The transition from small, close-range FPV drones to larger, high-payload models has rendered traditional shotgun-based defense tactics increasingly lethal for frontline soldiers. While Russia has significantly scaled up the production of fiber-optic guided drones to bypass electronic warfare, Ukraine’s reliance on manual, short-range interception methods has created a critical vulnerability, according to reports from the Ukrainian defense outlet Militarnyi and training lead Roman Donik.
Why are shotguns failing as a defense against modern drones?
Shotguns are losing their effectiveness because the size and explosive payload of Russian FPV drones have surged. Previously, standard units measured roughly 20 centimeters in diameter, making them manageable targets for a scatter of buckshot. Today, the majority of Russian units measure nearly 40 centimeters and carry explosives with power comparable to a tank mine, according to reports cited by Roman Donik. Because shotguns require the operator to be within a 10-to-15-meter range to be effective, soldiers face an immediate risk of being caught in the massive blast radius when they successfully disable a target.
Unlike wireless drones that can be jammed via electronic warfare, fiber-optic drones are immune to signal interference. This makes them significantly harder to stop once they are in the air, though they remain susceptible to physical obstacles like trees or power lines.
How is the technology of frontline drones changing?
The tactical landscape is shifting toward specialized, high-speed, and stealthier hardware. Moscow has prioritized the mass production of fiber-optic drones, while Kyiv has moved toward wireless alternatives, according to military assessments. These new models are not only faster and quieter, making them harder to detect at long range, but they also possess the capacity to carry significantly heavier payloads than their predecessors. This evolution forces ground units to reconsider their defensive posture, as the previous reliance on standard small-arms fire is no longer sufficient against the current generation of aerial threats.
What are the recommended tactics for survival?
Military trainers now advise shifting from close-quarters shotgun defense to engagement with automatic rifles at greater distances. Roman Donik suggests that soldiers should aim to engage these larger drones from at least 100 meters away. For soldiers without adequate cover, 40 to 50 meters is considered the minimum “safe” distance to minimize the impact of the detonation. Despite these updated safety guidelines, Donik notes that some units continue to rely exclusively on shotguns, exposing themselves to unnecessary risk.
Avoid relying on manual manual-fire weapons as a primary defense if you are operating within a 20-meter radius of a suspected FPV drone. The blast power of a 40cm class drone is sufficient to cause severe injury even if the drone is successfully hit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are fiber-optic drones harder to jam?
Because they are controlled by a physical, ultra-thin wire rather than radio waves, they do not emit a signal that electronic warfare systems can disrupt. This makes them impervious to standard jamming techniques.
Is it possible to stop a 40cm drone with a shotgun?
While it is physically possible to hit the drone, the risk of injury from the resulting explosion is extremely high at the close range required for shotguns. Experts recommend using automatic rifles from a distance of at least 40 to 100 meters.
Why did the shift in drone size happen?
The shift toward larger, 40cm-diameter drones is a result of the ongoing arms race to increase payload capacity, allowing these units to carry explosive charges equivalent to tank mines.
Are you tracking the latest developments in drone warfare? Share your thoughts on the evolution of tactical defense or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly updates on military technology trends.
