthcare landscape is undergoing a quiet, yet significant, transformation. With Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds recently signing the Patients First Act into law, the state has taken a bold step toward eliminating bureaucratic hurdles in cancer diagnostics. As medical technology advances, the friction between insurance protocols and patient outcomes is becoming a focal point of legislative debate nationwide.

View this post on Instagram about Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds
From Instagram — related to Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds

This shift isn’t just about paperwork; it’s about the “torturous wait” patients experience when life-saving screenings are delayed by prior authorization requirements. By removing these barriers for specific insurance plans, Iowa is testing a model that could influence how other states handle chronic disease management.

Breaking Down the Barriers: Prior Authorization and AI

One of the most critical aspects of the new legislation is the regulation of artificial intelligence in insurance denials. As insurers increasingly rely on algorithms to automate claim processing, concerns about “black box” denials have grown.

Gov. Kim Reynolds signs ‘Patients First Act’ into law during stop in southeast Iowa

The Iowa law mandates a human element in the decision-making process, ensuring that AI cannot be the sole arbiter of a patient’s access to care. This trend toward algorithmic transparency is likely to gain momentum across the country as consumer advocacy groups demand more accountability from healthcare payers.

Pro Tip: If you are unsure if your health plan is affected by new state mandates, always call your insurance provider’s member services number. Ask specifically if your plan is “fully insured” or “self-insured,” as this often dictates whether state-level laws apply to your coverage.

The Limits of State-Level Reform

While the Patients First Act is a milestone, it highlights a persistent challenge in the U.S. Healthcare system: the divide between state and federal jurisdiction. Because the new Iowa law only applies to certain plans—covering roughly 25% of the state’s population—many Iowans on Medicaid or employer-sponsored federal plans remain subject to old protocols.

Industry experts suggest that for a truly seamless experience, federal action is required. We are likely to see a “patchwork” of state laws in the coming years, which will eventually force a national conversation about standardizing prior authorization processes for cancer screenings and other essential diagnostics.

Did You Know?

Prior authorizations were originally designed to control costs, but studies suggest that the administrative burden on physicians often exceeds the financial savings, leading to increased burnout and delayed treatment for patients with time-sensitive conditions.

Did You Know?
Iowa Insurance Division logo

What This Means for Patients

For the nearly 830,000 Iowans impacted by this legislation, the change represents a shift toward “patient-centered” care. Physicians can now prioritize clinical judgment over administrative navigation. When a doctor suspects cancer, the ability to order a scan without waiting for insurance approval can shave weeks off the diagnostic timeline—a window of time that is often crucial for patient mental health and treatment success.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • When does the Patients First Act take effect?
    The new law is scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026.
  • Does this apply to Medicare or Medicaid?
    No. Currently, the law is limited to specific fully insured individual, small-group, and state-sponsored plans. Federal action would be needed to extend these protections to federal programs.
  • What happens if an insurance company refuses to comply?
    Insurers risk significant penalties, including fines, suspension, or the revocation of their operating licenses within the state.
  • How can I check if my plan is covered?
    Iowans can contact the Iowa Insurance Division for guidance on plan eligibility and consumer rights.

Are you navigating the complexities of modern healthcare? We want to hear your story. Share your experiences with prior authorizations in the comments below, or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on health policy and patient advocacy.

May 24, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Early CPAP nonadherence does not predict long-term treatment failure

by Chief Editor May 20, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Hidden Struggle with CPAP Adherence: Why Early “Failure” Isn’t the End of the Road

For many people diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the journey to better sleep begins with a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine. However, the road to consistent use is often bumpy. While clinicians understand that adapting to a mask and pressurized air takes time, insurance policies often tell a different story.

Current industry standards—most notably Medicare policy—rely on a strict window of early use to determine if a patient “succeeds” with the therapy. If a patient doesn’t hit specific usage targets within the first 90 days, they risk losing their insurance coverage entirely.

Pro Tip: If you are struggling to meet your usage goals, document your specific challenges (e.g., mask leaks or discomfort) and share them with your sleep specialist immediately. This documentation can be vital when discussing coverage extensions with your provider.

Challenging the “90-Day Rule”: What the Data Shows

The assumption that poor early use predicts long-term failure is now being challenged by significant new evidence. Research presented at the ATS 2026 International Conference suggests that the current thresholds used by insurers may be prematurely cutting off patients who would eventually thrive on the therapy.

In a massive study involving more than 132,000 patients treated for OSA within Kaiser Permanente Southern California, researchers found a striking gap between insurance criteria and actual patient behavior. According to the data, 51 percent of patients failed to meet the 90-day Medicare criteria for continued use.

The Medicare policy in question requires patients to use their CPAP for at least four hours each night on 70 percent of nights during a 30-day window within those first 90 days. But is this “all-or-nothing” approach clinically sound?

“Our findings suggest clinicians and policymakers should not rely solely on Medicare-defined adherence, given its reliance on early CPAP use and an arbitrary four-hour threshold, when making long-term treatment decisions. Extending support and coverage beyond the first 90 days could help more patients achieve meaningful benefit.” — Dennis Hwang, MD, sleep and pulmonary physician at Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Why “Nonadherence” Isn’t Always Treatment Failure

The most surprising finding from the Kaiser Permanente study is that many patients who “failed” the initial insurance test didn’t actually give up. More than one-third of the patients who did not meet the early Medicare use criteria were still utilizing their CPAP machines one year later.

the definition of “success” itself is under scrutiny. While the insurance threshold is set at four hours, Dr. Hwang noted that even patients who didn’t hit that mark were often using their devices for at least two hours a night—a duration known to improve sleep apnea symptoms.

Did you know? Using a CPAP machine for as little as two hours a night can still lead to a meaningful improvement in sleep apnea symptoms, even if it doesn’t meet the strict “adherence” criteria set by some insurance providers.

Future Trends: Moving Toward Outcome-Based Coverage

As this data gains traction, the medical community is pushing for a shift in how sleep apnea therapy is managed and funded. We are likely moving toward a more nuanced, patient-centric model of care.

View this post on Instagram about Future Trends, Moving Toward Outcome
From Instagram — related to Future Trends, Moving Toward Outcome

1. From Arbitrary Thresholds to Clinical Outcomes

The future of CPAP coverage will likely move away from “stopwatch” metrics (how many hours a night) and toward outcome-based metrics (how much the patient’s health is actually improving). If a patient’s symptoms are resolving, the exact number of hours spent wearing the mask may become secondary.

2. Extended Adaptation Windows

Recognizing that some patients take longer to adapt to the equipment, there is a growing call to extend support and coverage beyond the first 90 days. This would prevent patients from losing access to life-saving treatment during the critical learning curve of the first few months.

3. Personalized Adherence Profiles

Future clinical practice may involve identifying “leisurely responders”—patients who struggle initially but eventually become long-term users. By understanding these profiles, doctors can provide targeted support to those most likely to benefit in the long run, rather than labeling them as “non-compliant.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current Medicare adherence requirement for CPAP?
Patients are generally required to use the device for at least four hours per night on 70% of nights during a 30-day window within the first 90 days of treatment.

Does failing the 90-day threshold mean the treatment isn’t working?
Not necessarily. Recent research shows that over one-third of patients who miss this threshold continue to use their devices a year later and still experience symptom improvement.

Can using a CPAP for only two hours a night still be beneficial?
Yes, evidence suggests that using the device for at least two hours a night can still improve the symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea.

Join the Conversation

Have you struggled with CPAP adherence or dealt with insurance hurdles? We want to hear your story. Share your experience in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates in sleep health and medical policy.

Subscribe for More Insights

May 20, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Trump demands Medicaid data for deportation. Some states go a step further.

by Chief Editor May 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The New Frontier of Enforcement: When Healthcare Data Becomes a Deportation Tool

For decades, the boundary between public health and law enforcement was treated as a sacred line. The logic was simple: if people fear that seeking medical help will lead to handcuffs, they stop seeking help. But a seismic shift is occurring across the United States, as several state governments transform public health agencies into extensions of immigration enforcement.

From North Carolina to Louisiana, a growing trend of “data-driven deportation” is emerging. By leveraging Medicaid enrollment records, state authorities are flagging individuals for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), creating a chilling effect that ripples far beyond the individuals targeted.

Did you know? According to a 2025 KFF-New York Times survey, roughly half of adults lacking legal status reported that a family member avoided medical care due to fears that their information would be shared with immigration enforcement.

The “Precision Bomb” Effect: Collateral Damage in Mixed-Status Families

While proponents of these laws argue they are necessary to combat Medicaid fraud and illegal immigration, health policy experts warn of a “precision bomb” effect. When a parent avoids a clinic to escape detection, their U.S. Citizen children often go untreated as well.

In states like Louisiana and North Carolina, the fear is not just about the person without documentation; It’s about the entire household. This creates a paradox where U.S. Citizens are effectively denied the healthcare benefits they are legally entitled to because the process of applying exposes their parents to deportation.

Researchers at Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families note that this dynamic pushes vulnerable families further into the shadows, increasing the likelihood of untreated chronic illnesses and missed vaccinations for the next generation of Americans.

The Fraud Argument vs. The Reality

Republican lawmakers often frame these reporting mandates as a crackdown on “fraud and abuse.” However, data from the Cato Institute suggests a different story: noncitizens are actually less likely to commit welfare fraud than native-born citizens.

Future Trends: Where is Data-Driven Enforcement Heading?

The current focus on Medicaid is likely only the beginning. As we analyze the legislative trajectory in states like Tennessee—where bills have proposed requiring all state agencies to report suspected undocumented individuals—several future trends emerge.

1. The Expansion to “Whole-of-Government” Surveillance

We are moving toward a model where any interaction with a state entity—be it renewing a driver’s license, applying for housing assistance, or enrolling a child in public school—could trigger an automated alert to federal immigration authorities. The “health-only” mandate is evolving into a comprehensive state-level surveillance net.

2. The Rise of “Shadow Healthcare” Systems

As trust in government-funded clinics evaporates, we expect to see a surge in “shadow healthcare.” This includes a heavier reliance on non-profit community clinics, faith-based health providers, and expensive out-of-pocket payments. While this protects individuals from deportation, it places an immense financial burden on underserved communities.

Trump Admin Sued Over Medicaid Data Release to Deportation Officials

3. Escalating Legal Warfare Between Red and Blue States

The divide between “Sanctuary States” and “Enforcement States” will deepen. With 21 states already joining lawsuits to prevent the DHS from mining Medicaid data, the judiciary will soon have to decide if the federal government’s right to enforce immigration law overrides a state’s duty to protect public health.

Pro Tip for Advocates: Families concerned about data privacy should consult with immigration attorneys to understand the specific “safe harbor” laws in their state and identify federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that may have different privacy protocols.

The Long-Term Public Health Risk

When a significant portion of the population avoids the healthcare system, the risk is not just individual—it is societal. Public health relies on early detection and containment. When treatable infections go unnoticed or chronic conditions like diabetes go unmanaged, the result is a spike in emergency room visits, which are the most expensive form of care and often funded by taxpayers.

By blurring the line between the doctor’s office and the detention center, states may be saving a few dollars in “fraud” while spending millions more on preventable emergency crises.

For more on how state policies are shifting, see our guide on The Evolution of State Health Mandates.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which states are currently requiring health agencies to report immigration status?
Currently, states including North Carolina, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, and Wyoming have passed laws to this effect, with others like Oklahoma and Tennessee considering similar measures.

Are U.S. Citizens eligible for Medicaid regardless of their parents’ status?
Yes, U.S. Citizen children are eligible for Medicaid and CHIP. However, many families avoid applying due to fear that the application process will expose undocumented parents to DHS.

Is it legal for the federal government to use Medicaid data for deportation?
What we have is currently a matter of intense legal dispute. While some courts have ruled that identities can be shared, others are fighting to protect medical information from being used as an enforcement tool.

Join the Conversation

Do you believe public health agencies should be used for immigration enforcement, or does this risk a broader public health crisis? Let us know in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on healthcare policy.

Subscribe Now

May 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Owner of autism center raided by feds tied to another business billing Minnesota Medicaid 

by Chief Editor April 30, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Fraud Investigation Shines Light on Complex Networks in Medicaid Billing

Federal raids on autism and child care centers in the Twin Cities are raising concerns about potential fraud within Minnesota’s Medicaid system. The investigation, involving over 20 search warrants, focuses on individuals and businesses billing for services through safety-net programs. A key element emerging from the investigation is the interconnectedness of companies through shared ownership, a pattern federal prosecutors have previously flagged as a potential indicator of fraudulent activity.

Shared Ownership: A Red Flag for Investigators

Public records reveal that multiple companies under scrutiny are linked by common owners. This structure, where individuals operate several businesses simultaneously billing Medicaid, is drawing increased attention from authorities. Former Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson, who oversaw Medicaid fraud prosecutions from 2007 to 2019, explained that such arrangements can “trigger added scrutiny” because a problem with one business could indicate issues across multiple entities. “If you have one business that you reckon is engaging in fraud, then potentially that’s a sign they may be engaging in fraud elsewhere,” she stated.

View this post on Instagram about Aspen Associates, House of Opportunity
From Instagram — related to Aspen Associates, House of Opportunity

Focus on Aspen Associates and House of Opportunity

Among the businesses searched was Aspen Associates, an autism center. Records identify Feisal Elmi as the company’s president, and manager. Elmi is also listed as the manager and owner of House of Opportunity, another Medicaid-billing company providing in-home support services. Both businesses share a common address, Suite 155, and operate from the same office space. Attempts to reach Elmi for comment were unsuccessful; he did not respond to calls or texts, and offered no explanation when contacted following the raid, stating, “I have no idea what they are looking for.”

Billions Billed: A Appear at Medicaid Spending

Data obtained through public records requests reveals the extent of billing by these companies to Minnesota’s Medical Assistance program since 2018. House of Opportunity billed $841,462.40 for integrated community supports, $195,953.48 for integrated home supports, and $17,371.20 for night supervision. Aspen Associates billed $323,651.32 for Adult Rehabilitative Mental Health Services (ARMHS), $2,805,299.43 for EIDBI (Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention) or Autism services, and $2,515,220.88 for housing stabilization services.

Owner of autism center raided by feds tied to another business billing Minnesota Medicaid

The Challenge of Tracking Complex Networks

The complexity of these networks presents a significant challenge for investigators. As Swanson noted, it can be “a game of whack-a-mole” trying to untangle the web of companies and identify fraudulent activity. The shared ownership structure allows for potential concealment of funds and makes it difficult to trace the flow of money within the system.

Future Trends: Increased Scrutiny and Data Analytics

This investigation is likely to accelerate several trends in Medicaid fraud detection. Expect to see:

  • Enhanced Data Analytics: States will increasingly rely on sophisticated data analytics to identify patterns of suspicious billing and shared ownership. Algorithms can flag anomalies and prioritize investigations.
  • Proactive Audits: Rather than solely responding to tips, agencies will likely conduct more proactive audits of companies with complex ownership structures or high billing volumes.
  • Increased Interagency Collaboration: Fraud investigations often require collaboration between state and federal agencies, including Medicaid agencies, law enforcement, and the Department of Justice.
  • Focus on Beneficial Ownership: There will be greater emphasis on identifying the true “beneficial owners” of companies – the individuals who ultimately control them – to uncover hidden connections.
  • Expansion of “Whack-a-Mole” Prevention: Regulators will seek ways to prevent individuals found to have engaged in fraud from simply creating new companies to continue the scheme.

Pro Tip:

For healthcare providers, maintaining meticulous records and ensuring full transparency in billing practices is crucial. Regular internal audits can help identify and address potential issues before they escalate.

Pro Tip:
Adult Rehabilitative Mental Health Services Early Intensive

Did You Grasp?

Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that provides healthcare coverage to millions of Americans, including children, pregnant women, seniors, and people with disabilities.

FAQ

  • What is Medicaid fraud? Medicaid fraud occurs when providers intentionally bill for services not rendered, bill at inflated rates, or otherwise misrepresent their services to receive payment.
  • Why is shared ownership a concern? Shared ownership can be used to conceal fraudulent activity and build it more difficult for investigators to track funds.
  • What are ARMHS and EIDBI? ARMHS stands for Adult Rehabilitative Mental Health Services, and EIDBI stands for Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention, both of which are Medicaid-covered services.

As the investigation unfolds, We see expected to shed further light on the extent of potential fraud within Minnesota’s Medicaid system and inform future efforts to protect taxpayer dollars and ensure access to quality care.

Explore more about fraud prevention: Report Fraud – HHS OIG

April 30, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Lack of mental health care facilities in Omaha area comes to light

by Chief Editor April 18, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Shift Toward Extended Mental Health Care

For too long, the mental health system has operated on a crisis-management model. As noted by Doris Moore, founder and CEO of the Center for Holistic Development, insurance guidelines often dictate the length of stay in care facilities. For those experiencing suicidal ideation, this may be as little as three days before they are transitioned to community therapists.

View this post on Instagram about Health, Mental
From Instagram — related to Health, Mental

The future of behavioral health must move toward extended care models. Many individuals with challenging conditions require “extra care” to ensure they remain stable and adhere to necessary medications. Without this extended support, patients are prone to spiraling downward once they leave the clinical environment.

Pro Tip: Shift the internal dialogue from “mental health care” to “healthcare.” As experts suggest, recognizing that mental health is health is the first step in changing how these services are funded and prioritized.

Decarcerating Mental Health: Beyond the Jail Cell

A troubling trend in the metro area is the reliance on correctional facilities to house those in psychiatric distress. In Douglas County, approximately 50% of the jail population suffers from some form of mental health issue.

Decarcerating Mental Health: Beyond the Jail Cell
Health Mental Shift

The trend is now shifting toward integrating specialized care within and adjacent to the justice system. By building true mental health facilities rather than utilizing jail cells, the goal is to ensure that no one has to enter the criminal justice system simply to receive psychiatric services.

This evolution in care aims to prevent the “downward spiral” that occurs when individuals on outpatient services stop taking their medication and finish up on the streets or in custody.

The Rise of Culturally Specific Behavioral Health

Generic mental health services often fail to address the specific needs of diverse populations. There is a growing recognition of the need for diversity in mental health positions and services, particularly for the BIPOC community.

Lack of adequate mental health care places heavy burden on young people

The Center for Holistic Development was established specifically to fill a void in Omaha, addressing the needs of the African American community in North Omaha. This approach acknowledges that historical trauma and systemic racism are traumas in themselves that require specialized, culturally competent care.

Did you understand? The lack of diversity in mental health providers often leads to a disparity in usage, where people of color are less likely to seek out help despite facing disproportionately higher rates of trauma.

Navigating the Financial Hurdles of Community Care

While community-based facilities are expanding—such as the $20 million project near the Douglas County Health Center—financial restrictions remain a significant barrier to scaling these services.

Navigating the Financial Hurdles of Community Care
Health Medicaid Mental

A critical challenge is the Medicaid reimbursement limit. Under National Institute for Mental Disease guidelines, facilities are often limited to 16 beds to collect Medicaid. These restrictions have historically contributed to the shutdown of regional centers, leaving a gap in the availability of long-term care beds.

Future trends suggest a need for legislative advocacy to fight funding cuts and Medicaid restrictions, alongside efforts to dismantle the social stigma that continues to hinder mental health progress.

For more on how these gaps impact the community, read about the lack of healthcare facilities in the Omaha area.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are there so few beds in community mental health facilities?
Financial restrictions, specifically Medicaid laws, often limit facilities to 16 beds to remain eligible for reimbursement, which limits the number of people the county can help.

How long do insurance companies typically allow for crisis stabilization?
In cases of suicidal ideation, insurance may only allow a stay of about three days before the patient is expected to connect with a community therapist.

Why is culturally specific care important in mental health?
Culturally specific services, like those provided to the BIPOC community, address unique historical traumas and racism that general services may overlook, making care more effective and accessible.

Join the Conversation: Do you think the current insurance model for mental health is sufficient? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more insights on community health.

April 18, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • NASA’s Historic Plan: Lighting the First Fire on the Moon

    July 10, 2026
  • Holiday Nightmare: Couple Forced to Abandon Belongings After Emergency Stop

    July 10, 2026
  • Baby Found Alive in Funeral Home After 5 Hours of Being Declared Dead

    July 10, 2026
  • Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy Named After Putin, Divided the Nation

    July 10, 2026
  • Microsoft’s carbon emissions surged 25% year-over-year, reaching 34 million metric tons

    July 10, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

© 2026 Newsy Today. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: [email protected]


Back To Top

For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: [email protected]

Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World