Tag:

vonis

World

Unverified Akan Divonis Tied to Hush Money Case Before Inauguration; Trump Furious

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking News: Donald Trump Slams New York Judge’s Timing in Hush Money Case

WASHINGTON D.C. – President-elect Donald Trump has strongly condemned a New York judge’s announcement that a verdict in the hush money case could be delivered just 10 days before his upcoming inauguration on January 20th.

In a scathing response via his Truth Social platform, Trump labeled the judge’s decision as "an unfair political attack" and a "staged production."

"Another Witch Hunt by a Radical Left New York Judge," Trump posted, as reported by AFP on Saturday, January 4, 2025.

Trump characterized Judge Juan Merchan as "a partisan radical" and argued that the timing of the sentence, coming just days before his inauguration, was a "conscious violation of the law, unconstitutional, and if allowed, would mark the end of the presidency as we know it."

Trump’s statement came after Judge Merchan disclosed that the verdict would be announced at a January 10th hearing, inviting Trump to attend in person or virtually.

In a 18-page ruling on Friday, Judge Merchan rejected various motions from Trump’s lawyers aiming to dismiss the case, thereby strengthening the jury’s guilty verdict.

Trump faces a maximum of four years in prison, although legal experts, even before his election victory last November, believed Judge Merchan was unlikely to send Trump to jail.

If convicted, Trump is expected to appeal, potentially further delaying any sentence.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Unveiling MA’s Dispute: ‘Restraint’ Eases Initial Decision?

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: "The Surprising Role of Politeness in Mitigating Sentences: A Look into Indonesia‘s Supreme Court Rulings"

Jakarta: The term ‘politeness‘ has recently sparked public curiosity, especially when it comes to the mitigation of sentences in several cases, even capturing the attention of supreme court officials. But where did this notion originate, and can politeness truly lessen a defendant’s punishment?

According to the Criminal Code Book of Indonesian Criminal Law (KUHP), there are several conditions that can decrease a defendant’s punishment. However, can politeness be one of these factors?

The idea of politeness influencing sentencing dates back to a Supreme Court decision in 2006, which has since been upheld in various subsequent rulings, creating a strong judicial precedent.

In the spirit of transparency, the following Supreme Court rulings have set this precedent:

  1. Supreme Court Decision No. 572 K/PID/2006:

    • Defendant displayed politeness during the trial
    • Defendant admitted their actions truthfully
    • Defendant had no prior convictions
    • Defendant expressed remorse for their actions
  2. Supreme Court Decision No. 2658 K/PID.SUS/201:
    • Defendant had no prior convictions
    • Defendant behaved politely during the trial

Additionally, Article 335(a) KUHP also cites:

  • Defendant had no prior convictions
  • Defendant admitted their actions truthfully and behaved politely throughout the trial
  • Defendant exhibited remorse

The Supreme Court’s official spokesperson, Yanto, clarified that the consideration of aggravating and mitigating circumstances is mandated by KUHP Article 197. However, the consideration of politeness as a mitigating factor is not explicitly mentioned in the KUHP, classifying it as a special consideration.

Yanto further explained that while politeness cannot be prescribed by law, it can be considered by judges, along with other extenuating circumstances, when making a ruling. For instance, a defendant who expresses remorse, assists victims, or demonstrates strong reformative potential may find that politeness and respect for the court process contribute favorably to their sentencing.

Ultimately, the application of politeness as a mitigating factor lies within the judge’s discretion, guided by their interpretation of the law and the facts presented in each case. The Indonesian legal system, much like many others, seeks fairness and legitimacy in its rulings, and the consideration of politeness is one aspect that may serve this purpose.

Video – "Supreme Court on Politeness: The Unusual Factor in Sentencing Mitigation"

by ZAP/DHN

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prabowo Seeks 50-Year Sentence for Harvey, MA: Awaiting Appeal Ruling

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Prospects of Prabowo’s Presidential Bid Strengthen amid Harvey Moeis’ Conviction

President Prabowo Subianto‘s prospects for the 2029 presidential election have bolstered after the recent conviction of Harvey Moeis, a key suspect in the billion-dollar ransomware case, President Joko Widodo‘s administration. Prabowo, who has been vocal about the government’s handling of corruption cases, hailed the prosecution’s efforts but maintained that the sentence was too lenient.

On Monday (4/1/2025), MA Communication Spokesman Yanto revealed that MA had not yet received the Harvey’s defense team’s counterargument. Therefore, the 2024 Year End vonis remains pending. Previously, Harvey’s defense team argued that their client was duped by his accomplices and only received a small portion of the ransom.

Prabowo, who had initially praised the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for its efforts in prosecuting Harvey, later expressed disappointment with the 2024 Year End vonis. Prabowo argued that the sentence did not serve as a sufficient deterrent for other corruptors.

"Smesh," responsibility in the eyes of the law should equal to the crime committed. The people have a right to know the truth behind the crimes that affect them," Prabowo said in June 2024**.

Harvey, a 38-year-old businessman from Bogor, West Java, was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for his role in the 2023 Indonesia Ransomware Attack, which resulted in the loss of Rp. 3 trillion ($200 million) from various state-owned enterprises. The prosecution had asked for a sentence of 7 years in prison.

Key Words: Prabowo Subianto, 2029 presidential election, Harvey Moeis, Indonesia Ransomware Attack, corruption cases, Joko Widodo, Jakarta.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judge Overrules: Eko Aryanto’s 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Judge Facing Scrutiny Over ‘lenient’ Sentence; His Luxury Vehicles Raise Eyebrows

Subhead:
Chief Judge Eko Aryanto’s decision to sentence corrupt official Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years sparks debate, while his lavish car collection garners attention.

Article:

metted in the spotlight for imposing a 6.5-year jail term on Harvey Moeis, a convict in a high-profile corruption case involving the mismanagement of tin commodity trading, which reportedly caused the state to lose Rp 300 trillion. But the public’s curiosity extends beyond the controversial sentencing to the judge’s personal wealth and assets, as highlighted by a recent Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (LHKPN).

Judge Eko Aryanto declared a total net worth of Rp 2.820.981.000 in his 2023 LHKPN report, with his most valuable asset being land and buildings worth Rp 1.350.000.000. This was followed by other non-business assets worth Rp 395.000.000 and cash and cash equivalents valued at Rp 165.981.000.

Of particular interest is the judge’s collection of vehicles and machinery, estimated at Rp 910.000.000. Here’s a breakdown:

  1. Honda CR-V Minibus (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  2. Honda Civic Sedan (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  3. Kawasaki Ninja Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 50.000.000
  4. Kawasaki KLX Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 20.000.000
  5. Toyota Innova Reborn G 2.0 AT (2016) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 240.000.000

Earlier reports indicate that Judge Eko Aryanto imposed a lighter sentence than what prosecutors sought due to differing opinions on Harvey Moeis’ role in the corruption case. The judge noted that Moeis did not play a significant part in the case, despite the prosecution’s demand for a 12-year imprisonment.

"The panel of judges found that the prosecution’s demand of 12 years was too heavy given the defendant’s involvement in the case," Aryanto stated while reading the verdict at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Bungur Raya Street, according to detikNews.

Moeis, who represented PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found guilty of benefiting from illegaltimah mining activities alongside PT Timah, the state-owned miner. However, Judge Aryanto ruled that Moeis was not involved in decision-making nor aware of the financial aspect of their collaboration.

The judge’s wealth declaration and luxury vehicles have sparked public interest, with some questioning the judge’s lifestyle and lavish spending. While it’s essential to maintain the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, such public scrutiny may add pressure on the judiciary to uphold the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Former Prosecutor Requests Return of Helena Lim’s Assets

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Jaksa Balikan Aset Helena Lim้ำ_side:
Justice Ministry to Review, Consider Appeal After Court Orders Return of Helena Lim’s Seized Assets

Jakartaцами Thedecision to return Helena Lim’s seized assets by the court will be reviewed and considered for appeal by the Justice Ministry.

Following the recent verdict in the corruption case involving Helena Lim, the Indonesian justice system is facing a new challenge. The Jaksa penuntut umum (Public Prosecutor) must now decide whether to appeal the court’s decision to return assets previously seized from the wealthy money changer.

Kapuspenkum Kejagung RI Harli Siregar, in a press conference held at the Office of the Attorney General in South Jakarta on Tuesday (31/12/2024), explained that the prosecutors have seven days to consider their next move. This timeframe, as stated in the Kodeethoxy Perilaku Hakim (KUHAP), allows them to thoroughly analyze the court’s decision and deliberiate on any potential appeal.

"We still have seven days according to KUHAP," Harli said, "This period is not merely a formality. It’s an opportunity for us to carefully analyze each aspect of the case and make an informed decision."

Prosecutors are currently assessing the court’s verdict, which includes not only the imprisonment sentence but also the order to return seized assets. The decision on whether to appeal will heavily depend on the prosecutors’ interpretation of the court’s reasoning and the strength of their case.

The case, involving alleged corruption and money laundering in the tin commodity trading sector, has resulted in Helena Lim being sentenced to five years in prison. The court has also ordered the return of assets worth around IDR 900 million ($62,500 USD) to Helena.

This includes various luxurious items such as branded bags, jewelry, luxury cars, and even a sum of money valued at IDR 10 billion (approximately $690,000 USD). Some of these items were seized during the investigation stage, pending the outcome of the trial.

The Justice Ministry is now weighing its options, with a possible appeal as a viable course of action. The ministry remains committed to upholding justice and ensuring that the verdict reflects the true extent of the crimes committed.

should follow proper HTML formatting, including appropriate tags for sections, paragraphs, headings, and images. Keywords related to the news topic (Helena Lim, corruption, seized assets, court, appeal) should be incorporated naturally within the article. The article should be well-structured, engaging, and informative, while also being SEO-friendly to increase its visibility on search engines.

Please note that the final article should not include a title, SEO keywords, or meta description. You are to act as a Content Writer, focusing solely on the content, and not as a Virtual Assistant providing additional comments or text.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Sandra Dewi’s Viral Balikpapan Story: The Harvey Moeis Hug

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Revealing the Story Behind Sandra Dewi‘s Viral Moment Hugging Harvey Moeis

Article:

Jakarta, Dec 31 – A intimate moment between actress Sandra Dewi and her husband, businessman Harvey Moeis, caught on camera inside a courtroom has gone viral on social media. Here’s the story behind the viral video.

Video footage circulating online shows Sandra Dewi approaching Harvey Moeis, who was seated in the defendant’s chair, accompanied by his defense lawyer. Sandra then embraced Harvey, and they exchanged a few words. In the video, Harvey can also be seen caressing Sandra’s head. One of the judges was seen smiling during this moment.

The account that uploaded the video claimed that it occurred during the verdict reading. However, the actual moment occurred during the hearing of the witness examination.

The story behind this viral moment unfolds as follows: Sandra’s embrace with Harvey happened after she testified in the corruption case involving a massive state loss of Rp 300 trillion at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on October 10, 2024. Sandra testified as a witness for her husband. Besides Sandra, the prosecutors called Harvey’s younger sister, Mira Moeis, and Sandra’s younger sister, Kartika Dewi, as witnesses. Both Mira and Kartika also approached and hugged Harvey after the hearing.

During her testimony, Sandra referred to Harvey as her "beloved husband." When asked about their relationship, Sandra confidently replied, "I know him very well, Your Honor, he is my beloved husband."

Other witnesses, Kartika and Mira, also expressed their familiarity with Harvey. Kartika said, "Of course, he’s my brother-in-law," while Mira added, "He’s my brother."

Now, Harvey Moeis has been sentenced to 6 years and 6 months in prison. The judge, Eko Aryanto, ruled that Harvey was guilty of committing corruption and money laundering, leading to a massive state loss. Along with the prison sentence, Harvey was also fined Rp 1 billion and ordered to pay Rp 210 billion as a form of restrictive civil penalty.

The judge considered Harvey’s polite demeanor during the trial and his family responsibilities in deciding the sentence. The prosecutor has filed an appeal, arguing for a harsher sentence than the one imposed. Initially, the prosecution sought a 12-year imprisonment, a Rp 1 billion fine, and to collect Rp 210 billion as a restrictive civil penalty.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail