The Evolving Dynamic Between Senior Advisors and Managers
The recent departure of Claudio Ranieri from his role as senior advisor at AS Roma highlights a recurring tension in modern football: the blurred line between advisory support and managerial authority. When a veteran figure and a current head coach clash over the direction of the squad, the result is often a breakdown in communication that affects the entire club.
In this instance, the friction between Ranieri and Gian Piero Gasperini underscores the difficulty of balancing the “senior advisor” role with the daily demands of a manager. While advisors provide historical context and experience, the manager requires total control over the sporting project to maintain authority in the dressing room.
The Friction of Player Recruitment
A primary catalyst for conflict often stems from recruitment. The dispute at Roma centered on which players were endorsed and selected. Ranieri noted that players are typically chosen one-by-one with the coach, mentioning that while some goals were met, others—specifically Sancho and Rowe—were not. He likewise pointed out that the arrival of Ferguson was endorsed.

This creates a precarious situation when the manager feels their autonomy is being questioned. Gasperini expressed “incredible surprise” at the tone of these discussions, suggesting that the rapport between the two had shifted from professional collaboration to public disagreement.
Managing Public Perception and Fan Expectations
Modern football is played as much in the press room as it is on the pitch. The “botta e risposta” (back-and-forth) between Ranieri and Gasperini serves as a case study in how internal disputes can alienate a fanbase. Gasperini explicitly criticized the “teatrino” (little theater), stating that the fans do not deserve such distractions.
When internal conflicts leak into the public eye, it often manifests as stadium unrest. Gasperini acknowledged that whistles from the crowd were a direct result of the tension surrounding the club’s leadership during that week, rather than just the performance on the field.
The Risk of Public Contradictions
When a senior advisor and a manager provide conflicting narratives regarding player selection, it undermines the club’s stability. Gasperini’s reaction—emphasizing that he had never felt such tones from Ranieri in previous months—shows how quickly a professional relationship can deteriorate when public statements are perceived as undermining.

For further insights into how these disputes unfold, you can review previous reports on Gasperini’s initial response to Ranieri and his later outburst regarding the “teatrino”.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Claudio Ranieri leave AS Roma?
Ranieri decided to step back from his role as senior advisor following a series of public disagreements and tensions with the current manager, Gian Piero Gasperini.
What caused the conflict between Ranieri and Gasperini?
The conflict was sparked by declarations regarding the selection of players, specifically mentions of Sancho, Rowe, and Ferguson, which Gasperini found surprising and inappropriate.
How did the fans react to the situation?
Gasperini noted that the fans were unhappy with the “teatrino” occurring within the club, which resulted in whistles during matches.
What do you think about the role of senior advisors in modern football? Should they have a say in recruitment, or should the manager have absolute power? Let us know in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more deep dives into football management.
