Garlasco Case: Legal Battles Continue as Attorney Cataliotti Clashes with TV Host
The Garlasco case, involving the death of Chiara Poggi, remains a focal point of public and media attention. Recent television appearances by Andrea Sempio’s attorney, Liborio Cataliotti, have sparked renewed debate and conflict with media personality Federica Panicucci.
The Ongoing Debate: Timeframes and Cell Tower Data
During a February 9, 2026, appearance on Mattino Cinque, Liborio Cataliotti defended Andrea Sempio’s timeline of events, responding to an analysis presented by the program’s correspondent, Emanuele Canta. Canta had highlighted the tight timeframe of Sempio’s movements, a point Cataliotti acknowledged but countered with his own assessments, factoring in local road conditions.
A key point of contention revolved around cell tower data. Cataliotti explained that cell phone signals don’t always connect to the nearest tower, particularly when a tower is overloaded, potentially impacting the accuracy of location tracking. This technical argument drew an interruption from Panicucci, who deemed the discussion overly complex.
Disputed Details: Trains, Parking Tickets, and a Book Purchase
The discussion extended to specific details of Sempio’s movements on the day of the crime, including a visit to a train crossing and a parking ticket. Cataliotti challenged the certainty of the program’s reporting on train schedules, even as Panicucci questioned Sempio’s recollection of a book he allegedly purchased in Vigevano.
Panicucci pressed Cataliotti on the inconsistency of Sempio remembering precise timings but not the book’s title. Cataliotti responded by questioning Panicucci about her own recent reading habits, a move she dismissed as irrelevant, stating she was not under investigation.
The Role of Media in High-Profile Cases
These exchanges highlight the tension between legal strategy and media representation in high-profile criminal cases. Cataliotti, who has previously defended Wanna Marchi and other public figures, believes that while legal battles are won in court, reputation management occurs in the media. He has also represented Davide Lacerenza and the uncle of Saman Abbas.
Cataliotti, a 59-year-old attorney from Reggio Emilia, took over the case in October 2025, joining Angela Taccia in defending Sempio. His background includes a brief career as a promising soccer player before pursuing law, following in the footsteps of his father, Carmelo Cataliotti, a respected criminal lawyer.
Future Trends in Legal Representation and Media Coverage
The Garlasco case exemplifies several emerging trends in legal representation and media coverage. The increasing reliance on forensic evidence, such as cell tower data, requires attorneys to possess a strong understanding of technical complexities. The rapid dissemination of information through television and online platforms necessitates a proactive approach to reputation management.
The dynamic between legal counsel and media personalities is likely to become more fraught as cases attract greater public scrutiny. Attorneys will need to balance their duty to their clients with the demands of a 24/7 news cycle. The utilize of social media and online video platforms will also continue to shape public perception and potentially influence legal proceedings.
FAQ
- Who is Liborio Cataliotti? He is a 59-year-old criminal defense attorney representing Andrea Sempio in the Garlasco case.
- What is the main point of contention between Cataliotti and Panicucci? Disagreements over the accuracy of timelines and interpretations of evidence related to Andrea Sempio’s movements.
- What other high-profile cases has Cataliotti handled? He has previously defended Wanna Marchi, Davide Lacerenza, and the uncle of Saman Abbas.
