Why the Berlin Summit Matters for the Ukraine‑Russia Conflict
U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and former President Donald Trump’s son‑in‑law Jared Kushner met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and leading European heads of state in Berlin. The goal: push a 28‑point peace blueprint that Trump promoted as a “quick‑exit” strategy before the holidays.
Key sticking points in the negotiations
- Territory: Kyiv refuses to cede the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, while Moscow wants full control of Donbas and formal recognition of Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk.
- Security guarantees: The U.S. is prepared to back Ukraine with a guarantee anchored in NATO’s Article 5, but the exact scope remains vague.
- EU finance: European leaders are debating the use of frozen Russian assets—roughly €210 billion—to fund Kyiv’s reconstruction.
- Internal U.S. politics: A rift is emerging between Vice‑President J.D. Vance, who downplays Ukraine, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who pushes a more robust diplomatic push.
What the 28‑Point Plan Actually Says
The full list has been published by major outlets; highlights include:
- Recognition of Ukraine’s sovereignty.
- A mutual non‑aggression pact among Russia, Ukraine and Europe.
- Limits on Ukrainian armed forces (down to 600 000 troops) and a constitutional ban on NATO membership.
- Use of frozen Russian assets: $100 billion for U.S‑led reconstruction, with half of the profits returning to the United States, and a separate €100 billion “U.S.–Russian” investment fund.
- Establishment of a joint U.S.–Russian security working group.
The plan’s breadth has drawn criticism for mixing geopolitics with economic deals that many experts say “lack local context.”
Future Trends Shaping the Diplomatic Landscape
1. The Rise of “Frozen‑Asset Financing”
European regulators have already shifted to a permanent freeze on Russian funds, unlocking about €210 billion. If these assets are redirected, analysts at the IMF estimate Ukraine could receive up to $70 billion in infrastructure loans over the next five years.
Pro tip: Watch for the EU’s “financial emergency procedure” rulings—once a precedent, they could be used for future sanctions on other state actors.
2. Shift from Military Victory to “Frozen Conflict”
Political scientist Iver B. Neumann warns that a full peace treaty is unlikely; instead, a “frozen conflict” where fighting stops but no definitive settlement is reached may become the norm. Similar outcomes have occurred in Nagorno‑Karabakh and parts of the Caucasus.
Such a scenario would keep NATO’s eastern flank on high alert while limiting Ukraine’s long‑term sovereignty.
3. Growing Influence of Private Deal‑Makers
Both Witkoff and Kushner have real‑estate backgrounds. Their involvement signals a trend where **business elites** shape foreign policy, focusing on “deal‑making” over traditional diplomatic channels. This could lead to more public‑private partnerships for post‑war reconstruction, but also raises concerns about accountability.
4. NATO’s Role in Security Guarantees
While the U.S. promises a guarantee linked to Article 5, NATO itself has not formally endorsed the plan. If the alliance adopts a “conditional guarantee” model—similar to the one used in the Baltic states—countries like Ukraine might receive security pledges without full NATO membership.
5. Economic Reintegration of Russia
The plan includes a phased lifting of sanctions and a joint U.S.–Russian investment fund. In practice, reinstating Russia into the G8 could take a decade, depending on compliance with non‑proliferation treaties and human‑rights benchmarks.
Did You Know?
Russia’s frozen assets in European banks total over €210 billion, roughly the same amount as the World Bank’s 2023 Ukraine Recovery Fund.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the main goal of Trump’s 28‑point peace plan?
- To end hostilities quickly by offering territorial compromises, security guarantees, and a massive economic package funded partly by frozen Russian assets.
- Can frozen Russian assets be used without EU member‑state approval?
- Yes. The EU adopted an “emergency procedure” that bypasses the quarterly vote, allowing immediate allocation for Ukrainian aid.
- Will Ukraine become a NATO member under the plan?
- No. The plan requires Ukraine to amend its constitution to prohibit NATO membership, and NATO would not station troops in Ukraine.
- How does the plan affect the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant?
- It proposes joint IAEA oversight and a 50/50 split of generated electricity between Russia and Ukraine.
- What are the risks of a “frozen conflict” outcome?
- Long‑term instability, ongoing arms buildups on both sides, and a diplomatic stalemate that hampers economic recovery.
What Comes Next?
Watch the upcoming EU summit where leaders will decide how to allocate the frozen assets. Meanwhile, the U.S. State Department is expected to issue a “security guarantee” memo that could redefine NATO’s collective defence posture in Eastern Europe.
Join the Conversation
What’s your take on the involvement of private deal‑makers in peace negotiations? Leave a comment, explore our deep‑dive articles, or subscribe to our newsletter for daily updates on the evolving diplomatic landscape.
