The Shift Toward “Traits-Based” Roster Building
Modern NFL team building is evolving. Rather than drafting the “safest” player available, forward-thinking organizations are increasingly prioritizing “unusual” physical traits—attributes that cannot be taught. This strategy focuses on the ceiling of a player rather than their current finished product.
A prime example of this approach is the selection of Eli Stowers and Markel Bell. Stowers, a former high school quarterback and John Mackey Award winner, brings unprecedented athleticism to the tight end position. While questions remain about his blocking capabilities, his ability to create separation is a unique tool that creates mismatches in a 12-personnel package.
Similarly, Markel Bell represents a bet on raw physical scale. Standing 6-foot-9 and weighing 346 pounds, Bell possesses a wingspan and size rarely seen in the league. While viewed as a developmental project, the logic is simple: you cannot coach 6-foot-9 height. By securing players with these “tools in the body,” teams are betting that their coaching staffs can refine the raw talent into elite starters.
Balancing Proven Veterans with Developmental Upside
While traits-based drafting secures the future, the “win-now” window requires immediate impact. The trade for Jonathan Greenard illustrates a sophisticated balancing act: using draft capital to acquire a proven commodity who fills a critical void.

Following the loss of Jaelan Phillips in free agency, the need for “pass-rushing juice” became urgent. By trading two third-round picks (including the 98th overall selection) for Greenard, the front office prioritized a veteran with a Pro Bowl pedigree over the uncertainty of the draft.
Greenard’s value isn’t just in the sack count—which dipped to three in 12 games during an injury-plagued 2025 season—but in his consistent ability to affect the quarterback. His 23.3% pass rush win rate demonstrates a level of disruption that is difficult to find in rookie edge rushers.
The Financial Chess Match: Value in the Edge Rusher Market
The economics of the edge rusher position are shifting rapidly. With the market ceiling recently pushed to $50 million per year by Will Anderson Jr., finding “value” contracts is the new priority for sustainable team building.
The four-year, $100 million extension granted to Greenard—with $50 million fully guaranteed—represents a strategic middle ground. At an average annual value (AAV) of $25 million, Greenard provides elite production at roughly half the cost of the absolute top-tier market. This allows a team to maintain a high-level pass rush without compromising the overall salary cap health.
Future-Proofing the Pass Rush
The trend of trading for established veterans while drafting for traits creates a tiered defensive structure. By adding a “relentless” player like Greenard, a team provides an immediate anchor for the defensive line, which in turn creates a more stable environment for younger players to develop.
This strategy is a direct response to the volatility of the edge position, where injuries can derail a season. Diversifying the roster with a mix of high-floor veterans and high-ceiling rookies ensures that the pass rush remains potent regardless of individual setbacks.
For those interested in how these moves integrate into a larger defensive scheme, you can explore more about modern defensive coordinator philosophies or check out our analysis of salary cap management in the NFL.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Eagles give up for Jonathan Greenard?
The Eagles traded a 2026 third-round pick (No. 98 overall) and a 2027 third-round pick. In return, they received Jonathan Greenard and a 2026 seventh-round pick (No. 244 overall).
Why is Eli Stowers considered an “unusual” pick?
Stowers is a former quarterback with elite athleticism for a tight end, though he is viewed as a work in progress regarding his blocking skills.
What makes Markel Bell a “traits-based” selection?
Bell’s massive physical profile—6-foot-9 and 346 pounds—is the primary draw. He is considered a raw, developmental project with a very high ceiling due to his size.
How does Greenard’s contract compare to the rest of the market?
His $25 million per year AAV is significantly lower than the top of the market (set at $50 million per year by Will Anderson Jr.), making it a value-priced deal for a Pro Bowl talent.
Join the Conversation
Do you think prioritizing “unusual traits” over polished skill sets is the right move for long-term success, or is it too risky? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more deep-dives into NFL roster strategy!
