news
A Canberra man faced with 14 family violence charges has had all charges dropped after police found evidence suggesting the complainant fabricated allegations, including sending threatening text messages to herself. The case has prompted a magistrate to accuse ACT police and prosecutors of “egregious” conduct, and the man’s legal team is calling for an apology and compensation.
Dramatic Arrest and Initial Detention
The case began last year with a dramatic arrest, as the ACT’s tactical response team descended on the man’s home, reportedly blowing open his front door and arresting him at gunpoint in his underwear. He spent two weeks in jail in October before being released on bail.
Did You Know? The man’s lawyer, Peter Woodhouse, stated that correspondence shows the ACT Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) was aware of a serious problem with the case as early as late January.
As the case progressed, questioning by Mr. Woodhouse revealed a critical turning point. Police admitted that evidence indicated the complainant sent anonymous text messages to herself on September 12th, a fact confirmed by a police officer’s analysis.
Magistrate’s Criticism and DPP Response
Magistrate Jane Campbell found “the entire conduct of both the police and the DPP to be egregious,” citing a two-month delay in addressing the evidence suggesting the complainant had lied to police. She noted the delay caused “significant prejudice” to the defendant, who had pleaded not guilty in September and October.
Expert Insight: The magistrate’s strong language underscores the seriousness of the alleged failings in this case. A delay in addressing evidence that undermines the prosecution’s case can have profound consequences for an accused individual, potentially leading to prolonged detention and significant emotional distress.
The DPP defended its handling of the case, stating the allegations involved multiple incidents over several years and required careful consideration. The DPP maintained that the complete police report raising concerns about the complainant’s evidence was not received until March 18th, and that a response was provided within seven business days.
ACT Policing also stated that the report was properly sent to both the defence and the DPP.
Calls for Accountability
Despite these statements, Mr. Woodhouse argued that his client has suffered a “terrible miscarriage of justice” and deserves an apology. He stated that regardless of intent, his client was wrongly subjected to a harrowing ordeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What charges was the man initially facing?
The man was initially facing 14 family violence charges, including allegations he sent threatening text messages to a former partner.
When were the charges dropped?
All charges were abandoned on Friday, after police admitted they could find no evidence the man sent the messages.
What did Magistrate Campbell say about the conduct of the police and prosecutors?
Magistrate Jane Campbell described the conduct of both the police and the DPP as “egregious.”
How might this case impact public trust in the reporting and investigation of family violence allegations?
