A proposed update to the California Department of Aging’s intrastate funding formula could result in significant service reductions for older adults in Los Angeles County. According to Maral Karaccusian, director of the Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department, a projected 17% funding cut would lead to nearly 343,000 fewer meals provided to seniors annually in the region.
The California Department of Aging is currently revising the formula used to distribute resources across local agencies. The stated goal of this initiative is to ensure that funding aligns with regional needs and promotes equity throughout the state. However, concerns have emerged regarding how the state weights variables such as age, income, disability, and geography.
Did You Know? Los Angeles County is currently home to approximately one-quarter of California’s older adult population, a demographic that grew by more than 92,000 people in a single year.
Why the proposed formula faces criticism
Critics of the current proposal argue that the formula prioritizes mathematical balance over the realities of regional service delivery. While the model applies equal weight to various socioeconomic and geographic factors, those factors do not influence service demand in the same way. In high-density urban areas like Los Angeles, the scale of operations and the reliance on public nutrition services are significantly higher than in smaller systems.

Expert Insight: The challenge here lies in the tension between standardized equity and operational capacity. While a uniform formula provides a clear administrative framework, it risks penalizing large, high-demand regions that lack the flexibility to absorb sudden resource shifts without disrupting essential services for vulnerable seniors.
What are the potential consequences for seniors?
If the 17% reduction is implemented, the impact on daily operations would be substantial. Projections indicate a loss of 186,000 meals served at community sites and 157,000 home-delivered meals each year. This totals roughly 1,300 fewer meals per day for older adults who rely on these services to maintain their health and independence.
What happens next?
The future of the funding formula remains under review. Advocates for the current system are calling on the state to test alternative scenarios before finalizing the plan. The objective is to ensure the model accurately reflects real-world demand and avoids unintended consequences that could undermine the state’s commitment to helping older adults age in their own homes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the new funding formula?
The California Department of Aging is updating the formula to better match funding with the levels of need across different regions and to ensure resources are distributed equitably.
How does the formula weight different factors?
The proposed model gives roughly equal weight to age, income, disability, and geography, which some officials argue does not accurately reflect how these factors drive actual demand in large urban areas.
What is the projected impact on Los Angeles County?
The county faces a potential 17% reduction in funding, which could result in approximately 1,300 fewer meals served to older adults every day.
How should the state balance mathematical equity with the practical needs of large, high-density communities?






