Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters on Sunday that he is prepared to drop Ukraine’s demand for NATO membership in exchange for bilateral security guarantees from the United States and other European partners, a move intended to move peace talks forward in Berlin.
What happened
President Zelenskyy said the compromise would involve “Article 5‑like guarantees” from the United States, as well as similar assurances from Canada, Japan and other allies. He added that Kyiv has not yet received a response from Washington to revised proposals submitted earlier in the week after consultations with European leaders.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and son‑in‑law Jared Kushner have urged Ukraine to accept concessions, including ceding frontline territory to Russia, ahead of discussions with Zelenskyy and European allies on a White House‑backed 20‑point peace plan.
Russia, through foreign‑policy adviser Yuri Ushakov, signaled that it would likely reject the Ukrainian‑European proposals and described them as “unlikely to be constructive,” while also opposing a demilitarised zone and a “free economic zone” in the Donbas.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hosted the talks at the Federal Chancellery, noting Europe’s desire to regain influence after having been largely sidelined.
Why it matters
Ukraine’s willingness to relinquish its NATO bid underscores the pressure on Kyiv to secure alternative security arrangements that could end the four‑year war. The request for Article 5‑style guarantees reflects a desire for a binding protection pledge without formal NATO membership.
The rejection of the “free economic zone” proposal by both sides highlights the difficulty of reconciling territorial concessions with Ukraine’s demand for a fair cease‑fire that leaves troops where they stand.
Possible next steps
Analysts suggest the talks could continue on Monday, with both delegations aiming to refine the 20‑point plan and address the “sharp objections” raised by Russia. If the United States were to extend Article 5‑style guarantees, Ukraine might accept the compromise, but Russia’s potential rejection could stall progress.
Should Russia maintain its stance against a demilitarised zone, a possible scenario is a “Korean‑scenario” freeze of the frontline, though this has not been discussed by Moscow.
Further diplomatic engagement may involve European leaders seeking a greater role in shaping the peace framework, potentially influencing the balance between security guarantees and territorial concessions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What security guarantees is Ukraine seeking?
Ukraine wants bilateral guarantees similar to NATO’s Article 5 from the United States, as well as assurances from European partners and other countries such as Canada and Japan.
Has Russia indicated its position on the proposed peace plans?
Russia’s foreign‑policy adviser Yuri Ushakov said the Ukrainian and European suggestions are “unlikely to be constructive” and that Russia would have “sharp objections” to any U.S.‑adopted plan.
Why is Ukraine willing to give up NATO membership?
Zelenskyy said Ukraine recognizes that NATO membership is unlikely in the near term due to Russia’s strong opposition, and a compromise on security guarantees could advance peace talks.
What do you think could be the most viable path toward a lasting cease‑fire in this conflict?
