Tag:

timah

News

Residents Push for Auditing Rp 271T in Mercury Scandal Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Residents Lodge Complaint Against Experts’ Testimony in Rp 271 Trillion Timah Case Dispute

Subheadline: Local leaders question the competency of IPB professor in calculating environmental damage, calling for clearer evidence to support the Rp 271 trillion loss figure.

SEO Keywords: Timah case, environmental damage, Bambang Hero Saharjo, pencemaran lingkungan, kerugian negara, Bangka Belitung

Meta Description: Local residents in Babel question the competency of Professor Bambang Hero Saharjo from IPB in calculating environmental damage in the Rp 271 trillion Timah case. They urge for clearer evidence and transparency in the investigation.

In a surprising turn of events, residents of Babel, led by Dewan Pimpinan Daerah (DPD) Putra Putri Tempatan (Perpat) Babel’s head, Andi Kusuma, have lodged a police report against Professor Dr. Bambang Hero Saharjo, a renowned environmentalist from Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB). Andi accused Bambang of providing false testimony regarding the environmental damage and subsequent financial losses in the high-profile Timah case, which is estimated to have cost the nation Rp 271 trillion.

Andi submitted a report to the Papua Barat Regional Police (Polda Babel) on Friday, citing Bambang’s incompetence in calculating the environmental damage. He argued, "Bambang is not an expert in calculating national ecological losses. All his ‘findings’ were based on satellite imagery." Andi also expressed concern over the alleged impact of this calculation on Babel’s economy, stating that the province is still grappling with economic challenges.

The Timah case, involving illegal mining activities and environmental degradation, has been a cause for alarm among local residents and authorities alike. The deafening Rp 271 trillion figure, representing total environmental losses, has been a point of contention, with many questioning the methodologies used to arrive at this staggering amount.

Andi emphasized that the local economy is struggling, with many workers laid off due to the ongoing crisis. He suggested that while he supports the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in investigating the Timah case, the methodology and transparency of the calculations should be scrutinized thoroughly.

Bambang, in his defense, has maintained that his calculations are based on established scientific methods and satellite imagery. He argues that the environmental degradation caused by illegal mining activities is both visible and quantifiable.

Meanwhile, the Papua Barat Regional Police (Polda Babel) spokesperson, Kombes Nyoman Merthadana, confirmed receiving the police report. He assured that the police will thoroughly investigate the matter.

In another development, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has opened an investigation into the Timah case, naming several corporations as suspects. They suspect a total national loss of Rp 300 trillion, including environmental damages.

The residents of Babel, however, continue to question the transparency and methodology behind these staggering figures, urging for more clarity and accountability in the ongoing investigation.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Investigated Gold Case: Confirmed Losses of IDR 271 Billion

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Justin: Timah Corruption Case: Government Loses Rp 300T, Including Rp 271T Environmental Damage

Article:

In a significant development in the long-running timah (tin) corruption case, the government has confirmed losses totaling Rp 300 trillion ($21.2 billion), including Rp 271 trillion in environmental damage. The gargantuan figure was revealed during the recent sentencing of three former Bangka-Belitung provincial heads of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM).

The environmental damage, amounting to Rp 271 trillion, was calculated by expert witness Bambang Hero Saharjo, a professor at the Bogor Agricultural Institute (IPB). His estimates, which have now been validated by the courts, include:

  • Biaya Kerugian Lingkungan (Eco-logical Damage): Rp 183.7 trillion
  • Biaya Kerugian Ekonomi Lingkungan (Economic Environmental Damage): Rp 75.47 trillion
  • Biaya Pemulihan Lingkungan (Environmental Restoration): Rp 11.88 trillion

Saharjo’s calculations were based on satellite imagery from 2015 to 2022, showing extensive land and environmental damage due to illegal mining by PT Timah in Bangka-Belitung. His findings were corroborated by laboratory tests on soil samples. The total damaged area covers approximately 170,363 hectares, both inside and outside protected forests.

The court finding echoes earlier assertions by the prosecution, which had stated that the environmental damage amounted to Rp 271 trillion. The prosecution had also detailed the methods and costs associated with the environmental devastation caused by illegal mining.

Independent expert Andi Kusuma, chairperson of the Local District Parent-Teacher Association (Perpat) Babel, took issue with Saharjo’s findings and his expertise. Kusuma reported Saharjo to the Bangka-Belitung Police, alleging that Saharjo had expressed reluctance to provide full details on the state’s losses during the trial.

However, Attorney General Harli Siregar defended Saharjo’s credibility. Siregar noted that Saharjo, as an expert in his field, provided testimony based on his knowledge and that the final calculations were made by state auditors. He also reiterated that the total state losses were indeed Rp 300 trillion, including the verified environmental damage of Rp 271 trillion.

The sentencing of the three former ESDM provincial heads marks a significant milestone in the timah corruption case. Each received fines and prison sentences ranging from 2 to 4 years, totaling Rp 250 million ($17,166) in fines. However, these penalties are mere drops in the ocean compared to the staggering state losses.

Internal Linking:

External Linking:

Call to Action:

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Controversy over Harvey Moeis’ Ruling: A Legal Ethics Inquiry into the Prosecuting Judge

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Controversial Harvey Moeis Verdict Sparks Ethical Misconduct Inquiry Against Sentencing Judge

Subhead: Komisi Yudisial probes potential ethics breach by judge in timah corruption case

Article:

The recent sentencing of Harvey Moeis, convicted in the timah corruption case, has sparked a controversial debate and now led to a ethical misconduct investigation against the judge who issued the verdict. Moeis was sentenced to 6 years and 6 months in prison, a significantly lighter sentence than the 12 years demanded by the prosecution, causing public outcry and a storm of criticism.

The Jakarta-based Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Corruption Court) handed down the sentence on Monday, December 23, 2024. Alongside the prison term, Moeis was also fined Rp1 million, with an alternative of 6 months in prison, and ordered to pay Rp210 billion in restitution, with an alternative of 2 years in prison.

The leniency of the sentence has drawn flak, with some arguing that the judge insufficiently considered the seriousness of Moeis’ crimes and the needs for deterrence and public trust in the justice system. The judge, Eko Aryanto, acknowledged the discrepancy between the sentence and the prosecution’s demand, stating that the majority opinion among the judges was that Moeis’ guilt was not severe enough to warrant the harshest penalty.

The Komisi Yudisial (KY), Indonesia’s judicial commission, has since stepped in to investigate potential ethical misconduct by the sentencing judge. The probe follows numerous complaints from the public and legal professionals who contend that the verdict was unduly lenient, disregarding the gravity of the corruption.

"KY is aware of the public uproar and has initiated a review process to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary in this case," said Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata, KY’s spokesman.

The investigation will focus on whether the judge adhered to ethical standards and professional guidelines during the sentencing process. KY has not ruled out the possibility of further disciplinary actions against the judge if ethical misconduct is substantiated.

Moeis’ case has highlighted ongoing concerns about corruption in Indonesia and the need for a strong, independent, and rigorous judicial system to tackle it. As the KY’s investigation unfolds, many hope that transparency and accountability will prevail, instilling confidence in the public that justice is being served fairly and impartially.

Tags: Harvey Moeis, Timah Corruption Case, Corruption in Indonesia, Judicial Ethics, Komisi Yudisial, Sentencing Disparity

Internal Links:

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

7 Intriguing Facts About Judge Eko Aryanto You Need to Know

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Judgment Sparking Debate: A Deep Dive into Hakim Eko Aryanto‘s Career and Wealth

JAKARTA – Hakim Eko Aryanto has found himself in the limelight following his decision to impose a lenient sentence on Harvey Moeis, a defendant in a massive tin trading corruption case. The case, involving state losses of up to IDR 271 trillion, has sparked public discourse on the integrity of the judicial system.

Here are seven intriguing facts about Eko Aryanto, beyond his controversial ruling, delving into his career trajectory and personal wealth:

1. A Brief Profile of Hakim Eko Aryanto
Eko Aryanto, S.H., M.H., is a senior judge at the Central Jakarta District Court. Born in Malang, East Java, on May 25, 1968, Aryanto has dedicated over three decades to the legal profession. He obtained his Bachelor of Laws degree in Criminal Law from the University of Brawijaya in 1987, his Master of Laws from IBLAM School of Law in 2002, and his Doctorate in Laws from the University of 17 August 1945 Jakarta in 2015.

2. A Career Steeped in Judicial Experience
Aryanto’s career began at the district court level, rising to become the chief judge in various regions, including Pandeglang in 2009 and Tulungagung in 2017. His extensive experience handling significant cases has earned him a reputation as a highly dedicated judge.

3. A Net Worth of IDR 2.82 Billion
According to Aryanto’s January 2024 State Officials’ Wealth Declaration (LHKPN) for the 2023 period, his net worth stands at IDR 2.82 billion. Here’s a breakdown of his assets:

  • Land and Buildings: A plot and building measuring 200 m²/100 m² in Malang, valued at IDR 1.35 billion.
  • Motor Vehicles: Five units, including a 2013 Honda Civic Sedan, a 2016 Toyota Innova Reborn, and two Kawasaki motorcycles, with a total value of IDR 910 million.
  • Moving Assets: Worth IDR 395 million.
  • Cash and Cash Equivalents: IDR 165,981 million.

4. The Controversial Sentence for Harvey Moeis
In the high-profile tin trading corruption case, Aryanto sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years in prison, significantly shorter than the prosecutor’s demand of 12 years. Additionally, Moeis was ordered to pay a fine of IDR 1 billion and IDR 210 billion in restitution.

5. The Reasons Behind the lenient Sentence
The court led by Aryanto considered mitigating factors such as the defendant’s polite demeanor during the trial, family obligations, and his lack of previous convictions. However, critics argue that these factors scarcely offset the vast state losses incurred.

6. Public Reaction to Eko Aryanto’s Decision
The sentenced was widely criticized for not effectively deterring corruption. Many have questioned the integrity of the judicial system and called for legal reforms to ensure fair and impartial justice.

7. A Track Record of Notable Cases
Beyond the Harvey Moeis case, Aryanto has presided over numerous significant trials throughout his career. Yet, it is this high-profile case that has brought him into the public eye and media spotlight.

With a lengthy career and substantial wealth, Eko Aryanto continues to shape the face of Indonesian justice. His decisions remain a benchmark for assessing fairness and impartiality in the nation’s legal system.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Attorney General Announces New Suspect in Tin Case Linked to Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking: Indictments Issued in PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Smelter Corruption Case; Environment Damage Estimated at Rp 152 Trillion

Jakarta, CNBC Indonesia, Thursday, January 2, 2025 – The Indonesian Prosecutors’ Office has announced the addition of five new suspects in the corruption case involving smelter operations at PT Timah (Persistent) Tbk. This was revealed during a press conference organized by the Coordinating Ministry for Combating Corruption and Good Governance at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.

"We have identified five corporations that will be named as suspects in this case," said Attorney General ST Burhanuddin.

The five corporations are PT RBT, PT SIP, PT TIN, PT SB, and CV VIP. Additionally, two other corporations, PT AL and PT MRM, are suspected of money laundering involving smelter operations at PT Timah.

In an astonishing revelation, Deputy Prosecutor Febrie Adriansyah announced that the environmental damage caused by these corporations will be borne by each company individually. The environmental damage cost for each company is estimated as follows:

  • PT RBT: Rp 38 Trillion
  • PT SB: Rp 23.6 Trillion
  • PT SIP: Rp 24.1 Trillion
  • PT TIN: Rp 23.6 Trillion
  • CV VIP: Rp 24 Trillion

These staggering figures sum up to approximately Rp 152 Trillion. The total potential loss to the state is Rp 310.6 Trillion, making this one of the largest corruption cases in Indonesian history. Notably, Harvey Moeis, husband of Sandra Dewi, is also entangled in this webs of corruption.

February explained the case based on three main actions:

  1. Collaboration in leasing mining equipment,
  2. Transfers of funds between PT Timah and private parties,
  3. Environmental damage due to mining activities.

Indonesia’s economy, particularly that of the Bangka Belitung islands, is expected to suffer a loss of Rp 15 Trillion due to this corruption case.

Watch the video below:

Video: Corruption in Timah Brought Economy of Bangka Belitung to Rp 15 Trillion Loss

For more on this story, follow the link below:

Sidang Perdana Kasus Timah, Crazy Rich PIK Helena Lim Serba Hitam

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prabowo’s Call for 50-Year Sentence for Corruptors: Not an Intervention, Says MA

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Indonesia‘s High Court Clarifies President Prabowo‘s Stance on Corruption Punishments

Article:

The Supreme Court (MA) of Indonesia has weighed in on President Prabowo Subianto’s recent remarks regarding the punishment of corrupt officials, asserting that his statement was not an intervention from the executive into the judiciary. The clarification came during a press conference at the MA, attended by Yanto, the MA spokesperson, along with other top court officials.

Addressing a question about President Prabowo’s statement that corruptors with clear-cut cases should face harsher penalties, Yanto assured that the President’s words did not constitute an intervention into the judicial process. "President Prabowo was not interfering, he was merely expressing his stance," Yanto clarified.

President Prabowo’s statement, made during a planning meeting at Bappenas on December 30, 2024, had sparked conversations about the separation of powers. He had suggested that corrupt officials with clear cases and significant malfeasance should face harsher penalties, seemingly going as far as suggesting a 50-year prison sentence.

However, Yanto explained that the Indonesian legal system outlines the maximum punishment for corruption as the death penalty, as per the Law No. 31/1999 on Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, as amended by Law No. 20/2001. Nevertheless, no corruptor in Indonesia has ever been sentenced to death.

Yanto further elucidated that the death penalty can only be applied under specific circumstances, such as corruption during a natural disaster, financial crisis, or wartime. The MA representative emphasized that the President’s statement did not interfere with the judiciary’s independent role in meting out punishment.

Prabowo’s initial statement came shortly after the Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years in prison for corruption in the PT Timah mining case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Indonesian President to Address Harvey Moeis’ Verdict if Complaints Emerge

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Indonesia‘s Attorney General Exploresždy Re-examining Harvey Moeis’ 6.5-Year Sentence for Timah Corruption

Subheadline: Potential review follows Surabaya court’s controversial acquittal in Ronald Tannur case

In a significant development, the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) in Indonesia has not ruled out the possibility of reviewing the 6.5-year prison sentence handed down to Harvey Moeis, a key figure in the high-profile timah (tin) corruption case. The AGO’s spokesman, Harli Siregar, confirmed that a re-evaluation could take place if new information or reports from the public emerge.

The AGO maintains that they are open to investigating any irregularities in the court’s decision, as demonstrated in the case of Judge Mochammad Ronald Tannur of the Surabaya State Court. Recently, two separate public complaints led to further scrutiny of his controversial acquittal of a ballot fraud suspect. The AGO will proceed with a similar approach for Harvey Moeis’ case, should significant information come to light.

Harli emphasized that the AGO is currently monitoring the situation but has not found concrete evidence of any irregularities that could undermine the court’s decision in Harvey Moeis’ case. However, he underscored the importance of public vigilance and encouraged citizens to report any suspicious activities or information they might have regarding the case.

"It’s up to the public to help monitor and report any such instances," Harli said. "We will respond accordingly if we receive convincing reports or evidence."

Speaking at a press conference today, Attorney General ST Burhanuddin briefly touched on the matter, stating that the AGO would take appropriate action if any anomalies were discovered in relation to Harvey Moeis’ case. He confirmed that the AGO would publicly disclose any findings, much like they did in the Ronald Tannur case.

Stay tuned for further developments on this story, as the AGO’s potential review of Harvey Moeis’ sentence could have significant implications for ongoing anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia.

Editor’s note: This article is based on information gathered from a press conference held by the Attorney General’s Office on January 2, 2025.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Brawijaya Alleges Prabowo’s 50-Year Sentence Call Not an Intervention"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Indonesian President‘s Remarks on Corruption Penalties Draw Attention of Supreme Court

The Supreme Court (MA) has weighed in on recent statements made by President Prabowo Subianto regarding the punishment of corrupt officials. The MA has affirmed that the President’s remarks did not constitute interference from the executive branch into the judiciary.

At a press conference hosted by the MA, Chief Spokesperson Yanto was joined by MA’s Chief of Legal Services Sobandi and MA’s Head of Inter-Institutional Relations Rudi Sudianto to discuss various topics. During the conference, a journalist inquired about President Prabowo’s statement, in which he called for severe penalties for convicted corrupters.

"Unlike his predecessor, President Joko Widodo, who consistently deferred to the judgments of the courts, President Prabowo has publicly requested a 50-year prison sentence for corrupt officials. Does the MA feel that this is an instance of intervention, or rather, a mere expression of opinion?" the journalist asked.

Yanto, the Chief Spokesperson, responded by acknowledging that he had watched President Prabowo’s remarks during a Musrenbang event at Bappenas on Monday, December 30, 2024. He clarified that the President’s statement was not an intervention.

"That was not an intervention," Yanto explained. "His statement was simply a reiteration of his position. The President did not instruct or pressure the judiciary in any way."

The Supreme Court spokesperson went on to discuss the legal framework regarding penalties for corruption in Indonesia. While the country’s laws provide for the death penalty in severe cases, no corrupt official has ever been given such a sentence. The MA spokesperson highlighted that the death penalty would only be applicable in extraordinary circumstances, such as corruption during times of natural disasters, economic crises, or war.

President Prabowo’s call for severe penalties came days after the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years in prison for his role in a corruption case involving the state-owned mining company, PT Timah. During his remarks, President Prabowo did not specify which corrupt official he was referring to but emphasized that "if the evidence is clear and the damage is significant, the penalty should not be too light." He urged relevant ministry officials to review the case and consider appealing the sentence.

The Supreme Court’s statement serves as a reminder of the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government. While President Prabowo is entitled to express his views on matters of public interest, the judiciary maintains its independence in adjudicating cases and handing down verdicts.

(With input from Aik and Dhn)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judge Overrules: Eko Aryanto’s 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Judge Facing Scrutiny Over ‘lenient’ Sentence; His Luxury Vehicles Raise Eyebrows

Subhead:
Chief Judge Eko Aryanto’s decision to sentence corrupt official Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years sparks debate, while his lavish car collection garners attention.

Article:

metted in the spotlight for imposing a 6.5-year jail term on Harvey Moeis, a convict in a high-profile corruption case involving the mismanagement of tin commodity trading, which reportedly caused the state to lose Rp 300 trillion. But the public’s curiosity extends beyond the controversial sentencing to the judge’s personal wealth and assets, as highlighted by a recent Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (LHKPN).

Judge Eko Aryanto declared a total net worth of Rp 2.820.981.000 in his 2023 LHKPN report, with his most valuable asset being land and buildings worth Rp 1.350.000.000. This was followed by other non-business assets worth Rp 395.000.000 and cash and cash equivalents valued at Rp 165.981.000.

Of particular interest is the judge’s collection of vehicles and machinery, estimated at Rp 910.000.000. Here’s a breakdown:

  1. Honda CR-V Minibus (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  2. Honda Civic Sedan (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  3. Kawasaki Ninja Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 50.000.000
  4. Kawasaki KLX Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 20.000.000
  5. Toyota Innova Reborn G 2.0 AT (2016) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 240.000.000

Earlier reports indicate that Judge Eko Aryanto imposed a lighter sentence than what prosecutors sought due to differing opinions on Harvey Moeis’ role in the corruption case. The judge noted that Moeis did not play a significant part in the case, despite the prosecution’s demand for a 12-year imprisonment.

"The panel of judges found that the prosecution’s demand of 12 years was too heavy given the defendant’s involvement in the case," Aryanto stated while reading the verdict at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Bungur Raya Street, according to detikNews.

Moeis, who represented PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found guilty of benefiting from illegaltimah mining activities alongside PT Timah, the state-owned miner. However, Judge Aryanto ruled that Moeis was not involved in decision-making nor aware of the financial aspect of their collaboration.

The judge’s wealth declaration and luxury vehicles have sparked public interest, with some questioning the judge’s lifestyle and lavish spending. While it’s essential to maintain the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, such public scrutiny may add pressure on the judiciary to uphold the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Former Prosecutor Requests Return of Helena Lim’s Assets

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Jaksa Balikan Aset Helena Lim้ำ_side:
Justice Ministry to Review, Consider Appeal After Court Orders Return of Helena Lim’s Seized Assets

Jakartaцами Thedecision to return Helena Lim’s seized assets by the court will be reviewed and considered for appeal by the Justice Ministry.

Following the recent verdict in the corruption case involving Helena Lim, the Indonesian justice system is facing a new challenge. The Jaksa penuntut umum (Public Prosecutor) must now decide whether to appeal the court’s decision to return assets previously seized from the wealthy money changer.

Kapuspenkum Kejagung RI Harli Siregar, in a press conference held at the Office of the Attorney General in South Jakarta on Tuesday (31/12/2024), explained that the prosecutors have seven days to consider their next move. This timeframe, as stated in the Kodeethoxy Perilaku Hakim (KUHAP), allows them to thoroughly analyze the court’s decision and deliberiate on any potential appeal.

"We still have seven days according to KUHAP," Harli said, "This period is not merely a formality. It’s an opportunity for us to carefully analyze each aspect of the case and make an informed decision."

Prosecutors are currently assessing the court’s verdict, which includes not only the imprisonment sentence but also the order to return seized assets. The decision on whether to appeal will heavily depend on the prosecutors’ interpretation of the court’s reasoning and the strength of their case.

The case, involving alleged corruption and money laundering in the tin commodity trading sector, has resulted in Helena Lim being sentenced to five years in prison. The court has also ordered the return of assets worth around IDR 900 million ($62,500 USD) to Helena.

This includes various luxurious items such as branded bags, jewelry, luxury cars, and even a sum of money valued at IDR 10 billion (approximately $690,000 USD). Some of these items were seized during the investigation stage, pending the outcome of the trial.

The Justice Ministry is now weighing its options, with a possible appeal as a viable course of action. The ministry remains committed to upholding justice and ensuring that the verdict reflects the true extent of the crimes committed.

should follow proper HTML formatting, including appropriate tags for sections, paragraphs, headings, and images. Keywords related to the news topic (Helena Lim, corruption, seized assets, court, appeal) should be incorporated naturally within the article. The article should be well-structured, engaging, and informative, while also being SEO-friendly to increase its visibility on search engines.

Please note that the final article should not include a title, SEO keywords, or meta description. You are to act as a Content Writer, focusing solely on the content, and not as a Virtual Assistant providing additional comments or text.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts