Trump Backs Greenland Deal Respecting Danish Sovereignty After Tariff Threat

by Chief Editor

A framework for a potential agreement regarding Greenland was discussed Wednesday between President Trump and NATO Secretary General Marc Rutte, with two sources indicating the proposal respects Denmark’s sovereignty over the island.

Shifting Positions on Greenland

The development marks a potential shift in President Trump’s publicly stated position. He had previously indicated that any deal regarding Greenland would require U.S. control of the territory. Despite this, President Trump stated the proposed framework “gives us everything we needed.”

Did You Know? The 1951 “Greenland Defense Agreement” between the U.S. and Denmark allowed for the establishment of U.S. military bases and “defense areas” in Greenland if deemed necessary by NATO.

Earlier Wednesday, President Trump delivered a speech in Davos stating the U.S. “needs” Greenland, but clarified he would not pursue its acquisition by force. He then called for immediate negotiations, while also criticizing Denmark and NATO. His tone changed significantly following the meeting with Secretary General Rutte.

Tariff Threats Receded

President Trump announced he would not impose tariffs on eight European allies, previously scheduled for February 1st, due to their opposition to his claim regarding Greenland. He also indicated that a deal based on the terms discussed with Rutte could resolve the entire Greenland situation. He posted on Truth Social that a framework for a future deal regarding Greenland and the Arctic region had been formed.

When questioned by reporters about whether Greenland would become part of the U.S., President Trump offered an ambiguous response, describing it as “the ultimate long-term deal. It’s an infinite deal. It is a deal forever.”

Expert Insight: The apparent willingness to compromise on outright control of Greenland suggests a prioritization of strategic access and influence in the Arctic region, rather than direct ownership. This could represent a pragmatic adjustment to achieve U.S. objectives.

NATO Secretary General Rutte claimed in a Fox News interview that the issue of Greenland’s control was not discussed during the meeting. He stated the proposal focuses on increased NATO and specifically “seven Arctic allies” involvement in protecting the Arctic region.

Details of the Proposed Framework

Sources familiar with the proposal confirm it does not include a transfer of sovereignty from Denmark to the United States. The plan centers on updating the existing 1951 Greenland Defense Agreement, increasing security measures in Greenland, expanding NATO activity in the Arctic, and focusing on raw materials. It also includes provisions for positioning “Golden Dome” in Greenland and countering “malign outside influence” from Russia and China.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated, “President Trump is proving once again he’s the Dealmaker in Chief. As details are finalized by all parties involved, they will be released accordingly.”

The proposal reportedly mirrors previous Danish proposals, allowing for increased U.S. military presence while maintaining Danish sovereignty.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was President Trump’s initial position on Greenland?

President Trump stated numerous times that any deal regarding Greenland would require the U.S. to have control of the island.

What is the role of NATO in this proposed framework?

The proposal involves all of NATO, with a particular focus on the “seven Arctic allies” increasing their involvement in protecting the Arctic region.

Does the proposed framework include a transfer of sovereignty?

No, two sources with knowledge of the proposal stated it does not include the transfer of overall sovereignty over Greenland from Denmark to the United States.

High-level negotiations between the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland are expected to begin in the coming weeks. It remains to be seen whether these negotiations will lead to a finalized agreement, and what the ultimate terms of that agreement may be.

You may also like

Leave a Comment