Australia is considering barring the use of camera-equipped smart glasses in government workplaces due to privacy and security concerns, in what officials said could be the first ban of its kind, according to a report published on September 17. The potential restriction follows growing global unease over wearable technology capable of covertly recording individuals without their consent.
Government Workplaces and Public Service Guidance
Katy Gallagher, Australia’s minister for public service, stated that she asked the public service commission for advice on whether recording-capable smart glasses should be prohibited in government workplaces. According to Gallagher, these devices raise legitimate privacy and security concerns because of their ability to capture information, prompting a need for clear and consistent guidance for public servants.
Did You Know? Australia previously became the first place in the world to ban social media for teens last year, a precedent highlighted by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as part of the country’s ongoing digital safety initiatives.
Corporate Roundtables and Workplace Guidelines
Alongside the public sector review, the Australian government will convene a roundtable of the country’s biggest employers to consult on a set of guidelines for artificial intelligence in the workplace. According to the reported plans, participants in this consultation will include Microsoft, Commonwealth Bank, telecoms firm Telstra, and energy company AGL.
Global Context and Legal Challenges
International moves against smart glasses have already begun to take shape. Norway’s capital, Oslo, banned the devices in schools last month, while England and Wales have prohibited the use of Meta smart glasses in courts. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated in a Thursday release that it is important to put the right protections in place as technology evolves, adding that he is proud Australia is setting a world standard for digital safety.

Meanwhile, private sector companies selling smart glasses face external legal scrutiny. A German advocacy group has filed a criminal complaint against Meta and other entities involved in selling Meta devices, citing privacy laws.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Australia considering a smart-glasses ban?
According to government statements, the potential ban stems from privacy and security concerns regarding the ability of camera-equipped smart glasses to covertly record and photograph people without their consent.
Which companies are involved in the upcoming government roundtable?
The Australian government’s roundtable on workplace AI guidelines includes Microsoft, Commonwealth Bank, Telstra, and AGL.
What international actions have been taken regarding smart glasses?
Norway’s capital Oslo banned smart glasses in schools, and courts in England and Wales have prohibited the use of Meta smart glasses.