The California Supreme Court has declined to review the case of Daystar Peterson, known professionally as Tory Lanez, upholding his 10-year prison sentence. This decision follows a previous rejection of his arguments by a three-judge panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal in November.
Conviction and Aftermath Remain Intact
Peterson was convicted in December 2022 on three felony counts stemming from a July 2020 shooting, including assault with a semiautomatic firearm. Prosecutors maintained that evidence supported the jury’s verdict, stating the shooting occurred after an argument and “bruised his ego,” according to Deputy District Attorney Alexander Bott.
Peterson’s legal team had argued the trial contained flaws, specifically criticizing the admission of certain testimony and social media evidence. However, the appellate panel deemed any alleged errors as harmless. At oral argument, an attorney for Peterson asserted, “Daystar Peterson is innocent.”
Megan Thee Stallion testified during the trial that she was shot in both feet in July 2020. She stated under cross-examination that she “didn’t want to be a snitch” but felt compelled to “defend my name.”
Peterson is currently serving his sentence at the California Men’s Colony, where he was previously hospitalized after being stabbed 14 times, resulting in both lungs collapsing.
With the state’s highest court’s decision, Peterson’s conviction stands. His legal team could potentially seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What charges was Tory Lanez convicted of?
Daystar Peterson, known as Tory Lanez, was convicted on three felony counts related to a July 2020 shooting, including assault with a semiautomatic firearm.
What was the outcome of the appeal?
Both the 2nd District Court of Appeal and the California Supreme Court rejected Tory Lanez’s appeal, upholding his 10-year prison sentence.
What is the next possible legal step for Lanez?
His legal team may explore federal remedies, though success is uncertain.
As Lanez’s legal options narrow, what impact will this case have on discussions surrounding artist safety and accountability within the music industry?
