Former presidential candidate Claudia López has officially announced her vote for Iván Cepeda in the second round of the 2026 Colombian presidential elections. López stated that her support is intended to back a progressive government and prevent what she described as a “hegemonic, violent, and authoritarian” right-wing administration. She emphasized that her decision does not constitute a formal political adhesion to Cepeda’s campaign.
Political reactions to the endorsement
The endorsement has drawn sharp criticism from political opponents. Vicky Dávila publicly labeled López a “chameleon,” referencing past statements where López had identified Cepeda as a candidate associated with the alias “Calarcá.” This critique highlights the tension between López’s current alignment and her previous political rhetoric.
Strategic implications for the election
López’s decision to support a progressive platform reflects an attempt to consolidate opposition against the right-wing ticket. By framing the election as a choice between a progressive model and an authoritarian alternative, she is seeking to influence voter behavior in the final days of the cycle. It is likely that this endorsement will intensify the polarization between the two campaigns as they compete for undecided voters.
What happens next?
As the second round approaches, observers expect the campaigns to leverage these endorsements to solidify their respective bases. If the electorate mirrors the sharp divide currently seen in political discourse, the outcome of the vote could depend heavily on the ability of each candidate to reconcile past criticisms with their current platforms. Future political alignments may remain fluid until the final ballots are cast this Sunday.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who did Claudia López endorse in the second round?
Claudia López announced that she is voting for Iván Cepeda.
Did Claudia López officially join the campaign of Iván Cepeda?
No, López stated that her support is not a formal adhesion to his campaign.
Why is Vicky Dávila criticizing the endorsement?
Dávila criticized López for supporting Cepeda after previously describing him as a candidate linked to alias “Calarcá,” calling her a “chameleon” for the shift in position.
How do you think public declarations from former candidates influence the decisions of undecided voters in the final stage of a campaign?
Keep reading