UN Under Pressure: War & Politics Challenge Global Order

by Chief Editor

The Fractured World Order: Is the UN Facing an Existential Crisis?

The annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly in New York has, in recent years, been overshadowed by a growing sense of unease. As global conflicts escalate, the relevance and effectiveness of the United Nations – and international organizations in general – are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The question isn’t simply whether the UN is working, but whether it can continue to work in a world increasingly defined by geopolitical fragmentation.

The Erosion of International Norms

Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide recently articulated the core of the problem: a crisis of both finances and fundamental principles. The blatant disregard for international law – Russia’s invasion of Ukraine being the most prominent example – and consistent human rights violations, like those occurring in Palestine, are chipping away at the foundations of the post-World War II order. This isn’t merely a disagreement over policy; it’s a challenge to the very concept of a rules-based international system.

Vegard Heggelund Tørstad, a senior researcher at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, points to a significant shift in the UN’s standing. “This has clearly changed for the worse, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the election of Donald Trump,” he notes. The rise of nationalist and isolationist tendencies in major powers is directly undermining the multilateral approach the UN embodies.

The war in Ukraine has had significant repercussions for the UN’s operations.

The Security Council Paralysis: A Return to Cold War Dynamics?

The UN’s primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security rests with the Security Council. However, the Council is increasingly paralyzed by the veto power wielded by its five permanent members (the US, Russia, China, France, and the UK). This dynamic, reminiscent of the Cold War, prevents decisive action on critical issues. The inability to effectively address the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza are stark examples of this dysfunction.

Ellen Jenny Torgersen Ravndal, an associate professor at the University of Stavanger, highlights the structural issues. “The Security Council reflects the world as it was in 1945, not the realities of today,” she explains. Calls for reform, including expanding the Council’s membership and limiting veto power, have been consistently blocked by the existing permanent members, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of inaction.

Did you know? The veto power has been used over 290 times since the UN’s founding, often to protect national interests rather than promote international peace.

The Role of International Courts: A Glimmer of Hope?

While the Security Council struggles, international courts like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) are seeing increased activity. The ICC’s recent warrants for the arrest of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, though controversial and not universally recognized, demonstrate a willingness to hold individuals accountable for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Stian Øby Johansen, an associate professor at the University of Oslo, notes a recent trend: “It’s quite new that states are turning to the ICJ even while conflicts are ongoing.” The cases involving Israel and Palestine, and Ukraine and Russia, are unprecedented in their timing and scope. This suggests a growing, albeit limited, reliance on international legal mechanisms as a means of addressing conflict.

International Court of Justice
The International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Future Trends and Potential Scenarios

Several trends are likely to shape the future of the UN and international cooperation:

  • Increased Geopolitical Competition: The rivalry between the US, China, and Russia will likely intensify, further straining the UN’s ability to forge consensus.
  • Rise of Regionalism: We may see a greater emphasis on regional organizations (e.g., the African Union, ASEAN) as states seek solutions tailored to their specific contexts.
  • Focus on Non-State Actors: The growing influence of non-state actors, such as multinational corporations and NGOs, will require new approaches to governance and accountability.
  • Technological Disruption: Advances in artificial intelligence, cyber warfare, and other technologies will pose new challenges to international security and require innovative solutions.
  • Climate Change as a Security Threat: The escalating impacts of climate change – including resource scarcity, mass migration, and extreme weather events – will increasingly be recognized as a major threat to international peace and security.

Pro Tip: Staying informed about the evolving geopolitical landscape is crucial for understanding the challenges facing the UN. Follow reputable news sources and think tanks specializing in international affairs.

Is the UN Still Relevant?

Despite its shortcomings, the UN remains a vital platform for dialogue, diplomacy, and humanitarian action. It plays a critical role in addressing global challenges that no single nation can solve alone, such as climate change, pandemics, and poverty. However, its future depends on its ability to adapt to a changing world and regain the trust of its member states.

Ravndal concludes, “The UN as an idea and vision is not outdated. But some of its structures are. If the UN didn’t exist, we would need to invent it.”

FAQ

  • Is the UN powerless to stop wars? The UN’s ability to stop wars is limited by the veto power of the Security Council’s permanent members.
  • What is the ICC? The International Criminal Court investigates and prosecutes individuals accused of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
  • Can the UN be reformed? Reforming the UN is a complex process, requiring agreement from member states, particularly the permanent members of the Security Council.
  • What is the role of the General Assembly? The General Assembly provides a forum for all UN member states to discuss global issues, but its resolutions are not legally binding.

What are your thoughts on the future of the UN? Share your perspective in the comments below!

Explore more articles on global politics and international relations.

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights on world affairs.

You may also like

Leave a Comment