The city of San Diego and the state of California are preparing potential legal action against a massage business located on Adams Avenue in the University Heights neighborhood. The allegations, detailed in documents obtained by News 8, center on alleged criminal activity linked to the property spanning several years.
Allegations Detail Years of Concerns
According to the documents, authorities have been investigating the business since at least 2015. Investigators reportedly found more than 135 online advertisements, blog posts, and reviews referencing sex acts at the location between May 2011 and July 2025.
Prior Warnings Issued
In 2018, a Deputy City Attorney reportedly sent a letter to the business owner, informing them of alleged prostitution activity and requesting that the issue be addressed. A subsequent inspection in 2019 allegedly revealed evidence of people living on the premises, including personal belongings, and unpermitted modifications to the building’s electrical, plumbing, and structure.
When News 8 attempted to gather comment, a woman identifying herself as a part-time employee stated the owner was unavailable and declined to provide further information.
What Could Happen Next
It is possible the city and state will file a lawsuit against the business owner. A judge could then issue orders requiring the business to cease the alleged illegal activities or even close the business. It is also possible the owner could attempt to contest the allegations in court. Further investigation by law enforcement is also a potential next step.
Frequently Asked Questions
What specific criminal activity is alleged?
The documents allege the property has been linked to criminal activity, specifically referencing more than 135 online ads, blogs, and reviews for sex acts between May 2011 and July 2025.
When was the business owner first notified of concerns?
A Deputy City Attorney reportedly mailed a letter to the owner in 2018 informing them of alleged prostitution activity and requesting abatement of the nuisance.
What was found during the 2019 inspection?
The 2019 inspection allegedly uncovered evidence of “residential occupancy on the site,” including clothing and personal items, along with unpermitted electrical, plumbing, and building modifications.
What role do community concerns play in these types of investigations?