The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that sports sanctions affecting an individual’s professional career must be subject to review by an independent judicial body. This decision, prompted by the cases of former Juventus president Andrea Agnelli and former CEO Maurizio Arrivabene, mandates that national courts must have the authority to annul illegitimate sporting penalties, challenging the long-standing autonomy of sports governing bodies.
The Shift in Sports Jurisprudence
The CJEU ruling stems from the disciplinary action taken by the Italian Football Federation (FIGC) against Juventus executives regarding the “plusvalenze” (capital gains) investigation. The FIGC banned the executives from football-related activities, a sanction later extended globally by FIFA. Under previous Italian law, the administrative courts (TAR) were restricted to awarding financial damages if a sanction was deemed unjust, lacking the power to overturn the sporting ban itself.
According to the CJEU, this setup fails to meet the requirements of EU law. The court held that when a sanction impacts a person’s ability to work across European borders, it directly infringes upon the freedom of movement. Consequently, the judiciary must be capable of providing “effective protection,” which includes the power to annul the decision and implement interim measures.
Did you know? The CJEU specified that while a “double degree” of judgment is not strictly required by EU law, there must be at least one judicial body independent of sports organizations that can ensure full respect for defense rights and the principle of adversarial proceedings.
Implications for Sports Governing Bodies
The ruling directly questions the self-regulatory nature of organizations like the FIGC and FIFA. The European judges expressed skepticism regarding systems where federal presidents hold the power to appoint and revoke the judges who oversee disciplinary cases involving the federation itself. By requiring these bodies to be “provided for by law” and independent, the CJEU is effectively dismantling the “total autonomy” previously enjoyed by sporting tribunals.
The case now returns to the Italian administrative courts. These national judges are tasked with determining whether the current Italian sports justice system—or at least its final appellate body—conforms to these new European mandates. If the current system fails these tests, significant legislative reforms within the Italian sports sector may be required to align with EU standards.
Proportionality and Transparency
While the CJEU acknowledged that sporting bodies have a legitimate interest in maintaining the financial and accounting integrity of clubs, this does not grant them immunity from external review. The court emphasized that any professional ban must be proportionate to the objective pursued.
Future disciplinary regimes must ensure:
- Coherence: Sanctions must be part of a comprehensive, logical framework aimed at eliminating illicit behavior.
- Transparency: The criteria used to determine penalties must be objective, transparent, and non-discriminatory.
- Judicial Oversight: The ability for a defendant to challenge a sanction in an independent court of law is now a non-negotiable requirement under EU jurisdiction.
Pro Tip: For legal professionals and sports executives, this ruling serves as a precedent that “sporting autonomy” is no longer a shield against the fundamental rights of movement and professional practice guaranteed by the European Union.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this ruling mean all sports sanctions can be canceled?
No. The ruling does not automatically cancel existing sanctions. It requires that a system exists where an independent judge has the power to annul them if they are found to be illegitimate, rather than being limited only to awarding financial compensation.
Is a double degree of judgment required for sports justice?
The CJEU clarified that European law does not strictly mandate a double degree of judgment. It is sufficient to have at least one judicial organ capable of ensuring effective legal protection that meets the criteria of independence and impartiality.
What is the next step for the Italian courts?
The Italian administrative judge must now evaluate whether the current sports justice system complies with the requirements set by the CJEU. If it does not, the governing bodies may be forced to revise their internal disciplinary procedures.
Stay informed on the intersection of law and sport by subscribing to our newsletter for updates on how this ruling reshapes the future of football governance. Have questions about the case? Join the conversation in the comments section below.
Related reading
