The Indonesian government cannot guarantee the reimbursement of bridge funding provided by private investors for the construction of Nutritious Free Meal (MBG) program kitchens. Chief of Presidential Staff (KSP) Dudung Abdurachman stated on Wednesday (10/6) that the program is currently undergoing a comprehensive review, leaving the status of investor capital uncertain.
Why the status of investor funding remains uncertain
According to Dudung, the government is currently evaluating the locations and management of the Nutrition Fulfillment Service Units (SPPG). Because the program is being “reorganized,” the government has not committed to repaying the funds that investors spent to build these facilities. Investors had previously relied on official decrees (SK) issued by former Badan Gizi Nasional (BGN) leadership, specifically former head Dadan Hindayana and former deputy head Sony Sonjaya, to secure bank loans for these projects.

The uncertainty regarding investor funding stems from a broader corruption investigation into the MBG program’s governance, which has already resulted in the Kejaksaan Agung (Kejagung) naming Dadan Hindayana, Sony Sonjaya, and former deputy head Lodewyk Pusung as suspects.
Impact on investors and regional projects
The funding crisis primarily affects projects in Indonesia’s 3T regions—territories categorized as underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost. Many investors sought bank financing based on the project locations designated by the previous BGN administration, believing the sites were finalized and guaranteed. Dudung acknowledged that the issue is widespread, noting that a significant number of SPPG sites are currently facing similar operational and funding obstacles as the government begins its assessment.
The situation highlights the high-stakes risk inherent in public-private partnerships when administrative continuity is disrupted by corruption investigations. While investors may have acted in good faith based on government-issued decrees, the legal transition and subsequent audit of the BGN suggest that the financial burden of these “pre-authorized” projects may not fall on the state budget until the new administration confirms their necessity.
What happens next for the MBG program?
The BGN, under the leadership of Nanik S. Deyang, is expected to continue the evaluation process to determine which of the previously established sites will proceed. While the government hopes to salvage some of the already-constructed kitchens, any future realization of these projects remains dependent on the results of the ongoing reorganization and the availability of state funds. Meanwhile, legal demands continue to emerge, including a claim from Sukabumi-based businessman H. Mujazin, who is seeking the return of approximately Rp218.25 billion in bridge funding purportedly tied to a 97-site management agreement signed in September 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions
Will the government reimburse the money spent by investors?
Not necessarily. According to KSP Chief Dudung Abdurachman, the government has not promised to replace the funds because the program is currently being reorganized.
Why did investors spend money on these kitchens?
Investors obtained bank loans and began construction based on official decrees (SK) issued by the former leadership of the BGN, believing the project locations were finalized.
Who is currently under investigation regarding this program?
The Kejaksaan Agung has named former BGN head Dadan Hindayana and former deputy heads Sony Sonjaya and Lodewyk Pusung as suspects in a corruption case involving the management of the MBG program.
How should the government balance the need for public program oversight with the claims of investors who relied on previous official documentation?
