Junior 2, Águilas 1: a dubious penalty saved the points

Wánder Mosquera Mena saved Junior. When time was dying and the Sharks only reached a tie with a taste of defeat against Águilas, the central referee sanctioned an action between Miguel Borja and goalkeeper Carlos Bejarano as a penalty in the last second of play.

Just as it is protested at times when bad refereeing decisions harm the rojiblanco club, this time we must admit that the Cundinamarca whistle was wrong in their favor.

Borja, after eluding three defenders with his usual power, faced the goalkeeper and fell into the area. “Penalty!” The shark fans shouted immediately, very surely. That was the first impression, but in reality Bejarano went to the ball and did not commit an infraction. At least that showed the replay on television.

The determination of Borja to undertake the play and the failure of the referee, who did not have VAR and who was the victim of the same sensation of many of those who watched the game on television, rescued Junior.

The Cordovan attacker, who entered the second half for Michael Rangel, stopped at the white point and executed accurately to make the difference (2-1).

The victory was quite embollado by the confused and run-down game of the premises, that reserved to the majority of its eleven stellar thinking in the party of Tuesday against Independiente del Valle for the Copa Libertadores.

In that plan B, in which a rookie midfielder like Fabián Ángel was positioned as a defender, the Sharks managed to press, attack and create some offensive plays in the first half and put themselves ahead through a good goal from ‘ Cariaco ‘González.

But in the second half, the lack of understanding of this team became more evident, the absence of a creative midfielder like Sherman Cárdenas, who only entered with seven minutes remaining in the game (it must be because he will start on Tuesday) and everything is complicated. Much more after Obrian’s draw. There was no compass or ideas or clarity or imbalance. Already the hopes of winning were practically extinguished until the dubious penalty arrived and saved all three points.

Minute by minute

4. Quiet ball play in which the ball is surprisingly moved to Fabián Viáfara. The side takes a shot down and crossed that buzzes the goalkeeper’s right post.

23. Viáfara’s center, bad rejection and the ball remains for ‘Cariaco’ González, who finishes powerfully and goalkeeper Carlos Bejarano rejects.

32. Good play by Cristian Higuita, who sneaks into the area and defines with a shot from the side, which is narrowly missed.

33. GOAL Junior. Series of touches by Junior, Rangel gives it to Luis ‘Cariaco’ González and the Venezuelan, on the edge of the area, dispatches a shot above that exceeds the goalkeeper’s effort.

36. Daniel Moreno’s shot over the goal.

45. ‘Cariaco’ wastes a clear scoring opportunity. When he was about to finish with his right leg, he disarmed the ball with his left and the shot was totally deflected.

Second time

60. GOAL from Águilas. Deep pass from Marrugo to Jáder Obrian, who takes advantage of Jeison Angulo’s cold mark to surpass him in speed and define with an accurate shot against Viera.

68. Borja’s shot too high.

81. Carlos Bejarano saves almost in the line an attempt of Borja’s header that deviated in the humanity of a defender.

83. Bejarano shrinks well against Cetré, who built a good wall with Sandoval.

93. The referee sanctions a penalty for an alleged foul by goalkeeper Bejarano on Miguel Borja, which in reality did not exist

94. GOAL from Junior. Borja executed flush and to the left hand of the goalkeeper, who launched himself to the right.

.

“Collina’s heirs” take a close look: Why Stuttgart is unnecessarily angry


By Alex Feuerherdt

VfB Stuttgart is back in the Bundesliga – and struggles with the “Kölner Keller” in the game against SC Freiburg. Wrongly – but this only becomes clear on closer inspection. In Bremen, the video assistant also pays attention to every millimeter.

The stoppage time in the match between VfB Stuttgart and SC Freiburg was already running, the hosts had reduced a 3-0 deficit to 3-2 and were now urgently pushing for an equalizer. The guests suddenly had to fear for the victory they believed to be safe and braced themselves against it. When there was a free kick for the promoted player on the outside lane, which Philipp Klement was supposed to push into the penalty area, numerous players gathered in a confined space, as is so often the case in such situations; they pushed and held a little, they pushed and pulled together.

All of this stayed within the usual, within the usual framework – with one exception: Freiburg’s Lucas Höler clasped his opponent Waldemar Anton very tightly with both arms, preventing him from getting closer to the goal and finally pulled him to the ground. Referee Benjamin Cortus did not whistle, however – he probably had not seen the duel, but he should not be blamed. Because it is simply not possible to keep a close eye on several pairs of players who are working with their arms at the same time.

Höler finished staples in time

But there was still the video assistant Bibiana Steinhaus. It was seen that the referee was in touch with her; in Cologne the scene was of course checked. But there was no recommendation to Cortus to look at the scene again on the monitor in the review area, but rather the okay for him. Many, especially in the VfB camp, were amazed at this, but also commentators and experts: the hold was as clear as day, you couldn’t just leave it unpunished, there had to be a penalty afterwards! How could it be that Steinhaus simply waved this offense through?

imago0048357487h.jpg

Benjamin Cortus had good reasons for his decision.

(Photo: imago images / Sven Simon)

The answer is given by stopping the scene exactly at the moment when Klement took the free kick. Then you can see that Höler had released his grip just in time and Anton was already about to fall. In other words, the hold offense occurred when the free kick had not yet been taken and it was over when the ball came back into play. According to Rule 12 (fouls and unsportsmanlike conduct) an offense can only be punished with a free kick or penalty kick if the ball is in play at the time of the offense. However, this is not a free ticket, because a yellow or red card can still be given to the player in question.

The crux with the VAR powers

In this specific case, this means: Actually, the free kick should have been repeated because an irregularity had occurred before it was taken. In addition, Höler would have been warned, which would have meant yellow-red for the Freiburg resident, because he had already been warned. However, all of this would have presupposed that Benjamin Cortus had perceived the offense himself. Because Bibiana Steinhaus was not allowed to intervene here: Because a penalty was not considered in terms of the rules and holding Höler was not a case for a straight red card, an intervention was ruled out after the review was completed. After all, there was neither a clear and obvious mistake nor an overlooked serious incident.

Collina’s heirs

Collina’s heirs“- this is Germany’s only referee podcast, founded and run by Klaas Reese and Alex Feuerherdt. It deals with the football rules, the decisions of the referees as well as the background and depths of refereeing.” Collina’s heirs “write every Monday on n- tv.de about the referee services of the Bundesliga matchday Our author Alex Feuerherdt is since 1985 referee and directed games up to the league. He is responsible for training and further education in Cologne, referee observer in the DFB division and works as a lecturer and freelance journalist.

Stuttgart protested in the 75th minute when Philipp Lienhart had played the ball in his own penalty area with his left upper arm, but the well-positioned referee did not want to rate the handball as a criminal offense. In fact, in this situation, the Freiburg man’s arm was close to the body and hanging normally, so the posture was natural. On the other hand, Lienhart had made a short movement to the ball with his upper body and arm. Since the referee noticed and assessed this process himself, the intervention threshold for the video assistant was high. There are undoubtedly arguments in favor of a penalty kick, but it would be inappropriate to speak of a clear and obvious mistake on the part of the referee, which should inevitably have resulted in interference.

What else was important:

In the encounter between the 1. FC Köln and TSG 1899 Hoffenheim (2: 3) however, the VAR intervened shortly before the break. After a duel in the Cologne penalty area between Hoffenheim’s Christoph Baumgartner and Rafael Czichos, in which the ball finally went out, the guests claimed a penalty kick. Referee Daniel Siebert, whose view was blocked at the decisive moment, had initially made no decision because he lacked perception. An on-field review was carried out, which the VAR recommends not only in the case of clear and obvious errors, but also in the event of a missed, possibly serious incident – and which the referee can also make use of at his own request, albeit only rarely happens. On the monitor Siebert saw that Baumgartner was a blink of an eye earlier on the ball than Czichos and was then brought down by Cologne. The following penalty decision is therefore okay.

imago0048338551h.jpg

Before the line, so free kick.

(Foto: imago images/Nordphoto)

Also in the game Werder Bremen against Hertha BSC (1: 4) there was an intervention by the VAR shortly before half-time, but for a different reason: Referee Sascha Stegemann had decided on a penalty for the Berliners after a foul by Marco Friedl on Peter Pekarik, but the video assistant found during the check that it was the offense occurred outside the penalty area. Therefore, the referee changed his decision and recognized a free kick. Some frowned at this, after all Friedl had hit his opponent with his left foot directly on the penalty area line, which is known to be part of the penalty area. But immediately before that, he had knocked down Pekarik with his right foot outside the sixteenth. And the rule interpretation stipulates that in such cases, in principle, the first punishable contact is decisive. An exception are arrest offenses, which can last longer and where it is crucial where they take effect. That means: Anyone who grabs an opponent’s jersey outside the penalty area but only knocks them to the ground in the penalty area will be punished with a penalty kick.

.

The judges helped Pilsen, the Opava stopper didn’t get red! Julínek and Královec caught it

Vlastimil Vacek, Right

The commission stated in a press release that both penalties for the domestic Pilsen were in order. Before the second in the setting of the first half, when Hrabin fouled Jan Kovařík, first referee Alex Denev awarded the Opava defender a yellow card. However, video referee Jiří Adam then erroneously recommended a review of the situation, Denev changed his verdict and incorrectly excluded Hrabina. Viktoria finally won after a 3: 1 turn.

In the 45th minute, Nespor struck Jakub Hromada in the face with Liberec’s elbow and incorrectly received only a yellow card from the main referee Pavel Julínek. Assistant Marek Podaný and video referee Ondřej Cieslar were also wrong in the situation, who was to recommend to Julínek that he review the situation. The guests’ penalty penalty was penalized after 65 minutes, but Kamso Mara made an excellent save. Olomouc won 1: 0 at home.

Judge Pavel Královec is studying video.

Vlastimil Vacek, Right

In Saturday’s match Zlín – Slovácko (1: 2) Pavel Královec correctly ordered a penalty kick in favor of the home team at the end of the first half. However, the main referee made a mistake in the 75th minute, when he did not whistle the penalty for Slovácko immediately, but only after the VAR intervention and a review of the situation.

In Sunday’s match České Budějovice – Slavia Praha (0: 6) Miroslav Zelinka in the 78th minute wrongly ordered a penalty for the guests. However, the penalty kick was canceled after the intervention of the video referee and the review on the playing field.

The commission called the correct penalty for Bohemians 1905 in Sunday’s home duel with Mladá Boleslav (4: 0), which was ordered in the 30th minute by referee Pavel Rejžek.

.

“I went up behind and touched my bra.” Details of the story about a Perm teacher who was given 9 years for harassing a student

– It is difficult to build forecasts, but I believe in the best. I feel sorry for mom, she is very worried, it has been going on for more than a year, – said “KP» 49-year-old math teacher Valery Syropyatov and, with a sigh, he entered the courtroom.

On Monday in the Ordzhonikidze court Perm the teacher was sentenced under the article “Violent acts of a sexual nature”. The sentence is 9 years and 6 months in a maximum security colony.

“The girl begged the three”

This ugly story happened in March last year in a Perm school. According to the teacher, she looked like this:

– In the seventh grade, where the girl studied, I taught mathematics for the first year. In the first quarter, she deceived me, I believed and put the “troika”. But there must be an educational moment. I told her that now she will hand over all the work in the sequence in which they are studied. And until we get to the control for the third quarter, the final mark at her will not be!

On that day, March 27, several students came to the mathematician to take the “tails”.

“Everyone sat at their desks and did the work, and once again she decided to slip away,” the teacher continues. – I began to ask myself, said that her stomach ached, her head … I insisted: “Decide the control, get your” threefold “and you can step on all four sides. If it’s inconvenient for you to study in the classroom – the children are noisy – let’s go to another office. ” We left, she stood at the table and again began to whine. I sit at the table and tell her: “Go, decide!” The man does not leave, I waved. I am sitting, she is standing – where will i get? Here in the belt on the side with the back of the hand and hit. It turned out cotton. I admitted this, and was removed by the director from teaching in this class. I apologized and believed that the incident had been exhausted.

Soon, the information got into law enforcement. First, criminal proceedings were instituted for Art. Art. 135 of the Criminal Code RF “Depraved actions”, and after six months the investigations were re-qualified as more serious, Art. 132 “Violent acts of a sexual nature.”

At each meeting, teachers supported

To the court – at each hearing in the Valery case Syropyatova – a support group gathered: former graduates, colleagues, parents of students … 17 of them acted as witnesses from the defense. They all said that they could not believe the guilt of their beloved teacher. He does not smoke, does sports, organizes excursions around the Perm Territory and cities for children Of Russiaorganizes competitions in rogain, tourist trips, alloys, fees …

Despite all the kind words spoken to the defendant, the state prosecution requested 13 years of imprisonment for him.

Valery Syropyatov on the day the sentence was announced, we met near the courthouse. He was light, without things. As the teacher himself explained, he believed that the court would figure it out and justify it.

“I’ve already checked in, now I’ll take a little walk, breathe in fresh air, mentally tune in and go,” he explained before entering the courtroom.

Despite the fact that the process was closed, the journalists and the support group were allowed to announce the verdict.

It was impossible to understand what the teacher experienced at that moment when the judge said “nine and a half years in a maximum security colony”, the teacher’s face was hidden under a mask. And the former graduates and colleagues who were present at the announcement somehow immediately went down. Someone could not hold back tears.

– Do you understand the verdict and the procedure for appealing against it?

“Yes, your honor,” the convict answered calmly.

At that moment, three escorts entered the courtroom. Knowing the rules of staying in places of deprivation of liberty — the teacher spent three days in a pre-trial detention center while the investigation was under way — the teacher began to unfasten his belt in order to remove it, took money from his pockets, a cell phone and gave it to a relative. The guards locked handcuffs on his hands, and asked all those present to leave the courtroom.

It was impossible to understand what the teacher experienced at that moment when the judge said “nine and a half years in a maximum security colony”, the teacher’s face was hidden under a mask.Photo: Vasily Vakhrin

I closed and he pushed my hands away

– The criminal case was considered in closed court, so we can’t explain the details, you heard the verdict, the evidence that the prosecution presented to the court was enough to plead guilty to a particularly serious crime against the sexual integrity of a minor, therefore the sentence so big – said assistant to the prosecutor of the Ordzhonikidze district of Perm, Dmitry Shishkin. – And that slap, and the version that the defendant himself told everyone about, including in the media, is a way of protection.

As it became known to “Komsomolskaya Pravda” from a source familiar with the materials of the criminal case, one of the evidence presented in court was the correspondence of the seventh grader with his girlfriend in social networks. Late in the evening on the day of math retaking, the schoolgirl wrote to her close friend that she was at school, and the teacher took her to a separate office, put her at her desk, walked up behind and began to touch her bra.

“I sat at the table, he was at the back and was pawing me,” she wrote. – I tried to close my hands, and he pushed his hands and touched me by the chest.

Experts examined the girl for bruises and the only thing found on her body was a small scratch on her finger.

The accusation was also based on the words of the girl, her mother and friend. Investigators also found a video from school surveillance cameras, which shows how one of the schoolgirls told Valery Nikolaevich that she had passed the debt, and he leaned over and began to say in her ear that she was good. This was interpreted later as a kiss.

During the investigation, a forensic medical examination was carried out, the biological traces of the teacher on the things of the victim were not found. The teacher was also tested for a tendency to pedophilia, but the result was negative.

READ ALSO:

“Sex scandal” in Perm: a math teacher shines 13 years for a slap on the priest of the seventh grader

In an interview with Komsomolka, the teacher told his version of events [видео] (More …)

In Perm, 17 graduates spoke at the trial in defense of a mathematics teacher who faces 13 years for a slap on the priest of a seventh grader

Among them were police officers and lawyers [видео] (More …)

“Having heard the verdict, he took off his belt.” In Perm, the teacher received 9 and a half years for a slap on the student’s priest

Valery Syropyatov was handcuffed in the courtroom (More …)

.

“I went up behind and touched my bra.” Details of the story about a Perm teacher who was given 9 years for harassing a student

– It is difficult to build forecasts, but I believe in the best. I feel sorry for mom, she is very worried, it has been going on for more than a year, – said “KP» 49-year-old math teacher Valery Syropyatov and, with a sigh, he entered the courtroom.

On Monday in the Ordzhonikidze court Perm the teacher was sentenced under the article “Violent acts of a sexual nature”. The sentence is 9 years and 6 months in a maximum security colony.

“The girl begged the three”

This ugly story happened in March last year in a Perm school. According to the teacher, she looked like this:

– In the seventh grade, where the girl studied, I taught mathematics for the first year. In the first quarter, she deceived me, I believed and put the “troika”. But there must be an educational moment. I told her that now she will hand over all the work in the sequence in which they are studied. And until we get to the control for the third quarter, the final mark at her will not be!

On that day, March 27, several students came to the mathematician to take the “tails”.

“Everyone sat at their desks and did the work, and once again she decided to slip away,” the teacher continues. – I began to ask myself, said that her stomach ached, her head … I insisted: “Decide the control, get your” threefold “and you can step on all four sides. If it’s inconvenient for you to study in the classroom – the children are noisy – let’s go to another office. ” We left, she stood at the table and again began to whine. I sit at the table and tell her: “Go, decide!” The man does not leave, I waved. I am sitting, she is standing – where will i get? Here in the belt on the side with the back of the hand and hit. It turned out cotton. I admitted this, and was removed by the director from teaching in this class. I apologized and believed that the incident had been exhausted.

Soon, the information got into law enforcement. First, criminal proceedings were instituted for Art. Art. 135 of the Criminal Code RF “Depraved actions”, and after six months the investigations were re-qualified as more serious, Art. 132 “Violent acts of a sexual nature.”

At each meeting, teachers supported

To the court – at each hearing in the Valery case Syropyatova – a support group gathered: former graduates, colleagues, parents of students … 17 of them acted as witnesses from the defense. They all said that they could not believe the guilt of their beloved teacher. He does not smoke, does sports, organizes excursions around the Perm Territory and cities for children Of Russiaorganizes competitions in rogain, tourist trips, alloys, fees …

Despite all the kind words spoken to the defendant, the state prosecution requested 13 years of imprisonment for him.

Valery Syropyatov on the day the sentence was announced, we met near the courthouse. He was light, without things. As the teacher himself explained, he believed that the court would figure it out and justify it.

“I’ve already checked in, now I’ll take a little walk, breathe in fresh air, mentally tune in and go,” he explained before entering the courtroom.

Despite the fact that the process was closed, the journalists and the support group were allowed to announce the verdict.

It was impossible to understand what the teacher experienced at that moment when the judge said “nine and a half years in a maximum security colony”, the teacher’s face was hidden under a mask. And the former graduates and colleagues who were present at the announcement somehow immediately went down. Someone could not hold back tears.

– Do you understand the verdict and the procedure for appealing against it?

“Yes, your honor,” the convict answered calmly.

At that moment, three escorts entered the courtroom. Knowing the rules of staying in places of deprivation of liberty — the teacher spent three days in a pre-trial detention center while the investigation was under way — the teacher began to unfasten his belt in order to remove it, took money from his pockets, a cell phone and gave it to a relative. The guards locked handcuffs on his hands, and asked all those present to leave the courtroom.

It was impossible to understand what the teacher experienced at that moment when the judge said “nine and a half years in a maximum security colony”, the teacher’s face was hidden under a mask.Photo: Vasily Vakhrin

I closed and he pushed my hands away

– The criminal case was considered in closed court, so we can’t explain the details, you heard the verdict, the evidence that the prosecution presented to the court was enough to plead guilty to a particularly serious crime against the sexual integrity of a minor, therefore the sentence so big – said assistant to the prosecutor of the Ordzhonikidze district of Perm, Dmitry Shishkin. – And that slap, and the version that the defendant himself told everyone about, including in the media, is a way of protection.

As it became known to “Komsomolskaya Pravda” from a source familiar with the materials of the criminal case, one of the evidence presented in court was the correspondence of the seventh grader with his girlfriend in social networks. Late in the evening on the day of math retaking, the schoolgirl wrote to her close friend that she was at school, and the teacher took her to a separate office, put her at her desk, walked up behind and began to touch her bra.

“I sat at the table, he was at the back and was pawing me,” she wrote. – I tried to close my hands, and he pushed his hands and touched me by the chest.

Experts examined the girl for bruises and the only thing found on her body was a small scratch on her finger.

The accusation was also based on the words of the girl, her mother and friend. Investigators also found a video from school surveillance cameras, which shows how one of the schoolgirls told Valery Nikolaevich that she had passed the debt, and he leaned over and began to say in her ear that she was good. This was interpreted later as a kiss.

During the investigation, a forensic medical examination was carried out, the biological traces of the teacher on the things of the victim were not found. The teacher was also tested for a tendency to pedophilia, but the result was negative.

READ ALSO:

“Sex scandal” in Perm: a math teacher shines 13 years for a slap on the priest of the seventh grader

In an interview with Komsomolka, the teacher told his version of events [видео] (More …)

In Perm, 17 graduates spoke at the trial in defense of a mathematics teacher who faces 13 years for a slap on the priest of a seventh grader

Among them were police officers and lawyers [видео] (More …)

“Having heard the verdict, he took off his belt.” In Perm, the teacher received 9 and a half years for a slap on the student’s priest

Valery Syropyatov was handcuffed in the courtroom (More …)

.

“I went up behind and touched my bra.” Details of the story about a Perm teacher who was given 9 years for harassing a student

– It is difficult to build forecasts, but I believe in the best. I feel sorry for mom, she is very worried, it has been going on for more than a year, – said “KP» 49-year-old math teacher Valery Syropyatov and, with a sigh, he entered the courtroom.

On Monday in the Ordzhonikidze court Perm the teacher was sentenced under the article “Violent acts of a sexual nature”. The sentence is 9 years and 6 months in a maximum security colony.

“The girl begged the three”

This ugly story happened in March last year in a Perm school. According to the teacher, she looked like this:

– In the seventh grade, where the girl studied, I taught mathematics for the first year. In the first quarter, she deceived me, I believed and put the “troika”. But there must be an educational moment. I told her that now she will hand over all the work in the sequence in which they are studied. And until we get to the control for the third quarter, the final mark at her will not be!

On that day, March 27, several students came to the mathematician to take the “tails”.

“Everyone sat at their desks and did the work, and once again she decided to slip away,” the teacher continues. – I began to ask myself, said that her stomach ached, her head … I insisted: “Decide the control, get your” threefold “and you can step on all four sides. If it’s inconvenient for you to study in the classroom – the children are noisy – let’s go to another office. ” We left, she stood at the table and again began to whine. I sit at the table and tell her: “Go, decide!” The man does not leave, I waved. I am sitting, she is standing – where will i get? Here in the belt on the side with the back of the hand and hit. It turned out cotton. I admitted this, and was removed by the director from teaching in this class. I apologized and believed that the incident had been exhausted.

Soon, the information got into law enforcement. First, criminal proceedings were instituted for Art. Art. 135 of the Criminal Code RF “Depraved actions”, and after six months the investigations were re-qualified as more serious, Art. 132 “Violent acts of a sexual nature.”

At each meeting, teachers supported

To the court – at each hearing in the Valery case Syropyatova – a support group gathered: former graduates, colleagues, parents of students … 17 of them acted as witnesses from the defense. They all said that they could not believe the guilt of their beloved teacher. He does not smoke, does sports, organizes excursions around the Perm Territory and cities for children Of Russiaorganizes competitions in rogain, tourist trips, alloys, fees …

Despite all the kind words spoken to the defendant, the state prosecution requested 13 years of imprisonment for him.

Valery Syropyatov on the day the sentence was announced, we met near the courthouse. He was light, without things. As the teacher himself explained, he believed that the court would figure it out and justify it.

“I’ve already checked in, now I’ll take a little walk, breathe in fresh air, mentally tune in and go,” he explained before entering the courtroom.

Despite the fact that the process was closed, the journalists and the support group were allowed to announce the verdict.

It was impossible to understand what the teacher experienced at that moment when the judge said “nine and a half years in a maximum security colony”, the teacher’s face was hidden under a mask. And the former graduates and colleagues who were present at the announcement somehow immediately went down. Someone could not hold back tears.

– Do you understand the verdict and the procedure for appealing against it?

“Yes, your honor,” the convict answered calmly.

At that moment, three escorts entered the courtroom. Knowing the rules of staying in places of deprivation of liberty — the teacher spent three days in a pre-trial detention center while the investigation was under way — the teacher began to unfasten his belt in order to remove it, took money from his pockets, a cell phone and gave it to a relative. The guards locked handcuffs on his hands, and asked all those present to leave the courtroom.

It was impossible to understand what the teacher experienced at that moment when the judge said “nine and a half years in a maximum security colony”, the teacher’s face was hidden under a mask.Photo: Vasily Vakhrin

I closed and he pushed my hands away

– The criminal case was considered in closed court, so we can’t explain the details, you heard the verdict, the evidence that the prosecution presented to the court was enough to plead guilty to a particularly serious crime against the sexual integrity of a minor, therefore the sentence so big – said assistant to the prosecutor of the Ordzhonikidze district of Perm, Dmitry Shishkin. – And that slap, and the version that the defendant himself told everyone about, including in the media, is a way of protection.

As it became known to “Komsomolskaya Pravda” from a source familiar with the materials of the criminal case, one of the evidence presented in court was the correspondence of the seventh grader with his girlfriend in social networks. Late in the evening on the day of math retaking, the schoolgirl wrote to her close friend that she was at school, and the teacher took her to a separate office, put her at her desk, walked up behind and began to touch her bra.

“I sat at the table, he was at the back and was pawing me,” she wrote. – I tried to close my hands, and he pushed his hands and touched me by the chest.

Experts examined the girl for bruises and the only thing found on her body was a small scratch on her finger.

The accusation was also based on the words of the girl, her mother and friend. Investigators also found a video from school surveillance cameras, which shows how one of the schoolgirls told Valery Nikolaevich that she had passed the debt, and he leaned over and began to say in her ear that she was good. This was interpreted later as a kiss.

During the investigation, a forensic medical examination was carried out, the biological traces of the teacher on the things of the victim were not found. The teacher was also tested for a tendency to pedophilia, but the result was negative.

READ ALSO:

“Sex scandal” in Perm: a math teacher shines 13 years for a slap on the priest of the seventh grader

In an interview with Komsomolka, the teacher told his version of events [видео] (More …)

In Perm, 17 graduates spoke at the trial in defense of a mathematics teacher who faces 13 years for a slap on the priest of a seventh grader

Among them were police officers and lawyers [видео] (More …)

“Having heard the verdict, he took off his belt.” In Perm, the teacher received 9 and a half years for a slap on the student’s priest

Valery Syropyatov was handcuffed in the courtroom (More …)

.

Maria Poroshina showed her stretch

Maria Powder is a participant in the 11th season of the show “Dancing with the Stars.” People’s favorite pleases the audience with unusual images. She was already a glamorous diva of the 20s of the last century, and an oriental beauty, and even incendiary danced cha-cha-cha in bold mini and pantyhose in a net. This time, the mother of five children appeared on the floor in the image of a charming policeman.

Maria Poroshina and Evgenia Raeva enjoy wildly popular with the audience of the show “Dancing with the Stars”. The partner of the actress is a titled dancer and choreographer. Of course, without incidents on the floor is not complete. But stars cope with all difficulties for the sake of one goal – victory on the project.

Maria posted a series of photos on her blog. In the frame, she and her partner are captured during the performance of an incendiary number. Poroshina appeared as a policeman, and Raev – in the image of a biker.

Maria Poroshina fell during the show “Dancing with the Stars”

“Having fallen on the floor, I believe we did not fall before your eyes. We are preparing something interesting …”, the 46-year-old actress signed the pictures. In one of the photos she famously threw her foot at Eugene.

Stretching the star of the series “Always say” always “” made a splash. Fans were delighted with what they saw. They supported the star mom and daughters. Seraphim and Agrafena went live to express their admiration for Mom’s talent and convince the judges not to give her low scores.

“It was wonderful! I really liked how my mom suddenly threw her leg up. The stretch is good! Give her good marks … Mom is trying hard!”, One of the daughters said.

By the way, raher Poroshina admitted that very worried before agreeing to participate in the show. But she took up this challenge with her children. “I have five of them. All this is done for them and for their sake. Therefore, I went to dance. Not everything works out, but I tried,” said the actress. In a marriage with actor Ilya Drevnov, she gave birth to three daughters – Seraphim, Agrafen and Glafira. From the first husband of Gosha Kutsenko, she has a daughter, Polina. And in January 2020, the artist had the long-awaited son Andrei. She does not advertise the name of the boy’s father.

Maria Poroshina struck on the spot with her banner

.

ACB: ACB referees and police: “What do you say to someone who walks a stuffed dog?” | ACB 2019

García Ortiz and Oyón, members of the Endesa League, relate their intense experiences these days of alarm. “On the court and in the street you must have a lot of temperance and a left hand”


García Ortiz, with his colleagues in San Fernando.
THE WORLD

At the moment, they have stopped being García Ortiz and Oyón Cauqui. Now they are José Ramón and Juande, overturned in their other profession, parked the ACB whistle although they miss even the controversies.“Even the coaches’ protests!”, after finishing their day, they count police in San Fernando (Cádiz) and Badalona in these days of state of alarm, so intense and strange, in which it gives them to live unpublished things, but also to get excited and even to laugh.

“How can you forget the look of a child who has just been awarded a diploma to reward him because he has not left home for more than a month?” Explains García Ortiz,one of the most experienced referees in the Endesa League(more than 800 games), veteran of a thousand battles. Younger is Oyón, with whom he has shared an arbitration trio more than once – “two police referees, imagine the messing around of the players …” -, who cannot stop thinking about the eyes and tears of that old woman at the same time. that the other day they sang “Happy Birthday” to him from the patrol car.

But also, of course, there were hard moments, those that will remain forever in the retina of these rare days. It is not easy to assimilate that the normal citizen can be suspected for the simple fact of going out. José Ramón had to ask many neighbors to stop censuring that father who was walking with his son. «I had ASD[Trastorno del espectro autista]and I needed rides. People chastised him. We had to explain that it was not on a whim. It was not easy. At the beginning we were given many circumstances that did not appear in the BOE ».

Oyón, Badalona police and ACB referee.
Oyón, Badalona police and ACB referee.

His empathy, forged in the streets and put to the test on so many courts, is more fundamental than ever. Both agree on the exemplary behavior of the majority and that, as in arbitration, “common sense” must be the basic rule. «The other day I had a very extreme case. I stopped a boy on a motorcycle and he told me that his mother, who had been cremated, had died. And that he came from seeing his father.I did not ask for the death certificate. Because of your experience and how you see that person, because you believe it. You have to have a left hand. And that is what basketball looks like, “admits Oyón, who has also had to run a career like those virals that circulate on social networks, especially every day he comes out of the country:” A boy who was riding a scooter, we saw something Weird, we stopped him and we fled. At the end we located him and he had 45 grams of hash on him ».

It is about unmasking the cheater, on the track and in life. “If they break the regulations, you have to be firm. And temperance, because everything has a limit. And if it is exceeded, many times the consequences are worse and for a simple infraction you end up in the police station.It happens a bit like with the coaches’ protests», Tells García Ortiz.

Although there are times that it is even difficult to hold back the laughter. More in San Fernando, land of permanent joke, tricks and excuses to write a book. “It is that people have a lot of art,” says José Ramón, who had to deal with a citizen who was walkinga stuffed dog …. And what do you say … You have to laugh. You just can’t do anything else. The people who saw the scene were laughing with laughter ». Also half a smile escaped Oyón and his partner when they stopped two hairdressers who were coming to make curlers at home to a lady. «With all the gadgets, combs and others in the car … And we who have been without cutting our hair for weeks. We were about to ask them for a favor, ”he jokes.

Two professions that receive more criticism than praise, always in the spotlight. Referees and police. That is why, although they long for the initial jump, the adrenaline of the competition, both García Ortiz and Oyón recognize themselves as protagonists of a unique moment, of the “applause that is dedicated to us every day at eight”. ‘The other afternoon they shouted at us from a balcony’Long live the Urban Guard!‘. That had never happened to me before. You feel rewarded », adds the Barcelona player.

That fear on a court has long gone down in history, although there are always tense moments. The one of now is another fear, to be infected or to infect.“You try to push it away from your mind”. Because they are at the forefront of the fight against the coronavirus. “We try to be scrupulous. But there are times when you are wrong, because everything is so new … The other day, an elderly man fell on the street and was without a mask. The first intuitive intention is to go help him, to lift him up. And you do, of course. And then you think. He was not wearing a mask, I have exposed myself … », García Ortiz reflects aloud, because the mistake, living with him is part of his professions. And when you fail, you better recognize it. The player appreciates it ».

According to the criteria of

The Trust Project

Know more

.

The Sports Day: 11:55 am New rules apply to referees when the league continues – n-tv NEWS

  1. The sports day: 11: 55 For referees, new rules apply to league continuation n-tv NEWS
  2. Corona crisis: This should change for the referees SPORT1
  3. Corona secret conference: This is changing for the Bundesliga referees BILD
  4. New rules: Referees should whistle games from their own region – kicker kicker
  5. Report: New rules for Bundesliga referees – Zwayer and co. Are allowed to direct games near home
  6. See “Learn More” on Google News

.