• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - Tesla
Tag:

Tesla

Business

Why Policy Whiplash Stalled America’s EV Growth

by Chief Editor July 6, 2026
written by Chief Editor

U.S. electric vehicle adoption is slowing significantly as federal policy shifts and regulatory support wanes. BloombergNEF’s 2026 Electric Vehicle Outlook, published in June, projects that EVs and plug-in hybrids will capture only 17% of the U.S. market by 2030, down from a 2024 projection of 47.5%. This decline follows the removal of federal tax credits and the weakening of fuel economy standards.

Why is the U.S. EV market forecast declining?

The primary driver behind the cooling EV market is the withdrawal of federal regulatory support. According to BloombergNEF researchers, the loss of government incentives and the sunsetting of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit have fundamentally altered the industry’s trajectory.

Huiling Zhou, an electric vehicles analyst at BNEF, noted that new fuel economy rules require very little electrification compared to previous standards. Furthermore, the Senate’s decision to revoke California’s waiver—which previously allowed the state to set stricter emissions rules—has removed a major legislative pillar that once pushed automakers toward a 100% plug-in sales target by 2035.

Did you know?

BNEF expects the U.S. EV market to hit a temporary slump in 2026 and 2027, with plug-in sales share dropping to 8.4% and 9% respectively, before beginning a recovery in 2028.

How are automakers responding to the policy changes?

Without the pressure of strict regulations and faced with lower consumer demand, manufacturers are pulling back on their electrification strategies. Several major models have been canceled or delayed, including the Volkswagen ID.4, Nissan Ariya, Hyundai Ioniq 6, and the Ford F-150 Lightning.

How are automakers responding to the policy changes?

Stellantis has removed its entire lineup of plug-in hybrids, such as the electrified Jeep Wrangler and Chrysler Pacifica, from the market. While new models like the BMW iX5 and the Jeep Wagoneer extended-range EV are slated for release, Zhou points out that the net effect of these cancellations is a reduction in total available options for consumers in the near term.

What is the price gap between EVs and gas cars?

Price remains a major barrier to adoption in the United States. According to BNEF data, electric vehicles in the U.S. are approximately 25% more expensive than internal-combustion counterparts. This represents the highest price differential among the regions studied by the firm.

What is the price gap between EVs and gas cars?

Zhou attributes this gap to high battery costs and R&D expenses, but also highlights a lack of market competition compared to regions like China. In China, intense competition among manufacturers has driven prices down, a dynamic that has yet to fully materialize in the American market.

How does the U.S. compare to the global market?

The U.S. is increasingly lagging behind the rest of the world regarding EV integration. BNEF forecasts that global plug-in car sales will reach 23 million this year, accounting for more than 27% of total vehicle sales worldwide. By 2030, the global share is expected to reach 38%.

How does the U.S. compare to the global market?

While countries like Germany, South Korea, France, Australia, and the UK are on pace to exceed these global averages, the U.S. remains projected at less than half of that global share if current trends persist. Long-term growth in the U.S. remains contingent on lowering the total cost of ownership and increasing model availability.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Why were the federal EV tax credits removed?

    Congress sunsetted the $7,500 EV tax credit several years earlier than originally planned as part of a broader shift in federal policy toward vehicle electrification.
  • Will EV sales stop growing completely in the U.S.?

    No. While the growth rate has been downgraded, BNEF still anticipates that lower total costs of ownership and more competitive pricing will eventually drive sales higher, though the pace will be significantly slower than previously expected.
  • What happened to California’s 2035 EV mandate?

    The Senate revoked California’s waiver to set its own emissions rules. While the state and other regional partners are currently challenging this in court, the mandate is currently off the books.

Have thoughts on the future of the EV market? Join the discussion in the comments below, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter for the latest updates on industry trends.

July 6, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

Why SpaceX Is an Underrated Autonomous Driving Stock

by Chief Editor June 20, 2026
written by Chief Editor

SpaceX recently concluded an initial public offering (IPO) that raised approximately $86 billion, exceeding the company’s original $75 billion target. According to corporate filings, this influx of capital positions the aerospace firm to aggressively fund growth initiatives, with industry analysts increasingly viewing the company as a foundational player in the future of autonomous driving technologies. By leveraging cross-company resource sharing, SpaceX serves as a critical infrastructure provider for Tesla’s self-driving ambitions.

How Does SpaceX Support Autonomous Driving?

SpaceX provides the data and artificial intelligence backbone necessary for high-level autonomous navigation. The company’s Starlink satellite network is currently being utilized to provide the high-speed, low-latency connectivity required for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication. According to industry reports, this data infrastructure allows autonomous systems to process complex traffic environments in real-time. By integrating these services, SpaceX moves beyond aerospace, acting as a functional component in the broader autonomous vehicle ecosystem.

Did you know?
Cathie Wood, CEO of Ark Invest, estimates the global autonomous taxi market could reach a valuation of $8 trillion to $10 trillion.

Why Is the Tesla and SpaceX Relationship Significant?

The relationship between SpaceX and Tesla is defined by the strategic sharing of resources and technology under CEO Elon Musk. Earlier this year, Tesla invested $2 billion into xAI, an artificial intelligence startup that subsequently merged with SpaceX. This financial maneuver grants Tesla direct access to the advanced AI research and computational power developed at SpaceX. Analysts note that this connection is vital for Tesla’s development of Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, as the training of neural networks requires massive, proprietary datasets and specialized hardware often shared across the Musk-led corporate portfolio.

Why Is the Tesla and SpaceX Relationship Significant?

What Are the Long-Term Financial Implications?

With a market capitalization exceeding $2 trillion, SpaceX is expected to deploy its $86 billion capital hoard to accelerate infrastructure projects. Investors are watching the company’s spending patterns closely, as capital-intensive growth initiatives—such as satellite launches and AI development—typically create significant ripple effects for suppliers and partners. While SpaceX remains a diversified entity spanning satellite internet and rocket manufacturing, its deep integration into Tesla’s autonomous driving stack suggests that future capital deployment will likely prioritize AI-heavy ventures. This strategy mirrors historical tech growth cycles, where early infrastructure investment paved the way for mass-market adoption of new technologies.

Pro Tip: Tracking Capital Deployment

Investors looking to gauge the health of the autonomous vehicle sector should monitor the quarterly capital expenditure (CapEx) reports of both SpaceX and Tesla. Increased spending in AI-related research and development is often a leading indicator of upcoming software enhancements in autonomous driving capabilities.

Elon Musk did this to engineer SpaceX's IPO?

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SpaceX a pure-play autonomous driving stock?

No. SpaceX is a diversified aerospace and telecommunications company. While it provides critical data and AI infrastructure for autonomous driving, its revenue streams also include government contracts, satellite internet services, and rocket launch operations.

How does Tesla benefit from the SpaceX IPO?

Through its $2 billion stake in xAI—which is now part of SpaceX—Tesla gains a vested interest and direct access to the AI advancements resulting from the capital raised during the IPO.

What is the role of Starlink in autonomous vehicles?

Starlink serves as a high-bandwidth data backbone. It ensures that autonomous vehicles remain connected to cloud-based neural networks, facilitating the real-time data processing required for safe, self-driving operation.


What do you think about the intersection of aerospace technology and autonomous transportation? Share your perspective in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on emerging tech market trends.

June 20, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Tesla-SpaceX Merger Rumors: Impact on AI and Investors

by Chief Editor June 15, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Speculation regarding a potential merger between Tesla (NasdaqGS: TSLA) and SpaceX has transitioned from fringe theory to a credible market scenario, driven by SpaceX’s pending IPO and public commentary from its leadership. Analysts and prediction markets now weigh the impact of combining Tesla’s AI-driven energy and automotive platform with SpaceX’s capital-intensive aerospace infrastructure, potentially creating a unified Musk-led technology ecosystem.

Why are investors considering a Tesla-SpaceX merger?

Market attention shifted toward a potential combination as SpaceX prepares for its initial public offering. According to recent public comments from the SpaceX president, the idea of a merger is being treated as a realistic possibility rather than a hypothetical. Prediction markets and high-profile analysts have begun incorporating this scenario into their models, noting that the two companies already share deep operational ties, including the development of custom semiconductors, AI data infrastructure, and energy storage systems.

Did you know? Tesla and SpaceX already maintain a symbiotic supply chain. Tesla’s energy storage solutions and custom chip architectures, often designed for autonomous vehicles, provide a technical foundation that mirrors the compute-heavy requirements of SpaceX’s launch and satellite networks.

How would a merger change the Tesla investment thesis?

A merger would fundamentally shift Tesla from an electric vehicle and energy company into a broader AI and manufacturing conglomerate. Investors are currently evaluating the trade-off between increased scale and the risk of higher capital intensity. While Tesla’s current narrative focuses on autonomous mobility and grid-scale batteries, absorbing SpaceX could introduce significant cash burn profiles, potentially challenging the company’s recent trajectory of rising software margins.

How would a merger change the Tesla investment thesis?

According to market data, Tesla shares closed recently at $406.43. While the stock has seen a 24.9% increase over the past year, it has faced a 7.2% decline year-to-date. This volatility reflects investor sensitivity to shifts in capital allocation and governance, especially as shareholders weigh the impact of potential dilution against the benefits of a consolidated “Musk ecosystem.”

What are the primary financial risks for shareholders?

The primary concern for investors involves the balance between long-term innovation and short-term capital requirements. Analysts note that Tesla’s profit margins have shifted from 6.4% to 3.9%, a trend that could be exacerbated if the company absorbs the high R&D and capital expenditure needs of a space-faring business. Any deal structured through new equity issuance could lead to further dilution for existing shareholders, who are already monitoring the company’s heavy investment in robotaxis and AI data centers.

Comparative Risk Profile

Factor Current Tesla Combined Entity
Primary Focus EVs & Energy AI, Space, & Energy
Capex Profile High Significantly Higher

What should investors watch for in the coming months?

Investors should monitor formal disclosures from both SpaceX’s board and Tesla’s independent directors regarding potential governance structures and synergy projections. Key indicators include SpaceX’s official equity issuance plans and Tesla’s own capital allocation toward large-scale chip fabrication and AI data centers in Texas. Analysts are currently recalibrating models to account for the potential impact of cross-company M&A on Tesla’s free cash flow.

MEGA MERGER?: Experts predict Elon Musk could merge Tesla, SpaceX
Pro Tip: When evaluating a potential merger, look beyond the headline growth numbers. Focus on the “capital intensity” of the combined entity—specifically, how much debt or equity is required to sustain SpaceX’s launch cadence versus the revenue generated by Tesla’s Megapack and automotive segments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a Tesla-SpaceX merger confirmed?

No. While SpaceX leadership has publicly acknowledged the possibility as a serious topic for discussion, no formal merger proposal or agreement has been presented to shareholders.

How would this affect Tesla stock (TSLA)?

A merger could increase volatility. While it might solidify Tesla’s position as a leader in AI and advanced manufacturing, it also introduces risks regarding capital dilution and the absorption of a high-burn aerospace business model.

Where can I track the latest news on this?

You can stay informed by monitoring Tesla’s regulatory filings with the SEC and engaging with community-driven investment platforms that aggregate narrative-based analysis on the company.


Are you adjusting your portfolio based on these rumors? Share your strategy in the comments below or subscribe to our weekly newsletter for the latest analysis on the aerospace and tech sectors.

June 15, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

What to Do If Your Car Battery Dies While Driving

by Chief Editor June 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Range anxiety remains a primary barrier for potential electric vehicle (EV) buyers, as real-world driving conditions often cause battery depletion to deviate from manufacturer estimates. Recent reports from EV owners, including a viral account from a BYD driver, highlight the discrepancy between dash-mounted mileage calculators and actual remaining battery capacity, often exacerbated by high-speed highway travel, weather conditions, and the use of onboard climate systems.

Why Mileage Estimates Often Fail Drivers

Range projections in electric vehicles are dynamic calculations rather than fixed values, according to discussions on Kia EV6 owner forums. These systems estimate remaining distance based on recent energy consumption patterns, which can fluctuate wildly depending on driver behavior. As noted by InsideEVs, factors like ambient temperature, tire pressure, and sustained high-speed driving can cause a vehicle’s range to drop faster than the onboard computer initially predicts.

Did you know?
EVs generally achieve higher efficiency in stop-and-go city traffic through regenerative braking, whereas sustained highway speeds increase aerodynamic drag and battery drain.

Battery Percentage vs. Mileage: Which is More Reliable?

Many experienced EV owners prefer relying on battery percentage rather than mileage estimates to gauge their remaining travel capacity. While a mileage calculator attempts to predict distance, it is susceptible to sudden changes in driving style or terrain. Conversely, battery percentage provides a raw measurement of the energy stored in the pack. However, even this metric is not immune to environmental variables; cold weather can temporarily reduce the usable capacity of lithium-ion batteries, leading to a faster drop in percentage as the pack works to maintain optimal operating temperatures.

How Automakers are Adjusting Range Transparency

Accuracy in range reporting has become a legal and consumer priority. Following a probe by the Department of Justice, Tesla adjusted its range estimates for several models after numerous owners reported that their real-world range failed to meet advertised projections. This shift reflects a broader industry movement toward more conservative, transparent labeling to manage consumer expectations.

View this post on Instagram about Department of Justice, Pro Tip
From Instagram — related to Department of Justice, Pro Tip
Pro Tip:
Plan your routes using dedicated EV charging apps that account for elevation changes and current weather, rather than relying solely on the car’s internal dashboard estimate.

The Future of Real-World Range Testing

Newer models are beginning to outperform their official EPA ratings in real-world scenarios. According to Electrek, the 2026 Mercedes CLA EV demonstrated this trend by achieving 434 miles on a single charge during real-world testing, significantly exceeding its EPA-rated 374 miles. This suggests that as battery management software and thermal efficiency improve, the gap between “advertised range” and “actual range” will likely narrow, potentially alleviating the range anxiety that currently plagues the market.

Longest EV Journey Yet! BYD Dolphin Surf Range & Battery Test UK. Plymouth to Exeter. UK Drive

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Why did my EV’s range drop suddenly? High-speed highway driving, heavy use of cabin heating or air conditioning, and cold weather are the most common factors that accelerate battery drain.
  • Is it better to charge to 100% every day? Most manufacturers recommend keeping the battery between 20% and 80% for daily use to maximize the long-term health of the battery cells.
  • Do all EVs have the same range accuracy? No. Accuracy varies by manufacturer; some prioritize conservative estimates, while others provide optimistic projections based on ideal driving conditions.

Have you ever experienced a “near-zero” range moment in your EV? Share your experience in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more tips on maximizing your vehicle’s performance.

June 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Can SpaceX Stock Make You a Millionaire?

by Chief Editor June 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

SpaceX has set the record for the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history, entering the public markets with a valuation exceeding $2 trillion. While the company’s massive scale generates significant investor interest, financial analysts caution that the firm’s current market capitalization limits the potential for the exponential growth seen in smaller, early-stage companies. According to reporting from The Motley Fool, the company’s established status across its space, connectivity, and AI business units suggests a lower-risk profile compared to historical tech IPOs, but also implies more modest long-term return expectations for new shareholders.

Why Market Capitalization Limits Return Potential

The primary barrier to SpaceX functioning as a “millionaire-maker” stock is its starting valuation. When Tesla went public, the automaker was valued at approximately $2 billion. In contrast, SpaceX debuted with a market cap of over $2 trillion. Financial analysts note that for a company to provide the type of 100x return that turns modest investments into seven-figure sums, it must either start at a small valuation or grow to an unprecedented size. If SpaceX were to grow tenfold from its current valuation, it would reach $20 trillion, a figure that exceeds the market capitalization of the largest companies in the world today.

Did you know?

A $5,000 investment in Tesla at its IPO would be worth over $1 million today. This historical performance is a key driver of investor sentiment, though analysts point out that Tesla was a struggling, fledgling automaker at the time of its public offering, whereas SpaceX is already a mature, profitable entity.

Operational Maturity Versus Early-Stage Risk

SpaceX enters the public market as an established powerhouse, not a startup on the verge of bankruptcy. According to data provided by The Motley Fool, the company operates across three distinct segments: space exploration, connectivity, and artificial intelligence. With the exception of its AI division, all these segments are currently profitable on an adjusted EBITDA basis. This operational maturity reduces the risk of total loss, which was a significant factor for early Tesla investors, but it also means the “venture capital-style” growth phase is largely behind the company.

Operational Maturity Versus Early-Stage Risk

Comparative Growth Profiles

Company IPO Valuation Risk Profile
Tesla ~$2 Billion High (Pre-profit)
SpaceX >$2 Trillion Moderate (Established)

How Portfolio Allocation Affects Wealth Building

Financial experts generally advise against allocating more than 10% of a total portfolio into a single stock, regardless of the company’s growth prospects. To reach $1 million from a 10% stake in SpaceX, an investor would need to hold a portfolio already worth $1 million, assuming the stock could perform at extreme growth levels. Because the company is already valued at $2 trillion, the mathematical path to “millionaire-maker” status requires a level of growth that is historically rare for companies of that size. Investors are encouraged to view SpaceX as a component of a balanced portfolio rather than a single-stock solution for wealth creation.

Record SpaceX IPO 'Calculus Based on Faith' Not Valuation, Says Colas

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SpaceX currently a profitable company?

Yes, according to The Motley Fool, SpaceX is profitable on an adjusted EBITDA basis across its space and connectivity segments, though its artificial intelligence unit is still in a growth phase.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does SpaceX compare to Tesla’s IPO?

Tesla went public as a fledgling automaker valued at $2 billion, while SpaceX has entered the market as an established $2 trillion entity. The difference in starting valuation significantly changes the potential for future percentage returns.

Should I invest more than 10% of my portfolio in SpaceX?

Financial professionals generally advise against putting more than 10% of a portfolio into a single stock. Maintaining diversification remains the standard approach for risk management.

Pro Tip:

Before committing capital to high-profile IPOs, research the company’s current market cap relative to its sector. A massive starting valuation often signals that a significant portion of the growth has already been “priced in” by early private investors.


What is your take on the current valuation of space-tech companies? Share your thoughts in the comments section below or subscribe to our newsletter for more deep dives into market trends and IPO analysis.

June 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Elon Musk Becomes World’s First Trillionaire

by Chief Editor June 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

SpaceX IPO: How the $2 Trillion Debut Reshapes the AI and Space Race

SpaceX shares closed nearly 20 percent higher on their Nasdaq debut Friday, raising more than $75 billion and pushing the company’s market valuation above $2 trillion. This record-breaking initial public offering makes Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire and signals a potential wave of upcoming IPOs from major artificial intelligence firms.

What were the key figures from the SpaceX stock debut?

SpaceX shares, trading under the ticker symbol “SPCX,” saw intense volatility during their first session on the Nasdaq exchange. The stock climbed as high as $176, representing a 31 percent increase over the initial offering price of $135. By the end of the trading day, the shares settled at $161.50.

According to a Thursday filing with US market regulators, the company priced more than 555 million shares at $135 each. While the initial offering raised over $75 billion, Bloomberg reported the offering was more than four times oversubscribed. If investors exercise options for an additional 83 million shares, the total amount raised could exceed $86 billion.

Did you know?

Retail investors were given significant access during this launch, with 20 percent of the total shares reserved specifically for them.

How does SpaceX’s valuation compare to other tech giants?

Friday’s market gains pushed SpaceX’s total valuation to over $2 trillion. This milestone places the rocket and AI conglomerate among the 10 most valuable American companies. SpaceX now holds a higher market value than Tesla, Meta (the parent company of Facebook), and Walmart.

How does SpaceX's valuation compare to other tech giants?

The company’s valuation is built on a diverse business model that has expanded far beyond its 2002 origins as a rocket startup. SpaceX now operates as a massive conglomerate encompassing:

  • Starlink: A global satellite internet service provider.
  • xAI: An artificial intelligence division that includes the Grok chatbot.
  • Space Infrastructure: Capabilities aimed at establishing data centers in space.

Why is SpaceX losing money despite record revenue?

Despite its massive market cap, SpaceX’s financial filings reveal a significant gap between revenue and profitability. While the company’s revenue reached $18.7 billion in 2025, it reported a net loss of $4.9 billion for the same period.

The company attributes these losses primarily to heavy capital expenditures required to build out AI computing capacity. To offset these costs and shore up its balance sheet, SpaceX has entered into multi-billion dollar short-term deals to rent out its AI computing power to other industry leaders, including Google and Anthropic.

Financial Metric (2025) Reported Value
Total Revenue $18.7 Billion
Net Loss $4.9 Billion
Projected Revenue (Long-term) $28.5 Trillion

What does the SpaceX IPO mean for the AI sector?

Wall Street is viewing the SpaceX debut as a bellwether for the broader artificial intelligence market. The success of “SPCX” suggests strong investor appetite for companies that integrate physical infrastructure with advanced AI capabilities.

Live: SpaceX IPO launch, ticker as stock's Nasdaq debut makes Elon Musk world's first trillionaire

Market analysts are watching to see how this offering impacts AI rivals currently preparing for public markets. Both OpenAI and Anthropic have recently filed initial documents with regulators, and the SpaceX IPO may set the pricing expectations for their upcoming debuts.

Pro Tip:

When analyzing AI-driven IPOs, look beyond software. Companies like SpaceX that control the underlying hardware and energy infrastructure often command higher valuations during periods of rapid technological expansion.

How has Elon Musk’s public profile influenced the launch?

The IPO occurred amid significant political and social polarization surrounding Musk. Following his stint leading the “DOGE” effort to reduce government spending, Musk has become a divisive figure due to his political endorsements and comments on the X platform.

How has Elon Musk's public profile influenced the launch?

However, the market response suggests that investor interest remains tied to his technical goals rather than his political activities. At a launch event in Starbase, Texas, Musk stated that SpaceX intends to eventually transport humans to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

This ambitious roadmap has drawn criticism from political figures. Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren noted that the rise of the world’s first trillionaire occurs while many Americans struggle to save for retirement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the SpaceX stock ticker symbol?
SpaceX trades on the Nasdaq under the symbol SPCX.

How much did SpaceX raise in its IPO?
The company raised more than $75 billion, with the potential to reach $86 billion through stock options.

Is SpaceX a profitable company?
No. According to its recent filings, SpaceX reported a net loss of $4.9 billion in 2025, largely due to investments in AI capacity.

What businesses does SpaceX own?
SpaceX operates rocket launch services, the Starlink satellite internet service, and the xAI artificial intelligence division.

What do you think about the massive valuation of SpaceX? Does the integration of AI and space travel justify a $2 trillion price tag? Let us know in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more deep dives into the future of tech.

June 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

China’s Humanoid Robot Push: Who Will Buy Them?

by Chief Editor June 6, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Rise of the Humanoid: Can China’s Robotics Bet Pay Off?

From the factory floor to the neighborhood hotel, the landscape of labor is shifting. China, long known as the “world’s factory,” is pivoting its massive manufacturing prowess toward a new frontier: the mass production of humanoid robots. While the global race for a $5 trillion market is heating up, the path from prototype to household helper remains fraught with technical and economic hurdles.

View this post on Instagram about Matrix Robotics
From Instagram — related to Matrix Robotics

In 2025, the industry saw a surge in production, with China accounting for roughly 85% of global humanoid shipments. Companies like Unitree and AGIBOT are leading the charge, shipping thousands of units annually—a stark contrast to Western counterparts that are still largely in the R&D phase.

The Economics of Automation: Why Now?

The urgency behind China’s robotics push is driven by two unavoidable realities: an aging population and the ever-present need to optimize labor costs. By automating repetitive tasks—sorting parcels, managing power plants, or even providing hospitality services—firms are attempting to future-proof their operations.

However, price remains the ultimate barrier to entry. While some entry-level models are priced under $6,000, high-end units like the MATRIX-3 from Shanghai-based Matrix Robotics retail for roughly $99,000. Experts suggest that for widespread, daily adoption, these costs will need to drop significantly, with projections hinting at an average price point closer to $21,000 by mid-century.

Pro Tip: Look beyond the “cool factor” of backflips and dancing robots. The real value for investors and business owners lies in robots that can operate in unpredictable, unstructured environments—the true “holy grail” of current robotics research.

Hardware vs. “Brains”: The Global Tug-of-War

While China excels at scaling hardware production and harvesting the massive data sets required for machine learning, the United States continues to hold a competitive edge in high-level AI computing power—the “brains” of the machine. The winner of this race may ultimately be the entity that best bridges the gap between sophisticated software and affordable, mass-producible mechanical frames.

Challenges in the “Messy” Real World

Functionality is the current bottleneck. Most humanoid robots thrive in controlled laboratory settings but struggle when faced with the chaotic environment of a typical home or a busy, unorganized warehouse. According to industry analysts, we are still in the early stages of commercialization. The fragility of these machines, combined with the difficulty of navigating little, human-centric spaces, means that robots are currently more likely to serve as specialized industrial tools than domestic assistants.

Ronomics Robot Review: Matrix-3 by Matrix Robotics
Did you know? In 2025 alone, China saw the emergence of over 140 humanoid robot manufacturers and more than 330 distinct models, signaling a highly competitive—and potentially overcrowded—market.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are humanoid robots ready to replace human workers?
A: Not yet. Current technology is largely limited to repetitive tasks in structured environments. Most robots still require human supervision or function as assistants rather than autonomous replacements.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Matrix Robotics MATRIX-3 humanoid

Q: Why is China leading in humanoid production?
A: China leverages its massive existing supply chain for hardware, strong government support under current five-year economic plans and a unique ability to collect vast amounts of training data from industrial settings.

Q: When will we see affordable robots in our homes?
A: While specialized cleaning or service robots exist today, a general-purpose humanoid that is affordable and capable enough for household chores is likely still several years, if not decades, away from mass-market viability.

The Road Ahead

As the technology matures, You can expect a shift toward more specialized industrial applications before we see a humanoid in every living room. For now, the focus remains on closing the gap between the lab and the factory floor. Whether the current boom results in a sustainable industry or a market correction, one thing is clear: the era of the humanoid has officially begun.


What are your thoughts on the rapid rise of humanoid robotics? Do you believe these machines will become a staple in our daily lives within the next decade? Leave a comment below to join the conversation, or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on emerging tech trends.

June 6, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

Tesla Teases Potential Model 3 Plaid with Tri-Motor Setup

by Chief Editor May 25, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The Future of Performance: Could a Tri-Motor Model 3 Disrupt the EV Market?

With the curtain finally closing on the iconic Tesla Model S and Model X, a performance-sized hole has emerged in the automaker’s lineup. Enthusiasts have long looked to the “Plaid” badge as the gold standard for electric acceleration, and while the refreshed Model 3 Performance is a masterclass in handling, it lacks the sheer, physics-defying launch of its predecessors.

View this post on Instagram about Motor Model, Tesla Model
From Instagram — related to Motor Model, Tesla Model

However, recent insights from Tesla’s own engineering leadership suggest that the dream of a “Model 3 Plaid” isn’t just fan fiction—it’s a genuine engineering curiosity.

The Engineering Hurdle: Fitting the Future

During a candid conversation on the Ride the Lightning podcast, Tesla Vice President of Engineering Lars Moravy addressed the elephant in the room: the possibility of a third motor finding its way into the Model 3 chassis. When asked about the potential for a tri-motor configuration, Moravy didn’t mince words, admitting, “I think about it all the time.”

The Engineering Hurdle: Fitting the Future
Tesla Model Performance

The core of this ambition lies in Tesla’s carbon-sleeved electric motors. These high-RPM powerhouses were the key to the Model S Plaid’s sub-2-second 0-60 mph capability. Integrating this technology into the smaller Model 3 platform presents a massive spatial challenge. The rear subframe of the Model 3 is tightly packaged, and adding a third motor would require a total rethink of the vehicle’s structural layout.

Pro Tip: Performance isn’t just about motor count. The efficiency gains from Tesla’s carbon-sleeved motors allow for sustained power output without the rapid thermal degradation seen in traditional EV drivetrains.

Priorities and the “Roadster Effect”

Despite the internal enthusiasm, Tesla operates on a “work for reward” philosophy. Currently, the company’s engineering resources are laser-focused on the next-generation Roadster. As Tesla’s ultimate performance halo, the Roadster is slated to debut the company’s most advanced motor and battery innovations.

Episode 499: Special Guest: Tesla Engineering VP Lars Moravy

This creates a trickle-down effect. The engineering breakthroughs required to make the Roadster a reality are the exact technologies that could eventually make a Tri-Motor Model 3 viable. Once the Roadster enters production, the manufacturing processes and component miniaturization will likely mature, potentially opening the door for high-performance variants across the fleet.

Why Performance Matters for the EV Brand

Why chase a niche, ultra-high-performance Model 3 when the standard models are already segment leaders? It comes down to brand identity. By pushing the boundaries of what a compact sedan can do, Tesla maintains its reputation as the leader in electric vehicle technology. This “halo effect” keeps the brand relevant, attracts engineering talent, and keeps the community engaged with every software and hardware update.

Why Performance Matters for the EV Brand
Tesla Teases Potential Model Motor Setup
Did you know? Tesla’s transition to a tri-motor system isn’t just about speed; it allows for sophisticated torque vectoring, which significantly improves cornering stability and handling precision on track-focused vehicles.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Is a Tri-Motor Model 3 currently in production? No. As of now, it remains a theoretical engineering challenge that Tesla leadership is actively considering for the future.
  • Why is the Model S Plaid so much faster than the Model 3? The Model S uses a tri-motor setup with carbon-sleeved rotors, which are designed to handle significantly higher power loads and higher RPMs than the dual-motor setup in the Model 3.
  • What is the biggest barrier to a Tri-Motor Model 3? Packaging. Fitting a third motor into the existing rear subframe of the Model 3 requires significant structural changes that are not currently prioritized over the upcoming Roadster development.

What do you think? Would you trade up for a Tri-Motor Model 3, or is the current Performance trim already enough for your daily drive? Let us know in the comments below or join our newsletter for the latest updates on Tesla’s engineering roadmap.

May 25, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Elon Musk’s Plan to Keep Complete Control of SpaceX After Its Public

by Chief Editor May 21, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Elon Musk’s SpaceX IPO: How a Dual-Class Structure Could Redefine Corporate Power—and What It Means for the Future of Tech

The Musk Playbook: Why SpaceX’s IPO Isn’t Like Any Other

Elon Musk’s approach to corporate governance has always been unconventional. After stepping down as Tesla’s chairman following a high-profile SEC battle in 2018, Musk learned a hard lesson: public companies demand accountability—and he prefers control. Now, with SpaceX’s highly anticipated IPO, Musk is pulling out all the stops to ensure his vision for the company remains unchallenged. The result? A governance structure so tightly wound around his leadership that it could set a new standard for how tech titans operate in the public sphere.

SpaceX’s S-1 filing reveals a company designed to be controlled, not governed by traditional shareholder democracy. With over 85% voting power, Musk will dictate board elections, compensation, and even the fate of the company itself. This isn’t just about power—it’s a strategic move to shield SpaceX from activist investors, hostile takeovers, and the kind of scrutiny that once forced Musk to relinquish control at Tesla.

Did You Know?

Musk’s voting control at SpaceX (85%) dwarfs his 13% ownership stake at Tesla—yet at Tesla, shareholders still had the final say on his $1 trillion pay package in 2025. SpaceX’s dual-class structure flips the script entirely.

Dual-Class Stocks: The Tech Elite’s Secret Weapon

SpaceX isn’t the first company to use a dual-class stock structure, but its implementation is among the most aggressive yet. Under this model, Class B shares (held by Musk and insiders) carry 10 votes per share, while Class A shares (available to the public) carry just one. The result? Musk and his allies control the company’s destiny, regardless of how much stock the public owns.

This isn’t just theory—it’s a battle-tested strategy. Meta (formerly Facebook) uses a similar structure, where CEO Mark Zuckerberg holds just 13% of shares but wields 60% of the voting power. The logic is simple: founders and early investors need flexibility to execute long-term visions without the noise of quarterly earnings calls or activist pressure.

But is this the future? As more tech companies go public, dual-class structures are becoming the norm. Companies like Airbnb and Uber have already adopted them. The question now is whether regulators will push back—or if this model will become the default for high-growth tech firms.

Pro Tip: Why Founders Love Dual-Class Structures

  • Long-term focus: No need to please short-term investors.
  • Protection from takeovers: Hostile bids become nearly impossible.
  • Founder control: Insiders retain decision-making power even with minority ownership.

Controlled Companies: The New Corporate Monarchy

SpaceX’s governance structure classifies it as a controlled company—a designation that exempts it from rules requiring independent board members or compensation committees. Which means Musk can handpick directors, set his own pay (without shareholder approval), and operate with minimal oversight.

View this post on Instagram about Pro Tip
From Instagram — related to Pro Tip

This isn’t just about Musk. Companies like Alphabet (Google), Walmart, and Ford have already embraced this model. The trend is clear: as companies grow, founders and early investors are increasingly opting for absolute control over traditional governance.

But is this sustainable? Critics argue that such structures can lead to entrenchment, where founders become untouchable—even if they underperform. The Tesla example is telling: Musk’s 13% ownership gave shareholders enough leverage to approve his $1 trillion pay package. At SpaceX, that power dynamic shifts entirely.

Reader Question: “Will this lead to a corporate oligarchy?”

Absolutely. As more companies adopt dual-class structures, we’re seeing the rise of a new corporate elite—where a handful of founders and insiders hold disproportionate power. The risk? Less accountability and more founder-driven decision-making, regardless of shareholder interests.

Beyond SpaceX: How This Could Reshape Tech and Finance

SpaceX’s IPO isn’t just about rockets—it’s a blueprint for the future of corporate governance. If successful, we could see a wave of tech IPOs following Musk’s playbook, where founders prioritize control over shareholder democracy. Here’s what that could mean:

1. The Death of Shareholder Democracy?

Traditional public companies rely on one-share, one-vote structures, where shareholders elect boards and approve major decisions. Dual-class models flip this script, giving founders veto power over critical issues. The result? Less transparency and more founder absolutism.

2. Activist Investors vs. The Founder Fort Knox

Activist investors thrive on public companies with weak governance. But with SpaceX’s structure, even if an activist group buys 20% of the company, Musk’s voting power ensures they’ll have no real influence. This could make it harder for investors to push for change—even if it’s in the company’s best interest.

3. A New Era of “Founder Forever” Companies

Companies like Tesla and SpaceX are increasingly becoming lifetime projects for their founders. With no forced succession plans and near-total control, we may see more cases where CEOs stay in power indefinitely—even as companies scale to trillions in value.

Key Stat: The Dual-Class Domination

Over 60% of U.S. Tech IPOs since 2020 have used dual-class structures, according to CNBC. The trend shows no signs of slowing.

SpaceX Filing Shows Losses, Musk’s Control

What’s Next? The Future of Corporate Power

SpaceX’s IPO is just the beginning. As more companies adopt Musk’s governance model, we’ll likely see:

  • More “controlled company” IPOs in tech, biotech, and AI.
  • Increased scrutiny from regulators over founder control.
  • A shift in investor expectations—will retail investors still buy shares if they have no real voting power?
  • The rise of “founder-controlled” ETFs, where investors bet on companies without governance influence.

One thing is certain: the era of shareholder supremacy may be ending. Instead, we’re entering an age where founders and insiders call the shots—and the public gets to watch.

FAQ: Your Burning Questions About SpaceX’s IPO and Dual-Class Stocks

1. What is a dual-class stock structure?

A system where some shares (Class B) have super-voting rights (e.g., 10 votes per share), while others (Class A) have just one. This gives founders/insiders disproportionate control.

2. Can SpaceX shareholders fire Elon Musk?

Technically, yes—but only if they control the board. With Musk’s 85% voting power, this is nearly impossible unless he loses majority control.

3. Is this legal?

Yes, but it’s heavily scrutinized. The SEC allows dual-class structures, but companies must justify why they’re necessary for long-term growth.

4. Will other companies follow SpaceX’s model?

Almost certainly. Tech founders increasingly prefer control over traditional governance—see Uber and Airbnb.

5. What are the risks of this structure?

  • Founder entrenchment: No forced succession.
  • Less accountability: Weak board oversight.
  • Investor frustration: Public shareholders have little say.

What Do You Think?

Is Elon Musk’s governance model the future—or a recipe for corporate tyranny? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

For more deep dives into tech governance, check out:

  • How Meta’s Dual-Class Structure Works
  • The Rise of Controlled Companies in Tech
  • Why Tesla’s Shareholder Rebellion Failed

Subscribe to our Tech Governance newsletter for updates on corporate power plays.

May 21, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

Anthropic Hires Andrej Karpathy in Major AI Talent War Win

by Chief Editor May 19, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Anthropic’s Big Bet: How Andrej Karpathy’s Hire Could Reshape AI’s Future—and What It Means for You

Anthropic just made a move that could redefine the AI arms race. The hiring of Andrej Karpathy—legendary AI researcher, Tesla’s former AI director, and the mind behind “vibe coding”—signals a bold shift in how frontier AI models like Claude are built, tested, and deployed. But what does this mean for the future of AI development, cybersecurity, and even how we code? Let’s break down the implications, the rivalry heating up between Anthropic and OpenAI, and why Karpathy’s arrival is a game-changer.

— ### Why Karpathy’s Hire Is a Nuclear Move for Anthropic Anthropic’s recruitment of Andrej Karpathy isn’t just another high-profile hire—it’s a strategic coup. Karpathy, who helped launch OpenAI, led Tesla’s AI team, and later founded Eureka Labs, brings decades of experience in large language models (LLMs), autonomous systems, and AI education. His arrival at Anthropic’s pretraining team, led by Nicholas Joseph (another ex-OpenAI veteran), is a clear message: this company is doubling down on building the next generation of AI—not just competing with OpenAI, but potentially surpassing it. > Did You Know? > Karpathy’s term “vibe coding”—where AI agents handle the heavy lifting of coding while humans guide the vision—has become a defining concept in how non-experts interact with generative AI. His work at Anthropic could accelerate this trend, making AI development more accessible than ever. #### The AI Talent Wars: A Zero-Sum Game Karpathy’s defection from OpenAI to Anthropic is the latest skirmish in an increasingly bitter rivalry between the two AI giants. OpenAI, led by Sam Altman, has faced internal turmoil, public backlash, and even a molotov attack on Altman’s home—an incident Altman has publicly linked to Anthropic’s influence. Meanwhile, Anthropic, with its $1 trillion valuation (surpassing OpenAI in secondary markets), is positioning itself as the safer, more disciplined alternative. But Karpathy’s hire isn’t just about talent poaching—it’s about strategic vision. While OpenAI has faced criticism for rushing models to market (like the controversial rollout of GPT-4), Anthropic has taken a more cautious approach, famously delaying the release of Claude Mythos—a model so powerful it autonomously discovered thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities in major operating systems. Instead of releasing it publicly, Anthropic partnered with tech giants (Amazon, Google, Microsoft) and cybersecurity firms to defend against AI-driven threats—a move that could redefine AI safety protocols. — ### The Rise of “Agentic Engineering”: What It Means for Developers Karpathy didn’t just coin “vibe coding”—he also introduced “agentic engineering”, a concept that describes how AI models are now writing, debugging, and optimizing code autonomously, with humans acting as overseers rather than primary authors. This shift has massive implications: – Faster Development Cycles: AI agents can now generate, test, and refine code in hours—something that would take human teams weeks. – Democratization of AI: Tools like Anthropic’s Claude Code and Claude Cowork are making AI-assisted development accessible to non-experts, blurring the line between “coding” and “prompting.” – New Security Risks: As Karpathy noted, AI models like Claude Mythos can find critical vulnerabilities faster than humans—but they can also exploit them. Anthropic’s decision to restrict Mythos’ public access highlights the dual-edged sword of AI advancement. #### Real-World Example: AI Agents in Action In early 2026, a team at Cisco used Anthropic’s early access to Claude Mythos to automatically patch a zero-day exploit in their network before it could be weaponized. Meanwhile, startups like Eureka Labs (Karpathy’s former venture) are using AI agents to tutor students in real-time, adapting lessons based on individual learning speeds—a far cry from traditional coding bootcamps. > Pro Tip for Developers > If you’re working with AI coding tools like Claude Code, try agentic workflows: > 1. Define the goal (e.g., “Build a secure API endpoint”). > 2. Let the AI draft the code. > 3. Review for edge cases—AI excels at speed but may miss nuanced security risks. > 4. Iterate collaboratively—use the AI to refine, not replace, your expertise. — ### Anthropic vs. OpenAI: A Rivalry That Could Shape the Next Decade The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI isn’t just about who builds the “better” AI—it’s about how AI is governed, deployed, and trusted. Here’s how the two companies are diverging: | Factor | Anthropic | OpenAI | Approach to Safety | Restrictive (e.g., Mythos not public) | More permissive (e.g., GPT-4 rollout) | | Valuation | $1T+ (secondary markets) | ~$86B (last reported) | | Key Hires | Karpathy, Nicholas Joseph (ex-OpenAI) | Altman, Jan Leike (ex-Anthropic) | | Public Perception | “The responsible AI lab” | “The aggressive innovator” | | Recent Controversies | Trump administration tensions | Altman’s home attack, internal strife | #### The Trump Administration Factor Anthropic’s relationship with the U.S. Government has grown tense, particularly after the company refused to disclose its AI models’ inner workings to regulators. In contrast, OpenAI has faced scrutiny for lobbying against AI safety bills while pushing for rapid commercialization. This divergence could lead to regulatory favoritism—or backlash—depending on how Washington views each company’s stance on AI risks. > Reader Question: > *”Will Anthropic’s cautious approach slow down innovation?”* > > Answer: > Not necessarily. While Anthropic delays public releases, its private partnerships (like Project Glasswing) are accelerating defensive AI research. For example, Google used Mythos to preemptively secure Android’s next OS update—innovation that happens behind the scenes. — ### The Future of AI: Three Trends to Watch Karpathy’s hire and Anthropic’s recent moves suggest three major trends will dominate AI in the coming years: #### 1. The Era of AI Agents as Co-Pilots (Not Replacements) – What’s happening? Tools like Claude Cowork are evolving into collaborative AI assistants that don’t just generate code but debug, optimize, and even explain their own logic. – Why it matters: This could reduce the global developer shortage by making AI accessible to non-experts. – Example: A minor business owner in 2026 might use an AI agent to build a custom CRM without hiring a developer—then iterate as the business grows. #### 2. AI-Driven Cybersecurity: A Double-Edged Sword – What’s happening? Models like Mythos can find vulnerabilities faster than humans, but they can also exploit them. Anthropic’s Project Glasswing is a first-of-its-kind defense initiative, giving AI to both attackers and defenders. – Why it matters: The arms race between AI-powered hackers and AI-powered security will define cybersecurity in the 2030s. – Data Point: In 2025, 68% of Fortune 500 CISOs reported using AI for threat detection—up from 12% in 2023 (Source: [IBM Security Report, 2025](https://www.ibm.com/security)). #### 3. The Education Revolution: AI as a Personal Tutor – What’s happening? Karpathy’s work at Eureka Labs and his plans to resume education initiatives suggest AI-driven personalized learning will explode. – Why it matters: By 2030, AI tutors could replace 40% of traditional coding bootcamps (McKinsey, 2025). – Example: Duolingo’s AI tutor, Duolingo Max, now adapts lessons in real-time—but future versions could write custom curricula based on a student’s career goals. — ### FAQ: What You Need to Know About Anthropic’s Latest Move #### Q: Why did Andrej Karpathy leave OpenAI for Anthropic? A: While Karpathy hasn’t detailed his reasons, speculation points to Anthropic’s focus on AI safety, long-term research, and its more collaborative culture. OpenAI’s recent turbulence—including Altman’s ouster and internal conflicts—may have also played a role. #### Q: Will Anthropic’s AI be more “ethical” than OpenAI’s? A: Anthropic has positioned itself as the responsible AI leader, but ethics aren’t binary. Its restrictive approach to Mythos shows caution, while OpenAI’s aggressive commercialization (e.g., GPT Store) prioritizes speed. The real question is: Which approach will governments and enterprises trust more? #### Q: How will “agentic engineering” change coding jobs? A: It won’t eliminate jobs—but it will transform them. Developers will shift from writing every line of code to guiding AI agents, focusing on high-level architecture and creative problem-solving. Companies like GitHub Copilot and Anthropic’s Claude Code are already proving this shift. #### Q: Could Anthropic’s AI surpass OpenAI’s in capability? A: Possibly. Anthropic’s $1T valuation and access to Microsoft/Amazon’s cloud resources give it a funding advantage. However, OpenAI’s larger user base and ecosystem (e.g., Microsoft integration) mean the race isn’t over. Benchmark tests in 2026 show Anthropic’s Claude 4 leading in mathematical reasoning, while OpenAI’s GPT-4 excels in generalist tasks. #### Q: What’s next for Claude Mythos? A: Mythos won’t be publicly released, but its capabilities will trickle into enterprise security tools. Expect to see: – Automated vulnerability patching in major software. – AI-driven red-team exercises (ethical hacking simulations). – Government and defense contracts (as AI safety becomes a national priority). — ### The Bottom Line: Why This Matters for You Anthropic’s hiring of Andrej Karpathy isn’t just a corporate move—it’s a signpost for the future of AI. Whether you’re a developer, a business leader, or just someone curious about technology, these trends will shape your world: ✅ Developers: Get ready for AI co-pilots that write, debug, and optimize code—but focus on the big picture. ✅ Businesses: AI agents will cut development costs but also introduce new security risks—invest in AI-driven cybersecurity now. ✅ Students: Personalized AI tutors will make learning faster—but critical thinking will remain irreplaceable. ✅ Investors: The AI safety vs. Speed debate will determine which companies win long-term—Anthropic’s cautious approach could pay off. > Call to Action: > The AI revolution isn’t coming—it’s here. Which side of the debate do you align with? > – Comment below: Should AI models like Mythos be public, or is caution the right approach? > – Explore further: [How AI Agents Are Redefining Work](link-to-internal-article) | [The Cybersecurity Risks of Advanced AI](link-to-internal-article) > – Stay updated: Subscribe to our AI & Tech Insider newsletter for exclusive insights on the next big shifts. —

This article was crafted with insights from Anthropic’s latest moves, industry reports, and expert analysis. For more on AI trends, follow our AI & Technology coverage.

May 19, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • 2026 World Cup Live: Egypt Files FIFA Protest Against Referee Letexier

    July 8, 2026
  • Founder of Latvian Emergency Services Dies at 74

    July 8, 2026
  • Putin’s Luxury Yacht Spotted Sailing Along Norway

    July 8, 2026
  • Egypt Football Association Files Official FIFA Complaint Over World Cup Loss

    July 8, 2026
  • CT Residents Demand Action After Bear Breaks Into Multiple Homes

    July 8, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

© 2026 Newsy Today. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: [email protected]


Back To Top

For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: [email protected]

Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World