President Donald Trump has terminated Roger Rogoff as the federal prosecutor for the Western District of Washington less than one hour after the attorney was sworn into office. The administration asserts the firing aligns with presidential authority, citing a lack of consultation between local judges and the executive branch regarding the appointment.
The Swift Removal of Roger Rogoff
Roger Rogoff’s tenure as a federal prosecutor lasted approximately 60 minutes. According to an interview with KOMO News, Rogoff was sworn in at 7:40 a.m. local time on Wednesday. While waiting in a lobby shortly thereafter, he received an email notifying him that President Trump had exercised his executive powers to remove him from the position.

Rogoff, who previously served as a federal prosecutor and a judge in King County Superior Court, described the brief appointment as the “best hour of my life.” He noted that the termination was not entirely unexpected, as his team had attempted to reach the Trump administration prior to the swearing-in ceremony without receiving a response.
Did you know?
Before this appointment, Roger Rogoff led the independent oversight office in Washington that reviewed cases involving police use of lethal force.
Executive Authority vs. Judicial Appointments
The conflict centers on the appointment process for interim federal prosecutors. When the president does not nominate a candidate, federal law allows local judges to appoint an interim replacement. In this instance, Rogoff was selected to replace Charles Neil Floyd, a former immigration judge who had served as a temporary prosecutor but was not renominated for the position by the White House.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche addressed the incident on X, stating that the judges in the Western District of Washington failed to consult the administration to ensure the appointee was qualified. Blanche confirmed the firing, maintaining that while judges possess the legal right to appoint interim prosecutors, the president retains the authority to dismiss them.
Legal and Political Implications
The administration’s stance faces pushback from lawmakers who question the legal basis for such rapid dismissals. Senator Patty Murray, in comments reported by the Washington Post, criticized the decision, arguing that Rogoff was highly qualified and that the administration’s actions warrant a legal review, given that the judges acted in accordance with existing statutes.
This event reflects a broader trend within the current administration. According to the Washington Post, President Trump has dismissed dozens of federal prosecutors since returning to the White House, frequently utilizing the “You’re fired” catchphrase popularized during his tenure on the reality television program The Apprentice.
Pro Tip: Tracking Federal Appointments
For those monitoring judicial and prosecutorial shifts, the U.S. Following the accounts of acting officials on official government channels provides the most immediate updates on personnel changes.

Frequently Asked Questions
Can a president fire an interim federal prosecutor?
Yes. According to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, the president holds the authority to dismiss interim prosecutors, even those appointed by local judges under federal law.
Why was Roger Rogoff fired so quickly?
The Trump administration claims the firing was necessary because the judges involved in the appointment did not consult with the executive branch to ensure the candidate met their standards for the role.
Is this a common practice in the current administration?
According to reporting by the Washington Post, the administration has fired dozens of federal prosecutors since the president’s return to office.
What are your thoughts on the balance of power between the judiciary and the executive branch regarding these appointments? Share your perspective in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for ongoing coverage of federal policy changes.