Thailand has called for a specific approach to dealing with Myanmar’s current government, which is controlled by the military following recent elections. On Thursday, Thailand stated that Myanmar’s Southeast Asian neighbours should pursue a “calibrated engagement” with the post-election government.
Understanding the Call for Engagement
This statement from Thailand suggests a potential shift in how regional powers are approaching the situation in Myanmar. The call for “calibrated engagement” indicates a desire to maintain communication and interaction with the current government, even while continuing to advocate for a resolution to the ongoing conflict.
Implications of a Softening Stance
A “calibrated engagement” could involve diplomatic efforts, economic considerations, or other forms of interaction with the military-controlled government. This approach differs from complete isolation, which some have advocated for as a means of pressuring the government to address the conflict. However, Thailand’s statement explicitly links this engagement to continued pressure for an end to the conflict.
What Could Happen Next
Other Southeast Asian nations may consider adopting a similar approach to Myanmar, potentially leading to a more unified regional response. Alternatively, some countries may maintain a stricter stance, creating a divergence in policy. It is also possible that the military-controlled government in Myanmar could react negatively to the call for continued pressure, potentially escalating the conflict.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Thailand specifically recommend?
Thailand recommended that Myanmar’s Southeast Asian neighbours adopt a “calibrated engagement” with its military-controlled post-election government while still pressing for an end to conflict.
What does “calibrated engagement” mean?
The source does not define “calibrated engagement,” but it suggests maintaining interaction with the current government while continuing to advocate for an end to the conflict.
Is this a change in Thailand’s position?
Thailand’s statement is described as signalling a possible softening in stance.
How might a regional shift in approach impact the ongoing conflict within Myanmar?
