Could Be Worse Than Qatar

by Chief Editor

The 2026 FIFA World Cup, hosted by Mexico, Canada, and the United States, faces mounting scrutiny regarding labor rights and worker safety. According to the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), all three host nations face challenges in protecting workers, with Mexico’s construction sector specifically flagged for risks involving organized crime and limited oversight, while the U.S. and Canada navigate systemic labor rights concerns.

How does the 2026 World Cup compare to the Qatar 2022 tournament?

Unlike the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, which required the construction of massive infrastructure from the ground up, the 2026 tournament relies largely on existing venues. However, labor advocates argue that the lack of new construction does not eliminate human rights risks. Jonas Eriksson, an ombudsman for the Swedish union Elektrikerna, notes that while there are no reports of mass fatalities similar to those seen in Qatar, the pressure on workers remains high. In Qatar, the death of a 22-year-old worker during construction led to the cancellation of an inspection, a stark contrast to the current, more controlled, but restricted access environment in Mexico.

How does the 2026 World Cup compare to the Qatar 2022 tournament?
Did you know?
The ITUC’s Global Rights Index ranks Canada and Mexico at a 3 out of 5 for labor rights—indicating “regular violations”—while the United States receives a score of 4, denoting “systematic violations.”

Why are labor rights in Mexico a specific concern for FIFA?

Mexico presents unique challenges due to the influence of organized crime in the construction industry. According to Lennart Reinius, secretary general of Union to Union, the presence of cartels—particularly in regions like Jalisco—creates an environment where union leaders face threats of violence. Eriksson reports that workers at the Azteca stadium are hesitant to discuss working conditions due to fear of retaliation from employers or local criminal elements. Inspections conducted by labor groups have been hampered by restricted access, with owners often preventing direct communication between inspectors and the workforce.

“We all want to be successful together.” | Lawrence Shankland Interview | 2026 FIFA World Cup

Pro Tip: Tracking Global Labor Standards

To stay informed on international labor rights, monitor the annual ITUC Global Rights Index. It provides a standardized look at how different countries perform regarding collective bargaining, the right to strike, and worker safety.

Pro Tip: Tracking Global Labor Standards

What happens when workers in host nations attempt to organize?

The ability to organize varies significantly across the three host nations. In the U.S. and Canada, established trade unions provide a layer of protection that is largely absent in Mexico. In Los Angeles, for instance, venue staff have utilized collective bargaining power to address concerns regarding the presence of immigration authorities at their workplaces. Conversely, in Mexico, the Mexican Building Workers’ Union reports that workers face intense pressure from companies. According to Eriksson, these workers often suffer from low wages and poor conditions, and they risk immediate termination if they voice concerns, as companies can easily replace them with other laborers from poorer regions of the country.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Is there a formal agreement to monitor 2026 World Cup labor conditions? Yes, the Building and Wood Workers’ International (BWI) signed an agreement with FIFA in October 2023 to conduct inspections, though it is limited in scope and duration compared to the long-term needs of the industry.
  • Are the risks in 2026 as severe as in previous tournaments? While the scale of construction-related deaths is currently lower, labor advocates like Eriksson warn that the lack of transparency and the influence of organized crime in host regions could lead to a “worse” environment for workers’ rights if left unmonitored.
  • How did the U.S. and Canada rank in the latest labor reports? The ITUC Global Rights Index assigns a 4 to the U.S. and a 3 to Canada, reflecting systemic and regular rights violations respectively.

Have thoughts on how international sports federations should handle human rights? Join the conversation in the comments below or subscribe to our weekly newsletter for more in-depth reporting on the intersection of sports and global policy.

You may also like

Leave a Comment