Philadelphia City Council passed a resolution on Thursday, October 2, 2026, calling for a boycott of Starbucks until the company reaches a contract with its unionized baristas, 6abc.com reported. The vote makes Philadelphia the first U.S. city to officially back the Starbucks Workers United boycott campaign, which targets the coffee chain on behalf of more than 12,000 unionized workers nationwide.
Philadelphia City Council Backs Union Boycott
The resolution passed by the Philadelphia City Council adds municipal weight to an ongoing labor dispute between Starbucks and Starbucks Workers United. The union issued a statement declaring that it is no longer possible to be both a Starbucks customer and a supporter of workers, labeling the coffee corporation a law-breaking entity. 6abc.com reported that the union’s national boycott initiative aims to pressure corporate leadership into finalizing a first contract.
Starbucks defended its labor practices in a statement provided to 6abc.com. “Starbucks has competitive pay, industry-leading benefits, and meaningful opportunities to grow a career,” a company spokesperson said. “People love working at Starbucks which is why we have the lowest turnover in the industry and why more than 1 million people every year apply to wear the green apron. As we have always been, we’re committed to engaging in productive bargaining.”
Starbucks workers launch national boycott backed by AFL-CIO
The municipal action in Philadelphia aligns with broader student and labor organization efforts across the country. According to The Daily Tar Heel, Starbucks Workers United originally announced the national boycott on August 25, later receiving an official endorsement from the AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest labor federation. The union’s core demands include a $17 starting wage, 4 percent annual raises, and enhanced health and safety protections.
In North Carolina, where union membership rates rank among the lowest in the country despite a high concentration of stores, baristas have participated in extended labor actions such as the Red Cup Rebellion, as reported by The Daily Tar Heel. Meanwhile, in California, the Berkeley Student Food Collective and the UC Berkeley chapter of the Young Democratic Socialists of America announced their support for the boycott over the weekend, dailycal.org reported. J. Noven, executive director of the Berkeley Student Food Collective, cited stalled negotiations and alleged bad-faith bargaining by corporate leadership as catalysts for the student solidarity campaign.
Core Disputes Over Wages, Staffing, and Health Benefits
Union baristas point to hundreds of unresolved unfair labor practice charges against the company, alongside operational challenges at individual stores. Julia Barton, a shift supervisor at a unionized Starbucks in Wilkesboro, North Carolina, told The Daily Tar Heel that mandatory minimum staffing policies requiring only two workers on the floor make breaks difficult to manage. “You can’t legally take your 30-minute unpaid meal if there’s only two people on the floor,” Barton said. “You have to work through it because you can’t drop it to just one person.”
Writing in CounterPunch.org, North Carolina barista Lisa Watson detailed additional grievances, including rising health insurance premiums that have doubled costs for some workers, low starting wages between $15.25 and $16 an hour across 43 states, and difficulties securing enough weekly hours to qualify for company benefits. Watson also criticized the company’s executive compensation structure, pointing to a high CEO-to-worker pay ratio under CEO Brian Niccol. Jeff Hirsch, a professor at the UNC School of Law, noted to The Daily Tar Heel that federal law requires both parties to bargain in good faith but does not mandate reaching an agreement or impose financial penalties for failing to do so.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Starbucks Boycott
Why did Starbucks Workers United call for a boycott?
The union initiated the boycott to pressure Starbucks into signing a first collective bargaining agreement after years of stalled negotiations since unionization efforts began in 2021.
What are the primary demands of the unionized baristas?
The union is asking for a $17 starting wage, 4 percent annual raises, consistent staffing levels, improved health and safety protections, and better access to benefits and guaranteed hours.
How has Starbucks responded to the union demands and the boycott?
Starbucks maintains that it offers competitive pay, industry-leading benefits, and low turnover, emphasizing that the company remains committed to engaging in productive bargaining.
What legal obligations govern the contract negotiations?
Federal labor law requires both Starbucks and the union to bargain in good faith, though neither side is legally compelled to reach a deal, according to legal experts cited in the coverage.
Related reading