The European Commission’s proposed “EU Inc” project—officially known as the 28th regime—aims to create a voluntary, pan-European legal form for businesses to bypass the complexities of navigating 27 different corporate systems. By enabling company registration in under 48 hours for less than 100 euros, the EU seeks to boost economic competitiveness and scale, though the proposal faces significant pushback from labor unions concerned about potential social dumping and the erosion of worker representation rights.
The Mechanics of the “28th Regime”
Proposed on March 18, the EU Inc framework is designed to function as an optional, digital-first alternative to national corporate structures. According to the European Commission, the system would allow companies to register entirely online, eliminating the need for a minimum capital requirement. The regime includes standardized procedures for the entire lifecycle of a business, from initial registration to liquidation.
For startups, a key feature is the ability to implement pan-European employee stock option plans. Under these rules, taxation on profits would occur at the point of sale rather than upon the granting of the options. This is intended to help younger firms compete with established corporations for specialized talent by offering equity-based incentives without the immediate tax burden.
Did you know?
The EU Inc proposal aims to connect national commercial registries through a unified interface, allowing businesses to obtain tax and VAT numbers without redundant paperwork.
Economic Competitiveness and the Draghi Report
The push for a unified corporate identity is a direct response to the “European competitiveness” challenges outlined by Mario Draghi. In his report, Draghi argued that the current fragmentation of corporate, tax, and insolvency laws prevents European innovations from reaching the scale of their American or Asian counterparts. He advocated for a 28th regime to harmonize key legal aspects and stem the tide of companies moving headquarters outside the EU to find more favorable capital environments.
The stakes are high. Draghi’s analysis suggests the EU requires an additional 750–800 billion euros in annual investment to remain competitive with the U.S. and China. By providing a single, recognizable corporate structure, the EU hopes to make European firms more attractive to investors, who currently face high costs when dealing with varying national legal frameworks.
Labor Unions and the Risks of “Regulatory Arbitrage”
Opposition to the proposal centers on the fear of “regime shopping,” where large corporations might register in jurisdictions with the weakest worker representation laws. The European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) has expressed concern that the current draft does not sufficiently restrict the use of EU Inc to startups, potentially allowing multinationals to bypass local labor protections.
Finnish Member of the European Parliament, Li Andersson, has cautioned that the ease of registration could lead companies to migrate to countries where employees have less influence in corporate governance. Because national models for worker representation vary significantly, there is a risk that companies could use complex subsidiary structures to stay below the thresholds required for mandatory staff consultation or board representation.
Legislative Safeguards and Proposed Amendments
To address these concerns, European Parliament rapporteur René Repazi has proposed binding the applicable labor rules to the country where the employee physically works, rather than the jurisdiction of the company’s registration. There are also discussions about excluding sectors with high risks of exploitation, such as construction and food services, from the regime.
However, analysts at the Financial Times warn that excessive regulation could dilute the project’s impact. If the regime is burdened with too many exceptions, it may fail to provide the legal certainty investors require, effectively rendering the reform moot. The challenge for the EU is to balance the need for a streamlined business environment with the protection of the European social model.
Pro Tip:
When evaluating the impact of EU Inc, look closely at the distinction between “corporate structure” and “employment law.” The Commission maintains that national labor laws will continue to govern individual contracts, regardless of where a company is registered.
Global Comparisons: How Competitors Handle Registration
The EU is not operating in a vacuum. Other jurisdictions have long utilized digital-first registration to attract capital:
- United Kingdom: Companies House allows for registration in roughly 24 hours for a fee of 100 pounds.
- Singapore: The Bizfile platform offers a centralized portal for registration and ongoing compliance.
- United States (Delaware): Known for its specialized courts and flexible law, the state offers expedited, same-day registration for an additional fee.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will EU Inc replace national labor laws?
No. The proposal states that it does not replace national labor or social legislation. Generally, the law of the country where the employee performs their work will continue to apply.
Is the new regime mandatory for all companies?
No, it is entirely voluntary. Businesses can choose to continue using existing national corporate forms or opt into the EU Inc framework.
How does this benefit startups?
It reduces administrative costs and time during the initial registration phase and provides a unified legal structure that is easier for investors and employees across the EU to recognize.
What are your thoughts on the balance between economic growth and labor rights in the EU? Share your views in the comments section below or subscribe to our weekly policy newsletter for further updates on the EU Inc legislative progress.
Worth a look