Uganda’s most recent elections were officially declared “peaceful” and “successful,” yet for many Ugandans they felt anything but democratic. When a government claims a landslide victory but simultaneously shuts down the internet, suppresses protests, and moves to arrest its main challenger, citizens are right to ask uncomfortable questions. If the process was truly free and fair, why did it require so much force to sustain it?
According to the Electoral Commission, President Yoweri Museveni won with about 72% of the vote, while opposition leader Bobi Wine received roughly 25%. On paper, that margin suggests overwhelming public support. In reality, it tells a more troubling story about power, control, and fear. Museveni has ruled Uganda since 1986, taking power as a liberator but remaining in office through constitutional amendments, weakened institutions, and a shrinking democratic space. After nearly four decades, elections no longer feel like a choice between alternatives, but a ritual designed to confirm an outcome already known.
One of the clearest red flags was the internet shutdown imposed before and during the vote. Governments confident in their legitimacy do not need to silence digital communication. The internet was not cut to protect peace; it was cut to control information, prevent mobilisation, and limit scrutiny. In a country where many rely on mobile internet as their primary source of news, this blackout crippled transparency and reinforced suspicion that something was being hidden.
Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines
Equally troubling was the violent response to protests following the announcement of results. Security forces were deployed aggressively, protesters were killed, and opposition supporters were arrested. Bobi Wine’s movements were restricted, his home surrounded by security, and attempts were reportedly made to arrest him. Again, this raises a simple question: if Museveni truly won by such a decisive margin, why fear peaceful dissent?
Museveni’s grip on power is not maintained by popularity alone but by a patronage system that rewards loyalty and punishes opposition. Over the years, key positions in government and the military have been filled by close allies and family members. His wife, Janet Museveni, has served as a senior cabinet minister. His son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba, has risen to the highest levels of the military. His brother, Salim Saleh, remains a powerful figure in security and state affairs. This concentration of power within one family reinforces the perception that the Ugandan state serves a ruling elite rather than the public.
For young Ugandans, especially Gen Z, this reality is suffocating. They face unemployment, rising living costs, and limited political voice, all while being told to wait patiently for change that never comes. Bobi Wine’s appeal lies not just in his politics, but in what he represents: a break from a system that has outlived its credibility.
Museveni once promised stability and progress. Today, stability is enforced with guns, and progress is reserved for the connected few. Uganda deserves more than elections without choice and peace without freedom. True democracy cannot grow in the dark, behind internet blackouts and military barricades. It requires trust, openness, and the courage to let the people decide — even when the outcome is uncertain.
——————————
Daniel Makokera is a renowed media personality who has worked as journalist, television anchor, producer and conference presenter for over 20 years. Throughout his career as presenter and anchor, he has travelled widely across the continent and held exclusive interviews with some of Africa’s most illustrious leaders. These include former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, former South African presidents Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki, former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, Zimbabwean Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and presidents Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe and Joseph Kabila of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. He currently is the CEO of Pamuzinda Productions based in South Africa.
The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism in Africa
Uganda’s experience isn’t isolated. Across Africa, we’re witnessing a worrying trend: the weaponization of digital tools to suppress dissent and maintain power. Internet shutdowns are becoming increasingly common during elections and protests, as documented by organizations like Access Now and the Internet Society.
The Economic Cost of Internet Blackouts
These shutdowns aren’t just about controlling information; they have significant economic consequences. A 2022 report by Top10VPN estimated that internet shutdowns cost African countries $237 million in GDP in 2021 alone. This impacts businesses, disrupts essential services, and hinders economic growth.
Beyond Internet Shutdowns: Surveillance and Social Media Control
The control extends beyond simply cutting off access. Governments are investing in sophisticated surveillance technologies to monitor citizens’ online activity. Social media platforms are also under pressure, with laws being enacted to regulate content and hold platforms accountable for user-generated material – often used as a pretext for censorship.
The Case of Ethiopia and Social Media Restrictions
Ethiopia, for example, has implemented strict regulations on social media, requiring platforms to obtain licenses and remove content deemed harmful. Critics argue these laws stifle free speech and are used to silence opposition voices. (Source: Human Rights Watch)
The Role of Youth and the Demand for Digital Freedom
Africa has a young and rapidly growing population, many of whom are digitally native. They rely on the internet for information, communication, and economic opportunities. This generation is increasingly demanding digital freedom and challenging authoritarian tactics. The frustration is palpable, and the potential for unrest is high.
Did you know? Africa’s internet penetration rate is still relatively low compared to global averages, but mobile internet usage is skyrocketing.
What Does the Future Hold?
The future of digital rights in Africa hinges on several factors. Increased international pressure on governments to respect freedom of expression, the development of robust legal frameworks to protect digital rights, and the empowerment of civil society organizations are all crucial.
Pro Tip:
Support organizations working to promote digital freedom in Africa. Access Now, the Internet Society, and Article 19 are good starting points.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- What is digital authoritarianism? It refers to the use of digital technologies by governments to control information, suppress dissent, and monitor citizens.
- Why are internet shutdowns becoming more common? Governments often use them to prevent the spread of information during protests or elections they fear losing control of.
- What can be done to protect digital rights in Africa? Strengthening legal frameworks, increasing international pressure, and empowering civil society are key steps.
What are your thoughts on the future of digital freedom in Africa? Share your opinions in the comments below!
