Tag:

tipikor

News

Headline: "Surabaya PN Chief’s SGD 20K Bribery Charge Dropped: Judge Rules Evidence Insfficient"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Leaked: Key Indonesian Judge Holds Bribe Money for Ronald Tannur’s Acquittal

Jakarta – The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has revealed that the Chairman of Surabaya District Court (PN) stands to gain from the bribe money used to secure a not-guilty verdict for Gregorius Ronald Tannur. According to AGO’s Public Relations Division Head, Harli Siregar, the bribe money is currently possessed by the presiding judge in Ronald Tannur’s case, Erintuah Damanik.

Harli initially revealed that Ronald Tannur’s mother, Meirizka Widjaja, prepared bribe money for the PN Chairman and a clerk. "This includes USD 20,000 for Surabaya PN Chairman," he said.

The AGO confirmed that the bribe money, amounting to USD 20,000 for the PN Chairman and USD 10,000 for the clerk, has been handed over to Erintuah Damanik. However, the money has not yet been distributed to the intended recipients and remains in Damanik’s possession.

Three PN judges, namely Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo, and Mangapul, are currently indicted in this case. They are accused of receiving bribes totaling IDR 1 billion and USD 308,000 (approximately IDR 3.6 billion) in exchange for acquitting Ronald Tannur in the death of Dini Sera Afrianti.

The case surfaced after Ronald Tannur was arrested for killing his partner, Dini Sera Afrianti. Meirizka Widjaja attempted to secure his acquittal by engaging a lawyer, Lisa Rahmat, who approached a former MA official, Zarof Ricar, to find a bribe-accepting PN judge in Surabaya.

The bribery granted Ronald Tannur’s acquittal in July 2024. Later, it was exposed that the acquittal was secured through bribery. The prosecution had filed an appeal, which was granted by the MA, sentencing Ronald Tannur to 5 years in prison.

Besides being charged with accepting bribes to acquit Ronald Tannur, the three judges are also accused of graft. The prosecution has not yet specified the origin of the graft.

This article is based on a release from the Jakarta-based Attorneys Office.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Wife’s Right: Liberation from Zero-Balance ATM vòng phosphatase Lock by Ronald Tannur"

(Improved to be more descriptive, concise, and respectful while conveying the key elements of the story)

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Wrath of a Wife: Marital Strains as Husband-Hakim Frees Ronald Tannur

Article:

In a dramatic turn of events, Marta Panggabean, wife of Mangapul – one of the three judges from Surabaya’s District Court, has expressed her frustration after her husband’s decision to acquit Gregorius Ronald Tannur in a high-profile case. The acquittal, allegedly influenced by bribery, has left Marta grappling with financial strain, as revealed in her testimony at the Corruption Court in Jakarta.

Marta, appearing as a witness, recounted her distressing situation during the ongoing trial against her husband and two other judges: Erintuah Damanik and Heru Hanindyo. All three are accused of accepting bribes totaling Rp 1 billion and SGD 308,000 (approximately Rp 3.6 billion) in exchange for acquitting Tannur of the murder of his girlfriend, Dini Sera Afrianti.

Marta’s Testimony: A Tale of Financial Strain

Marta’s woes began when news of the corruption scandal broke in December 2024. Since then, she has not received her husband’s salary, which was previously used to support their three children pursuing higher education. Adding to her distress, she discovered her ATM balance was zero, a discovery that left her enraged at her husband.

"I’ve been to the ATM twice, and both times it said ‘your balance is zero’," Marta tearfully recalled. "I was so upset, I even scolded my husband, ‘This happened because of you!’ But in my heart, I still feel sorry for him. I wonder why we’ve been struck by this fate," she said, breaking down in tears.

Coping Mechanisms

Despite her anger and distress, Marta remains resilient. She revealed that her brother-in-law has been helping her with daily expenses, and she has even sold some jewelry to make ends meet. Unfortunately, this has not been enough to cover tuition fees for their children.

The trial is ongoing, and Marta’s heart-wrenching testimony has shed light on the personal cost of corruption, beyond the courtroom and headlines. As the investigation progresses, all eyes are on the three judges, and the institution they serve. The public awaits justice, as Marta and her family await relief from their financial burdens.

Stay Informed with Detik Videos and Live Streaming

Catch the latest developments in the case with this exclusive video from Detik: ‘Kronologi 3 Hakim Pemvonis Bebas Ronald Tannur Diduga Terima Suap‘.

Get real-time updates on news and happenings with our live streaming service, Live DetikPagi. Stay informed, stay ahead.

This is a developing story. DetikNews will continue to provide updates as more information becomes available.

Reporting by [Your Name], DetikNews.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Women Judges Recall Liberating Ronald Tannur

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Judul: Hakim-Pengacara Suap: Istri Istri Kakap di Sidang Kasus Ronald Tannur

Kesaksian Istri-istri Hakim Pembebas Ronald Tannur

Jakarta – Sidang kasus suap berkaitan dengan vonis bebas Gregorius Ronald Tannurтолок похода в dalsite berlanjut. Pada sesi terbaru, jaksa menghadirkan istri hakim yang menjadi terdakwa dalam kasus ini.

Tiga hakim di Surabaya didakwa menerima suap sebesar Rp 1 miliar dan SGD 308 ribu atau setara Rp 3,6 miliar untuk memberikan vonis bebas kepada Ronald Tannur pada kasus tewasnya Dini Sera Afrianti. Mereka adalah Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo, dan Mangapul. Penetapan putusan dilakukan oleh Ketua Hakim Erintuah Damanik dengan anggota Hakim Mangapul dan Heru Hanindyo.

Jaksa penuntut umum: "Telah melakukan atau turut serta melakukan perbuatan, Hakim yaitu Terdakwa Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo dan Mangapul. Mereka memutus perkara pidana atas nama Gregorius Ronald Tannur, setelah menerima hadiah atau janji berupa uang tunai sebesar Rp 1.000.000.000 dan SGD 308.000."

Politikerin ini seluruhnya bermula dari bertindak jinak dalam kasus kematian kekasih Ronald Tannur, Dini Sera Afrianti.ouble lineIbu Ronald Tannur, Meirizka Widjaja, kemudian mencari pengacara bernama Lisa Rahmatcs untuk memohon pernyataan putusan yang bebas. Lisa kemudian bertemu mantan pejabat MA Zarof Ricar untuk mencari hakim Pengadilan Negeri (PN) Surabaya yang dapat memutus kasus ini.

Singkat cerita, suap diberikan dan Ronald Tannur dijatuhkan vonis bebas di Juli 2024. Namun,atteringnie vonis bebas ini kemudian terungkap bahwa ini terjadi akibat suap.

Majelis Agung (MA) telah mengabulkan kasasi,ránzigan ini автобуслайтhat telah dMA mengabulkan kasasi ini, dan Ronald Tannur telah divonis 5 tahun penjara.

Selain suap vonis bebas Ronald Tannur, ketiga hakim ini juga didakwa erhaltengratifikasi, dicaranya keuangan. Jaksa belum menjelaskan asalศร attorney-i gratifikasi ini.

färm ladite Jaksa sudah memanggil isteri-isteri hakim sidang sebagai saksi.

Titikgrafi Istri Erintuah Damanik

äußertatelyrospective Sel Táterately istri hakim Erintuah Damanik, Rita Sidauruk, dihadirkan sebagai saksi pertama. Rita mengaku kesulitan tidur setelah sebuah u roce terbaru ke tempat tinggal mereka.

"Saya seperti biasa, Pak ya, Subuh sekali sudah bangun. Lanjut saya kegiatan sebagai ibu rumah tangga. Belum saya mulai memasak, pintu diketuk," kata Rita ketika ditanya tentang hari penangkap Link upkannya. "Saya pada akhirnya membolehkannya memasuki rumah, dan turn out saja, mereka adalah pemastautin jack. Saya membuabakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakakak

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Your ATM Balance is Zero: Act Now!

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Marta‘s Financial Struggles as Husband, Mangapul, Faces Bribery Charges

Marta Panggabean, wife of Mangapul, a judge at Surabaya District Court, has expressed her frustration and financial struggles due to her husband’s involvement in a bribery case. The case centers around the acquittal of Gregorius Ronald Tannur, who was initially charged with the death of his girlfriend, Dini Sera Afrianti.

During her testimony as a witness in the trial of three judges at the Corruption Court in Jakarta, Marta revealed that she has been without her husband’s income since December 2024. She and Mangapul have three children in college, adding to their financial burden.

"I haven’t received my husband’s salary since December," Marta said, tears welling up in her eyes. "Our youngest is still in private school. It’s been so hard, I’m even having to sell my jewelry to make ends meet."

Marta’s frustration is understandable, given the circumstances. The family’s finances have been significantly impacted by her husband’s legal troubles. She has been seeking help from her sister-in-law to cover daily expenses and has been selling jewelry to support her children’s education.

The trial of the three judges involved in the Tannur case began in January 2025. The judges—Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo, and Mangapul—stand accused of accepting a Rp 1 billion (approximately USD 70,000) bribe and SGD 308,000 (approximately Rp 3.6 billion) to acquit Tannur.

The case’s roots trace back to Tannur’s acquittal in 2024. Tannur’s mother, Meirizka Widjaja, had hired a lawyer named Lisa Rahmat to help secure his freedom. Rahmat then contacted a former official, Zarof Ricar, to find a judge who could be swayed to acquit Tannur. The bribe was subsequently paid, and Tannur was acquitted. The case was later retried, and Tannur was sentenced to 5 years in prison.

As the trial unfolds, Marta awaits the verdict, hoping for some resolution to her family’s financial crisis.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Key District Court Judge’s Suspension: Iwan Henry Detained at Salemba Prison"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Former Jakarta Culture Chief Arrested in Corruption Case Involving Rp150B

The Jakarta Corruption Court has formally arrested corruption-case/” title=”Jakarta's Cultural Affairs Chief Inactive, Named Suspect in Corruption Case”>Iwan Henry Wardhana, the former inactive Head of the corruption-officials-arrest-iwan-henry-former-jakarta-kadisbud-over-fictitious-spj-case/” title=”Indonesian Anti-Corruption Officials Arrest Iwan Henry, Former Jakarta Kadisbud, Over Fictitious SPJ Case”>Jakarta Culture Department, in a corruption case involving a suspected misappropriation of funds totaling over IDR150 billion (approximately USD10.6 million).

This arrest, made by the Jakarta Corruption Court’s investigations team led by Syahron Hasibuan, occurred on Thursday (2/1) after Wardhana was named a suspect. Alongside Wardhana, the court also arrested Fairza Maulana, the Head of Culture Utilization at the same department.

"During the investigation, we detained Wardhana at the Salemba Class C Prison, South Jakarta District Court, and Maulana at the Salemba Class C Prison, High Court, for a period of 20 days," Hasibuan stated.

In this case, the two suspects are alleged to have conspired to use a team led by suspect Gatot Arif Rahmadi to execute Culture Department projects in Jakarta. They are also suspected of creating fictitious arts studios to generate fake receipts for the purpose of withdrawing funds.

According to the indictment, the suspects had agreed to use these fictitious studios for the issuance of receipts (SPJ) for cultural events and art performances. The funds withdrawn into the studio accounts, as well as those from genuine studios, were then transferred to Gatot’s account, allegedly for the benefit of Wardhana and Maulana.

Wardhana and Maulana, along with Gatot, face charges under Articles 2 and 3, joined with Article 18(1) of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, and Article 55(1)joined with Article 64(1) of the Criminal Code.

The Jakarta Corruption Court has been probing this case since November 2024, escalating it to formal investigation status on December 17, 2024.

Prior to his arrest, Wardhana had been non-active as the head of the Culture Department following allegations of corruption involving the department’s budget of over IDR150 billion in 2023. assets seized include cash totaling IDR1 billion, hundreds of counterfeit stamps, documents related to the disbursement of funds, phones, laptops, and computers.

(tfq/wis)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Jakarta’s Cultural Affairs Chief Inactive, Named Suspect in Corruption Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking News: Jakarta Anti-Corruption Bureau Names Iwan Henry Wardhana and Two Others as Suspects in Cultural Agency Corruption Case

The Independentunicipal Corruption Eradication Commission (Korini), Jakarta, has named Iwan Henry Wardhana, the former head of the Jakarta Culture Agency, and two others as suspects in a corruption case involving the embezzlement of government funds. The two other suspects are MFM, the acting head of the utilization division, and GAR, a private individual.

"The three suspects are alleged to have conspired to use ghost cultural centers to inflated expense reports for art and culture events, allowing GAR to siphon off funds into their personal accounts," said Syahron Hasibuan, head of the Public Relations Unit of Korini, Jakarta.

In this case, investigators accuse the suspects of violating Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law (UU Tipikor), read together with Articles 18 and 55 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Article 64 of the Criminal Code. MFM and GAR have been taken into custody for 20 days, while Iwan Henry Wardhana’s whereabouts are yet to be determined.

Prior to this, Governor Teguh Setyabudi had earlier revoked Wardhana’s appointment as head of the Jakarta Culture Agency pending the outcome of the corruption investigation. The governer also stated that the Secretary of the Culture Agency would act as the interim head of the agency until further notice.

[End of Article]

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judge Overrules: Eko Aryanto’s 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Judge Facing Scrutiny Over ‘lenient’ Sentence; His Luxury Vehicles Raise Eyebrows

Subhead:
Chief Judge Eko Aryanto’s decision to sentence corrupt official Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years sparks debate, while his lavish car collection garners attention.

Article:

metted in the spotlight for imposing a 6.5-year jail term on Harvey Moeis, a convict in a high-profile corruption case involving the mismanagement of tin commodity trading, which reportedly caused the state to lose Rp 300 trillion. But the public’s curiosity extends beyond the controversial sentencing to the judge’s personal wealth and assets, as highlighted by a recent Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (LHKPN).

Judge Eko Aryanto declared a total net worth of Rp 2.820.981.000 in his 2023 LHKPN report, with his most valuable asset being land and buildings worth Rp 1.350.000.000. This was followed by other non-business assets worth Rp 395.000.000 and cash and cash equivalents valued at Rp 165.981.000.

Of particular interest is the judge’s collection of vehicles and machinery, estimated at Rp 910.000.000. Here’s a breakdown:

  1. Honda CR-V Minibus (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  2. Honda Civic Sedan (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  3. Kawasaki Ninja Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 50.000.000
  4. Kawasaki KLX Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 20.000.000
  5. Toyota Innova Reborn G 2.0 AT (2016) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 240.000.000

Earlier reports indicate that Judge Eko Aryanto imposed a lighter sentence than what prosecutors sought due to differing opinions on Harvey Moeis’ role in the corruption case. The judge noted that Moeis did not play a significant part in the case, despite the prosecution’s demand for a 12-year imprisonment.

"The panel of judges found that the prosecution’s demand of 12 years was too heavy given the defendant’s involvement in the case," Aryanto stated while reading the verdict at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Bungur Raya Street, according to detikNews.

Moeis, who represented PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found guilty of benefiting from illegaltimah mining activities alongside PT Timah, the state-owned miner. However, Judge Aryanto ruled that Moeis was not involved in decision-making nor aware of the financial aspect of their collaboration.

The judge’s wealth declaration and luxury vehicles have sparked public interest, with some questioning the judge’s lifestyle and lavish spending. While it’s essential to maintain the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, such public scrutiny may add pressure on the judiciary to uphold the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Aid in $300 T Timah Corruption Scandal

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Corruption Scandal: Activist Frowns on Court’s Decision, Demands Return of Seized Assets from Helena Lim

Subhead:
Anti-Corruption Activist Disagrees with Court Verdict, Pressures Prosecutors to Appeal

Byline:
Lirang Brata, Jakarta

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, the Masyarakat Anti Korupsi Indonesia (MAKI) has expressed its displeasure with the court’s decision to return seized assets to Helena Lim, a money changer and businesswoman accused of participating in a multi-billion-dollar corruption scheme involving the trade of tin. The activist group is urging prosecutors to appeal the verdict, which it believes is lenient given the magnitude of the alleged crime.

MAKI’s coordinator, Boyamin Saiman, told reporters, "I was let down by the court’s decision to return Helena Lim’s assets. I urge the Attorney General’s Office to file an appeal and insist on the seizure of her wealth to make up for the Rp 300 trillion loss to the state."

In its verdict, the court ruled that Helena Lim must pay a Rp 900 million fine as damages for her role in the corruption case that benefited Harvey Moeis. Boyamin contests this, highlighting the disparity between the damages assigned to each defendant. "It’s confusing, to say the least. Harvey Moeis was initially accused of causing Rp 420 billion in losses, but the damages assigned to him in this latest verdict amount to only Rp 210 billion," he said, questioning where the remaining funds went.

Boyamin maintains that Helena Lim, who has been convicted of corruption and money-laundering, should have her assets seized to compensate for the losses incurred by the state. "Given her involvement in the corruption case and the fact that her wealth is suspected to be the proceeds of her illegal activities, her assets should be seized and forfeited to the state," he stated.

The activistgroup is calling for a fair and just legal process, underscoring the enormous losses suffered by the state due to Helena Lim’s alleged role in the illegal tin trading scheme. "Helena Lim’s conviction should serve as an example, and her assets should be seized to help recover the Rp 27 trillion in damages caused to the state," Boyamin stressed.

Moreover, MAKI has urged the government to continue investigating the case and consider declaring entrepreneur Robert Bonosusatya (RBS) a suspect in connection with the illegal tin trading scandal.

In a separate development, Helena Lim was sentenced to five years in prison for her role in the corruption case. The court also handed down a Rp 750 million fine, subsided by an additional six months of imprisonment, and ordered her to pay Rp 900 million in damages.

*}

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Sandra Dewi’s Viral Balikpapan Story: The Harvey Moeis Hug

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Revealing the Story Behind Sandra Dewi‘s Viral Moment Hugging Harvey Moeis

Article:

Jakarta, Dec 31 – A intimate moment between actress Sandra Dewi and her husband, businessman Harvey Moeis, caught on camera inside a courtroom has gone viral on social media. Here’s the story behind the viral video.

Video footage circulating online shows Sandra Dewi approaching Harvey Moeis, who was seated in the defendant’s chair, accompanied by his defense lawyer. Sandra then embraced Harvey, and they exchanged a few words. In the video, Harvey can also be seen caressing Sandra’s head. One of the judges was seen smiling during this moment.

The account that uploaded the video claimed that it occurred during the verdict reading. However, the actual moment occurred during the hearing of the witness examination.

The story behind this viral moment unfolds as follows: Sandra’s embrace with Harvey happened after she testified in the corruption case involving a massive state loss of Rp 300 trillion at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on October 10, 2024. Sandra testified as a witness for her husband. Besides Sandra, the prosecutors called Harvey’s younger sister, Mira Moeis, and Sandra’s younger sister, Kartika Dewi, as witnesses. Both Mira and Kartika also approached and hugged Harvey after the hearing.

During her testimony, Sandra referred to Harvey as her "beloved husband." When asked about their relationship, Sandra confidently replied, "I know him very well, Your Honor, he is my beloved husband."

Other witnesses, Kartika and Mira, also expressed their familiarity with Harvey. Kartika said, "Of course, he’s my brother-in-law," while Mira added, "He’s my brother."

Now, Harvey Moeis has been sentenced to 6 years and 6 months in prison. The judge, Eko Aryanto, ruled that Harvey was guilty of committing corruption and money laundering, leading to a massive state loss. Along with the prison sentence, Harvey was also fined Rp 1 billion and ordered to pay Rp 210 billion as a form of restrictive civil penalty.

The judge considered Harvey’s polite demeanor during the trial and his family responsibilities in deciding the sentence. The prosecutor has filed an appeal, arguing for a harsher sentence than the one imposed. Initially, the prosecution sought a 12-year imprisonment, a Rp 1 billion fine, and to collect Rp 210 billion as a restrictive civil penalty.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Seized State Assets: The Plight of Helena Lim and Harvey Moeis"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Divergent Fates: Helena Lim and Harvey Moeis in Property Seizure Case

Article:

In a significant turn of events, the Jakarta High Court has issued verdicts in the corruption case involving the mismanagement of tin commodities, with two prominent figures, Helena Lim and Harvey Moeis, receiving contrasting sentences.

Helena Lim’s Fate

Freelance money changer and socialite Helena Lim, often dubbed "crazy rich," has been sentenced to five years in prison for her role in the corruption case. The verdict was delivered at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Monday, December 30, 2024. Unlike the prosecution’s earlier demands, the court ruled against personal enrichment, sentencing Helena to a lower penalty. Additionally, she was ordered to pay Rp 900 million in fines, with a deadline of one month after the verdict becomes final.

If Helena fails to pay the fine, her properties will be seized and auctioned to cover the amount. However, if her assets are insufficient, an additional one-year prison term will be imposed.

The court also ruled that Helena’s properties could be seized and auctioned to cover the fine, with the same condition for an additional one-year prison term if the amount is not met.

Furthermore, Helena was fined Rp 750 million, substitute for a six-month prison term. Similar to her other sentences, if she fails to pay the fine, her properties will be seized and auctioned, with the possibility of an additional one-year prison term if her assets are insufficient.

Hakim Perintahkan Aset Helena Lim Dibalikin

In a surprising twist, the court ruled that all assets seized from Helena should be returned to her. The items in question had been seized earlier due to suspicions of involvement in the corruption case. However, the court ruled that none of the seized assets were related to the case at hand and thus should be returned to Helena.

The court also acknowledged Helena’s participation in the 2016 tax amnesty program and the 2022 voluntary wealth disclosure program. The assets declared during these programs are protected by law and cannot be seized.

Harvey Moeis’ Sentence

Meanwhile, entrepreneur Harvey Moeis was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The court found Harvey guilty of corruption and money laundering, causing Rp 300 trillion in state losses. Harvey was also ordered to pay a fine of Rp 1 billion, substitute for a six-month prison term.

Additionally, Harvey was ordered to pay Rp 210 billion in reparations, failing which his properties would be seized and auctioned. If the amount cannot be covered by the auction, an additional two-year prison term will be imposed.

Seluruh Harta Harvey yang Disita Dirampas Negara

Unlike Helena, Harvey’s fate concerning his seized assets was harsher. The court ruled that all of Harvey’s seized assets should be forfeited to the state. Among the seized assets were townhouses, luxurious bags, precious metals, bank deposits worth Rp 33 billion, and high-end vehicles like a Ferrari and a Mercedes.

The court agreed with the prosecution’s view that these seized assets should be considered as reparations for the state’s losses.

The sentencing of Helena Lim and Harvey Moeis highlights the differing outcomes in such cases, with both defendants facing varying prison terms and financial penalties. As the justice system works its way through these high-profile cases, the public awaits further developments.

SEO Keywords: Helena Lim, Harvey Moeis, Corruption, Tin commodities, Indonesia, Jakarta High Court, Prison sentence, Fine, Property seizure, assets forfeiture

Meta Description: The Jakarta High Court delivers contrasting verdicts to Helena Lim and Harvey Moeis in the tin commodities corruption case, with prison terms and significant fines varying between the two prominent figures.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts