Golf analysts are calling for the PGA of America to strip Long Island of future major championship hosting duties following aggressive crowd behavior at the 2026 U.S. Open. According to Golf Channel commentator Eamon Lynch, the conduct of spectators at Shinnecock Hills and previous events like the Ryder Cup at Bethpage represents a persistent pattern that warrants a permanent ban from the region.
Why are critics calling for a boycott of Long Island golf venues?
The primary driver for the proposed boycott is a perceived decline in spectator decorum. Eamon Lynch of the Golf Channel stated that the behavior exhibited by fans at the 2026 U.S. Open was consistent with previous disruptive incidents at the 2025 Ryder Cup at Bethpage. Lynch described the crowd as a “stain on the game of golf,” arguing that the repetitive nature of these outbursts creates an environment unsuitable for major championships. He specifically characterized the disruptive demographic as “drunk crypto bros” who lack the self-regulation typically expected at professional golf tournaments.
The PGA of America is currently slated to return to Bethpage for the PGA Championship in 2033. Critics now argue this commitment should be rescinded based on the recent conduct of local galleries.
How does the Augusta National model compare to current PGA standards?
Industry observers are increasingly comparing the loose atmosphere of public-access major venues with the restrictive policies of private clubs. Lynch pointed to the “Augusta National model”—which enforces a strict no-phone policy and zero-tolerance rule for disruptions—as a potential solution for the PGA of America. While Augusta National maintains total control over its gated environment, the PGA’s reliance on public-access courses like Bethpage makes enforcing such rigid standards significantly more difficult. The contrast highlights a growing tension between the desire to keep golf accessible and the need to maintain the sport’s traditional sense of decorum.
Pro-Tip: Understanding Tournament Etiquette
Professional golf relies on silence and stillness to ensure player performance. Spectators who violate these norms are often subject to immediate removal, though enforcement varies depending on the venue’s security staffing and local culture.
What are the long-term consequences for host cities?
If the PGA of America acts on these criticisms, it could set a precedent for how host cities are selected. Historically, host venues were chosen primarily for their course architecture and logistical capacity. If “fan culture” becomes a primary metric for selection, regions with historically rowdy sports fanbases—such as New York—may find themselves excluded from future bids. This shift would prioritize the experience of the players and the television broadcast over the local economic impact of hosting tens of thousands of spectators.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Has the PGA of America officially responded to the calls to boycott Long Island? No official statement has been released regarding the status of the 2033 PGA Championship at Bethpage.
- Is this the first time golf crowds have been criticized? No, but the intensity of the criticism following the 2026 U.S. Open marks a shift toward demanding systemic changes in venue selection.
- What is the “Augusta National model”? It is a set of strict, enforced rules regarding spectator behavior, including a total ban on mobile phones and a zero-tolerance policy for noise or interference.
What is your take on the behavior of golf crowds? Should the PGA prioritize fan conduct when choosing venues? Subscribe to our newsletter for more updates on the future of professional golf.
