Latvia’s Constitutional Court is now reviewing a challenge to recently approved regulations that would end mandatory state verification of water meters in apartments. The case centers on whether the changes, approved by the Cabinet of Ministers on June 3rd, align with the country’s constitution.
Constitutional Concerns Raised
The dispute involves regulations defining which measuring instruments require state metrological control. While mechanical, electromagnetic, and ultrasonic water meters generally fall under this control, the new rules would exempt those installed in apartments within multi-apartment buildings. An applicant company, involved in both the replacement and verification of water meters, argues this exemption infringes on constitutionally protected property rights.
The applicant contends the Cabinet of Ministers did not provide a reasonable transition period or compensation for businesses reliant on the previous verification requirements. They also claim the government did not adequately assess the necessity of the changes, justify the public benefit, or consult with the industry before implementing them.
Timeline and Next Steps
The court has requested a written response from the government, outlining the factual and legal basis for the regulations, with a deadline of February 2026. A case preparation period will follow, extending to May 2026. The court will then determine the format and schedule for a hearing.
The government initially approved the abolition of mandatory water meter verification starting January 1, 2026. Amendments to Cabinet regulations, drafted by the Ministry of Economics on May 14, 2024, would allow apartment owners to continue using existing meters without re-verification.
The Ministry of Economics has stated the change is intended to reduce costs and administrative burdens for residents, noting that repeated verification of apartment water meters is not cost-effective. Previously, mechanical meters required verification every four years, while electromagnetic and ultrasonic meters were checked every six years.
Vladislavs Eidimts, a board member of plumbing services provider OB serviss, stated in June that the decision was made “without industry involvement or professional discussion.” He urged the Ministry of Economics to reconsider and engage in dialogue with the sector, warning of potential legal action if the decision remained unchanged.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is being challenged in this case?
The applicant is challenging the Cabinet of Ministers regulations approved on June 3rd that exempt apartment water meters from mandatory state verification.
What is the applicant’s primary argument?
The applicant argues the regulations infringe on their constitutionally protected right to property and violate the principle of legitimate expectations due to a lack of transition measures.
When could a decision be reached?
The court will decide on the form and date of a hearing after the preparation phase is completed in May 2026. A timeline for a final decision has not been established.
How might changes to water meter verification regulations affect Latvian residents and businesses in the long term?