News

Boston police have arrested a woman in connection with a fatal stabbing that occurred Friday night in South Boston. Officers responded to a reported stabbing at 258 Old Colony Ave. Around 6 p.m. And discovered a man with a stab wound inside an apartment.

Details of the Incident

The man was transported to a local hospital, where he was pronounced dead on Saturday. Authorities have not yet released the victim’s name.

Following an investigation, Gisselle Pascual, 24, of South Boston, was arrested and charged with manslaughter, according to police.

Pascual is scheduled to be arraigned Monday in South Boston District Court.

What Happens Next

Following the arraignment, a judge could set bail for Pascual or order her held without bail pending further proceedings. The case may proceed to trial, where the prosecution will attempt to prove Pascual’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A conviction could result in a prison sentence.

Boston Police Homicide Detectives are continuing their investigation and are asking anyone with information to contact them at 617-343-4470.

Frequently Asked Questions

What prompted the arrest?

The arrest of Gisselle Pascual followed an investigation by Boston police into a stabbing that occurred on Old Colony Avenue.

Where did the stabbing seize place?

The stabbing occurred inside an apartment located at 258 Old Colony Ave. In South Boston.

When will Pascual appear in court?

Gisselle Pascual is scheduled to be arraigned in South Boston District Court on Monday.

What role does the public play in this investigation?

On March 26th, the Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias in Valencia inaugurated one of the most striking exhibitions of 2026: for the first time in Spain, renowned South Korean sculptor Park Eun Sun is presenting his collection “Genoma y estructura escultórica”.

An Outdoor Artistic Experience

The exhibition combines marble, granite, and steel to create segmented columns and bicolor structures that explore the tension between destruction and reconstruction. Visible fractures in the sculptures represent the “wound” of the stone, a symbolic resource that reflects the fusion of Eastern and Western influences in the artist’s perform, who is based in Italy.

Three of the pieces emerge directly from the lakes of the complex, interacting with the futuristic architecture of Santiago Calatrava. Highlights include the ‘Colonna Infinita – Accrescimento’, 11 meters high, next to the Puente de Monteolivete, and the ‘Colonna Infinita – Diffusione’, with segmented columns, illuminated compartments, and hollow spheres of polychrome marble, onyx, and stainless steel.

Valencia, a Contemporary Art Hub

The exhibition by Park Eun Sun not only adds artistic value but also consolidates Valencia as a key destination for public and contemporary art. The sculptor’s previous works have been exhibited in cities such as Florence, Seoul, and Berlin, and its arrival in Valencia offers a unique opportunity to enjoy the dialogue between monumental sculpture and modern architecture.

A recent report on cultural tourism in Europe indicates that the presence of interactive public art in urban spaces increases visitor numbers and enhances the cultural identity of the city, an effect that the Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias perfectly replicates with this exhibition.

Visiting the Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias thus becomes an immersive journey: from the reflections of water in the sculptures to the interplay of light and perspective, the exhibition allows you to experience art actively. The combination of forms, materials, and architectural context makes this exhibition a prominent event on Valencia’s cultural calendar, ideal for travelers and locals interested in cutting-edge art.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the name of the exhibition?

The exhibition is called “Genoma y estructura escultórica”.

Who is the artist?

The artist is Park Eun Sun, a South Korean sculptor based in Italy.

Where is the exhibition located?

The exhibition is located at the Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias in Valencia.

As this exhibition demonstrates the interplay between art and architecture, what role do you believe public art plays in shaping the identity of a city?

The Pack Smart Group has secured the ability to report the physical record sales made by its clients through Bandcamp to the Official Charts Company for the first time.

A Change for Independent Artists

This development addresses a previous issue in the UK chart reporting system. Previously, physical releases sold via Bandcamp were not counted towards the UK charts unless customers likewise downloaded the digital version of the album.

Now, all sales from The Pack Smart Group’s clients can be reported to the Official Charts Company (OCC). This change is expected to particularly benefit independent artists in genres like jazz, blues, and metal, where chart positions are often determined by small sales margins.

Seánna Holland, business development director at The Pack Smart Group, explained that for years, artists selling physical formats through Bandcamp have been aware that a significant portion of those sales were not reflected in the UK charts.

“That disconnect has been frustrating for artists and their teams, because the fans were there and the purchases were real, but they weren’t always reflected in the charts,” Holland said. “Being able to report those sales feels like a really positive step for the independent sector and it ensures that when fans support an artist directly, it genuinely counts.”

This news comes after Bandcamp enforced a ban on music generated wholly or in substantial part by artificial intelligence, prohibiting its employ for impersonation or copyright infringement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the previous issue with Bandcamp sales and the UK charts?

Previously, Bandcamp sales were only counted towards chart rankings in the UK if the buyer also purchased a digital version of the album.

Which genres of music are expected to benefit most from this change?

Independent artists operating in specialist genres like jazz, blues, and metal are expected to benefit most, as chart positions in these genres are often determined by small sales margins.

What has Bandcamp done regarding AI-generated music?

Bandcamp has banned music and audio that is generated wholly or in substantial part by AI, and prohibits the use of AI tools to impersonate other artists.

As artists increasingly rely on direct-to-fan platforms like Bandcamp, how might this shift in chart recognition influence their strategies for reaching and engaging with their audiences?

WASHINGTON — A case dating back to 1884, Elk v. Wilkins, is resurfacing as the Supreme Court considers the Trump administration’s plan to limit birthright citizenship. The case involved John Elk, a member of what is now known as the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, who was denied voter registration in 1880 because he was Native American.

Elk argued he had severed ties with his tribe and submitted to U.S. Authority, claiming he was a citizen by virtue of being born within U.S. Territory. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that Native Americans born within the United States did not automatically possess birthright citizenship. The court equated their status to that of children born within a foreign government’s territory to parents who were subjects of that government.

The Trump administration’s executive order, issued on the first day of his second term, seeks to restrict birthright citizenship to individuals with at least one parent who is a U.S. Citizen or a legal permanent resident. The administration is citing Elk v. Wilkins to support its argument that birthright citizenship is not automatic for anyone born within U.S. Territory.

Tribal Status and the 14th Amendment

The case centers on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause, which states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” are citizens. The administration argues that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes those who enter the country illegally and those with temporary legal status.

Experts on Native American law have expressed concern that the administration’s reliance on Elk v. Wilkins is problematic. They argue the decision was specific to the unique legal status of “quasi-sovereign tribal government” and should not be applied to other contexts. One lawyer noted that Native American law is complex and not easily transferable to other areas of law.

Notably, no briefs were filed in the case by Native American tribes or organizations. Experts suggest this is because, since 1924, Native Americans have been guaranteed citizenship by statute, and the more than 500 tribes likely hold diverse political views on the executive order.

The government, represented by Solicitor General D. John Sauer, argues the Supreme Court has already “squarely rejected the premise that anyone born in U.S. Territory…is automatically a citizen.” Opponents point to the 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, where the court ruled a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was a U.S. Citizen at birth, distinguishing it from the Elk decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of Elk v. Wilkins?

The Supreme Court ruled against John Elk, stating that Native Americans born within the United States did not have birthright citizenship.

What is the Trump administration’s argument regarding birthright citizenship?

The administration argues that the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause does not automatically grant citizenship to everyone born in the U.S., and is citing Elk v. Wilkins to support this claim.

Why haven’t Native American tribes filed briefs in this case?

Experts suggest this is because Native Americans have been guaranteed citizenship since 1924, and the tribes likely hold diverse political views on the executive order.

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments, it remains to be seen how much weight will be given to the 1884 Elk v. Wilkins decision and how it will shape the future of birthright citizenship in the United States.