Woman charged in Indiana root beer float murder orders hit on best friend, police say – CBS News

For months, the death of Harold “Peanut” Allen in Freetown, Indiana, looked like the tragic finish of a man battling a failing body. He was diabetic and struggling with severe gastrointestinal issues—problems that had landed him in the emergency room multiple times in 2022. When he passed away on December 20, just days before Christmas, there were no immediate signs of foul play. But the truth didn’t emerge from a medical examiner’s report or a deathbed confession. it came from a botched burglary a year later.

The Break-In That Cracked the Case

In September 2023, someone broke into the home of Marsha Allen on North State Road 135. The intruders smashed a window and made off with jewelry and several guns. To the police, it looked like a standard robbery, but to Marsha, something felt wrong. The burglars had known the combination to her gun safe—a secret shared only between her and her daughter, Ashley Jones.

The investigation moved quickly. Security footage helped police identify the suspects as Steven White and Nathaniel Kane Napier. Both men were arrested on September 21 and held at the Jackson County Jail in Brownstown.

During interrogation, the case shifted from a property crime to a homicide investigation. Steven White revealed that he and Napier hadn’t acted alone; they had been hired by Ashley Jones to rob her own mother. But White provided a detail far more sinister than the theft: he claimed Ashley had told him that Marsha was responsible for poisoning Harold Allen to death in December 2022.

The Mask of Illness: Harold Allen’s existing medical history—including diabetes and suspected diverticulitis—created a clinical smokescreen. His symptoms of distress and facial numbness reported by family members during Thanksgiving 2022 were initially viewed through the lens of these chronic health issues, which may have delayed the suspicion of foul play.

A Plot of Poison and Betrayal

As investigators dug deeper, a pattern of calculated behavior emerged. Evidence suggested that Ashley Jones had purchased various poisonous substances online in the months leading up to Harold’s death. The theory presented to investigators is that these substances were used to poison Harold via a root beer float, with Marsha allegedly being the one to administer the drink.

The betrayal in the Allen family is layered. Ashley not only allegedly plotted the death of her stepfather but later hired her “best friend,” Steven White, to rob her mother. Police further allege that Ashley’s criminal reach extended beyond her family, claiming she also ordered a hit on a close friend.

The case highlights a jarring contradiction: a daughter attempting to frame her mother for a murder they may have plotted together, only to then hire burglars to steal from that same mother. The entire house of cards collapsed only because the burglars knew too much about the safe, and one of them decided to talk.

Analysis of the Case

What makes this case particularly striking is the reliance on an unrelated crime to solve a “cold” death. Without the September burglary, Harold Allen’s death likely would have remained classified as natural. The intersection of familial betrayal—daughter against mother, and accomplice against employer—provided the only path to the truth.

Common Questions About the Investigation

Why was the death initially thought to be natural?

Harold Allen had a documented history of serious health problems, including diabetes and gastrointestinal issues. Because he had been visiting the emergency room frequently and exhibiting symptoms that mirrored these conditions, the initial signs of poisoning were not immediately flagged as suspicious.

Who were the accomplices in the burglary?

Steven White and Nathaniel Kane Napier were the two men hired by Ashley Jones to break into Marsha Allen’s home. Steven White, described as a close friend of Ashley, eventually provided the testimony that linked the burglary to the murder investigation.

What evidence links Ashley Jones to the poisoning?

Investigators found that Ashley had purchased poisonous items from the internet in the months preceding Harold’s death. This, combined with Steven White’s testimony and the discovery of deleted text messages, formed the basis of the charges against her, and Marsha.

What are the legal implications for the suspects?

While the burglary charges were the initial catalyst, the subsequent murder charges carry far more severe penalties. The case now hinges on the testimony of the burglars and the digital trail of poison purchases, which could lead to significant prison sentences for both Ashley Jones and Marsha Allen.

In cases where family bonds are weaponized for profit or malice, can the legal system ever truly uncover the full extent of the conspiracy?

You may also like

Leave a Comment