A major government-backed review has urged police forces across England and Wales to abandon “woke” culture wars and refocus on catching criminals. Co-led by Lord Blunkett and Lord Herbert, the report calls for an “ethical reset” to address systemic issues including poor leadership, cronyism, and corruption within the service.
Why is the review calling for a policing “reset”?
The assessment concluded that senior officers must remain “resolute” in “refusing to take sides” to concentrate on the prevention, detection, and prosecution of crime. The report accused police leaders of “preferencing certain groups” amidst ongoing debates regarding allegations of two-tier policing.
“The idea that people should be diverted onto other issues is entirely wrong,” Lord Blunkett said, noting there is “no room for culture wars or woke” causes in policing.
The review was commissioned by the College of Policing with Home Office backing following high-profile scandals, including the murder of Sarah Everard by serving Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens. It also follows the killing of Henry Nowak, a case that intensified debates over “two-tier policing.”
Sir Stephen Watson, Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, noted the service had “adopted the language of activism” and suggested official guidance had “over-corrected” in response to concerns about racism.
What issues were identified regarding police leadership?
The review delivered a critical verdict on leadership, finding that no force in England and Wales had been rated “outstanding” for leadership by inspectors. The report stated that current leadership quality is not consistently effective and is undermining the ability of the workforce to meet public expectations.
Since 2018, there have been 47 investigations into alleged misconduct involving chief officers. These investigations include claims of cronyism, nepotism, corruption, and the abuse of power for sexual purposes. Currently, eight chief constables or former chief constables are under investigation or awaiting disciplinary proceedings.
Did You Know? Since 2018, there have been 47 investigations into alleged misconduct involving chief officers, including claims of corruption and nepotism.
How do rank-and-file officers view their organizations?
Confidence among frontline officers is reported to be low. According to the review, just 13 per cent of constables and 17 per cent of sergeants said they worked in a “well-led and managed organisation.”
The report also warned that promotion processes have become “subjective, inconsistent and shaped in the image of the leaders,” which the authors claim creates “fertile ground” for nepotism.
What are the recommended changes for the police service?
Among its recommendations, the review called for the creation of a Sandhurst-style leadership academy for senior officers. It also proposed nationally accredited training for all new recruits and the introduction of a new senior constable rank to recognize experienced frontline officers.
Policing Minister Sarah Jones said that current structures “do not allow them to realise the full potential of their workforce” and noted that leadership has failed to meet the standards that officers and the public expect.
What may happen next for UK policing?
The implementation of these recommendations could lead to a fundamental shift in how officers are trained and promoted across England and Wales. A possible next step for the Home Office and the College of Policing involves overseeing the transition to new training models and addressing the ongoing misconduct investigations involving chief officers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main recommendation of the review?
The review urges police forces to abandon “woke” culture wars and refocus on the prevention, detection, and prosecution of crime.
Worth a look