Sudan’s Escalating Conflict: A Regional Powder Keg
Sudan’s civil war, nearing its fourth year, is rapidly evolving from an internal struggle into a complex regional conflict. The ongoing battle between the Sudanese army (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) is attracting external actors, fueling the violence and diminishing hopes for a swift resolution. Sudanese civilians continue to bear the brunt of the escalating crisis.
The Shifting Sands of Power
Military momentum in Sudan has fluctuated between the SAF and the RSF, with the current front line concentrated in west-central Kordofan. However, the conflict is no longer contained within Sudan’s borders. It’s increasingly regionalizing, extending into the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea, complicating any potential settlement. The involvement of external patrons, providing financial and military support, is prolonging the fighting and reducing incentives for compromise.
A Divided Coalition of Support
The Sudanese army has garnered support from a diverse coalition including Egypt, Eritrea, Turkiye, Qatar, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. These nations, along with international bodies like the United Nations and the Arab League, recognize army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan as Sudan’s head of state, framing their support as a response to an internal rebellion.
The UAE’s Role and Rising Concerns
Conversely, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has emerged as the primary backer of the RSF, providing substantial financial, military, and logistical assistance. This support enabled the RSF to sustain operations, including the prolonged siege of el-Fasher, which was marked by documented atrocities – executions, torture, abductions, and sexual violence. Despite widespread condemnation, the UAE has not altered its course of support.
Geostrategic Interests at Play
Sudan’s strategic location – at the crossroads of the Red Sea, the Horn of Africa, the Sahel, and North Africa – explains the deep involvement of outside powers. For many regional actors, the conflict transcends Sudan itself, becoming intertwined with their national security interests and the projection of regional influence.
Regional Spillover and Growing Instability
Sudan’s neighbors are also being drawn into the conflict, either through direct national interests or by serving as transit points for arms and supplies. This dynamic risks exacerbating existing tensions across the Horn of Africa and potentially merging multiple regional conflicts, with Sudan at the epicenter.
Diplomatic Efforts Hampered by Rivalries
In September 2025, the Quad – the United States, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt – proposed a roadmap to end the war. Initial progress was made, including agreement on broad principles and indirect talks. However, mounting tensions between Saudi Arabia and the UAE are now overshadowing these negotiations.
The Saudi-UAE Rift
The public eruption of the Saudi-UAE feud in December, with the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council in Yemen launching an offensive near the Saudi border, has severely strained relations. Saudi Arabia publicly rebuked the UAE, demanding a withdrawal. Although the UAE announced a pullout, the rift persists, with Saudi-aligned media accusing the UAE of regional destabilization, including in Sudan. This feud threatens to escalate support for the SAF from Egypt, Turkiye, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, while the UAE is unlikely to reduce its backing of the RSF.
The US Role and Emerging Challenges
The United States remains central to efforts to end the war, but questions linger regarding its long-term commitment. The ongoing conflict involving the US and Israel against Iran, and Iran’s retaliatory strikes, further complicate the situation. These developments cast doubt on the progress of Quad negotiations, as Gulf states prioritize addressing the immediate security threat. However, the shared security challenge could also create an opportunity for Riyadh and Abu Dhabi to find common ground, potentially reviving stalled diplomatic efforts.
Cooling Temperatures in the Horn of Africa
There is an urgent need to de-escalate tensions in the Horn of Africa, which is on the brink of a wider regional war partly fueled by rivalries over the Sudan conflict. African and international leaders must step up efforts to prevent further escalation.
FAQ
Q: What is the primary cause of the conflict in Sudan?
A: The conflict stems from a power struggle between the Sudanese army (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
Q: Which countries are supporting the SAF?
A: Egypt, Eritrea, Turkiye, Qatar, Iran, and Saudi Arabia are supporting the SAF.
Q: Which country is primarily supporting the RSF?
A: The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the main patron of the RSF.
Q: What is the Quad?
A: The Quad is a group consisting of the United States, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt, which proposed a roadmap to end the war in Sudan.
Q: Is the conflict in Sudan likely to spread?
A: Yes, the conflict is increasingly regionalizing, with potential for spillover into the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea.
Did you know? The Rapid Support Forces originated as auxiliary force militias known as the Janjaweed, used during the War in Darfur.
Pro Tip: Understanding the geopolitical interests of external actors is crucial to comprehending the complexities of the Sudan conflict.
Stay informed about the evolving situation in Sudan and its regional implications. Explore our other articles on geopolitical conflicts and regional security for further insights.
Keep reading