Latvian higher education institutions are undergoing a structural shift as the size of university councils is reduced to cut costs and improve administrative efficiency. Under the new guidelines, scientific and applied sciences universities are transitioning to smaller governing bodies, with some councils seeing their membership reduced by nearly half. Officials state that these leaner councils are expected to operate with greater speed and flexibility while lowering the financial burden on individual university budgets.
Did You Know?
The restructuring mandates specific council sizes based on institution type: scientific universities are moving to seven-member councils from 11, while applied sciences universities are shifting to either five or three members, depending on their specific designation.
Operational Changes at Riga Technical University (RTU)
RTU has completed its council appointment process for the next four years, retaining some leadership while introducing new members. Andris Vanags, deputy chair of the council of AS “Sakret Holdings,” will continue to serve as the council chair. Janis Lochs, a professor at the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technologies, and Anita Straujuma, executive director of the RTU Development Fund, also remain in their roles.
New appointments to the RTU council include Egons Lavendelis, a professor at the Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology, and Energy; Janis Rosenbergs, chairman of the Cesis County Council; Krisjanis Kruminsh, chairman of the board of SIA “Rīgas ūdens”; and Osvalds Pugovich, acting director of the “Teika” Scientific Center of the National Institute of Research and Innovation. Notably, Sanda Liepina, former council member and director of the public policy center “Providus,” has departed to join the council of the University of Latvia.
Financial and Administrative Rationale
University leadership frames the reduction in council size as a move toward fiscal responsibility. Arturs Zeps, RTU Vice-Rector for Development and Finance, stated that the smaller council structure is designed to save on remuneration costs and streamline decision-making processes. This sentiment is echoed by Janis Kudins, Vice-Rector for Development at Daugavpils University, who noted that moving from seven to five members reduces the pressure on the university’s budget.
Daugavpils University has largely maintained its institutional continuity during this transition, with only one member change in its newly approved council. As these boards begin their four-year terms, the long-term impact on governance flexibility will likely become clearer as universities manage their operations with fewer oversight personnel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are the sizes of university councils being reduced?
According to university officials, the goal is to save on remuneration costs for council members and to ensure the councils operate with more speed and flexibility.
How many members will serve on these new councils?
The size depends on the university type: scientific universities will have seven members (down from 11), while applied sciences universities will have either five (down from seven) or three (down from five) members.
Are all university council members being replaced?
No. In several institutions, including Riga Technical University and Daugavpils University, some previous members and chairs are retaining their positions for the next four-year term.
Do you believe a smaller governing board will improve the quality of strategic decision-making at these institutions?
Related reading
